iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Newt Gingrich Freddie Mac Fees: Former House Speaker Reportedly Received At Least $1.6 Million From Housing Giant

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 11/16/2011 5:51 am Updated: 11/16/2011 10:17 am

In recent months, GOP presidential candidate Newt Gingrich has strongly criticized Freddie Mac and sister company Fannie Mae, as well as Democrats in Congress that he claims played a key role in the collapse of the housing market. And yet two former Freddie Mac officials recently told Bloomberg that Gingrich made between $1.6 million and $1.8 million in consulting fees from the mortgage company.

That amount is significantly larger than the $300,000 payment that Gingrich was asked about during a Republican presidential debate on Nov. 9.

The Freddie Mac officials also told Bloomberg that Gingrich was asked to build bridges with Capitol Hill Republicans and help sell the mortgage company's public-private structure to conservatives.

While campaigning in Iowa this week, the former House Speaker disputed these claims.

"I do no lobbying of any kind, and I offered strategic advice and that's all I do," Gingrich said. "I don't go to the Hill. I don't lobby in any way. I haven't for the years I've left the speakership, period."

In a discussion with HuffPost's Jon Ward Tuesday, Gingrich made similar claims.

"I have no idea what the dates were. I offered strategic advice over a period of time. I did no lobbying of any kind. And I'm very happy to offer people strategic advice if they come and ask my advice," he said.

Gingrich also spoke favorably about the purpose of government sponsored enterprises such as Freddie Mac, but provided a caveat.

"I personally think there are circumstances where government sponsored enterprises are legitimate," Gingrich told Ward. "You go back and look at the transcontinental railroad, you look at rural electric co-ops -- there are a lot of ways to organize activity in this country. So I was quite happy to talk about the GSEs, which was the question. But once you got into a cycle where people were literally giving mortgages to people with no credit at all, you don't have to be much of a historian to know that's not sustainable."

During his eight years working with Freddie Mac, Gingrich's primary contact was Mitchell Delk, the company's chief lobbyist. According to Bloomberg, Gingrich was allegedly paid a monthly retainer of $25,000 to $30,000 between 1999 and 2002 for consulting with Freddie Mac executives on a program to expand home ownership. Delk later pitched that very idea to the Bush administration.

In the Nov. 9 debate, Gingrich said he warned Freddie Mac about its lending practices: "I offered advice. My advice as an historian when they walked in and said we are now making loans to people that have no credit history and have no record of paying back anything but that’s what the government wants us to do. I said at the time, this is a bubble. This is insane. This is impossible."

However, one source reportedly told Bloomberg that Gingrich gave positive feedback on Freddie Mac's plans to publicly pledge to issue subordinated debt, manage liquidity, undergo capital stress tests and expand various types of risk disclosures. Gingrich also said these moves would enable Freddie Mac to demonstrate benefits to the taxpayer, the source claimed.

For his second contract with Freddie Mac, Gingrich allegedly received a $600,000 retainer. But what he did for that money is highly debated. Gingrich claims he offered the company "advice on precisely what they didn't do."

None of the former Freddie Mac officials who spoke to Bloomberg said Gingrich raised the issue of the housing bubble or was critical of Freddie Mac's business model.

R.C. Hammond, a Gingrich campaign spokesman, disputed the sources' claims.

"Newt did have a series of contracts with Freddie Mac over a period of many years, during which he was paid to give strategic advice," Hammond told Bloomberg.

The slideshow below has more details on Newt Gingrich:
Nearing The End?
1  of  26
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
Speaking the day before the Delaware primary, Gingrich hinted he was considering ending his presidential run:

"I think we need to take a deep look at what we are doing," Gingrich said in an interview with NBC News during a campaign stop in Delaware. "We will be in North Carolina tomorrow night and we will look and see what the results are."

