More

Jerry Sandusky Interview With Bob Costas Could Haunt Him At Trial

Sandusky Interview

MARK SCOLFORO, MARYCLAIRE DALE and GENARO C. ARMAS   11/15/11 11:15 PM ET   AP

STATE COLLEGE, Pa. — A former Penn State graduate assistant cited by a grand jury report as claiming he saw an ex-assistant football coach sexually abusing a young boy in a campus locker room shower says in an email he made sure the act was stopped and then went to police – contradicting what the report says.

Mike McQueary's comments, in an email made available to The Associated Press on Tuesday, appeared to add more confusion to a scandal that has enveloped the university and resulted in the firing of head coach Joe Paterno, the ousting of president Graham Spanier and charges of perjury against the athletic director and a senior vice president.

McQueary, now the football team's wide receivers coach, told a friend from Penn State that he made sure the 2002 shower assault he witnessed was stopped and went to the police about it. The friend made McQueary's email, written Nov. 8, available to the AP on Tuesday on the condition he not be identified.

McQueary, who has been placed on administrative leave and did not coach in Saturday's 17-14 loss to Nebraska, wrote: "I did stop it, not physically ... but made sure it was stopped when I left that locker room ... I did have discussions with police and with the official at the university in charge of police .... no one can imagine my thoughts or wants to be in my shoes for those 30-45 seconds ... trust me."

Added McQueary: "Do with this what you want ... but I am getting hammered for handling this the right way ... or what I thought at the time was right ... I had to make tough impacting quick decisions."

According to the grand jury report, McQueary testified he spoke to his father and then to Paterno before speaking to athletic director Tim Curley and senior vice president Gary Schultz, who oversaw campus police. Paterno has not been charged with any crime, and state prosecutors have said he is not a target. Curley and Schultz are accused of breaking the law by not going to police but maintain their innocence.

McQueary's actions also have been scrutinized, with some critics suggesting he didn't do enough after witnessing what he said was the sexual abuse of a child. Emails to McQueary from the AP were not immediately answered Tuesday.

McQueary's remarks in the email to his friend came less than a day after former assistant coach Jerry Sandusky's admission that he showered with and "horsed around" with boys stunned legal observers. Sandusky's comments, they said, could be used by prosecutors trying to convict him of child sex abuse charges.

Experts in criminal law and crisis management questioned Sandusky's decision to give a TV interview in which he said that there was no abuse and that any activities in a campus shower with a boy were just horseplay, not molestation.

"Mr. Sandusky goes on worldwide television and admits he did everything the prosecution claims he did, except for the ultimate act of rape or sodomy? If I were a prosecutor, I'd be stunned," said Lynne Abraham, the former district attorney of Philadelphia. "I was stunned, and then I was revolted."

Abraham, who led a grand jury probe involving 63 accused priests from the Philadelphia archdiocese, was retained this week to lead an internal investigation of Sandusky's charity, The Second Mile, from which he's accused of culling his victims.

Sandusky is charged with abusing eight boys over the span of 15 years. He told NBC on Monday that he is not a pedophile but should not have showered with boys.

"I could say that I have done some of those things. I have horsed around with kids. I have showered after workouts. I have hugged them, and I have touched their legs without intent of sexual contact," Sandusky said Monday on NBC News' "Rock Center." "I am innocent of those charges."

When NBC's Bob Costas asked him whether he was sexually attracted to underage boys, Sandusky replied: "Sexually attracted, no. I enjoy young people. I love to be around them. But, no, I'm not sexually attracted to young boys."

Sandusky apparently decided to talk to Costas by phone Monday at the last minute, with the blessing of his attorney, Joseph Amendola, who was in the studio.

What was especially astonishing about Sandusky's interview was when he stumbled over the question about whether he was sexually attracted to children, said crisis management expert Eric Dezenhall, who runs a Washington consulting firm.

"That may not be legal proof that he's guilty, but it is certainly not helpful, to struggle with the question," Dezenhall said.

The state grand jury investigation that led to Sandusky's arrest followed a trail that goes back at least 13 years, leading to questions from some quarters about whether law enforcement moved too slowly.

The grand jury report detailed a 1998 investigation by Penn State police, begun after an 11-year-old boy's mother complained that Sandusky had showered with her son in the football facilities. Then-District Attorney Ray Gricar declined to file charges.

Another missed opportunity came in 2002, the grand jury said, when then-graduate assistant McQueary told Paterno that he had witnessed Sandusky sodomizing a boy in the team's showers.

