iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Family Secrets: Parents Prey On Children's Identities As Victims Stay Silent

First Posted: 11/11/2011 7:43 am Updated: 01/11/2012 4:12 am

"Burdened Beginnings" is a series examining the problem of child identity theft. Other stories in the series can be found here.

Ana Ramirez rents a cramped, two-bedroom house in southern California with her husband and three young children. Someday, she hopes to buy a home.

But according to her credit report, the 25-year-old already owns a home. In fact, she has been a delinquent homeowner, at least on paper, since she was 10 years old, she said.

Ramirez said her mother stole her identity to take out a mortgage when she was a child, but failed to make timely payments and nearly fell into foreclosure. When Ramirez became an adult, she discovered her credit was trashed.

So Ramirez had a choice: She could either report her mother to police -- a necessary step to fixing her credit -- or say nothing and enter adulthood with a tarnished financial reputation.

She decided to keep quiet.

Now, her blemished record is preventing Ramirez and her husband from acquiring a home loan, she said. She feels helpless and frustrated, but out of a sense of family loyalty, she refuses to file a police report that would repair her credit.

"I get angry sometimes when I think about it," Ramirez said. "But it's my mom. I wouldn't want to do that to her."

Ramirez said she is a victim of child identity theft, a crime that is capturing the attention of authorities as young adults find their Social Security numbers have been abused for years without detection. When victims turn 18, they encounter a series of financial roadblocks, unable to acquire loans for college, cars or homes due to damaged credit.

But advocates say cases like Ramirez's are the most difficult to detect and resolve because the ones who are supposed to monitor children's credit -- their parents -- are the thieves, and victims are often unwilling to report them. Without a police report, experts say it is nearly impossible to restore a victim's good name.

An estimated 500,000 children have had their identities stolen by a parent, according to ID Analytics, which sells identity fraud protection. It is a crime of opportunity, with the culprits having total access to their children's unused Social Security numbers and the victims unaware they are victims at all.

"Why would a family member do this?" Russell Butler, executive director at the Maryland Crime Victims' Resource Center, said at a July conference on child identity theft. "Well, it's easy -- as easy as taking candy from a baby. Because you have a child, and they don't even want the candy. They don't even know they have credit."

An Unreported Crime

The concern over child identity theft comes as Americans have a greater need for clean sources of credit. Last April, 25 percent of Americans had credit scores of less than 600 -- the least-creditworthy category -- compared to 15 percent before the recession began, according to data compiled by Deutsche Bank. Therefore, the temptation to hijack a child's pristine credit may be greater than ever.

Government efforts to stop child identity theft have only created new problems.

In 1987, the federal government launched a program to encourage parents to apply for their newborn's Social Security numbers at birth so identity thieves didn't apply for them first. But the program had an unintended consequence: By issuing Social Security numbers in a predictable sequence based partly on the year a person was born, identity thieves could infer a child's 9-digit identifier based on public information, according to Alessandro Acquisti, associate professor at Carnegie Mellon University.

In response, the Social Security Administration in June began assigning a randomized series of numbers to children. But some say this may complicate future efforts to prevent child identity theft. The credit card industry, for example, relies on the older, predicable sequence to reject applications linked to Social Security numbers that appear to belong to children.

"I am concerned that it might make it a little easier for children to be victimized," said Doug Johnson, vice president of risk management policy at the American Bankers Association.

In the largest study on child identity theft to date, researchers at Carnegie Mellon University earlier this year found the identity theft rate among children (10.2 percent) was 51 times higher than among adults (0.2 percent) in the same population

The stolen identities of children were used to purchase homes and cars, open credit card accounts, gain employment and obtain driver's licenses, according the report. The study was based on data provided by Debix, which sells identity theft services and offers free scans for parents who want to find out if a credit file exists on their child.

Last year, more than 18,000 identity theft complaints were reported to the Federal Trade Commission by victims 19 and under, making up about 8 percent of all complaints. That number has remained mostly flat over the past three years.

But experts say figures on child identity theft are likely much higher because the crime often goes unreported. ID Analytics estimates more than 140,000 children are victims of identity theft each year, based on a one-year study of children enrolled in the firm's identity protection service.

Advocates say the lack of reporting is most common when parents hijack their children's Social Security numbers. The unwillingness of victims to report these cases can be found in a small survey taken this year by the Identity Theft Resource Center.

