Reawakening The Radical Imagination: The Origins Of Occupy Wall Street

Occupy Wall Street Organizers

First Posted: 11/10/11 02:21 PM ET Updated: 11/10/11 06:36 PM ET

Three months ago, a loosely organized group of activists concerned about growing income inequality, corporate greed and the global influence of powerful financial institutions decided to make Lower Manhattan its home, setting in motion a movement known as Occupy Wall Street.

Since then, tens of thousands of people who share Occupy Wall Street's concerns have taken to the streets throughout the United States and around the globe, shifting the national discourse away from the federal deficit and toward financial woes of a more personal nature, like student debt.

Now Occupy Wall Street is much larger than its initial small group of organizers. President Barack Obama and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke have given it a nod. Many among its now-broad base of supporters hold conventional political views. Some 64 percent call themselves Democrats, according to a recent AP-GfK poll.

The movement didn't get that big simply because AdBusters, a Canadian magazine, sent out a flashy email promoting it, or because the hacker collective Anonymous flicked out a few tweets. Instead, it took a group of about 200 committed activists 47 days to outline the ground rules that have allowed the protest to flourish.

Older organizers were protest veterans, members of far-left parties, anarchists or unaffiliated supporters of the anti-globalization movement who have spent the decade since 9/11 marching against banks and both Democrats and Republicans. Many of them can tick off battle scars and arrest records from a long list of protests: the WTO in Seattle in 1999; the G-7 in Washington in 2002; the Republican National Convention in New York in 2004. Often, their efforts passed by with little media attention.

None of them had any idea what would happen on day one of Occupy Wall Street -- or how the rest of the country and the world would react. But after lifetimes spent in the political wilderness, they tapped into the anti-Wall Street zeitgeist in a way they never imagined.

"I was worried about whether it would come off. I'm shocked the way it's touched the mass U.S. population," says Jackie DiSalvo, a semi-retired college professor active in radical politics since the 1970s who attended early Occupy meetings. "It just goes to show you how the media and the political parties distort the positions of the American people. You would have thought the American people only cared about deficits."

BLOOMBERGVILLE

Before its world debut in Zuccotti Park, the New York City General Assembly -- the official name of the decision-making group for the much larger and looser Occupy Wall Street movement in New York -- went to work on the nitty-gritty planning for an occupation.

Occupy Wall Street's organizers took their cue from months of protests in the Arab world, Europe and New York City. In Europe over the summer, hundreds of thousands marched against cuts intended to stem the Eurozone crisis. A Spanish contingent camped out in Madrid's Puerta del Sol, purposefully adopting the tactics Egyptian revolutionaries employed to such success in February.

What all three of those occupations have in common, says Luis Moreno-Cabullud, an assistant professor at the University of Pennsylvania who took part in the Spanish demonstrations before returning to New York to plan, is "being inclusive, setting aside strong ideological identities that could divide and also, of course, the idea of taking the square to try and do a replica of the society you would like to see."

That "replica" is about a lot more than tents: it's about struggling towards a world without injustice. Before Occupy Wall Street came along, the struggle in the United States took the shape of a small protest organized by a loose coalition called New Yorkers Against Budget Cuts.

Starting in mid-June, a group of mostly young, mostly leftist activists took to the sidewalk near City Hall to protest financial austerity. They dubbed their city Bloombergville, in honor of the mayor's plan to lay off 4,000 public school teachers and close 20 fire companies. The Green Party, the International Socialist Organization and the South Bronx Community Congress were among its endorsers. AFSCME DC 37, the city's largest municipal union, dropped off food but kept some distance from the group's more radical elements.

Bloombergville had sleeping bags, a library, teach-ins and a nightly assembly open to all. All of those elements would be familiar to anyone who's ever strolled through Zuccotti Park. But some participants felt it fell short in other areas.

"There is a straight line from Bloombergville to Occupy Wall Street," says Justin Wedes, a 25-year-old part-time teacher who took part in Bloombergville. "It's a straight line, but it's also full of a lot of lessons learned."

For one, Wedes believes, the campers played by the rules too much. On the advice of lawyers, they took advantage of a loophole in New York law that allowed them to sleep on the edges of sidewalks, which kept them out of jail, but also made the place look a little pathetic. Bloombergville also appointed negotiators to speak to the authorities, which Wedes argues "created essentially police within our group that were like mouthpieces for the NYPD."

