iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Will Obama Back Down On Birth Control?

Obama Birth Control

First Posted: 11/18/11 05:35 PM ET Updated: 11/18/11 08:16 PM ET

Top White House officials held a private call with lawmakers of the Pro Choice Caucus on Friday for advice on how to deal with the religious exemption to universal birth control coverage. The move comes amid heavy pressure from the Catholic bishop lobby, and lawmakers have expressed frustration that Obama has granted more face time to the bishops on the issue than to them so far.

The Department of Health and Human Services is currently considering a rule that would require all private health insurance plans to cover contraception at no cost for women. Churches, HHS initially proposed, would be exempt from having to cover birth control for their employees if it conflicts with their teachings and beliefs.

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) and other religious groups have been aggressively lobbying HHS, Congress and the White House since September to expand the religious exemption to include hospitals, schools, non-profits and any other religious-affiliated organization that would pay for their employees' contraception. Women's health advocates argue that expanding the religious exemption would unfairly block access to contraception coverage for the millions of women who work for those employers.

The lingering question is whether Obama, who supports reproductive rights and has a strong record of protecting women's health, will cave to the opposition lobby on the birth control issue.

"Politically, it would be disastrous for the President and the White House to back off on this issue and take away this very popular benefit that improves women's health," Rep. Nita Lowey (D-N.Y.), a member of the Pro Choice Caucus, told HuffPost Friday. "It's going to be tough to ask for women's votes in 2012 if their last impression of him is his willingness to trade their health coverage options for politics."

Obama met privately with Archbishop Timothy Dolan recently to discuss the exemption.

"I found the president of the United States to be very open to the sensitivities of the Catholic community," Dolan said in a news conference Monday. "I left there feeling a bit more at peace about this issue than when I entered."

White House legislative affairs director Rob Nabors told lawmakers in the conference call on Friday that President Obama has not even been briefed on the issue yet, as HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius is still sifting through all the public comments. But Nabors promised lawmakers that the President would meet with members of the Pro Choice Caucus before he makes his final decision, a Democratic aide on the call told HuffPost later Friday.

Friday's conference call was the first opportunity the lawmakers have had to talk to the White House about their concerns, said the staffer, who did not want to be named for professional reasons. The aide said Pro Choice members are frustrated that the White House has repeatedly refused to grant them an in-person meeting, despite having granted one to Nolan.

"Members are so nervous that the White House is going to expand the religious exemption that they demanded to have a conference call, but even getting that was a very heavy lift," the staffer told HuffPost. "It's never been more clear to me than today that the primary element of pressure on the White House is being orchestrated by the bishops. I don't know if they're meeting with the White House, I don't know what kind of access they have, but I do find it troubling that the Pro Choice Caucus hasn't been able to meet with the White House yet."

Lowey said that the fact that Obama would have any trouble deciding on a rule that affects millions of women's birth control coverage speaks to the power of the opposition lobby.

"Let me say this: I don't have first hand information that the lobby is stronger on the other side," she said, "but the fact that the White House is asking for opinions and advice makes it clear to me they've been very powerful."

HHS held an open comment period in September during which various advocacy groups could express their opinions on the interim guidelines before the final version is released, but the bishops went further. The day the comment period ended, the USCCB established a major new political arm -- the Ad Hoc Committee for Religious Liberty -- to convince the Obama administration either to entirely remove the coverage of birth control from the guidelines, or to give all religious-related organizations a free pass.

The bishops have also worked with House Republicans to draft and push a bill that would preempt the Obama administration's decision by imposing a giant religious exemption onto the new HHS recommendation through legislative means.

Sister Mary Ann Walsh, a spokesperson for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, said if the Obama administration chooses not to expand the religious exemption, he will be trampling on the First Amendment rights of the Catholic Church.

"A Catholic organization cannot be forced to pay for services that go against its teaching," she said. "It's just untenable. We're hoping for a decision which respects religious freedom."

Senior White House advisor Valerie Jarrett predicted on Friday that Obama will announce a final decision on the rule in late December or early January.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Top White House officials held a private call with lawmakers of the Pro Choice Caucus on Friday for advice on how to deal with the religious exemption to universal birth control coverage. The move com...
Top White House officials held a private call with lawmakers of the Pro Choice Caucus on Friday for advice on how to deal with the religious exemption to universal birth control coverage. The move com...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 951
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (22 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
contrariandy
Progressive Capitalism created the Middle Class.
07:44 AM on 02/09/2012
This is another over-hyped phony outrage.