Out of 55 identity theft victims who were targeted by family members, 24 percent said they "did not feel right" about filing a police report, the survey found. An additional 13 percent said "my family is ashamed and remains in denial" and 9 percent said "my family will turn against me if I take any action against this person."

"They're really torn about whether they should do something or not," said Gabby Beltran, a spokeswoman for the Identity Theft Resource Center. "They'll say 'It's my mom' or 'It's my dad, and I don't want anything to happen to them.' A good number of them don't do anything."

Some states have stiffened penalties for parents or guardians who steal children's identities. Florida, for example, has made the crime a second-degree felony with a maximum punishment of 15 years in prison.

Still, experts say more should be done to help children sort through the time-consuming and expensive process of repairing credit fraud. Victims of identity theft spend an average of 330 hours fixing their credit and incur more than $850 in expenses, according to the Identity Theft Resource Center.

Police are often unwilling to take a report when parents use their child's Social Security number, viewing it as a domestic matter, experts say. And the child-welfare system is not equipped to handle cases of parents stealing their children's identities because children are not allowed to retain legal assistance on their own, said Butler at the Maryland Crime Victims' Resource Center. Advocates say the law should view these cases like child abuse.

"You don't have a system now that considers the financial abuse of a child as a gateway to needing assistance," Butler said. "There's got to be someone who can step into those shoes and act in the child's best interests."

A Family Secret

Parents use their children's Social Security numbers for a variety of reasons. Some use them to get jobs because they have felony convictions on their records. Others use them to apply for credit cards and utilities because their own credit is tarnished.

Last April, Maryland resident Jimmy Louis Craighead, 40, was convicted of stealing the identities of his three children -- ages 6, 4 and 2. He told a judge he and his wife were not able to get credit in their own names, so they used their children's names to get money for food, fuel and other necessities, according to the Carroll County Times.

"They have maxed out their ability to get credit, so they borrow their child's thinking, 'Oh, it's okay. I'll pay all the bills so by the time they turn 18, they'll have great credit,'" Linda Foley, co-founder of ID Theft Info Source and an expert on child identity theft, said at a conference in July. "Well, they haven't unlearned the bad behaviors that got them in debt in the first place, so at 18, the child ends up in debt."


FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,044
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (48 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:29 PM on 11/17/2011
No one should have to do the detecting, determine the identity of the criminal and THEN report the crime. These young people should only have to present a birth certificate to prove their case.

The rest is up to the bank and the police.

And that is before we start asking what on earth banks are doing allowing children to buy houses.
04:47 PM on 11/15/2011
At some point there needs to be a way to sue the banks or anyone else who extends credit without thoroughly checking. If I have to provide tax records, driver's license, job verification and all forms of ID for a loan, why shouldn't they????

There needs to be a class action lawsuit against the 3 credit services too but that's a whole other story. Consumer's credit reports seem to have unstable scores based on what is paid off or their debt load. As long as the bills are paid, so what? Why does a score drop if you pay off an account? Silly.
04:23 PM on 11/15/2011
This is widespread. There are even cases like this on Judge Mathis too. Parents who do this to their children are worthless and puth themselves first before any offspring. Parents are suppose to protect and raise their children, not tarnish their futures.

Warning: don't get a cell phone, credit card, utility or anything else for someone. You probably won't get paid and will never financially recover from someone else's dishonesty.

When a child is born they need to put some type of code on their SSN that lets companies know they're minors and then the code comes off at 18.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blizzard man robot voice
11:17 AM on 11/15/2011
This is why I feel parenting is not a right but a privilege. I think it would be great to see adults tested on a variety of things to earn the right to raise a child.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LittleSanityLeft
10:20 PM on 11/14/2011
No one needs credit before they're 18 and it's really the fault of money hungry borrowers who could somehow ignore the lunacy of a 10 year old looking to require a mortgage.