What's more, focusing on the single issue of budget cuts allowed the protest to be co-opted. Injustice and inequity were reduced to budget lines.

"In the messaging, it was really a one-issue thing," Wedes says. "It was like, we're going to sleep out here until the City Council stops these budget cuts, these unfair budget cuts."

When the council passed a budget that managed to avoid most layoffs, the activists packed up. Still, like Wedes, many of them saw fiscal austerity as more than just a local issue, and one without an expiration date.

ADBUSTERS

On July 13, just two weeks after Bloombergville turned into a ghost town, the Vancouver, Canada-based magazine AdBusters issued a somewhat cheeky call to "Occupy Wall Street."

"Are you ready for a Tahrir Moment?" the magazine asked. "On September 17, we want to see 20,000 people flood into lower Manhattan, set up tents, kitchens, peaceful barricades and occupy Wall Street for a few months."

In addition to that, Adbusters gave the "Tahrir moment" a Twitter hashtag (#OccupyWallStreet) and a campaign poster (a ballerina balanced atop a bull). Beyond a few coordinating emails later on, that was about the extent of AdBusters' involvement, according to several organizers.

For the Bloombergville crew, the AdBusters call seemed to drop like manna from the skies. Seizing on the call to Occupy Wall Street, New Yorkers Against Budget Cuts sent out an email to its allies. The coalition invited interested folks to gather near "Charging Bull," the Arturo Di Modica structure near Wall Street. The meeting was meant to be both a protest and also, according to the email's language, a "people's general assembly."

Mary Clinton, a 25-year-old labor studies graduate student at the City University of New York who helped edit the call to action, explains that asking for the Aug. 2 gathering to be a general assembly was "chosen based on inspiration from Tahrir Square and the acampadas in Madrid and Barcelona."

But the meeting also had a dual purpose as a rally. The program also called for a "speak-out" about economic injustice, and activists chose Aug. 2 because of a looming debt ceiling deadline.

So some of the city's most committed leftist activists gathered by the bull, hoping they could put aside their differences and focus on targeting Wall Street.

It didn't work.

As David Graeber, a self-described anarchist and an anthropologist at Goldsmiths, University of London, recounted, the factions' internecine distrust became unwieldy.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST NEW YORK

Three months ago, a loosely organized group of activists concerned about growing income inequality, corporate greed and the global influence of powerful financial institutions decided to make Lower Ma...
Three months ago, a loosely organized group of activists concerned about growing income inequality, corporate greed and the global influence of powerful financial institutions decided to make Lower Ma...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 633
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mfcarrandi
02:11 PM on 11/17/2011
ITS OVER AND FINISHED!

As far as I am concerned, this "movement" is FINISHED.

Incidentally, did you see all the used needles being swept out of the Park? I am sure that weren't for insuline.It is a disgrace and an insult to our decent citizens and those that in the last 200 years formed and protected the greatest nation on earthh, TO DATE!
yesiamaconservative
waiting for an intelligent reply ...
12:13 AM on 11/15/2011
I'm glad all this non-sense is finally dying a natural death ... the news reporting is getting harder and harder to find and the comments are fewer and fewer .... HORRAY!!!!

Money does not equal happiness, research on lottery winners and welfare programs report that if you don't earn it, it won't bring you happiness. True happiness comes from earned success ... key word EARNED ... Welfare destroys society as it brain-washes one to believe that they are ENTITLED (owed) a job, food, clothing, shelter, etc.. by the govt.. For men it totally robs them of their manhood - leadership, providing for their family, and sense of self-worth. But liberals just don't get this in my opinion.

The flip side to earned success is LEARNED HELPLESSNESS , which leads to unhappiness. We are seeing in OWS 2 generations of "trophy kids" who were brought up learning high self esteem while falling behind further and further in math an science. Yet they were conditioned (taught) that everyone receives a trophy for just showing up. They were ENTITLED to their TROPHY!!!

We need a free enterprise system that recognizes that a belief in free enterprise means we also help others find opportunities.WHEN WE TAKE THE RISK OUT OF LIFE, WE TAKE THE
LIFE OUT OF LIFE.

Free enterprise is a noble system, built not on envy but aspiration ...

