More

Keystone XL: State Department Considers Rerouting TransCanada's Proposed Pipeline, Official Says

By MATTHEW DALY   11/ 9/11 02:53 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON -- The State Department is considering a plan that would reroute the proposed Keystone XL oil pipeline from Canada away from environmentally sensitive areas of Nebraska, an action that could delay a final decision on the project until after the 2012 election.

A U.S. official said told The Associated Press on Wednesday that rerouting the pipeline was a key issue that came up during public meetings and this fall in the six states through which the pipeline would run. The official asked not to be identified because no decision has been made.

Calgary-based TransCanada Corp. is seeking to build the $7 billion pipeline to carry oil derived from tar sands in Alberta, Canada, to refineries on the Texas Gulf Coast. A portion of the 1,700-mile pipeline would pass through Nebraska's Sandhills region and the massive Ogallala aquifer, which supplies water to eight states.

A State Department decision to reroute the pipeline would require an environmental review of the new section, a process that would likely push a final decision on the pipeline past the 2012 election.

The heavily contested project has become a political trap for President Barack Obama, who risks angering environmental supporters if he approves the pipeline and could face criticism from labor and business groups for thwarting jobs if he rejects it. Some liberal donors have threatened to cut off funds to Obama's reelection campaign if he approves the pipeline, which has become a major focal point of environmental groups who say it would bring "dirty oil" that requires huge amounts of energy to extract. They also worry that the pipeline could cause an ecological disaster in case of a spill.

Thousands of protesters gathered across from the White House on Sunday to oppose the pipeline. The crowd linked hands to surround the White House, keeping pressure on Obama as his administration decides whether to approve the project. The State Department has authority over the project because it crosses a U.S. border.

The Keystone XL pipeline would double the capacity of an existing pipeline operated by TransCanada, and supporters say it could significantly reduce U.S. dependence on Middle Eastern oil while providing thousands of jobs.

TransCanada has said any delay in the approval process could cost it millions of dollars and keep thousands of people of from getting jobs.

State Department spokesman Mark Toner said deliberation over whether to reroute the pipeline is part of a broad review of issues that include environmental concerns, energy security, jobs, economic impacts and foreign policy.

"So all of these are blended together. It's not just one issue. It's a range of issues that we're looking at," Toner said.

Meanwhile, the department's inspector general has launched a review of the Obama administration's handling of the pipeline request. The review is being conducted in response to complaints from Democratic lawmakers about possible conflicts of interest in the review process.

Deputy Inspector General Harold W. Geisel said the special review will center on whether the State Department "and all other parties involved" in the project followed federal laws and regulations related to the pipeline, which would travel through Montana, South Dakota, Kansas, Nebraska and Oklahoma before reaching Texas.

