iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change: Get Ready For Extreme Weather

SETH BORENSTEIN   11/18/11 03:40 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — Think of the Texas drought, floods in Thailand and Russia's devastating heat waves as coming attractions in a warming world. That's the warning from top international climate scientists and disaster experts after meeting in Africa.

The panel said the world needs to get ready for more dangerous and "unprecedented extreme weather" caused by global warming. These experts fear that without preparedness, crazy weather extremes may overwhelm some locations, making some places unlivable.

The Nobel Prize-winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change issued a special report on global warming and extreme weather Friday after meeting in Kampala, Uganda. This is the first time the group of scientists has focused on the dangers of extreme weather events such as heat waves, floods, droughts and storms. Those are more dangerous than gradual increases in the world's average temperature.

For example, the report predicts that heat waves that are now once-in-a-generation events will become hotter and happen once every five years by mid-century and every other year by the end of the century. And in some places, such as most of Latin America, Africa and a good chunk of Asia, they will likely become yearly bakings.

And the very heavy rainstorms that usually happen once every 20 years will happen far more frequently, the report said. In most areas of the U.S. and Canada, they are likely to occur three times as often by the turn of the century, if fossil fuel use continues at current levels. In Southeast Asia, where flooding has been dramatic, it is likely to happen about four times as often as now, the report predicts.

One scientist points to this year's drought and string of 100 degree days in Texas and Oklahoma, which set an all-time record for hottest month for any U.S. state this summer.

"I think of it as a wake-up call," said one of the study's authors, David Easterling, head of global climate applications for the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. "The likelihood of that occurring in the future is going to be much greater."

The report said world leaders have to prepare better for weather extremes.

"We need to be worried," said one of the study's lead authors, Maarten van Aalst, director of the International Red Cross/Red Crescent Climate Centre in the Netherlands. "And our response needs to anticipate disasters and reduce risk before they happen rather than wait until after they happen and clean up afterward. ... Risk has already increased dramatically."

Another study lead writer, Chris Field of Stanford University, said scientists aren't quite sure which weather disaster will be the biggest threat because wild weather interacts with economics and where people live. Society's vulnerability to natural disasters, aside from climate, has also increased, he said.

Field told The Associated Press in an interview that "it's clear that losses from disasters are increasing. And in terms of deaths, "more than 95 percent of fatalities from the 1970s to the present have been in developing countries," he said.

Losses are already high, running at as much as $200 billion a year, said Michael Oppenheimer of Princeton University, a study author.

Science has progressed so much in the last several years that scientists can now attribute the increase in many of these types of extreme weather events to global warming with increased confidence, said study author Thomas Stocker at the University of Bern.

Scientists were able to weigh their confidence of predictions of future climate disasters and heat waves were the most obvious. The report said it is "virtually certain" that heat waves are getting worse, longer and hotter, while cold spells are easing.

The report said there is at least a 2-in-3 chance that heavy downpours will increase, both in the tropics and northern regions, and from tropical cyclones.

The 29-page summary of the full report – which will be completed in the coming months – says that extremes could get so bad at some point that some regions may need to be abandoned.

Such locations are likely to be in poorer countries, van Aalst said in a telephone interview, but the middle class may be affected in those regions, which aren't specifically identified in the report. And even in some developed northern regions of the world, such as Canada, Russia and Greenland, cities might need to move because of weather extremes and sea level rise from man-made warming, he said.

In places like van Aalst's native Netherlands, citizens will have to learn how to handle new weather problems, in this case heat waves.

And it's not just the headline grabbing disasters like a Hurricane Katrina or the massive 2010 Russian heat wave that studies show were unlikely to happen without global warming. At the Red Cross/Red Crescent they are seeing "a particular pattern of rising risks" from smaller events, van Aalst said.

Of all the weather extremes that kill and cause massive damage, he said, the worst is flooding.

There's an ongoing debate in the climate science community about whether it is possible and fair to attribute individual climate disasters to manmade global warming. Usually meteorologists say it's impossible to link climate change to a specific storm or drought, but that such extremes are more likely in a future dominated by global warming.

Jerry North, a scientist at Texas A&M University who wasn't part of the study, said he thought the panel was being properly cautious in its projections and findings, especially since by definition climate extremes are uncommon events. MIT professor Kerry Emanuel thought the panel was being too conservative when it comes to tropical cyclones.

The panel was formed by the United Nations and World Meteorological Organization. In the past, it has discussed extreme events in snippets in its report. But this time, the scientists are putting them together.

The next major IPCC report isn't expected until the group meets in Stockholm in 2013.