It's up to our society as a whole to look out for it's children not just the parents. Young lives ruined before they even began. A true shame.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anne Mccormick
09:16 PM on 11/14/2011
forget this family first nonsense. what Ramirez's mother did was a crime. at the very least she should give that mother two choices; either make full restitution or get ready to go to court.
11:38 AM on 11/14/2011
I can sum up my entire spiel about the actions presented in this article in three words: This is wrong.
photo
Ossit
Ossit
08:52 AM on 11/14/2011
“I bet you watch a lot of daytime T.V”

I wish I could again, H Seldon. Haven't had Cable for two years. I've got all my tapes memorized though practically. Star Trek, Discovery Channel Documentaries, have a big collection of movies. When I'm not watching them, I write in my hobby writing serial. When I did have Cable? People's Court, the Spanish Channel, Discovery Channel, National Geographic Channel, NBC Nightly News. Saturdays were strictly Sci-Fi Channel awful movie night. Sundays were Discovery Channel for hours. I've always hated soaps, but Spanish language soaps are interesting though can't understand more than a few words at a time. Let's see. Afternoons, People's Court, Judge Judy, okay I'll admit it, Dr. Phil. I have the opportunity to get Cable back now and one of these months I'll do it. Jeopardy was the only game show I'd watch. Was great in the Science and Biology questions. Law and Order was good and CSI. Love the science of Forensics. Once even watched Autopsy. Not for the squeamish. Man, I've gotta get Cable back! Any other petty questions you'd like to ask H Seldon?
09:56 AM on 11/14/2011
Cool story Bro

zzzzzzzzzzzzzz
10:11 AM on 11/14/2011
I'd say you watch a Helluva lot of daytime tv, jerry springer and fox is probably your main source of information
photo
Ossit
Ossit
08:34 AM on 11/14/2011
H Seldon, I got into debt because my homeowner's insurance wouldn't pay for a claim because I had to reduce payments which they offered and I took. Got ripped off by three roofers. Had to use my savings, retirement fund, back savings and the leak is still there. For three years I was in debt trying to recover and rapidly on the mend. Never resorted to crime. Mom's been dead for 14 years, dad 22 years. Neither were criminals. I'm not. My brother isn't. You don't sacrifice your children to solve your debts. Desperation has no limits to you. Sheltered? Pampered growing up? You bet.Riding and cooking lessons, eating steaks every night, cleaning ladies, I'd be chased out when bills were paid because my job was to be a kid not worry about their bills. Once I got out on my own my parents offered help but I refused. Do miss steaks every night. Dad worked hard like his dad. Grandpa had to drop out of school in the 5th grade to work but he did know how to read and write beautifully so no cracks about him. My dad was born in '27 so he grew up during the Depression. Don't have kids. There's always a way to support your kids without being a criminal. C'mon! You don't my unwavering honesty so you're narrower.
11:08 AM on 11/14/2011
You had an average easy pampered life and you want a medal because you didn't need to turn to any kind of crime?
You think what you describe is a really tough life LOL it's average, boring, normal.

Come back to me when you've had REAL life experience and not that of a spoilt brat who's seems to have spent his life in star trek outfits rather than in the real world.
11:09 AM on 11/14/2011
"Sheltered? Pampered growing up? You bet.Riding and cooking lessons, eating steaks every night, cleaning ladies,..."

LOL wtf do you know about real life?

And you have the cheek to moan about dishonest people
photo
Ossit
Ossit
07:42 AM on 11/14/2011
Yes, H Seldon everyone was once honest. Not any more. Identity Theft and yes, even petty crime, shouldn't be tolerated and protected by family because someone is affected by it. Yes, I stand by saying I see nothing wrong with turning in a parent who steals your identity or is a criminal in any other fashion. Shoplifting, bank robbery, drug dealing, murder, identity theft, child abuse. Turning in a criminal parent illegal? Pul-eeze! Parents have no immunity from being a criminal as much as you'd like, or immune to prosecution. It's skewed loyalty to protect them, yet complain about the damage they cause. I'm not worried about my wallet because I never had a family member steal my identity. Never came into anyone's thoughts. Mom's not worried about her wallet. She's been dead 14 years. Mom was never a thief. Identity thieves, family or not, should be put away not protected.
08:34 AM on 11/14/2011
Its' not just the child who is a victim. The banks don’t get paid, they're a victim. Banks have to cover the loss so they charge more to merchants and card holders to cover these thefts. We all suffer for the criminal behavior of a few. Maybe a year of birth should be included in the SS# so you could automatically determine the approx. age of the person whose credit is being accessed. Use the last three digits. EX: born in 1895, your card would end in "895". Born in 2009, your card would end in "009". This would instantly tell you if the "borrower" is 116 years old (already dead) or they are only 2 years old and not eligible for credit. Loan applicant looks like a 22 year old, SS card says it’s a 68 year old, further investigation is needed. Now that doesn't seem too difficult. Let's get a 5 million dollar Federal grant and study this idea for 20 years.
04:34 PM on 11/15/2011
Great idea!!! I was just saying some sort of code needs to be embedded in one's SSN to let creditors know the person is a minor.