__

Associated Press writer Matthew Lee contributed to this story.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON -- The State Department is considering a plan that would reroute the proposed Keystone XL oil pipeline from Canada away from environmentally sensitive areas of Nebraska, an action that coul...
WASHINGTON -- The State Department is considering a plan that would reroute the proposed Keystone XL oil pipeline from Canada away from environmentally sensitive areas of Nebraska, an action that coul...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 182
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
09:26 AM on 11/28/2011
This is over....the tar sands will be shipped through the Seaway pipeline that is already in place..It's a old line so I really don't see a win here..
12:59 PM on 11/10/2011
Well, I'm glad they want to reroute it around Nebraska, but could we reroute it around areas in the Arctic that are environmentally sensitive, populated by the Inuit and native population? This whole project is fraught with environmental disaster. If the Canadians want to ruin their country, let's not be a part of it. Let's just wait for the first spill.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Lee Harrington
There's still time to change the road you're on...
08:59 AM on 11/10/2011
Let's kill TransCanada Keystone XL Pipeline. If Canada will not allow a pipeline, refinery and tanker terminal on their coast why should we?
07:59 AM on 11/10/2011
Re-route, Keystone XL, straight West, to the Ocean. Use transport ships, like all the other oil-producing Nations.....
photo
Iamrebelriser
iamrebelriser
12:35 AM on 11/10/2011
Where do the pollution kings & Republicans think they're going reside after earth is unlivable? Are they making plans to hop a space ship and leave for outer planets? Well, good ridance, and lets ship them off before they finish the nasty pollution here. We won't approve Keystone even if rerouted. Never. Maybe they think one of those clowns in that republican bunch will win, and them the pipeline would be a sure thing. Stop them, people with the shriveled brains due to too much FOX & Limbaugh lies.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:42 PM on 11/09/2011
If the Nebraska governor wasn't a republican would a change in the route even be considered? Probably a good move for Obama to find a way to move this decision past the 2012 election because you know he has to approve it. We are stuck in a fossil fuel world as much as I wish it wasn't so.
photo
Lucile S
Lib and a truth lover.
07:17 AM on 11/10/2011
1. No he hasn't to approve it. By saying that you mean that big oil and all their lobbies will or have already taken over Obama decisions. Is that it?
2. I don't think that's a good idea for him to move his decision past the elections in so far as that won't help him to be re-elected. But it will be rather an encumbrance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ddeanfountain
11:05 PM on 11/09/2011
Here's an idea...why not scrap both the Keystone and Gateway pipeline projects and let the Canadians take their 7 billion, build a refinery in Canada and keep their toxis mess. The Keysrtone pipeline and the Gateway are both being financed by China with an agreement that once the tar sands oil is converted to lightly refined crude, it will be sold to them. Now that Big Oil's bogus jobs estimate has been exposed, the only lasting jobs created with this project will be the people that spend their lives cleaning up the toxic mess that's refined out or cleaning up after another of their many spills.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chipher
06:41 AM on 11/10/2011
The Canadians have found they can maximize their profits and still meet Kyoto Accords by stripping tar out of the earth, and shipping it south to Wood River, IL and Borger, Texas, where there aren't any environmental or clean air laws to prevent 'upgrading' the sandy pitchblende into refinable synthetic crude oil, yet Wood River and Borger only process 240,000bbls/day, while KeystoneXL is supposed to provide more than 1,000,000bbls/day, and if the pipeline has to shut down for any length of time, the sandy pitchblende turns into cold molasses, which explains the huge tank farm being built (and heated) so there's no supply interruption. 1,000,000bbls/day being upgraded will impact the air quality of the entire lower Mississippi, and for those of you who remember what Pittsburgh was like, sulfur and brimstone, and the city hidden in blue-gray smog, now imagine that over a 10,000-square mile area, especially in summer doldrums when the air is heavy and thick with sulfuric acid vapors from Borger. Wow. Alaskans get $1000 a year in oil dividends every year. What do Texas & Illinois citizens get?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ddeanfountain
01:21 AM on 11/11/2011
I began following this months before the Huffington Post of other news media realized what was taking place. The Keystone is due to pass within 1/2 mile of my property in East Texas and the condemnation of property began last year once a route was determined even though they had yet to receive permit from the US Government. This area is very rural and a large majority of property owners are dependant on their own water wells as a source of water; me included. Many of these are shallow wells only a few tens of feet deep. There have been large amounts of gas well drilling in the last few years in the area and a portion, albeit a small portion of deep drilled water wells have gone bad since then, even a small disharge of tar sands oil could easily ruin the remaining water supply. While many have indicated the majority of leaks have occurred at pumping stations, a pumping station is scheduled to be built where the pipeline most cloely nears my property. I simply believe there are too many alternatives to having this in this country!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pixeloid
Reality has a liberal bias.
10:11 PM on 11/09/2011
So, the message from all the protests is that the route is bad? It's a bad idea no matter where it runs. Increasing exploitation of the tar sands will only hasten the death of our species.
12:01 AM on 11/10/2011
"the death of our species"

Which one?  Homo corporatus?  Homo motormanius?  Homo christowackitella?

And doesn't it depend on how well they dance?

            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TrURLJ6Vlsg
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pixeloid
Reality has a liberal bias.
04:20 AM on 11/10/2011
Those are 3 destructive subspecies that are probably impossible to eradicate. All we can do is try to maintain healthy populations of their natural enemies: homo progressivus, homo intelligentus, and homo scientificus.