___

Online:

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: http://www.ipcc.ch/

NOAA on weather extremes: http://1.usa.gov/sYQQRv

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON — Think of the Texas drought, floods in Thailand and Russia's devastating heat waves as coming attractions in a warming world. That's the warning from top international climate scient...
WASHINGTON — Think of the Texas drought, floods in Thailand and Russia's devastating heat waves as coming attractions in a warming world. That's the warning from top international climate scient...
Filed by James Gerken  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,935
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (48 total)
10:14 AM on 11/23/2011
The skies in Michigan look like China's did when we held the Olyempics there! Is their pollution reaching us? Or is it from Chemtrail spaying? We would like to see our Blue Skies again and know that we are not breathing pollution......
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:12 PM on 11/21/2011
BILL GATES $59 Billionaire, from his blog

“... scientists now pretty much agree that greenhouse gases are building up in the earth’s atmosphere as a result of human activity. There are many different measuremen­ts indicating that carbon dioxide levels have been rising since at least the 1950s and probably since the beginning of the industrial revolution­. From analysis of carbon isotopes and other things, scientists have identified industry as the source of most of this CO2. And everybody agrees that CO2 absorbs infrared radiation from the sun, which tends to produce a greenhouse effect.
“... Projection­s of future warming range from not too bad to catastroph­ic. Most scientists believe there’s at least a significan­t risk of serious warming unless we reduce CO2 emissions. In an editorial, The Economist argues that the risk is big enough to justify action.

"I agree, especially because even moderate warming could cause mass starvation and have other very negative effects on the world’s poorest 2 billion people. ... I’ve gotten very interested in new energy technologi­es that could move us toward zero carbon emissions. ...my dream is to create zero-carbo­n technologi­es that will be cheaper than coal or oil. That way, even climate skeptics will want to adopt them, and more of the world’s poorest people will be able to benefit from the services and the improved quality of life that energy makes possible.”

http://www.thegatesnotes.com/Topics/Energy/Recommended-Reading-on-Climate-Change
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:09 PM on 11/21/2011
WARREN BUFFETT $39 Billionaire investor, on Monday, March 1, 2010 at CNBC.

"BUFFETT: I'm not a physicist, but if--it may be that odds are 90 percent that the global warming people are right. It may be 95 percent, it may be 50 percent. But if it's 20 percent, you still have to act like they're right, because, I mean, if you're betting on the future of the planet, you know, you do not want to say, you know, `Well, I'm not sure about it,' when the problem keeps increasing year by year. So we have to do something significan­t to reduce carbon emissions. I didn't think--the cap and trade thing was a big wealth transfer, basically, from the Midwest to the coast. But we can--we can dictate that X percent of electric generation by 2020, by 2030, by 2040, you know, has to be--you have to get rid of the stuff that's polluting the atmosphere­. And the utility industry will do that. It'll be expensive. Consumers will pay for it. I mean, it's the nature of utilities. Consumers will pay for it. But it's the price we pay for the planet."

http://www.cnbc.com/id/35644956/page/2/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:04 PM on 11/21/2011
RUPERT MURDOCH $7.4 Billionaire, head of News Corp., which owns Fox News

"I am proud to announce that News Corporation has reached its first major sustainability milestone: we have become carbon neutral across all of our global operations and we are the first company of our kind to do so."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/03/01/rupert-murdoch-news-corp-carbon-neutral_n_829640.html?ir=Green

PAUL ALLEN Microsoft co-founder, $13.2 Billionaire:

"In global warming I think everyone is scratching their heads — are there technological things that can be brought to bear that can make a difference?"

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2003811002_paulallen29.html

“We have to get much more serious about this...It’s incumbent on us to think about how we can stop this, otherwise the planet is going to fry,” he said. “The problems are so huge, how are you going to stop this?” '

http://www.techflash.com/seattle/2011/04/paul-allen-talks-about-his-book-idea.html

SIR RICHARD BRANSON, $4 Billionaire, transportation
Sept. 21, 2006, from the New York Times

“Sir Richard Branson, British magnate and adventurer­, said today that all of his profits from his five airlines and train company, projected to be $3 billion through the next 10 years, would be invested in developing energy sources that do not contribute to global warming.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/science/22warmcnd.html?hp&ex=1158897600&en=0701aafab92a6837&ei=5094
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:57 PM on 11/21/2011
SERGEY BRIN and LARRY PAGE: Co-founders Google, $16.7 Billion apiece

“The ambitious founders of Google, the popular search engine company, have set up a philanthropy, giving it seed money of about $1 billion and a mandate to tackle poverty, disease and global warming.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/14/technology/14google.html?adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1321852174-gWzt4/6F2oeV5KaziWlrOw

MICHAEL DELL, Founder Dell Computers, $15 Billionaire
Dell Inc. - Dell Meets Carbon Neutral Goal Ahead of Schedule

2008 AUG 18 - (VerticalNews.com) -- Dell has met its carbon neutral goal ahead of schedule, achieving a major milestone in its commitment to be the 'greenest' technology company on the planet and fulfilling a pledge to operate efficiently, maximize investment in green power and responsibly offset remaining impacts.