Crooks are always thinking though. A secretary was telling me that in her day when people had bad credit, they would drive thru the cemetary, pick a name and start using it to get new credit.
10:08 AM on 11/14/2011
"everyone was once honest. Not any more. "

earlier you claimed in the 60, 70s everyone was honest, you're obviously very silly or a liar.
Keep spinning your little back stories
11:19 AM on 11/14/2011
Is your second name Agnew by any chance?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:11 AM on 11/14/2011
Stupid, stupid, stupid. First, the now adult kid only has to report that someone has used their social security number in an identity theft. They don't have to grass on their parents. Second, no one is going to prosecute the parents, mostly because they can't prove the case. Third, the new adult can simply point out to the police and credit bureaus that they cannot contract for the services or credit they are alleged to have applied for or used.
It looks like the parents are still lying to and using the kids. And the kids aren't bright enough to realize they don't have to be taken advantage of.
02:06 AM on 11/14/2011
As interesting as this story is - bad credit doesn't last longer than 7 years. If she was 10 years old when the credit was 'bad' it would have rolled off her report before she was 17. It is not a police record - it doesn't last forever...
photo
southingtonian
"I'm a Capricorn and you can't make me do sh*t.."
02:41 AM on 11/14/2011
there's more to it than that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Poison Snake
09:17 AM on 11/14/2011
Um, no. Actually, bad credit ONLY "doesn't last longer than 7 years" if you file some form of bankruptcy. A person has to actively stop using their credit and file for that to actively form that void of 7 years with their credit rating. Most people try to *avoid* this at all costs, however, because that period of 7 years isn't just "wait and this will go away" - it also means they can not do anything that requires better credit. Most would try to refinance with the company they're borrowing from, and/or simply ignore the problem until a credit agency has already reported them to a *collection agency* and been hounded for years until it's taken to court. The story only said she's been a "delinquent homeowner" since she was 10 - it THEN went on to state that the mother had used her identity to get the mortgage and went through a period of making late and/or incomplete payments and nearly got foreclosed on. It did not say how long FROM 10 years old that process really took.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kerry Cook
01:47 AM on 11/14/2011
I used to speak to a woman I'd met over the net who did this to her daughter. She totally trashed her credit for silly things, not necessities & to the obnoxious limit of $50000!!! Her daughter had graduated college & then married, had a child & was surprised to find that she & her husband were denied a home loan when both were under the impression that they had no record of any credit, but had good history paying their bills, etc. When her daughter came to her for support & tell her mother about the problems they were having, "mom" finally spilled the beans. This woman has other issues, which is why I no longer speak with her, but she couldn't understand why her daughter was mad at her, after all she was making 'minimum payments when she could' to try to make it right. Just as with the daughter in this story, no charges were pressed. I remember just being floored by what she admitted to doing & not taking fault, nor understanding just how low that was to do to anyone, esp. her own child. I hope all of those fancy clothes & things she bought makes up for the non-relationship she now has with her daughter & grandkids. I think that a lot of people do some desperate things in desperate times, but stealing your child's ID & pillaging their future is mighty low, esp. when it's for $50000 of material things that one most
01:45 AM on 11/14/2011
When my neice turned 18 I took her to the bank to open her first acct. We were so surprised to learn that her mother had opened an acct 5 yrs ago in her name. She wrote a bunch of bad checks, got electric in her name that she did not pay. Got an apartment in her name which she got evicted. This girls life was ruined before it got started. Of course she did not want to press charges against her mom. SO, I called her mom and told her if she did not pay off the bank and the electric bill,I would go to the police. She did pay those bills off. The worst part was she now used her other 2 kids SS#'s too.
01:33 AM on 11/14/2011
She shouldn't report her mother, but the bank for having given credit to a minor. From the social sec number the bank should have obtained age and other info regarding loan applicability.