Life, Liberty and the PURSUIT of (not guarantee of) Happiness ...
photo
spilkus
I'm in the art world, for Pete's sake.
08:47 AM on 11/15/2011
What you say is partially true... but most of the OWS people would agree that it is only a part of the truth.
You don't want to hear that there are a handful of giant corporations who cheat even hard working folks and manly men out of their chance at a share of the wealth.
You don't want to hear that corporations and share holders should pay when they pollute the air, water, and earth for their privileged position.
You probably don't care that I was born into a family of modest wealth and I have learned that hard work is a good way to get ahead in America-- but a better way is to lie, cheat, steal and murder-- as long as you do it for wealthy, well connected people.
If you were not a fool you would be not on the side of the privileged, and not on the side of the lazy-- but on the side of those fighting for justice. Justice.
yesiamaconservative
waiting for an intelligent reply ...
10:43 PM on 11/15/2011
What you libs. don't get is that not even in a totalitarian state do you erase cheating and corruption ... but that's what you want - more government regulation on everything in some blind attempt to achieve some utopian universalism and equality. It's really funny.

And explain this to me einstein - how do the lazy get to be the privileged ... The fool is the person who voted for Hope and Change and thinks the govt. has the answers.

But you keep on with your silly mask and beating your drums and fighting for justice ...
11:44 PM on 11/14/2011
Three months ago, a loosely organized group of activists concerned about growing income inequality, corporate greed and the global influence of powerful financial institutions decided to make Lower Manhattan its home, setting in motion a movement known as Occupy Wall Street.

Since then, nothing has changed except the level of lawlessness within the OWS movement.

The more the OWS crowd listens to the Tea party movement, the greater their impact will be.

Until then, Wall Street, Congress, and the WH will continue to laugh at them.
yesiamaconservative
waiting for an intelligent reply ...
12:15 AM on 11/15/2011
They are in the wrong zip code ...
photo
spilkus
I'm in the art world, for Pete's sake.
08:50 AM on 11/15/2011
OWS should sell out to the Koch Brothers? Good idea. I represent OWS and I have a PO Box where the checks can be sent.
11:27 PM on 11/14/2011
There is a lot of people in this country upset with the governemnt­. I wrote an article on how I think that this can be solved. You can find it here http://wp.­me/p1Ihsg-­3p. Check it out. I think that we can come to a solution.
yesiamaconservative
waiting for an intelligent reply ...
12:18 AM on 11/15/2011
Mike - in all due respect - we have a political system that - right or wrong and there is a lot
of wrong - is the vehicle to work out solutions. All this hooliganism with OWS is just a circus and won't accomplish anything but trashing a number of beautiful public parks ... until OWS has the ability to get organized and get some leadership (that can be respected with someone who is
not named "ketchup" ) they will die like the grass in the coming winter ... RIP OWS -- it will make a nice footnote in history ...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nabsentia23
Practical Idealist
11:34 AM on 11/15/2011
OMG! I'm a liberal and I'm agreeing with a conservative! This is a rarity - especially on HuffPost.

Although I strongly believe in the right to protest - there are more effective ways of doing it. OWS, despite its own hype, has not accomplished much. It did not change public discourse to economic issues. The public discourse was already there. It's been there since at least January. OWS can't even take credit for Bank Transfer Day. There was another movement called "Move Your Money" that began long before!

And last, but not least, protesting, by itself, will not change anything. It's only one tool in the political arsenal. Voting is another one. Advocacy (towards elected officials and voters - mostly through organizations of like-minded individual). And then, of course, there's running for public office yourself.

Sorry, but as much as I agree with the sentiment of OWS, I do not agree with the methods. I've seen protest, after protest, after protest accomplish nothing because the organizers didn't have a clear view of what they wanted and they didn't set simple goals. Sure, they say, "Stop corporate greed!" But try being on the other end of the protests - the one who's being protesting and see that this message is very vague. They're protesting institutions but have no clear message of what they want them to do. So, what change do they expect to get?

So, we probably disagree on everything else, but agree on this, yesiamaconservative.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WalterRetlaw
07:37 PM on 11/14/2011
I think it's legitimate to ask, "how much is an idea worth"? More than the labor that brings it to fruition? If so, how much more? Should the owner of a company (i.e. a single individual) take a larger share of the profits than the workers they depend on to bring their product and/or service to market? Should they make more than all their workers combined? How much more? Who is really more valuable to the operation; management or labor? The same question can be asked in regards to equipment. Is equipment worth more than labor? Are factories worth more than the workers who run them?