This is not an all or nothing proposition. Why is no one asking or explaining the rest of the equation - WHAT'S THE PENALTY FOR NON-COMPLIANCE?

This appears to be a Federal Funding issue not a Religious Liberty issue. Why should a church get Standard treatment with no penalties if they choose to provide deficient, non-Standard coverage?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MFierstos
11:25 AM on 02/08/2012
Okay why should we as Americans be forced to marry gay people? Also force our women-folk to have their babies ripped from their bodies or have birth control pills dissolved and jammed into their unwilling veins daily. Oh yes, we don't; it is OUR choice to marry, to survive a pregnancy
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
contrariandy
Progressive Capitalism created the Middle Class.
07:47 AM on 02/09/2012
funny? brutal? brutally funny?
bipolarbears60
common sense isn't so common
05:32 PM on 11/21/2011
Does the plan cover fertility treatments?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Sock De Jour
Democracy is an illusion
09:32 AM on 11/21/2011
As an employer they have a duty to obey the laws of the land, no matter their religious beliefs. If they can't fulfill that obligation, they shouldn't be an employer.

I'd bet money their employee plan covers Viagra. The hypocrisy is blatant.

Remove the tax exempt status from churches and religious organizations, NOW.
11:39 PM on 11/24/2011
Okay - you want to close down all Catholic hospitals and Catholic colleges because they will not obey your man made pro-choice laws which are directly opposed to God's Commandment and Catholic religious doctrine - "Thou Shalt Not Kill!" I call such government action unconstitutional - against religious liberty and it constitutes religious bigotry! We do not live in a dictatorship and no president should force citizens to behave in ways contrary to what they believe. If this HHS ruling is enacted the government's anti-christian religious war against its citizens will get worse and this country will turn into an immoral dictatorship. In fact, a war against children in the mother's womb was already begun 50 years ago! Over 50 million abortions have been performed since Roe vs Wade was passed. The abortions are performed via vivisection using no pain medication on the poor babies. They are hacked to pieces which is the standard operating procedure. I call this murder and you call it choice! At the Last Judgement we shall see who is right concerning this very serious moral problem. It's irrational that our U.S. government by law protects fertilized eagle eggs from being destroyed but does not protect human life in the mother's womb. Become aware that the war continues against babies in mothers' wombs -- over one million are killed each year -- mainly Black babies! This is a form of genocide!
04:49 PM on 11/26/2011
One more male rant wanting to control women.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pnllsprkf
GOD Please help us
03:53 PM on 11/20/2011
when the churches want to guarantee that all children will be properly housed-fed and educated as well as as clothed and given proper medical/dental etc=then and only then should they be able to put their 2cents in-- (enough to cover their freedom of speech)we're not all catholic and should not have their doctrines thrown on us
12:39 AM on 11/21/2011
They're not asking for that. They're asking that you not force *your* doctrines on *them.*
02:02 AM on 11/21/2011
We just don't want a religion we don't belong to to have the right to decide what kind of health care we can have.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pnllsprkf
GOD Please help us
09:05 AM on 11/21/2011
this is not china -nobody is MANDATING you use birthcontrol or having an abortion but what the churches are trying to do is TAKE AWAY THE RIGHT to have birth control or an abortion if some one wants one BIG DIFFERENCE
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
biancamitt
African at heart
11:12 AM on 11/20/2011
Where were these bishops when insurance companies covered Viagra? Where were these bishops when their priests were raping young boys? There seems to be a total bias against women.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Raven1970
Do not be a pre-checked box, opt out
11:42 AM on 11/20/2011
seems to be? How many female religious leaders are there in the Catholic church....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Raven1970
Do not be a pre-checked box, opt out
11:12 AM on 11/20/2011
Here is an interesting diddy: http://www.wave3.com/story/16006692/jewish-would-get-83-million-in-hospital-merger

It's about the merger, second merger really, between Catholic healthcare systems and the Jewish Hospital. So, let's see here. It's ok to merge, for increased profit (I mean surplus of course because they are after all non-profit!) with an organization that does not believe that Jesus is the son of God...you know the thing that the entire Catholic religion is based on......as long as they don't provide birth control to women....

