iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Iran Nuclear Program: Russia, West Agree On Iran Text

GEORGE JAHN   11/17/11 02:58 PM ET   AP

VIENNA — The U.N. atomic agency's new resolution on Iran criticizes Tehran's nuclear defiance but, in a concession to Russia and China, does not set an ultimatum for allowing a probe of its alleged secret work on atomic weapons.

The document, obtained by The Associated Press, is expected to be circulated and voted on Friday by the International Atomic Energy Agency's 35-nation board.

It had been eagerly awaited as a signal of how harshly Iran would be treated for ignoring both IAEA and U.N. Security Council demands that it stop activities that could be used to make nuclear arms and allow the agency to probe its alleged secret weapons work.

The resolution was also an indication that the six world powers at the forefront of trying to engage Iran on cooperating with the international community on its nuclear program had surmounted a difficult hurdle testing their unity.

The U.S. and its Western allies – Britain, France and Germany – had come to the meeting saying they were seeking a tough warning to the Islamic Republic to start cooperating or face renewed referral to the Security Council. But Russia and China were opposed to any harsh criticism or an overt time frame on Iran to act or face further punishment.

The text shared with the AP reflected compromise on both sides. It expressed "serious concern that Iran continues to defy the requirements and obligations contained in the relevant IAEA Board of Governors and UN Security Council Resolutions." It also spoke of "deep and increasing concern about the unresolved issues regarding the Iranian nuclear program, including those which need to be clarified to exclude the existence of possible military dimensions."

"Serious concern," and "deep and increasing concern" are strong terms in the diplomatic world. At the same time, the text had no reference to Security Council referral if Tehran remained defiant, although two Western diplomats said that could still happen at the next IAEA meeting in March.

Even though there's no reference to the Security Council, U.S. State Department spokesman Mark Toner said he was confident a "strong message" and a "unified message" was going to come out of the Board of Governors.

"We believe that it's going to send a very clear message to Iran that the Board of Governors and IAEA are very concerned and asking Iran to address those concerns," Toner said.

In opening comments to the meeting, IAEA chief Yukiya Amano also repeated his concerns "regarding possible military dimensions to Iran's nuclear program," saying such work may extend into the present.

The West had hoped that an unprecedented detailing of Iran's alleged secret weapons work contained in a restricted Nov. 8 IAEA report could sway Moscow and Beijing. For the first time, the agency said Iran was suspected of clandestine work that is "specific to nuclear weapons."

In comments to the closed meeting made available to reporters, Amano said his agency finds the information leading to such suspicions to be generally credible.

"The information indicates that Iran has carried out activities relevant to the development of a nuclear explosive device," he said. "It also indicates that, prior to the end of 2003, these activities took place under a structured program, and that some activities may still be ongoing."

Amano said he has written Iranian officials proposing that a high-level IAEA mission go to Tehran to try and jump-start his agency's stalled probe and is awaiting a reply.

Diplomats who spoke ahead of the meeting had said the U.S. and its allies were ready to push through a tough document, before ceding to Russian and Chinese pressure and accepting a watered down version that allows Iran to continue ignoring international demands.

Western diplomats defended the compromise Wednesday. One – who, like others, asked for anonymity in exchange for discussing the document – said the compromise text would likely be supported by almost all 35 board members with the probable exception of Cuba, which always votes against resolutions critical of Iran.

Wide support is crucial at board meetings, which strive to work by consensus, and the diplomat said such broad support will send a strong signal of world concern to Iran.

Avoiding a big power split along East-West lines is taking on increased urgency as Tehran advances in enriching uranium, which can be used for making weapons as well as fueling reactors.

Tehran denies hiding a weapons program and insists its enrichment activities are meant only as an energy source. But as Iran gets closer to bomb-making ability, Israel may opt to strike militarily rather than take the chance that its arch foe will possess nuclear weapons.

Israeli government officials have increased warnings that such a strike is being contemplated, and the U.S. also has refused to take that option off the table.

Israeli officials have suggested they could accept crippling Iran sanctions as an alternative to force. But despite four rounds of economic sanctions, the United Nations is being held back from tougher measures by Russia and China, both of them veto-wielding Security Council members and bound to Iran by strategic and economic interests.

The State Department's Toner said the U.S. was "looking and consulting with our partners around the world on ways that we can strengthen the existing sanctions against Iran and take additional measures, additional steps, to increase pressure."

___

Matthew Lee in Washington contributed to this story.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

VIENNA — The U.N. atomic agency's new resolution on Iran criticizes Tehran's nuclear defiance but, in a concession to Russia and China, does not set an ultimatum for allowing a probe of its alle...
VIENNA — The U.N. atomic agency's new resolution on Iran criticizes Tehran's nuclear defiance but, in a concession to Russia and China, does not set an ultimatum for allowing a probe of its alle...
Filed by Eline Gordts  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 54
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
02:32 PM on 11/25/2011
Its silly to think that the United States can get Russia and China to agree to sanctions against the Iranian government, when Iran is supplying high grade oil and gas to China and Russia. Fact of the matter is that the Russians are providing the Iranians with the technology to build their nuclear facilities.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Mighty Cynic
01:53 PM on 11/18/2011
Hilarious. Each time Russia and China agree to anything, it's because the move is in their favor and against US interests. The only reason they agreed to sanctions the last time was to further eliminate Western investment into Iran's economy, the 17th strongest in the world, one above Turkey's, and not composed of oil revenues by majority -- even with sanctions.