According to NBC, the former House speaker said he would need to "reassess" based on the results of Tuesday's primary in Delaware, a state where Gingrich has spent a great deal of time campaigning in recent weeks. Gingrich indicated that the state's 17 delegates were crucial to his viability as a candidate.
FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5,110
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (126 total)
10:46 AM on 12/01/2011
So, from what I can tell...Newt worked for Freddie Mac and they paid him for his services. What's the BFD??
photo
Just Ask Jheri
Tomorrow is a mystery, and today is a gift.
12:19 PM on 11/22/2011
Gingrich could not remember how much money he received from Freddie Mac.
I guess if you are irresponsible enough to spend $500,000 at Tiffany's, then
you probably would not remember a measly $1.6 million in income from Freddie Mac.
01:01 PM on 11/20/2011
Where is the consulting report? We'd like to see.
10:17 PM on 11/18/2011
Whats a Mil. here or there anyway. Dam I hope I have enough money to buy gas, to get to work.
03:47 PM on 11/18/2011
Newt gave advice as an historian to Freddie Mac? How interesting. The title of his 1971 dissertation is "Belgian Education Policy in the Congo, 1945-1960.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l78lancer
Wisdom is the principal thing
09:14 PM on 11/17/2011
At $25-30k a month it off the taxpayer dole explains how he can afford a $500k line of credit for jewelery.

I'm not sure if this is a form of high-level welfare or just plain theft.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l78lancer
Wisdom is the principal thing
09:07 PM on 11/17/2011
Down through the years Gingrich has gone relentlessly after the oppotion in some cases for far less than what he's being implicated in now. He went after Former House Speaker Jim Wright over a questionalble book deal, resulting in Wright's resignation. Yet, he sees no impropriety in these activities.

And this man wants to be our president?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
AxelDC
11:37 AM on 11/17/2011
The minute one of the unRomneys start to gather steam, their past resurfaces. Gingrinch has such a notorious past that he couldn't last long. Meanwhile, Romney can't convince 3/4 of his party to vote for him.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:26 AM on 11/17/2011
so clearly Newt is of the 1%.

And he is so because of tax dollars....

That makes him a HUGE welfare Queen.

come on repubs, defend this one....
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
AxelDC
10:41 AM on 11/17/2011
This is a typical Republican approach to government: bemoan "greedy" government works like the Phd who makes $75k a year to run the nuclear regulatory program, and then hire consultants who charge $1.5 m for their "expertise".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rneigh9880
"They call me Mr. Friendly"
10:28 AM on 11/17/2011
I know you libs believe that he should have gone on unemployment, or welfare, or gotten some other form of government subsidy, but what he did was perfectly legal. As if you wouldn't have done it yourself if you could.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:30 AM on 11/17/2011
legal, but disingenuous, because he is critical of the same agency he got money to help.....

and to me, he is nothing more than a welfare queen anyway....

folks work their lives in public service for low pay, and people on your side want to use the huge power of government to strip pensions that these folks EARNED, and yet you are ok with Newt taking 1.6 million of taxpayer dollars......
09:02 AM on 11/17/2011
Wait just a cotton pick'n minute: Gingrich was paid as a "consultant," and it is perfectly legal for him to receive money for services rendered. The difference between Gingrich being paid for services rendered, and those who gave billions of taxpayer money to a KNOWN FAILING COMPANY, is like comparing not just apples and oranges, but apples and rocks.
Newt Gingrich was HIRED by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, to help get them out of the financial mess they were in, because Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae recognized that they were on a sinking ship. More than once Gingrich told them, as a HIRED CONSULTANT, that the company needed to stop doing what they were doing, or risk going under. That is called good advice! Yet, Barney Frank and Chris Dodd continued to claim that there were no problems with Freddie Mac, and Fannie Mae, even though both of them knew that that was a LIE! WHY IS THERE NOT A COMPLETE (ALL MEDIA COVERAGE) ABOUT THE INCOMPETENCE OF BARNEY FRANK AND CHRIS DODD, and as to whether there has been politcal pay back concerning this matter? Hmmmm? I wonder.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
AxelDC
11:08 AM on 11/17/2011
But Gingrinch will complain that VA doctors are overpaid making $65k a year.
12:36 PM on 11/17/2011
Could you please show me the facts that back that statement...I really want to know.
But, when the likes of Michael Moore, Alex Baldwin, Rosanne Barr, Janine Garoffalo, Harrison Ford, Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie, and other (stars..ha ha) can make millions of dollars just by speaking lines from a script, you probably think that might be OK.....Especially if they are the ones who go down to Wall Street and supposedly stand with the protestors.
Yet, the protestors refuse to protest where the problem really is......The White House, the Senate and the House of Representatives. As long as you are making this study of facts.....google the N17 group. You will find who is really in charge of the protestors.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:33 AM on 11/17/2011
half of what you said is made up...

