More

American Eagle Airlines Fined $900,000 For Lengthy Tarmac Delays

Airline Fined 900000 For Lengthy Tarmac Delays

JOAN LOWY   11/14/11 07:49 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — Sometimes it seems like airline passengers just can't win: The government cracks down on airlines that keep people cooped up on planes that sit on airport tarmacs for endless hours, and carriers respond by canceling more flights to avoid hefty fines.

The Transportation Department's $900,000 fine Monday against an American Airlines regional affiliate for holding hundreds of passengers on board 15 planes for hours in Chicago earlier this year may only fuel more debate over whether the government's get-tough policy is making air travel better or worse for passengers.

Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood has hailed as a success his department's three-hour limit on such tarmac delays. Between May 2010 and April 2011, the first 12 months after the time limit was in effect, airlines reported 20 tarmac delays of more than three hours, none of which was more than four hours long.

In contrast, during the 12 months before the rule took effect, airlines had 693 tarmac delays of more than three hours, and 105 of the delays were longer than four hours.

However, a recent Government Accountability Office report concluded, "The rule appears to be associated with an increased number of cancellations for thousands of additional passengers – far more than DOT initially predicted – including some who might not have experienced a tarmac delay."

With Monday's fine against American Eagle Airlines, the first imposed on an air carrier under new rule, cancellations will shoot up even more, airline analyst Michael Boyd said.

"If there's a 20 percent chance of this happening, an airline will cancel," Boyd said, because of the potential for massive fines.

Ken Quinn, a former Federal Aviation Administration chief counsel who now represents airlines, said the three-hour limit is "having an inadvertent and anti-consumer effect."?

Airlines that violate the rule can be fined as much as $27,500 per passenger, but transportation officials had held off fining air carriers in any of the several dozen instances where the rule has been broken until this week. Industry officials are watching for any action from DOT on a similar incident at the Hartford, Conn., airport during a freak snowstorm in October.

The fine imposed on American Eagle was the largest penalty to be paid by an airline in a consumer protection case not involving civil rights violations, although airlines have paid much higher fines for violating federal safety regulations.

The transportation department "understands that many of these instances are outside of an airline's control," said Steve Lott, a spokesman for the Air Transport Association, which represents major carriers. Sometimes, airports have a shortage of Customs officials on hand for international flights, or an airport may not have enough buses to transport passengers safely to the terminal, or experience other emergency shortages.

But officials apparently felt the case involving American Eagle was particularly egregious and wanted to send a warning to other carriers the week before Thanksgiving travel.

American Eagle kept passengers cooped up for more than three hours on 15 flights arriving at O'Hare International Airport in Chicago on May 29, according to a settlement agreement between the department and the airline. A total of 608 passengers were aboard the delayed flights.

Poor weather that day had intermittently prevented scheduled flights from departing O'Hare, including American Eagle flights that were sitting at the airline's gates. But the carrier continued to send planes from other airports into O'Hare even though airline officials knew there were no gates for the planes. In some cases, the flight crews needed to enable American Eagle planes to leave gates, and make room for incoming flights, were stuck aboard the planes waiting on the tarmac with no way to get to the terminal.

American Eagle had a plan in place that might have avoided the gridlock, but failed to implement it until it was too late, the department said.

The airline must pay $650,000 of the fine within 30 days, the department said. But up to $250,000 can be credited for refunds, vouchers, and frequent flyer mile awards provided to the passengers on the 15 flights, as well as to passengers on future flights that violate the three-hour rule, the department said.

The new DOT rule requires that after three hours airlines must either return the plane to a gate or provide passengers who wish to disembark with some other means of safely getting off. Sometimes that means pulling up a stairway, allowing passengers off and taking them on buses to the terminal. The rule has since been extended to international flight delays, which are capped at four hours.

"We think airline passengers deserve to be treated fairly – before, during, and after their flights," LaHood said in a blog posted by his office. "The tarmac delay rule and vigilant enforcement by DOT are critical steps toward ensuring they are."

He said the department will "take any violation very seriously."

American Eagle said it has apologized to passengers and provided either travel vouchers or frequent flyer program mileage credit.

"We take our responsibility to comply with all of the department's requirements very seriously and have already put in place processes to avoid such an occurrence in the future," American Eagle President and CEO Dan Garton said in a statement.

American and American Eagle are owned by AMR Corp. of Fort Worth, Texas. AMR is in the process of spinning off American Eagle into a separate company.

In October, unusually severe weather and trouble with the Federal Aviation Administration's landing guidance systems at two New York-area airports caused 28 flights to be diverted to Hartford's Bradley International Airport, overwhelming the smaller airport. Passengers on as many as seven planes, including at least three JetBlue planes and an American Airlines plane, were stranded on the tarmac for seven hours or more.

The captain of one of the JetBlue flights could be heard pleading over his radio with authorities for help getting passengers, some of whom were becoming unruly, off the plane. The ordeal continued after they were eventually let off and had to spend the night on cots and chairs in terminals.

