More

Congress Seeking To End Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Executive Bonuses

Fannie Mae

DEREK KRAVITZ   11/15/11 04:23 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — Congress is seeking to end the practice of paying million-dollar bonuses to executives at government-controlled mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The House Financial Services Committee approved legislation Tuesday that would suspend tens of millions in Fannie and Freddie executive compensation packages, stop future bonuses and align their salaries with other federal employees who make much less. The vote was 52-4, with strong support from both parties.

The Senate is expected to take up a similar measure. Lawmakers say the legislation limiting pay at the bailed-out firms could be sent to President Barack Obama by the end of this year.

Twelve executives at the firms received roughly $35.4 million in total salary and bonuses in 2009 and 2010. Fannie CEO Michael J. Williams received about $9.3 million for the two years. Freddie CEO Edward Haldeman Jr. was paid $7.8 million for that stretch.

The government rescued Washington-based Fannie and McLean, Va.-based Freddie three years ago after they nearly folded because of big losses on risky mortgages they purchased. Taxpayers have spent about $170 billion to rescue the two firms, the most expensive bailout of the 2008 financial crisis.

The government estimates the bailout could reach up to $220 billion through 2014.

"These lavish compensation packages and bonuses are unfair, unreasonable and unjust to the taxpayers whose assistance is the only thing keeping Fannie and Freddie afloat," said Rep. Spencer Bachus (R-Ala.), chairman of the House committee.

Edward DeMarco, acting director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, said the executives were hired after the companies were taken over by the government in 2008. After the takeover, the salaries for those positions were reduced by an average of 40 percent and some senior positions were eliminated, he said.

DeMarco told the Senate Banking Committee that bonuses are being used to keep talented executives with the companies. Without them, taxpayers would incur greater losses.

"The people who are there now did not choose government jobs," he said. "A sudden and sharp change in pay would certainly risk a substantial exodus of talent, the best leaving first in many instances."

Fannie and Freddie own or guarantee about half of all mortgages in the U.S., or nearly 31 million home loans. Along with other federal agencies, they backed nearly 90 percent of new mortgages over the past year.

This month, Fannie asked for $7.8 billion and Freddie requested $6 billion in extra aid to cover large quarterly losses, mostly caused by low mortgage rates reducing profits.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Congress is seeking to end the practice of paying million-dollar bonuses to executives at government-controlled mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The House Financial Serv...
WASHINGTON — Congress is seeking to end the practice of paying million-dollar bonuses to executives at government-controlled mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The House Financial Serv...
Filed by Maxwell Strachan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 146
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
02:09 PM on 11/17/2011
How's 'bout going back to the Clinton years and coming forward to see who got how much and what they are currently doing?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tarpon22
08:37 AM on 11/17/2011
Bonuses!!!!!
WE THE PEOPLE are no llonger concerned with their Bonuses.

All we are concerned about now is shutting them down forever.
Prosecuting the Executives so they snicth on each other for the Fraud.

They are about to be Occupyed
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:26 AM on 11/17/2011
Bonuses paid to corrupt and/or incompetent leadership who devastated the agencies. Rings like a Simpsons episode.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kamact
Market Observer
11:39 PM on 11/16/2011
Claw it back,...
hgus
It's not about the economy, stupid
10:07 PM on 11/16/2011
To me this is a story of the failure of capitalism and not failure of governmnet.

Is there anyone who works in government who makes more than the president?
Is there any "agency" of the government that tries to make profits?

Yeah, this entity was created by the government, but certainly this is free market through and through.
08:18 PM on 11/16/2011
The thieves who escaped should be sued to try to recoup their salaries.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jflorish
06:30 PM on 11/16/2011
If they are still asking for gov money, then there should be no bonuses. If they were profitable and not relying on tax payers, then I wouldn't care.
photo
knewsreply
PhD: International Educator and Marketer
12:22 PM on 11/16/2011
Bonuses, while others who are smarter and better managers lose their jobs. If they believe this, they should walk the streets with the protesters for a week and meet some of the more brilliant and experienced members in the various protests.
photo
drbob601
Soylent Green is People
12:16 PM on 11/16/2011
"DeMarco told the Senate Banking Committee that bonuses are being used to keep talented executives with the companies. Without them, taxpayers would incur greater losses."

