iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Iowa Governor Warns Mitt Romney That Voters May 'Punish Him' For Lackluster Effort

First Posted: 11/15/2011 7:14 pm Updated: 11/16/2011 6:42 am

NASHUA, Iowa -- Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad on Tuesday said he has warned advisers to Mitt Romney that if the Republican presidential candidate does not spend more time in the Hawkeye State ahead of the Jan. 3 caucuses, he could finish as low as fifth or sixth in the voting and suffer serious damage to his candidacy.

Romney has polled consistently around 20 percent in most statewide polls of likely Iowa caucus-goers, but Branstad said "that's not going to last if he doesn't spend a lot more time and put a lot more effort in here."

"I think he's going to have to put a real effort in here or he's going to be embarrassed," Branstad said in a phone interview. "He's trying to downplay it and keep the expectations down. But if he comes in fifth or sixth here I think it really damages his campaign nationally. Iowa voters are spoiled by attention, and if you have a candidate who does not take them seriously, I think they'll punish him."

Romney's campaign did not respond to a request for comment.

The strongly-worded warning from the Republican governor comes after the Romney campaign said Monday that the former Massachusetts governor will campaign for the fourth time this year in Iowa next week, the day before Thanksgiving. But Romney is also skipping a number of major political events here in the Hawkeye State, including a candidate forum in Des Moines on Saturday, as well as a birthday party for the governor, who turns 65 on Thursday.

Romney also skipped another gathering of social conservatives in Iowa in October, and a Nov. 4 dinner in Des Moines organized by the state party.

Romney's approach to the state is based on his 2008 experience, where he spent $10 million and went all out to win over the state's conservative Republican voters, only to finish second to former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee. That loss was a major blow to Romney's chances at the nomination, and he eventually dropped out of the race.

This year, Romney has avoided Iowa and has done little to organize support here, though his state director David Kochel and a small staff have worked quietly to ensure that a good portion of the 30,000 voters who caucused for them in 2008 -- giving them 25 percent support -- will be with Romney again.

The Romney campaign's calculus, so far, has been that Iowa voters are too fickle and so conservative that going all-in here is too big a risk, Romney advisers have said. As long as Romney finishes in the top two or three, or maybe even fourth, he will have set expectations low and will move on to New Hampshire, where he is expected to win.

However, the lure to come in and contest Iowa more aggressively has grown. The conservative grassroots is still split among five or six candidates. Almost all of these candidates have at one point been the most popular Romney alternative, but all have faded after only a short time. The most recent candidate to catch fire is former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.), who is coming on as former Godfather's Pizza CEO Herman Cain fades under fire from sexual harassment allegations.

And Branstad's comments channeled a growing irritation in the state that Romney seems to want to place well in the caucuses without really working hard for Iowans' support. He said he has conveyed this frustration to Ron Kaufman, a longtime Republican political operative, a Washington lobbyist, and a close adviser to Romney.

"My advice to them is, they're trying to avoid the mistake of the last campaign, but I think in so doing they're making another mistake," Branstad said. "Last time they spent a lot of time in Iowa and got expectations way too high. A second-place finish for someone from Massachusetts would be fine, and I think they'd be very happy to come in second here this time."

But, he added, "My feeling is they're gonna blow that if they don't get much more serious about it."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 983
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (28 total)
lawman11
This space for rent.
02:55 PM on 11/16/2011
Who was the last Iowa Caucus winner to win the White House?
Cause I can't remember one. Might it be because the people of Iowa in no way reflect the views and politics of the rest of the country?
08:03 PM on 11/16/2011
The last Iowa caucus winner to win the white house? That would be Obama. The last Republican to win the Iowa caucus and get the white house was George W. Bush. Also the last Republican to win the white house. So it actually is very important.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:49 PM on 11/16/2011
romney=obama=bush= more debt and war. Paul in 12'.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:46 PM on 11/16/2011
This is the not-story they run? But no story on the Only actual poll done which was released yesterday. Not an online 'poll' that media's been using to promote the has-been 'newt', but a real poll. Why the silence? http://www­.bloomberg­.com/news/­2011-11-15­/romney-tw­o-way-race­-is-now-fo­ur-way-rep­ublican-de­ad-heat-in­-iowa-cauc­uses.html
02:34 PM on 11/16/2011
This article wrong states that the most recent candidate to "catch fire" in Iowa is Newt Gingrich. The article totally ignores Ron Paul, who, in the most recent Bloomberg Iowa poll, came in AHEAD of both Romney AND Gingrich at 19%!