I think that about sums up where their heads are at.
01:27 PM on 11/21/2011
So now you're upset that Catholics aren't anti-Semitic enough for you? Or are you saying it is immoral to help others alongside Jews? I think I've figured out where your "head is at".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Raven1970
Do not be a pre-checked box, opt out
03:28 PM on 11/21/2011
I am not saying ANY of that....I am pointing out an obvious contradiction of the Catholic church when it comes to what they can and cannot participate in based on their "beliefs" They are lobbying against our healthcare proposal because it entails providing birth control to all women and that is against their beliefs and yet the Jewish religion operates under a completely different foundation of beliefs and their only concern with merging these hospitals of separate faiths is that the Jewish hospital also provides limited healthcare to women.

Maybe I offended you because you're Jewish? I am offended because I am a woman and I don't think a bunch of men in robes should be making decisions about what I can do with my own body.
01:17 AM on 11/20/2011
Some of you are not reading this article correctly. This is not banning contraception, this is an exemption meaning that some can opt out of providing free contraception for thier members.
So if you want free contraceptives, do not go to work for the Catholic Church or other exempt organizations.
Choose somewhere else to work and you get free contraceptives. See how easy that is? You do not have to be a Catholic if you disagree with their beliefs now do you?
09:18 AM on 11/20/2011
The Catholic Hospital in our city is the largest hospital in the state. They also have 2 other hospitals that employ another large chunk of folks.
But you seem to think because they are "catholic" hospital, that they should not provide basic contraceptive care for all the women who work there. I would be making a wild guess, but most of the women working there are not catholic, nor do they follow the tenants of that religion.
So all of the female employee's should be restricted not only at these hospitals, but at every catholic hospital across the nation? When they are hired to work at these hospitals, employees are not signing anything that states they will adhere to the catholic tenants or cannon law, are they?
If you are catholic, then follow their rules as you see fit.
But do not make the assumption that all the employees at the thousands of catholic hospitals are "followers" of the catholic faith.
This is just one example.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
biancamitt
African at heart
11:14 AM on 11/20/2011
Many Catholic Women practice birth control with Contraceptives. Only the rich can afford many children. We have enough children in poverty.
05:39 PM on 11/29/2011
"Some of you are not reading this article correctly."

You are assuming that most of these folks actually READ beyond the headlines (often incredibly misleading) and first two lines...
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ChasG
Unborn, unchanging, undying Universe
01:01 AM on 11/20/2011
If I had the time to read every main comment on this article and count the number of times the words "Obama" and "cave" appear in the same comment, it would be a startling large number. The press on the far left has been pushing this meme for three years now, and the meme has taken root in so many minds on the left of the political spectrum, I am alarmed that so many on the left have succumbed to a right wing strategy coming from the far-left anti-Obama extremists. Why don't we wait and see what, if anything, comes out of this meeting, instead of wasting our time on idle speculation and re-living a false anger that eats away at and undermines us from the inside out as a political force. Why "cave in" to despair before anything has even happened?
photo
Spock
You are completely, absolutely, illogical
07:08 AM on 11/20/2011
This president has a history of caving in.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ChasG
Unborn, unchanging, undying Universe
05:36 PM on 11/20/2011
Examples?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
biancamitt
African at heart
11:16 AM on 11/20/2011
I consider myself to be a left-wing feminist, if Obama allows this to go through, then I feel he has abandoned women and, yes, he has CAVED IN.and
12:49 AM on 11/20/2011
People are not getting birth control free right now anyway unless they go to a clinic that offers it. This bill wants to mandate that people pay higher premiums so that the birth control can be given free.
I say keep it like it is, and if you have insurance you pay the deductible price or if you do not have insurance you pay the full price.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
biancamitt
African at heart
11:17 AM on 11/20/2011
It much cheaper for the insurance companies to pay for birth control pills, rather than paying for childbirth.
12:43 AM on 11/21/2011
And they will continue to have the option to do so when this proposed rule is cancelled. They always have. They always will. (Most of them already do.)