What I'm getting at is this; for thousands of years, profits were based on labor. A craftsman made their own products, took them to market, and kept (most of) the profits. Granted, that wasn't always the case. During eras of slavery and feudalism, for example, labor was exploited. Industrialization had a similar effect. Skilled craftsmen were transformed into unskilled laborers, and a 3rd party (i.e. the capitalist) reaped the vast majority of the rewards for their hard work. That's what's at the heart of class warfare; do you believe there is inequity in the division of profits, or do you think labor and management are equitably rewarded in respect to the value they provide? When I read about golden parachutes, and CEOs who are worth more than entire nations of people, I can't help but think the former might be true.
yesiamaconservative
waiting for an intelligent reply ...
12:22 AM on 11/15/2011
Who decides? You? If you want a better company, go form one and share the wealth with the employees. The govt. started educating people 40 years ago to be WORKERS in society. This is what industry leads said they needed, so the government responded. Today so many are just brainwashed.

We have a congress that is equivalent to feudalism with kings and aristocracy ... until we change the system the system will control everyone ... and OWS has no prayer of changing anything with their drums and chants ... it's just a side-show ...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mfcarrandi
06:46 PM on 11/14/2011
This says it all:

quote
Occupy Wall Street is the best illustration
of what Obama's America looks like,
where the lawless, unaccomplished, ignorant and incompetent rule. It is
an America where those who have sacrificed nothing pillage and destroy
the lives of those who have sacrificed greatly.

It is an America where history is rewritten to honor dictators, murderers
and thieves, where violence, racism, hatred, class warfare
and murder are all means of overturning the American
society.

It is an America where humans have been degraded to the level of animals:
defecating in public, sex in public, devoid of hygiene. It is an
America where the basic tenets of a civil society,
have been rejected. Where, great suffering will come to the American
people, and rulers like Obama, Reid, Pelosi,
Frank, Dodd, Biden, Jackson, Farrakhan, liberal
college professors, union bosses and other loyal liberal/Communist Party members
will live in opulent splendor.

It is the America that Obama and the Democratic Party have created with the
assistance of the media, Hollywood , unions, universities, the
Communist Party of America, the Black Panthers and numerous anti-American
foreign entities.

Obama has brought more destruction upon this country in four years than
any other event in the history of our nation, but it is just the beginning of what he
and his comrades are capable of.

The Occupy Wall Street movement is just another step in their plan for the
annihilation of America .

Thomas Sowell
endquote
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nabsentia23
Practical Idealist
11:45 AM on 11/15/2011
LMFAO! Sorry, but the GOP and conservatives played a very active role in our government for the last 30 years. They promoted the failed economic policies but try to shift the blame to the Democrats and liberals. And what's even worse is that they want those failed policies to continue.

And liberal college professors are being blamed? Your conservative politicians were educated by these same elitists liberals and became successful financially as a result of it. Then, they have the nerve to turn around and tell their base "down to earth" like they are? Ha!

The mere fact that Farrakhan, the Black Panthers, and the Communist Party are lumped together with established DC politicans undermines any seriousness Mr. Sowell had. This quote is more of a delusion than anything else.

As for the OWS being another step in annihilating America. Hardly. LMFAO.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mfcarrandi
02:38 PM on 11/17/2011
Let me just reply to your usual lib "baffle gab" and cliche words with the following:

Thomas Sowell (born June 30, 1930) is an American economist, social theorist, political philosopher, and author. A National Humanities Medal winner, he advocates laissez-faire economics and writes from a libertarian perspective. He is currently a Rose and Milton Friedman Senior Fellow on Public Policy at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University.
Sowell was born in North Carolina, but grew up in Harlem, New York. He dropped out of high school, and served in the United States Marine Corps during the Korean War. He had received a bachelor's degree from Harvard University in 1958 and a master's degree from Columbia University in 1959. In 1968, he earned his doctorate degree in economics from the University of Chicago.
Dr. Sowell has served on the faculties of several universities, including Cornell and University of California, Los Angeles, and worked for "think tanks" such as the Urban Institute. Since 1980 he has worked at the Hoover Institution. He is the author of more than 30 books.