Romney would have a very hard time matching conservative credentials with Ron Paul.
photo
scottishboy
Born in the USA!
02:25 PM on 11/16/2011
I'd put my money on Mitt, if he doesn't win the nomination, I'd be shocked.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:46 PM on 11/16/2011
his numbers haven't moved since he announced. Only Paul's numbers are growing.
photo
scottishboy
Born in the USA!
03:27 PM on 11/16/2011
I know. Conservatives don't like Mitt that much. However, they will vote for him and do it gladly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
opinioned1
MADAM president 2016
02:05 PM on 11/16/2011
Iowa politics have become a joke. Who ever wins Iowa, wins nothing.....
01:58 PM on 11/16/2011
YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!!!

During the Presidenti­al campaign of 2000, war with Iraq was not mentioned.

But when Bush gained the Presidency­, the first priority was the invasion and subjection of Iraq.

And we know now how it all turned out. More than 4,000 American troops dead; another 30,000 wounded, some so seriously that they neve will recover; and more than a trillion dollars spent.

And still arguments remain as to just why we invaded and occupied Iraq.

AND IT'S HAPPENING AGAIN.

As Campaign 2012 unfolds, we are learning that should Mitt Romney become President, the United States will attack Iran. Unlike Bush, he's made his plans perfectly clear.

http://201­2.republic­an-candida­tes.org/Ro­mney/Iran.­php

And please note that Romney's foreign policy advisers are neocons, many of whom served during the Bush Administra­tion and who continue to support a doctrine of preemptive attack.

Of course, Romney being Romney, he surrounds his plans with a hail of whofors and whatifs and whome's but they fail to mask his clear preference for war for anyone paying attention.

Keep in mind:

Iran is no Iraq. It is no Afghanista­n. And it is no Pakistan. It's much, much more.

An attack on Iran by the United States would have unintended consequenc­es beyond measure.
These should be understood and reflected upon by anyone advocating that path.

But in any case, you have been warned . . . this time.
photo
pursang
Corporate Criminals Playing with Tanks
02:34 PM on 11/16/2011
Just like Nixon's minions haunted this country for decades so will Bush's. The fact that there is another Bush in the wings and Poppy is still considered to be relevant makes it even worse. Since the Bush's are still around it gives them power behind the scenes and the crime family is never one to let something that doesn't benefit them to happen.

Agree 100% that the next time a Republican sits in the White House that Iran will be invaded. I think that's part of the reason why the huge embassy sits in Iraq as well as the semi-permanent military bases. The goal of the 1% is forever war because that's what the rich are, war profiteers and war makes them smile because it puts dollars in their pocket.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stephen McAbee
Clowns to the left of me, Jokers to the right.
05:26 PM on 11/16/2011
I'd be more concerned about Obama's(and Romney's) aggressive behavior towards China.

And please note that OBAMA'S foreign policy advisers are neocons, many of whom served during the Bush Administra­­tion and who continue to support a doctrine of preemptive attack.
george6090
America can be better
01:48 PM on 11/16/2011
Translation: Spend money here, now. It does not matter that Iowa often does not choose the eventual nominee, just spend the money here. Promise us everything we want and that you will take care of us if and when you are President. For now, spend the money on ads, here, tour here, sleep here, have reporters and staff here, spending money. That is all we really want, the money. Once the caucus is done, we know you will not be coming back, that is why Iowa needs to be first. Come on, spend the loot here, now.
Thank you, Gov. Terry Branstad(not really the gov posting this, just in case someone cannot figure that out).
01:47 PM on 11/16/2011
IS IT JUST ME OR DO IOWA VOTERS HAVE A PRIMA DONNA ATTITUDE??

If/When I figure out who I think would be the best person in the 2012 election, the fact that he/she didn't make even ONE personal appearance in my town to 'pay court' wouldn't sway my vote ONE BIT.

