More

BofA, Others Quietly Boosting Fees In Wake Of Debit Fee Debacle

Bank Fees

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 11/14/11 09:57 AM ET Updated: 11/14/11 09:57 AM ET

Most banks may have backed away from the debit fee idea, but they're still nickle and diming customers in other ways.

Banks such as Bank of America, U.S. Bancorp and TD bank are quietly quietly upping various fees on mobile deposits, lost debit cards and other services, The New York Times reports. The banks' focus on fees is an effort to recoup an estimated $12 billion a year that disappeared as result of financial reform legislation curbing overdraft charges and swipe fees, according to the NYT.

Consumers and lawmakers were in an uproar after Bank of America announced plans to charge customers $5 to use their debit cards for purchases starting in 2012. But bank fees are far from new. Banks charge a median 49 fees per checking account that range in cost from $1.50 to $175, according to a study by the Pew Charitable Trust, cited by Reuters. Customers are often charged extra for a variety of services including getting a printed bank statement, receiving a wire transfer or making too few transactions in a given month.

Though BofA ultimately backed off of the debt card fee, CEO Brian Moynihan initially defended it, saying that his company "has a right to make a profit."

Frank Keating, President of the American Bankers Association, also defended the fee at the time, arguing that financial reform legislation forced Bank of America to find new ways to generate revenue.

"As a direct result of the Durbin Amendment, consumers have started paying for financial services they previously enjoyed free of charge," Keating said in a statement last month. "Unfortunately, this proves that whenever government tries to control pricing of a product or service, consumers lose."

What made the debit card fee different from other charges was that it was so explicit, likely stoking consumers anger. After scrapping the fee, a Bank of America official told Reuters that the bank only disclosed the charge months before it was to take effect in an effort to be transparent with consumers.

But the plan backfired. More than 650,000 people joined credit unions between September 29 -- the day Bank of America announced the debit card fee -- and the first week of November, according to the Credit Union National Association. That's more new accounts than in all of 2010.

Even though new regulations have been enacted, banks are still on track to rake in $16 billion in overdraft fees this year, Bloomberg Businessweek reported last month. That's down 16 percent since their 2009 peak.

Banks have justified boosting fees and making them harder to avoid by saying they must recoup revenue lost from financial reform. BofA raised the monthly fee on its most popular checking account by more than $3, while Chase Bank doubled its monthly checking account fee, the Detroit Free Press reported in May.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Most banks may have backed away from the debit fee idea, but they're still nickle and diming customers in other ways. Banks such as Bank of America, U.S. Bancorp and TD bank are quietly quietly up...
Most banks may have backed away from the debit fee idea, but they're still nickle and diming customers in other ways. Banks such as Bank of America, U.S. Bancorp and TD bank are quietly quietly up...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 418
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kojak007
01:59 PM on 11/15/2011
So Keating is blaming government regulation for the banks imposing new fees??? How about blaming the banks for imposing new fees?

www.currentlychicago.com
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kamact
Market Observer
10:38 AM on 11/15/2011
Financial terrorist groups,... The greatest threat to Americans,...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robin-B
[The rest is silence.~Hamlet
07:05 AM on 11/15/2011
Keating said in a statement last month. "Unfortunately, this proves that whenever government tries to control pricing of a product or service, consumers lose."

This isn't new, the banking system is in bed with the "lawmakers" and are always looking for ways to make more money from the consumers/taxpayers. This was just a game they play to make it 'appear' as if the lawmakers are on the side of the consumer, but most people are no longer drinking the kool-aid.
06:10 PM on 11/14/2011
Sen. Durbin put us into this mess by pushing hard for lower debit interchange fees, which cost card issuers about $7 billion a year. It has been clear to anyone paying attention that placing a cap on debit interchange will inevitably translate into higher fees for consumers elsewhere. We've been warning about it all along. http://blog.unibulmerchantservices.com/debit-card-fee-limit-lifted-to-24-cents-consumers-will-still-pay-for-it
photo
flaconoire
Anartist
07:46 PM on 11/14/2011
And how much are they making in fees? Just curious. I am not about to cry over the poor Crook of America
11:53 PM on 11/14/2011
First of all, who is we? Second, you are wrong. Placing caps on fees doesn't translate into higher fees elsewhere, the unbridled greed of the big banks translates into higher fees.
05:16 PM on 11/14/2011
It is up to the consumer to do their research. Billions of dollars are just not enough for big business. They will continue to nickel and dime consumers as long as the consumer puts up with it. Eventually they will bring themselves down.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linda Edmondson
if we don't who will
04:59 PM on 11/14/2011
The big banks are correct to say they are in business to make profit....... So let them!

If those who still use there services still want to pay the user fees, more power to them.
I for one can't afford them. My money is now in the credit union and will remain there.

Now I wonder how long it will take _Congress to go after the credit unions. Surely our bankers are not going to stand by quitely and be bettered by these people oriented organizations. Be on the watch, don't let a bill quietly slip into law that will make credit unions more _like banks.
08:08 PM on 11/14/2011
The Durbin Ammendment is making the CU's more like the banks, in the sense that almost all CU's that offer debit cards will be adding fees. Even CU's will have ot make up for the revenue that the government made illegal.
photo
AKansasComment
Don't it make my brown eyes blue
04:56 PM on 11/14/2011
650,000 people joined credit unions as a result of the debit card fee fiasco.
Let's hope it goes to 6,500,000.
04:58 PM on 11/14/2011
Some of us joined credit unions because of not wanting to be associated with a bank that makes millions in profit and pays no taxes.
04:33 PM on 11/14/2011
"Recoup fees"? "Generate new revenue" ?