Nice song. Here's another one, straight from the horse's mouth.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiYZxOlCN10
09:34 PM on 11/09/2011
Tough decision for O, does he allow the pipeline to reduce profits of the Koch family or keep the Saudi's happy. Postpone the decision to after the election and get pay offs from the Saudi's seems to be the plan.
09:37 PM on 11/09/2011
Unfortunately this is a done deal. Unless of course, the American people start demanding their rights not to have this. But it is going to take a huge mass effort.
03:49 AM on 11/10/2011
According to the U.S. Energy Information agency, the U.S. is now a net exporter of fuel, and imports of oil are about 80% of what they were at their high around 2005. If the country would get serious about driving fuel efficient cars, using renewables as much as possible, and building or retrofitting efficient buildings, we could lower our oil use without even any big technological breakthroughs. For more info on the Keystone XL, see
http://keystonepiper.blogspot.com/p/keystone-basics.html
08:53 PM on 11/09/2011
My take on this pipeline is.. THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DON"T WANT IT BUILT, PERIOD! Doesn't Anyone GET IT! WE DON"T WANT THE KEYSTONE PIPELINE IN OUR COUNTRY!
09:36 PM on 11/09/2011
I dont know the % but I would bet that most Americians who are the least bit informed would prefer the oil from the oilsands than Saudi Arabia.
I know I would.
photo
Iamrebelriser
iamrebelriser
12:59 AM on 11/10/2011
Sure, sure, but why not demand that Keystone take it through New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Pensylvania, DC, The Carolinas, Georgea, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana and into Texas, and I bet it would be scrapped faster than you could say jack rabbit.
01:08 AM on 11/10/2011
great one
09:39 PM on 11/09/2011
Time for massive protests, demonstrations and occupations.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mkdewboohoohoo
08:47 PM on 11/09/2011
This means the pipeline is going through, one way or the other.
photo
Dredd
Our government is a wartocracy.
08:30 PM on 11/09/2011
They need to re-route it through the "let's not do this pipeline at all" department.
photo
Cognitive Dissident
Non-paid, non-attorney populist spokesperson
08:25 PM on 11/09/2011
Tar sand mining is terrible stuff.
nam medic
Service above Self ...Always
08:24 PM on 11/09/2011
No pipelines, no drilling in the Gulf and Alaska, no water for the Central Valley farmers, no logging in Oregon and Washington, no chemical plants in NJ. And you wonder why there are no jobs? Priceless
photo
Dredd
Our government is a wartocracy.
08:32 PM on 11/09/2011
No, I don't wonder why. The answer is simple. The 1% who control the plutonomy don't want the 99% to have jobs.

They really don't.

http://blogdredd.blogspot.com/2011/10/bad-economy-cure-must-have-nexus-to.html
09:38 PM on 11/09/2011
Geez, I would have thought that more than 1% drove cars. used electricity, bought things at stores, ate in resturants, used computers, watched TV but guess Im mistaken
photo
Iamrebelriser
iamrebelriser
12:42 AM on 11/10/2011
Alternative energy creates lots of jobs, wealthy corporations have the money to build and hire and manufacturing jobs can be brought back to the US too. Logging, ranching, chemical plants and oil wells are not the only job sources, man.
photo
YannosB
I REASON, THINK, LEARN Equally
08:12 PM on 11/09/2011
How long has this 'project' been in the works?
How mnay hands, and who's.. are in this little pie?
State by atate, what are these micro governments positions, and why?
What is teh US to gain... not individual Corps, or small groups of 'involved'.. the whole gain for the us? And of course what are teh risks!

These are the basic questions, just in consideration of the pipeline crossing our border.. not even touching the whole tar-pit, and environmental impact, meaning of such.

so many are so quick to lay this on the current President, or to say he is dodging for election purpose... both are sad little painting attempts, there is much involved, and many forces pulling on this whole thing.
The obvious is that it is very risky at any level, it is sought after for one goal...profit, and that there is truly nothing to show of it that can improve this Nations quality of life, or even economic woes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Lee Harrington
There's still time to change the road you're on...
09:26 AM on 11/10/2011
Koch Brothers Positioned To Be Big Winners If Keystone XL Pipeline Is Approved

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUS292515702420110210?irpc=932