Greg Principato, head of the Airports Council International-North America, said FAA and airline officials set the airport up to fail by sending it more planes than it could handle. FAA spokeswoman Laura Brown said airlines decide which airport they will divert to when they can't land at their intended destination, not the FAA.

But Lott said it's important to recognize that it takes the FAA, airlines and airports working together to avoid such incidents.

To that end, LaHood and FAA Administrator Randy Babbitt are hosting a forum on Nov. 30 for airline, airport and other industry officials to talk about practical ways to avoid more tarmac strandings.

The three-hour rule was prompted by a series of incidents in which passengers complained of being kept virtual prisoners on planes in sight of an airport terminal. In one famous incident on Valentine's Day 2007, snow and ice in the northeast led to JetBlue Airways stranding hundreds of passengers on 10 planes on the tarmac at New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport for up to 10 1/2 hours.

In August 2009, 47 people were stuck overnight aboard a cramped Continental Express plane with a stinking toilet and crying babies after an employee for another airline refused to let them inside a closed airport terminal in Rochester, Minn., where the plane was diverted due to thunderstorms.

___

Follow Joan Lowy at http://twitter.com/AP_Joan_Lowy

____

Online:

Department of Transportation – www.dot.gov

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TRAVEL

WASHINGTON — Sometimes it seems like airline passengers just can't win: The government cracks down on airlines that keep people cooped up on planes that sit on airport tarmacs for endless hours,...
WASHINGTON — Sometimes it seems like airline passengers just can't win: The government cracks down on airlines that keep people cooped up on planes that sit on airport tarmacs for endless hours,...
Filed by Jade Walker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 153
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
04:14 PM on 11/14/2011
every penny of that $900,000 should go back to the passengers, ever wonder what happens to fines these big companies pay to the government? Why shoud the govt benefit from these peoples suffereing?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Y3rMawm
veni, vidi, bibi.
10:14 PM on 11/14/2011
My thoughts exactly. It is the passengers, not government that is inconvenienced.
03:42 PM on 11/14/2011
It's about time. The Airports should also be fined, as they many of them are co conspirators.
03:16 PM on 11/14/2011
good!....they suck as an airlines
photo
DismayedRepub
300km/s Not just common sense, it’s the law
03:01 PM on 11/14/2011
Every airplane has a safe way to get off and that is the emergency slide. I’m surprised that some mutinous passenger hasn’t tried to use one yet. What is worse? Sitting in a stinking aircraft with overflowing toilets or three hots and a cot at the local county lockup?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Y3rMawm
veni, vidi, bibi.
10:25 PM on 11/14/2011
Ha! On more than one occasion, while sitting on the tarmac at Sky Harbor, waiting for a gate to open, I have caught myself weighing exactly those options. All hat, no cattle I suppose :)
02:51 PM on 11/14/2011
do tax payers get some of this fine money (650 thousand dollars)? So some decision maker just decided to fine an airline in an already troubled industry 650k with the stroke of a pen -- where is this money going? maybe to draft another "read well, well written, fail in implementation" policy! what a waste of time..
photo
FoxIslander
Fox Island...no relation to Fox News
03:09 PM on 11/14/2011
...not as big a waste of time as being stuck in a stinking aircraft for hours. The intent of a fine is to be punative.
03:26 PM on 11/14/2011
it's a waste of time when these "punitive" - not "punative" as you put it; fines result in no results because the underlying regulation sucks to begin with... airlines just continue to cripple the consumer.. there are root causes and this punitive damage is symptomatic..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Adam Dray
There's a snake in my boot!
02:21 PM on 11/14/2011
...buuuuut isn't it the AIRPORTS fault? I mean the planes require clearance, SO if they start taxi, they require clearance for that TOO, sooooo, personally if the flying conditions aren't good OR too many planes taxi`ing , wouldn't the tower know long before the plane? AND if the tower clears them, then holds them for hrs on the taxi, that should be their fault too. Sounds like a whipping boy scenario!
02:34 PM on 11/14/2011
Yes it is to an extent. Most of the aircraft that are stranded on the ground are arrivals that have landed but have no gate to go to because they are all full. Full because operations will not let departures leave because of the bad weather. If a departing plane gets caught on the tarmac it is just bad timing because they were cleared away from the gate shortly before departing flights were held up. Once departures are held then al them arriving aircraft have to sit out the storm until departures are cleared to leave the gates and opening up spots. American Eagle operations is particularly sensitive to these issue being that they operate the most flights out of O'Hare than any other airline.
02:52 PM on 11/14/2011
I was there. I’m not an expert in how airports work but from I know the airports give clearance to land and help navigate the taxi to make sure there are no collisions but it’s the responsibility of the airline to develop the logistics to make sure gates are available and ground crew are available either they hire airport staff or their own hires.

At one point we finally went towards our gate. It was empty but we couldn’t move forward because there was no ground crew to assist our plane. We waited 30 mins 30 feet from the gate unable to move forward.