This time, they're agreeing to it because it creates a situation now where all Iran has to do is implement the Russian-Iran stepwise strategy to "reassuring" the West that it's Israeli-created fictional nightmares are not real. In that process, Iran follows a milestone/timeline process where specific requests are made and answered. This protects Iran's sovereignty and military secrets while giving the West a tummy rub and warm milk to ease their nerves.
10:32 AM on 11/18/2011
for some real reporting on the issue... "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxLeLRuoS7g"
ElCojonuo
I believe in WISDOM
08:13 AM on 11/18/2011
BO, I know your trying to look tough before the election because your domestic policies aren't doin so well ; but please, stop it already with the Iran thing.
If they want nukes they're gonna get them, it's in Russia's and China's best interest for them to have them ( as a balance to Israel's nukes ).
C'on guy, come home and find jobs for the folks and the kids in the 18 to 24 age group; we need tax payers.
This guy's exasperatin'.
photo
Talab
I tot i taw a putty tat
07:10 AM on 11/18/2011
The same resolution could be rewritten with Israel in place of Iran and Passed at the same time too. The main differences in the wording would be that Iran has at least partially complied with the NPT and does allow inspections , Until Israel matches Irans record on the NPT and inspections they should just shut up about it ( not to mention Israel being subjected to the same sanctions until they do comply)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Okey Umez
Yes i. Babylon gwon fall
06:40 AM on 11/18/2011
Dont care much for the regime in Tehran, but does anyone really believe that Israel does not have nuclear weapons?. Please dont make the standard argument that says they need them as a deterrent from hostile neighbors. Any country can make that argument. The technology is out there and for sale. If a country is willing to blow up their GDP in order to acquire nuclear weapons, let them have at it. I dont recall anybody stopping China or Russia from acquiring nuclear weapons. Herman Cain would probably disagree with me on China.
06:22 AM on 11/18/2011
Why doesn't the USA and the rest of the hypocrites ask Israel to open up its Atomic programme for inspection? Why only Iran? Why the hypocrisy on the part of the so called IAEA?????

Ismail from Kenya.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Okey Umez
Yes i. Babylon gwon fall
06:21 AM on 11/18/2011
Please remember that we are not the only country in the world that look out for own interests.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cadawa
02:31 AM on 11/18/2011
A couple of very nasty, dirty pots, calling the kettle black.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles Queen
I am a disabled nam vet
11:34 PM on 11/17/2011
So in other words we are going to more or less kiss chinas and russia ass's for now.What a crock.I didn't want to launch an all out attack on Iran,just get everyone together and on board with the sanctions program is all for now.I don't know how accuraye this really is,some are calling it a hoax so I guess we will see
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
analyse this
Everything is temporary anyway
09:30 PM on 11/17/2011
As I've said before, The US, Russia and China will "agree" on a sanctions regime, albeit toothless. For the US, it's for the benefit of AIPAC (See, we're doing our best, give me campaign money!) For Russia and China, it's a way to get the US to stop pestering them; they have too much invested in Iran. Israel will continue to nag the US to do the bombing since more and more Israeli military and defense analysts are coming out saying they cannot do it on their own. What remains to be seen now is if the pro-Israel lobby can trump US strategic interests as it has before. The difference is the US is broke now and bogged down in other wars. Tough call...
08:51 PM on 11/17/2011
The IAEA report is a hoax. The sources of information are purposely hidden, and the facts and conclusions are wrong. Yukiya Amano is a puppet of the US. Former IAEA Inspector: Misleading Iran report proves nothing:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-PfuciW1us0
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdncommentator
12:35 AM on 11/18/2011
tamarariver is stolen fairwayhill
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Okey Umez
Yes i. Babylon gwon fall
06:17 AM on 11/18/2011
Of course it's a hoax, just like the one that said Sadam never had WMDs.
photo
tallen
panem et circenses
08:33 PM on 11/17/2011
Another exercise in uselessness by the UN.
08:03 PM on 11/17/2011
"Iran Nuclear Program: Russia, West Agree On Iran Text". This headline made me giggle. I have visions of Ban Ki-Moon and Vladimir Putin arguing over what text message they should send to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's cellphone.

I imagine this important diplomatic communique would be something like:

"Ur nukes totes uncool dawg, Y U h8in on Izrail? ps plz buy more Putin swag
07:20 PM on 11/17/2011
This has been a failure for Israel. A face saving resolution for US by Russians and Chinese.