"We're driving 'green' into every aspect of our global business," said Dell Chairman and CEO Michael Dell. "This includes setting new standards for energy efficiency and green power, delivering environmental and cost savings for customers and aligning key growth priorities with our focus on preserving our shared Earth."

http://global-warming.verticalnews.com/Dell_Inc.html

STEVE BALLMER: Microsoft CEO, $13.9 Billionaire

Top down support is coming from Steve Ballmer as today he sent out a corporate responsibility letter to the company outlining all that we are doing in this space. He says,

"Addressing global warming is a responsibility we take very seriously at Microsoft." – Steve Ballmer

http://www.mikethearchitect.com/2009/03/microsoft-green-computing-commitment.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:53 PM on 11/21/2011
MICHAEL BLOOMBERG, $19.5 Billion
mayor of New York and billionaire head of Bloomberg News Service:

"You can see "political science" at work when it comes to global warming. Despite near unanimity in the science community there's now a movement - driven by ideology and short-term economics - to ignore the evidence and discredit the reality of climate change."

http://www.nyc.gov/portal/site/nycgov/?epi_menuItemID=c0935b9a57bb4ef3daf2f1c701c789a0&epi_menuID=13ecbf46556241d3daf2f1c701c789a0&epi_baseMenuID=27579af732d48f86a62fa24601c789a0&pageID=mayor_press_release&catID=1194&doc_name=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nyc.gov%2Fhtml%2Fom%2Fhtml%2F2006a%2Fpr176-06.html&cc=unused1978&rc=1194&ndi=1
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:58 PM on 11/21/2011
STEVE JOBS, founder/CEO Apple Computers, $7 Billionaire (recently departed)

"Apple is committed to protecting the environment and the communities in which we operate around the world. We strongly object to the Chamber's recent comments opposing the EPA's effort to limit greenhouse gases. As a company, we are working hard to reduce our own greenhouse gas emissions by relying on renewable energy at our facilities and designing more energy-efficient products for our customers. We have undertaken this unilaterally and without government mandate, because we believe it is the right thing to do."

Apple suspended its membership in the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, due to their denialist stance on man-made global warming

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/business/apple-chamber.pdf

Apple ranks 4th among the top 15 companies on Greenpeace's list for greener products, sustainability, and energy usage.

http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/campaigns/climate-change/cool-it/Guide-to-Greener-Electronics/

and is going greener

http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/sep2009/tc20090925_936881.htm
12:51 PM on 11/21/2011
In spite of rumors to the contrary, the 90 year old Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, Consort to Queen Elizabeth II, really does have a mind of his own, at least insofar as wind farms are concerned.

The rarely-seen Philip outside the company of Queen Liz on state occasions and who even more rarely says anything of consequence, thinks wind farms are bloody tommyrot, in Brit slang.

Of course, royalty doesn’t use slang but he was equally-emphatic on the functionality of those blots on the landscape and seascape which generate far more profits for developers than they produce reliable electricity. As Phil said, they are “absolutely useless,” a position shared by his son, the less than bonnie prince Charlie who has put the kibosh on any thoughts of building windmills on his Duchy of Cornwall lands.

That very politically incorrect opinion of the House of Windsor might be seconded by the House of Kennedy clan which opposed the construction of windmills but primarily because they would obstruct their Hyannis Port view of Nantucket Sound: To hell with being eco-friendly, not in our front yard!