With that said. Other airlines were getting it done that day. That was the most frustrating part of it all, watching a different airlines plane land and quickly taxi to their gates while we sat in a hot plane with no water and overflowing toilets for hours. If anything, this makes me happy because it validates my story. Most people just thought I was whining but now it’s been vindicated.
03:07 PM on 11/14/2011
When you pull up to a gate and have to sit that means that ground ramp operations have been suspended because of lightning. I know this can be extremely frustrating. The gate is right there and your so close. There are plenty of ramp crew available to bring the aircraft in but they are not allowed on the ramp when operations have been suspended. This is for ALL airlines not just one so all are affected by the situation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Adam Dray
There's a snake in my boot!
03:59 PM on 11/14/2011
Well, I find it pretty hard for an airline pilot to 'know' the condition of the airport at a specific given time. YES ground employees can probably notify pilots of delays but ...how are you gonna fix that? I mean would you rather be circling and then land when available or parked waiting...personally I'd rather be on the ground...........
02:10 PM on 11/14/2011
I was on these flights on May 29th. It was awful! Our flight attendant quit after 2 hours and gave away free drinks. The toilets were overflowing. It litteraly was criminal what they did to us. I will never fly American Airlines again for the rest of my life.
01:50 PM on 11/14/2011
Something people reading this article are the conditions under which O'Hare was under on May 29. There was flodding rains and very high winds on the 29th. Yes places get such conditions often but the timing and duration greatly effects the operations. O'Hare is one of the busiest airports in the world. American Eagle operates the most flights of any airline out of O'Hare. When such conditions exist O'Hare will cancel all departures. So when this happened all planes that have not left the gates yet are held at the gates. So when aircraft that are supposed to be departing do not vacate the gates there are no gates available to put arriving aircraft. So they have to sit on the tarmac and await a gate opening. This will not happen until the storm passes and departing aircraft are cleared to leave. Sometimes empty aircraft can be moved to the hangar by maintenance crews to free up gate space. However when there are lightning strikes occuring on or near the airport all ramp activities cease and the aircraft cannot move. I know it sucks but when there is no room there is no room. Now this situation does not effect smaller airlines that will have few aircraft and a few open gates. However the busiest airlines are affected the most. This was the reality at O'Hare on May 29, 2011.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
msbeal
Let no neo-con lie go unchallenged
02:16 PM on 11/14/2011
You know all that sounds nice but after three hours people need to be taken off those planes.
PERIOD!

I don't believe for one minute an empty plane can't be backed up out of a terminal connection to allow one of those waiting planes to disembark. It shouldn't matter who leases that terminal.
03:10 PM on 11/14/2011
Sounds like a plan. Not going to happen. When all the gates are full there is no room to back an empty plane anywhere.
photo
oakspondman
Proud US Veteran
01:48 PM on 11/14/2011
This law is needs to be changed.
Three hours is way too long. one hour is long enough.
The airport has to be fined as it applies
And the fine money should be paid to the passengers that were on the flight.
photo
MSROADKILL612
am not convinced geothermal energy is above ground
01:30 PM on 11/14/2011
Bit off topic - but think about it - how much has Osama bl cost the US for his lousy $359k investment - happy fliers no longer want to know about it - another reason for rail investment
01:30 PM on 11/14/2011
Even 3 hours is too long for some people! it actually ought to be no more than 2 hours. People need to be able to stretch, move, get food or water (in the event they were unable to do so prior to their boarding due to delays elsewhere). Often, when the planes sit on the tarmac, the AC isn't efficient and it gets really hot and stuffy! Some folks don't tolerate this well and become very anxious. Better to leave them in the terminal where they can tend to their needs, than stuck on a crowded aircraft! This is totally unhealthy!!!
photo
MSROADKILL612
am not convinced geothermal energy is above ground
01:24 PM on 11/14/2011
Interesting plane in the pic - seems a smart place to put the engines
photo
chainsawd1
I always seem to be where I am
12:29 PM on 11/14/2011
Wow, If it makes a difference great, but all that will happen is that they will pass along the cost of the fines to the passengers. Now if the CEO was fined it might have a positive impact.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sensimilla
You are not your body
12:21 PM on 11/14/2011
If i am ever stuck on a plane on a tarmac past 2 hours, I will start screaming and not stop until i am taken off that plane. F.uck the airlines and their bullsh1t.
01:47 PM on 11/14/2011
Good way to get pummeled by your fellow passengers.:)
12:18 PM on 11/14/2011
I'm a bit confused by the reporter's words, but he says $650,000 goes to the FAA and $250,000 "can be" credited to those customers or future customers through a variety of mechanisms. That seems to give the airline a lot of ways to pay the customers little of value (though they have made some recompense in some way).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sam Curcuro
Tell It Like It Is
01:10 PM on 11/14/2011
Flight Vouchers are like money in the bank. The airline, AA, (which used to be kind of known as the business man's airline) is just another 'Air Cattle Car" operation now, I was a frequent flyer for 30 years and the transformation that the airlines have gone through is from "Silk Purse to Sows Ear" for lack of a better analogy. I only fly now if it's an emergency..