Where in either of those objectives is a business worth sustaining?

The historical reason for people to put money into banks is to protect it. These days it would be safer to let your local Crack dealer hold it for you. Then came the notion of putting it in banks to invest. Well, we've seen how well that works..


Right now these big banks do one thing, they create numbers. That's it! reams and reams of digits 0..9, and nothing more.

Profits? Just more numbers. And the most amazing part is that every single digit they churn out comes with a disclaimer that says "Subject to change without notice." and "Based exclusively on the reality of our accounting methods." and most importantly, "We assume no responsibility for the numbers we generate or anything we say or do."

Big Banks are the snakeoil salesmen of the 21st Century
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cherylana GarrityStavrou
There's something wrong with being right
04:31 PM on 11/14/2011
What I'm really having trouble understanding is this: the "people" (aka: tea baggers) are all up in arms about the Durbin Amendment because instead of banks making $50 billion, they might only make $40 billion *can you see my eyeballs rolling in disgust???* But ~ these same people believe that it's ok to eliminate the minimum wage. So, in effect, they're concerned that the financial corporations ONLY have billions of dollars, but they're NOT concerned that a family of 4 is going to live in a cardboard refrigerator box because the head of the family will be working 70 hours a week for a grand total of $50. I am truly at a loss for words.......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robin-B
[The rest is silence.~Hamlet
07:15 AM on 11/15/2011
Class war. During the death throes of Herbert Hoover’s presidency in June 1932, desperate bands of men traveled to Washington and set up camp within view of the Capitol. The first contingent journeyed all the way from Portland, Oregon, but others soon converged from all over—alone, in groups, with families—until their main Hooverville on the Anacostia River’s fetid mudflats swelled to a population as high as 20,000. The men, World War I veterans who could not find jobs, became known as the Bonus Army—for the modest government bonus they were owed for their service. Under a law passed in 1924, they had been awarded roughly $1,000 each, to be collected in 1945 or at death, whichever came first. But they didn’t want to wait any longer for their pre–New Deal entitlement—especially given that Congress had bailed out big business with the creation of a Reconstruction Finance Corporation earlier in its session. Father Charles Coughlin, the populist “Radio Priest†who became a phenomenon for railing against “greedy bankers and financiers,†framed Washington’s double standard this way: “If the government can pay $2 billion to the bankers and the railroads, why cannot it pay the $2 billion to the soldiers?"
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/10/30-4
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robin-B
[The rest is silence.~Hamlet
07:16 AM on 11/15/2011
Published on Sunday, October 30, 2011 by New York Magazine The Class War Has Begun
And the very classlessness of our society makes the conflict more volatile, not less.
by Frank Rich
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l78lancer
Wisdom is the principal thing
03:56 PM on 11/14/2011
Whether they hold you up at gun point or pick your pockets, thieves are still thieves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l78lancer
Wisdom is the principal thing
03:53 PM on 11/14/2011
If in fact the banks want small depositors to move their money in favor of larger depositors, they their wish is being granted.

Now what will they do when their large depositors move their money to BNY Mellon or Abbot Downing?
Rantibus
Cogito, Ergo Rant
03:52 PM on 11/14/2011
Fees are also going up so banks can recover money now lost to their personal use by the inordinate amount of funds being transferred from Certificates of Deposit (CDs) to money market and checking accounts. $900 billion since 2007 and another $570 billion from "jumbo" CDs used by the rich and business) These transfers make the money instantly available to the depositor but not available to the bank.
However, since 2008, the Federal government has paid banks to move their excess reserves to the central bank, thus making it more profitable to have it do nothing than loan it. If the Fed were to charge them fees on these deposits, it might drive those funds back into the economy in the form of loans.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BklynDame
Now on BorderlessNewsandViews
03:45 PM on 11/14/2011
The CEO said the company has a right to make a profit. That's true -- but one would think that laying off 30,000 workers and tossing them on to the roles of the unemployed would have been enough to boost their bottom line. BoA...just like the other "too big to fail" banks, the operate in a world of boundless greed.

http://borderlessnewsandviews.com/2011/10/another-big-bank-heist/
03:42 PM on 11/14/2011
It would be nice if we could move our tax money out of state, federal and city governments who are much worse at raising fees, hidden taxes, etc. They are never satisfied and have no morality about their wasteful spending and inefficiency.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TrishtheFish
03:28 PM on 11/14/2011
This exemplifies why our crony capitalist system is dysfunctional and unsustainable. When a company that has made exorbitant profits from ripping people off, and scamming the system is told that they can't do that any more, and have to accept smaller profits, they freak out. They feel that they have an obligation to their shareholders to prop up the stock price and keep profits high, by any means necessary. Without exception, these companies start looking for devious ways to continue to scam money to maintain profit levels, rather than acting in a responsible manner, and accepting a sustainable business model with smaller profits. They do this at their own peril. The glory days of crony capitalism will soon be over. If they can't be happy with a smaller piece of pie (and clearly they can't) they are going to go down. We have reached the point in the movie where the monster eats its own head...
03:54 PM on 11/14/2011
F&F Great comment :P
photo
AKansasComment
Don't it make my brown eyes blue
04:58 PM on 11/14/2011
Gotta fan that.