NUFF SAID!
06:40 PM on 11/14/2011
I think this whole movement has past its prime very quickly. Out here on the west coast we are more than tired of our little OWS versions as they suck-up resources and in Oakland at least are basically bankrupting the city in their completely selfishness.

I hate to break to these guys, but this isn't Lybia. This isn't Egypt. There are not enough hungry people for the kind of revolution that these anarchists so clearly seek. At best, we can make adjustments to the ongoing project that is the American democracy. There is no way that in the current set-up, at the height of our fatness and wealth and comfort that there is going to be revolutionary change because some people's houses are underwater. As long as there is food on the table, people don't revolt. And lets not forget the little fact that we're not living under a tyrannical dictatorship either. So again, not a whole of reason for a popular uprising. There will always be the radicals but unfortunately for them it is only during a handful of brief moments in history when they achieve in results. The rest of the term they are just a marginal population to be ignored by the rest.
06:40 PM on 11/14/2011
I think it is the height of absurdity to think that this obsessive focus on maintaining a tiny encampment in downtown NY is going to lead to any meaningful or lasting change. While I agree with the primary OWS grievances, what I've heard from them is primarily a narcissistically inflated sense of their influence and not to mention more than a minor dolling of self-righteousness I find quite off-putting and misplaced. 99% or not we are all part of the same economic system and contribute to its perpetuation in every purchase, every transaction, every little iPad that these 20somethings at Zuccotti live to read-off of.
04:27 PM on 11/14/2011
Rabbi Michael Lerner email (reported in Commentary):

"The highlight of the day was a speech and a reading from the Egyptian movement that was followed by a “Solidarity March.” The reading was disturbing to hear because its focus was on the justification for violent resistance. Although the need for violent aggression may be debatable in Egypt, it is not here in America. The activists of our past changed this county by being willing to die, not by being willing to kill. What shocked me more was that no one (including myself) booed or hissed. We sat there and many applauded. Worse followed.

A leader of a Palestinian youth group read his own speech. “Down with Israel,” he said near the end of a speech that focused on past wrongs. There was resounding applause. Then one of the leader’s crew standing next to me said “f—— Jews,” and in the face of this I could stand it no longer."

Well, we need to embrace the President's friend & adviro, Dan Stern [SEIU]:
“We kind of agree with Mao that political power comes largely from the barrel of a gun” and “if we can't use the power of persuasion, then we'll use the persuasion of power.”
photo
massjim
Dem? Repub? Is there a difference?
12:39 PM on 11/14/2011
..." concerned about growing income inequality, corporate greed and the global influence of powerful financial institutions"

Sure, about 1/2 of them. The other 1/2 are a mix of partiers and anarchists.
12:38 PM on 11/14/2011
Turn off the lights......the party's over........

LOL
PC Contrarian
Political Correctnes­s is the opiate of the left.
12:33 PM on 11/14/2011
What "Reawakening the Radical Imagination" leads to:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=qwG4AuhOsrg
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ghkusa
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
03:48 PM on 11/14/2011
An excellent link, thanks.

I thought I'd seen everything!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mfcarrandi
02:34 PM on 11/17/2011
This did not happen in NYC thanks to the professionalism of the NYP.

What a bunch of creeps!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smarteeeee
Conservatism = Compassion
11:44 AM on 11/14/2011
I believe the true origin of the Occupy movement can be traced to the 9-11 terrorists. After all, the terrorists' mission was to bring Wall Street to its knees and force the economic collapse of the USA. The Occupy rioters appear to simply be the foot soldiers supporting their Air Force comrades.
12:39 PM on 11/14/2011
The Occupy people are indeed terrorists. Good point.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Saint Cynicism
06:19 AM on 11/15/2011
Oh, I'd love to hear the reasoning behind that observation.
10:10 AM on 11/14/2011
Occupy Wall Street Statement of Autonomy!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bgAh0FTEMxQ
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TN60
I Hope You'll Dance
09:20 AM on 11/14/2011
http://www.alternet.org/story/153015/occupy_wall_street_is_not_a_spectator_sport%3A_5_ways_the_99_percent_can_contribute_to_the_movement_right_now__?akid=7846.250559.RFSl_o&rd=1&t=2