Well then, let's pay them EVEN MORE and maybe they won't lose any taxpayer money at all.

Billion-dollar bonuses for all financial executives! They're WORTH IT.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dean77
"There's only one God, mam."
11:15 AM on 11/16/2011
Tea4Me
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WomenOnGuard
10:26 AM on 11/16/2011
So the government was also participating in large corporate bonuses? Well this explains why they haven't cracked down on Corporate America! How can they punish corporations, when they are actually doing the same thing? How twisted is that? SHAME!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sarahfigueroa207
Of all the animals, man is the only one that lies.
10:05 AM on 11/16/2011
DeMarco told the Senate Banking Committee that bonuses are being used to keep talented executives with the companies. Without them, taxpayers would incur greater losses.

Bullsh*t. If they are so talented then they wouldn't have needed bailing out in the first place.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
behavingbadly
reality doesn't care what you believe
10:50 AM on 11/16/2011
Seems so obvious, doesn't it? f/f
hgus
It's not about the economy, stupid
10:10 PM on 11/16/2011
But shouldn't that statement hold true for Goldman, BofA, Leahman, Chase, Citi et all?

They all claim that if they don't pay these huge bonuses, then they will lose these employees.

Really, where would they go? all of the financial system is corrupt
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Davidlf
09:45 AM on 11/16/2011
Oh yeah. The other thing is these clowns keep screaming that private sector workers make less than government sector, so aligning their pay with gov't workers means raises doesn't it?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:08 AM on 11/16/2011
Your argument is worth developing further. I missed this. To those who are crying out about the problems with "big government" we should ask them to go on government rates. Austerity measures for who!

The moot point is that the 1% is the government at present. The resources for a new beginning are locked up there. We don't have a congress that can implement changes independently. Neither is there much of a media that is able to inform the nation at large. HuffPost, you need to increase your reach further.
hgus
It's not about the economy, stupid
10:15 PM on 11/16/2011
Yeah, if they made 1/14 of what they actually made, their salary would equal the same as the highest paid public official in the US; the President.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Davidlf
08:09 AM on 11/17/2011
That is part of my point. The Republican liars that think these folks pay should be brought into line with public sector pay also make the claim that public sector pay is too high *because it is higher than private sector.*

Too, it is the very same people clamoring to lower these guys pay, who cry tyranny when anyone suggests an executive salary cap. Funny how all their beliefs and principles go right out the window when there is a chance to grandstand and demonize people they don't like.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Davidlf
09:45 AM on 11/16/2011
Republicans want to go after some of their favorite whipping boys - shocker.

Where is the outrage at the folks who actually made this mess? F&F are in a mess because the masters of the universe did a pump and dump in the housing sector that resulted in a systemic collapse that, big surprise, landed on working people who needed fha loans to realize the American dream. Now, those people don't have jobs because of insane crapp done by millionaires and billionaires, and this is all F&F's fault?

Compensation including bonuses is about doing a good job, that doesn't always mean making money. Some times things are beyond ones control - like the unregulated cdo/cds boondogle that blew up our economy. I don't honestly know if these guys are doing a good job or not, but blaming them for F&F losing money is like blaming the fire dept for a house burning down. F&F didn't start this fire.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter007
10:47 AM on 11/16/2011
"Masters of the Universe'?

Get away from the fantasy video games. They are not real life.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Davidlf
12:24 PM on 11/16/2011
I believe "masters of the universe" is a name they used for themselves, I use it derisively to mock their arrogance, but who can blame them, if they get to make billion dollar bets, with other peoples money, and then put a big hunk of the winners in their pocket, and pass on the losers to the tax payer...that's about as close to invulnerable as a mortal will get.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:01 PM on 11/16/2011
It was the govt that instructed Fannie and Freddie to lower their underwriting standards so they could buy sub primes. This took away much of the risk from the banks and shifted it to the taxpayer. The govt should never have allowed taxpayer backing for sub primes just to feed what they thought was a housing boom.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nypapajoe
09:40 AM on 11/16/2011
We the American people want our bonuses back! It is millions of dollars that have been misappropriated by these executives that mismanaged the loans are were rewarded for their blunder! So what ever it is that you inept fools in congress have to do to get the money back get to work because anywhere else it would be considered Grand Theft!