To hell with the Kennedys, said the Obama administration when it gave the okay to mar the Kennedy vista and ignore one of early-supporter Uncle Teddy’s final wishes last year,

Prince Philip has little worry that wind farms will be erected anywhere near . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=6176.)
11:54 AM on 11/21/2011
Why all the copy&paste? Use your own common sense!
photo
Lo Chiaro
Knowledge + wisdom defeats ignorance
07:36 AM on 11/21/2011
Knowledge and intelligence no longer makes any useful difference. Very sad.
11:52 AM on 11/21/2011
Can you elaborate on that?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:44 PM on 11/21/2011
I can. Shall we start with the fact that not one denier has shown any ecological literacy at all here? Or shall we start with the way that propaganda identifies the losing hand?
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
03:12 AM on 11/21/2011
It's like talking to a wall...except with FAR less flavour.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:37 PM on 11/21/2011
And dimension.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Badgersouth
10:55 PM on 11/20/2011
Much of the world's peatlands lie in regions predicted to experience increased frequency and severity of drought as a result of climate change- leading to the peat drying out and releasing vast stores of carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere. It's the very wetness of the peat that has kept the air out, locking in centuries of carbon dioxide that would normally be released from the decomposing plant materials in the peat. Now scientists at Bangor University have discovered that the effect of periods of severe drought lasts far beyond the initial drought itself.

Writing in Nature Geosciences (doi 10.1038 NGEO1323), Dr Nathalie Fenner and Professor Chris Freeman of Bangor University explain how the drought causes an increase in the rate of release of CO2 for possibly as long as a decade. It was originally assumed that most of the CO2 was released from the dry peat. Now scientists realise that the release of CO2 continues, and may even increase, when the peat is re-wetted with the arrival of rain. The carbon is lost to the atmosphere as CO2 and methane and to the waters that drain peatlands as dissolved organic carbon (DOC).

Source: “Climate change effect on release of CO2 from peat far greater than assumed” Eureka Alert, Nov 20, 2011

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2011-11/bu-cce111711.php
08:49 AM on 11/26/2011
Not only that, but there's the heat that is manufactured by the composting melted permafrost and the "compost-bomb" effect of spontaneous peat fires -- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01312.x/full -- interesting stuff.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Badgersouth
09:55 PM on 11/20/2011
A new study led by University of British Columbia researchers reveals how the effect of climate change can further impact the economic viability of current fisheries practices.

"Fisheries are already providing fewer fish and making less money than they could if we curbed overfishing," says Rashid Sumaila, principal investigator of the Fisheries Economics Research Unit at UBC and lead author of the study. "We could be earning interest, but instead we're fishing away the capital. Climate change is likely to cause more losses unless we choose to act."

Partly supported by the Pew Charitable Trusts, National Geographic, the World Bank and U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the study is a broad view of the impact of climate change on fisheries and their profitability. It is published online today in the journal Nature Climate Change.

Source: “Effects of climate change to further degrade fisheries resources: UBC researchers” Eureka Alert, Nov 20, 2011

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2011-11/uobc-eoc111811.php
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Badgersouth
09:28 PM on 11/20/2011
We will only achieve the target of limiting global warming to safe levels if carbon dioxide emissions begin to fall within the next two decades and eventually decrease to zero. That is the stark message from research by an international team of scientists, led by the University of Exeter, published today (20 November) in the journal Nature Climate Change.

The research focuses on the scale of carbon emission reduction needed to keep future global warming at no more than two degrees Celsius over average temperatures prior to the Industrial Revolution. This target is now almost universally accepted as a safe limit.

The team examined the extent to which carbon emissions should be reduced, how steep this reduction needs to be and how soon we should begin. They used mathematical modelling techniques to construct a number of possible future scenarios, based on different assumptions on emissions reduction. They accounted for a likely range of climate sensitivities: the amount of warming for a given increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide.

The research shows how quickly emissions need to drop in the next few decades. It also highlights how remaining emissions could cause the two-degrees target to be exceeded in the long term, over the next few hundred years.

“Limited options for meeting 2°C warming target, warn climate change experts” Eureka Alert, Nov 20, 2011

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2011-11/uoe-lof111811.php
photo
ILoveFiction
That's unbelievable!
06:13 PM on 11/20/2011
Draft Fumes!

You know what I mean.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
02:13 AM on 11/21/2011
Ja wohl.
ubrew12
that crazy uncle from Amarcord
05:01 PM on 11/20/2011
Dr Barry Bickmore (geochemistry, Brigham Young Univ), gives a talk about why its too easy for many Americans to avoid the truth about Climate Change. A former skeptic himself, his reading eventually convinced him that most skeptics are engaged in wishful thinking, have a poor understanding of the science, and are too ready to believe fossil-fuel-industry propaganda. He is still, obviously, a conservative Republican, but felt compelled to talk about what is driving the skeptics and how they are being misled:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=vDNXuX6D60U
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
02:14 AM on 11/21/2011
Most so called "skeptics" need a good lesson in why even Phyrro's followers did not pursue him over the cliff.