The question is, is the Executive Branch of the U.S. Government going to attempt to force the Catholic Church, a religion protected by the Free Exercise and Establishment clauses of the First Amendment, to pay for birth control in the insurance plans *the Church* offers to *its* employees?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HotheadPaisen
Longform bio awaiting the Donald's approval.
01:49 PM on 11/20/2011
Saying removing the deductible will increase cost is nonsense, unless you think somehow the price of prenatal care, delivery, and 18 years of pediatric care is cheaper than birth control. Not to mention the cost to businesses for short term disability, sick leave, FEMLA and counteless other time off from work tending to children's needs.
The overwhelming majority of women in this country use birth control for years of their lives. They alone bear the cost of men's sexual activity. This is one very small way to help even the financial playing field. But no, you say 'keep it like it is' ;all men can play and all women must pay.
It really is that simple.
01:35 PM on 11/21/2011
I think the government should pay when I take my girlfriend out to eat. Let's even that playing field.
08:38 PM on 11/19/2011
Why can't the people just be allowed to buy insurance that covers the stuff they want? Why do Obama and progressives think they have to make every decision on behalf of everyone? It is the most despicable wrong-headed control freakery imaginable.

Progressives simply are misanthropes that think they know better than everyone else, and they're more than willing to use the police state's gestapo to enforce their will on everyone.
12:09 AM on 11/20/2011
I'm sorry, but your statements seem to apply to Regressives, including the Catholic Church and the Republicans, who seem to desire forcing people to bow to their will when it comes to their medical decisions about their own bodies.

Even if the groups you blame are comically misidentified, your statements are otherwise right on the mark. Despicable, wrong-headed control freakery, and willingness to use the police state's gestapo to enforce their will on women. Regressives though, are misogynists.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ChasG
Unborn, unchanging, undying Universe
12:18 AM on 11/20/2011
If a person's insurance coverage includes coverage for birth control, that does not compel that person to use birth control.  It merely protects the individual's right to chose for him or her self.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:12 PM on 11/19/2011
Obama needs women to win reelection; if he ignores them in favor the "conservative" voting base (who, btw will never vote for him anyway,) he'll lose – it’s that simple!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eliasasm
itsgoingtobeabumpyride
06:51 PM on 11/19/2011
Something in my gut seems to be telling me that living in a country controlled by big business and religion ain't such a good idea. Or am I missing something?
09:23 AM on 11/20/2011
Nope.
Not missing a thing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Raven1970
Do not be a pre-checked box, opt out
11:18 AM on 11/20/2011
The only thing that may be missing between big business and religion is the distinction between the two...oh, wait, that's right religion doesn't pay taxes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eliasasm
itsgoingtobeabumpyride
12:32 PM on 11/20/2011
Neither does big business.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pjohns
Let nature be a teacher
06:28 PM on 11/19/2011
If President Obama caves into pressure from a religious hierarchy re: women's issues and rights, he's lost my vote. Which leaves me with no one to vote for!
09:33 PM on 11/19/2011
so if obama doesn't force a religious organization to do something that is in direct opposition to it's belief system you will not vote for him. why not?
12:13 AM on 11/20/2011
Because forcing women to go without medication is in direct opposition to the belief system of rational and sane individuals everywhere, while a President who kowtows to certain Religions and allows them to force their will onto hundreds of thousands of people who do NOT follow their religion is a bad thing.

It's kinda weird how you folks keep twisting things around.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ChasG
Unborn, unchanging, undying Universe
12:41 AM on 11/20/2011
Will you be voting for Obama?  Yes or no, regardless of his choice in this matter?
photo
Spock
You are completely, absolutely, illogical
07:25 AM on 11/20/2011
I'd still vote for him but I won't be enthusiastic about it and my vote could easily go elsewhere.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph Glackin
W Nature dsnt do will be done by our fellow man
05:24 PM on 11/19/2011
To the Bishops' conference, (using the punch-line from a very old joke).
If you don't play the game, you don't get to make the rules.
09:31 PM on 11/19/2011
huh? what does that mean?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph Glackin
W Nature dsnt do will be done by our fellow man
10:25 PM on 11/19/2011
Want the joke? The Pope stood on the balcony of St. Peter's, giving a lecture about the sin of birth control. An Italian mother of twelve looks up at the balcony and yells out. "Hey, Papo! You no play the game, you no make the rules!"
As the bishops are all supposedly celibate, what's it to do with you?