he was a paid lobbyist, NOT a financial consultant....

and still you want to ignore all the banking fraud and derivative bets that tanked our economy...

but you are so a tool of the rich, you can't see beyond a government program to back the loans that the bankers committed fraud with....
02:28 PM on 11/17/2011
Let me explain something to you in easier terms that you might understand. If I am a tool for the rich, then why have my husband and I been living on LESS THAN $28,000 a year for the last 25 years. Huh? Oh, and by the way, our 3600 sq. ft. home is completely paid for, we owe nothing on credit cards, we owe no bank loans, our 3 vehicles (2007-2009-2010) are completely paid for. We both have college educations, 3 married daughters, 5 grandchildren, and one great grandchild. We attend church every week, support our church, and give to several charities. We have two grandsons in Afghanistan fighting for your right to live in this country and run up all the bills you want, and then complain about not getting enough. So please do not take it upon yourself to tell me that I am a tool of the rich. Oh, and did I mention that I was born and raised in the South, love my family and my neighbors, and am a very conservative Conservative. IT IS CALLED A WORK ETHIC!
08:06 AM on 11/17/2011
I did not think Repbs. did that kinda stuff. I see on the news that ole Snooty will be here today & then H. Cain will be here tomorrow. Guess I will miss them, got too much to do around the house.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeramie Shebester
Corporations are people.
07:37 AM on 11/17/2011
Gingrich was a consultant, he told them to get out of the business of giving loans to people that couldn't afford to pay them back. No hypocrisy there. Why not pay some women to accuse him of sexual harassment? That smear seems to work much better. This is all because Obama is terrified of Gingrich, he knows that he would get destroyed in a debate, Gingrich would sound like a professor compared to Obama's, "Uhh, hmmm, uhhhh, well, you know, uhhhh, er, ummmmm, hope takes time."
photo
most reasonable
GOP Talking Points is Fodder for Fools
09:12 AM on 11/17/2011
Say hello to the latest Bum-of-the-Month.
The Newt.

It's great being a Republican supporter, it comes with an automatic reflux control. The potential "candidates" are still lining up for your attentions. Expecting you will swallow anything.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:43 AM on 11/17/2011
Freddy Mac did NOT lend people money, they guaranteed the bank loans, which were fraudulent, and tanked the economy....

so right away, we know you know nothing.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeramie Shebester
Corporations are people.
06:51 PM on 11/17/2011
Technically you are correct if you want to nitpick. No, they do not directly loan money to home buyers, but when the home loans that they guarantee go bad there is very little difference in the end result. And those banks wouldn't have made many of those loans to begin with if the Clinton regime hadn't threatened to investigate banks that didn't loan enough money to broke people. There is no getting around the fact that big government liberal intervention into the economy directly caused the crash.
06:32 AM on 11/17/2011
Why does this surprise anyone? Gingrich is the consummate hypocrite. In his political career, he has tirelessly condemned others for the very same activities and practices that he has been personally involved in. Since Karl Rove is not running and considering all of the announced GOP candidates, I really think Newt best represents current Republican Party principles and valves. He deserves to gets the nomination.