I can't imagine why ANY voter would put their own ego over concern for their country. It just makes no sense..... Am I missing something??
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:27 PM on 11/16/2011
Sounds like posturing and self-promotion to me. Just look at Michele Bachmann and her win in the straw poll in Iowa. That doesn't even get her on the bus anymore, without the full fare.
01:24 PM on 11/16/2011
I have family in Iowa, and think it's an interesting state, but the power they weld at the expense of the other 49 states is appalling. I saw it first-hand when I visited family in the fall of 2007. I opened the local paper and found an entire section devoted to the campaign stops of the canidates. I went and saw Obama in a high school auditorium the next day. It was wonderful, speaking directly with candidates, asking questions, getting real response and not newsbites. Why am I not allowed to do that in my home state? Why does being from Iowa make you vote more special than mine?

I have lived in 5 states, and on only one occasion have I ever heard of a local campaign stop (not including $500 a plate fundraisers) being done by a major canidate for president during the primaries. It's not fair and Iowa needs to let the rest of the country have their say too.
02:10 PM on 11/16/2011
People actually live in Iowa ? WOW, I thought the place was nothing but dirt farms and a few toothless farmers with sister/wives and mongrel children wearing overalls.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stephen McAbee
Clowns to the left of me, Jokers to the right.
05:27 PM on 11/16/2011
If not for the long primary process that starts with smaller states, Obama would not be president.
01:22 PM on 11/16/2011
If Romney ends up as the GOP nominee, I doubt anti-Obamites in Iowa would refuse to vote for him because he didn't spend enough time or money in their state.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mrm3
01:12 PM on 11/16/2011
A lot of people are trying to lambast Iowa on here saying "it doesn't matter" "who cares about Iowa"

Well... I've lived elsewhere but I'm a native Iowan. Iowa is solidly purple in its politics, progressive in social policy (gay marriage anyone? some of the best schools in the nation? leader in civil rights for 100+ years? Yes we are)

Also, Iowa represents every aspect of American society and culture -- we have huge financial institutions and small family farms. We have a lot of atheists, a lot of Christians, and a lot of Muslims (Cedar Rapids was the single largest center for Arab-Americans until maybe 50 years ago).

I could go on. Point is that Iowa is absolutely a bellweather for all of the USA. As goes Iowa goes the entire country.

Try making that connection with California, NY, etc (I've lived in both states). The coasts are essentially populated narcissistic delusional Americans who have no idea what the other 90% of the landmass senses and feels. Iowa provides that and therefore has a rightful place as first in the country.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stacy Marston
47% - Representation without taxation
01:24 PM on 11/16/2011
So what? You are still one state out of 50. If candidates tried to spend even half the time they spend in Iowa campaigning in every single one of those 50 staters, they would have to campaign 27 hours a day, 7 days a week, for a year just to hit every state.

You guys aren't that special. Its time for you to get over yourselves. And you can take your ethanol crap and shove it where the sun doesn't shine. The ONLY reason why we even subsidize the ethanol boondoggles is because every member of Congress secretely cherishes the hope of one day running for President, and they know they can't go to Iowa hat in hand looking for votes after saying NO to ethanol subsidies.

In 2008 Huckabee won the Iowa caucus. How'd that work out for him? Oh yeah, he lost the nomination. So much for "bellweather" state.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Stephen Stafford
Be the answer to somebody's prayer!
04:12 PM on 11/16/2011
Yoo hoo! Very nice native son (or daughter) boosterism.

You did everything but address the Governor's attempted shakedown of Romney for some of that campaign moolah.

You did have time to dilute or diminish your nicely made point, by bashing other places. You may be a novice at the boosterism thing. The idea is to point out the positives of your place without seeming to do it, and avoid making others upset by saying nasty things about someplace else.

In essence you end up saying only Iowans know what's going on because people in other places are too stuck on themselves and crazy to figure it out. Not a falttering way to represent.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:10 PM on 11/16/2011
HEre's the thing...even that won't help him. The American people do not want Obama Light.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Adam of CA
Independent Information Hunter
01:07 PM on 11/16/2011
Iowa being first means they'll be the last to see who gets nominated at the 2012 Republican convention. Being first has its drawbacks. The major shortcoming of voting first is that you're ignored for the rest of the long 2012 campaign.