The case apparently took on new urgency three years ago, when a woman complained to officials at her local school district that Sandusky had sexually assaulted her son. School district officials banned Sandusky from school grounds and contacted police, leading to an investigation by state police, the attorney general's office and a grand jury.

Gov. Tom Corbett took the case on a referral from the Centre County district attorney, Michael Madeira, in early 2009 while he was serving as attorney general.

Maderia said he referred the report to state prosecutors because of an "indirect connection" to Sandusky's family, but he declined to specify his tie to the Sandusky family.

Corbett bristled Tuesday when asked whether it was fair for people to criticize the pace of the probe.

"People that are saying that are ill-informed as to how investigations are conducted, how witnesses are developed, how backup information, corroborative information is developed, and they really don't know what they're talking about," he told reporters.

The attorney general's office declined to comment on the pace of the investigation.

The Patriot-News of Harrisburg reported Monday that only one trooper was assigned to the case after the state took it over in 2009. It wasn't until Corbett became governor early this year that his former investigations supervisor in the attorney general's office, Frank Noonan, became state police commissioner and put seven more investigators on it, the newspaper said.

Noonan's spokeswoman, Maria Finn, said Tuesday that manpower was increased in the case this year, but she could not confirm the numbers reported by the newspaper.

"The investigation, at the time, was gaining momentum," Finn said. "There were more leads. There were more things to do at that point. It's not that the state police weren't doing anything and Noonan comes in and changes things."

With the case now drawing global media attention and potential civil litigants watching from the sidelines, Sandusky went on the offensive in the NBC interview.

Criminal defense lawyer Mark Geragos, who represented O.J. Simpson and other celebrity defendants, said he would "knock my client over the head with a two-by-four before I would let them do it, but it cuts both ways."

"If prosecutors use it, it can end up being testimony without cross examination," he said.

He called the Penn State case an unusual case that may call for unusual tactics, given the "instantaneous uproar to convict the guy."

The New York Times reported Tuesday night that Paterno transferred full ownership of his house to his wife, Sue, for $1 in July. The couple had previously held joint ownership of the house. Paterno's attorney Wick Sollers told the paper in an e-mail that the transfer had nothing to do with the scandal but was part of an ongoing "multiyear estate planning program."

Penn State's trustees have hired the public relations firm Ketchum, which through corporate communications director Jackie Burton said only that "the details of all our client assignments are confidential."

Paterno, who authorities say fulfilled his legal responsibilities, has hired Washington lawyer Wick Sollers.

Also Tuesday, lawyers for Schultz and Curley issued a statement in which they said it was "a travesty" that prosecutors sought to delay their clients' preliminary hearing until next month.

"Mr. Curley and Mr. Schultz are anxious to face their accusers, clear their good names and go on with their lives," attorneys Caroline Roberto and Tom Farrell said.

The attorney general's office declined to comment on that.

Sandusky's next court date is Dec. 7, when he is due for a preliminary hearing in which a judge would determine if there's enough evidence for prosecutors to move forward with the case.

___

Dale reported from Philadelphia. Scolforo reported from Harrisburg, Pa. AP College Football Writer Ralph D. Russo in New York contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SPORTS

STATE COLLEGE, Pa. — A former Penn State graduate assistant cited by a grand jury report as claiming he saw an ex-assistant football coach sexually abusing a young boy in a campus locker room sh...
STATE COLLEGE, Pa. — A former Penn State graduate assistant cited by a grand jury report as claiming he saw an ex-assistant football coach sexually abusing a young boy in a campus locker room sh...
Filed by Michael Klopman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:23 PM on 11/16/2011
The only thing NBC wanted was ratings. The only thing Sandusky's lawyer wanted was to sway public opinion. The whole thing was nothing more than a circus. The only thing missing was the white Ford Bronco.
photo
robXdion
Because someone has to say it.
08:57 AM on 11/16/2011
Sandusky's lawyer may have had him do this interview on purpose so they'll have grounds for an appeal later. The interview can be cited as influencing potential jurors against his client.
08:44 AM on 11/16/2011
There is an interesting "twist" that was reported on CNN. Penn State is exempt from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's "Right to Know" law, despite the fact that Penn State is a state university recieving commonwealth funding. That means that police reports about actions that occur on campus are NOT accessible under what amounts to a "sunshine law'. in 2007, when the legislature was considering dropping the exception, PS's president lobbied successfully to MAINTAIN the exception, claiming high administrative costs....that means that the police documents concerning "incidents' are not accessible (yet).

Thus, the mother that went to her local school district, who then promply banned Sandusky and then promptly reported it to the State, looped around the Isolated Island of Privilege that Penn State had created.... and, given the "who knew what when" stuff that is now going on, the President's actions look - "suspicious".

and, it confirms the "halo of specialness' that Penn State shrouded itself in, an environment in which the appalling antics of Sandusky can be swept under the rug where, hopefully, they will just go away.
07:30 AM on 11/16/2011
You couldn't make up this script if you were doing a bad B-movie on a tight budget. Famous coach, pedophile; district attorney investigator, disappears; grand jury investigation; witnesses talking; conspirators fired; underage boys now grown and coming forward; coach's wife supposedly knowing nothing; and for how long did the perpetrator fool his adoring public? Since 1977 at least, when he created the magnet for young vulnerable boys as his pool of predation, Second whatever charity. And the latest, Sandusky in an interview stumbling over a simple "yes" or "no" question proffered by Costas: Do you find young boys sexually attractive? DOH! I'd say the handwriting is on the wall, but then you never know any more.
11:33 PM on 11/15/2011
McQueary is just trying to do damage control so that he can one day be the head coach at Penn State. This was the same motivation that led him to NOT report the incident in the first place. In my opinion, every coach that worked with Sandusky must be fired in order for the program to regain any integrity.
08:28 AM on 11/16/2011
at this stage, unless there is remarkable testimony that emerges during the trial, McQueary could not coach a pickup game on a dirt lot on the weekends....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Earl Davis
As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly.
11:28 PM on 11/15/2011
The only attacks McQueary is trying to stop are the ones from his peers and his conscience.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kritikos
Intelligence is not a science
11:10 PM on 11/15/2011
Granting this fellow a public forum at this time is repulsive. Costas should make better use of his airtime.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:58 PM on 11/15/2011
That e-mail he sent to his friend is just damage control.
photo
PatA
Pink is a 4 letter word
08:16 PM on 11/15/2011
When you find yourself in a hole, you don't ask for a longer shovel.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rebecca Mocciaro
08:14 PM on 11/15/2011
why did the Grand Jury leave that part out, that McQueary stopped the attack? Or is that what McQueary is telling himself he did now? Why not call 911? I'll say that again...why not call 911?
07:58 AM on 11/16/2011
He didn't physically stop the attack, but he claims he called the police. If he did, wouldn't it have been in the indictment? Also, according to reports, Sandusky was on a recruiting trip a year ago, and was on campus a few weeks ago. Wouldn't McQueary (among others) notice that this man is still present, and ask questions/follow through? This e-mail holds no weight, in my opinion.
08:48 AM on 11/16/2011
and, according to CNN's rather precise reporting on the subject this morning, Penn State is excluded from Pennsylvania;'s "right to know" law, which means that the police reports of "incidents" are not available. This only increases the finger pointing of who knew what when....

I'm not defending McQueary, far from it... but it is possible that he called the cops. It is also possible that in his currently lawyered up state, he may understand the implications of the exemption from what amounts to a "sunshine law" and CLAIMS to have contacted the Penn State cops, knowing that he cannot be proved wrong.
02:44 PM on 11/16/2011
Sort of. McQueary is telling the truth but it's presented in a different manner than what the indictment says. According to the indictment, McQueary called Paterno who in turn called Curley and Schultz. About a week later, McQueary had a meeting with Curley and Schultz in which he described the incident. These two then told him that the incident would be handled. Schultz oversees University police.

By the way, McQueary never says he called police in the e-mail. He said he had discussions with the police. By talking with Schultz he is having "discussions with the police." Schultz, in his testimony, claimed that he alerted "the child protection agency."

McQueary assumed that by talking to Schultz he was talking with police. However, Schultz was only the representative of the campus police not a member of the police organization itself. Schultz never reported to the actual police. Schultz is in fact now being charged with perjury and failure to report child abuse.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
shryock
It never is what it is anymore
08:13 AM on 11/16/2011
According to the grand jury report, McQueary was "shocked but noticed that both victim2 and Sandusky saw him. The graduate student left immediately, distraught. The graduate assistant went to his office and called his father. . . ." The report continues with a full description of McQueary's actions, and at no point does it mention McQueary stopping the attack or speaking to the police about the attack.
07:56 PM on 11/15/2011
Trial, what trial? The lawyer is a sleeze ball. where in PA can Sandusky get a fair trial?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
shryock
It never is what it is anymore
08:08 AM on 11/16/2011
Sandusky can request a change of venue, and likely get one.
Evidently, he could request a less "sleaze-ball"-ish lawyer as well, but likes the one he has.
So, then whose fault is it if he does not get a fair trial?
Who chose his lawyer?