iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

National Book Award 2011 Winners Jesmyn Ward And Nikky Finney Tackle Race And History (VIDEO)

First Posted: 11/18/2011 5:13 pm Updated: 11/20/2011 7:23 am

The National Book Awards 2011 winners exhibited diversity in the literary world. Of the four honorees, two were African American women who spoke about the importance of literature that represents black experiences.

Jesmyn Ward won the fiction award for "Salvage the Bones," a novel that tells the story of a poor family, days before Hurricane Katrina hits the Gulf Coast.

During an interview with the Times-Picayune, before receiving the award, Ward said the nomination came as a surprise.

"When I got the call about my nomination, I thought it was a prank, or maybe some elaborate scam to harvest personal information," she told the news outlet. "My first book had flown under the radar. And, of course, I'm from the South, I'm black and I'm a woman--and all those things push me into a niche that is outside the realm of experience for a lot of literary people."

Ward's debut novel, "Where the Line Bleeds," and "Salvage the Bones" both draw on the author's childhood experiences growing up in a poor, black community in the South. In her acceptance speech, she shared her thoughts about the importance of telling the stories of an, oftentimes, ignored population.


"I understood that I wanted to write about the experiences of the poor and the black and the rural people of the South," she said. "So that the culture that marginalized us for so long would see that our stories were as universal, our lives as fraught and lovely and important as theirs."

But it was Nikky Finney's powerful acceptance speech for her award for the poetry collection "Head Off & Split' that won praise from actor John Lithgow, who hosted the event, as "the best acceptance speech for anything that [I've] ever heard in [my] life."

Finney read a poem she wrote specifically for the occasion, drawing upon the history of slavery that she said "haunts every poem" she writes.

"Black people were the only people in the United States ever explicitly forbidden to become literate," she told the audience. "I am now officially speechless."

Although Washington Post fiction critic, Ron Charles, praised Ward and Finney's acknowledgment as literary history on Twitter, others disagreed. In a post for Commentary Magazine, D.G. Myers said black female writers have increasingly granted a number of honors in a literary affirmative action, of sorts.

Literary awards to black women writers are not historic. For nearly three decades, critical attention and honors have been demanded for some writers (and granted) on the basis of their race and sex. The day is long past when the identification of American writers by race and sex became a mental habit, a social custom; it is now a deep structural element in the grammar of literary criticism. Indeed, the self-congratulation implicit in the trumpeting of the ā€œhistoricā€ achievements of black women writers is, by now, thirty years on, a stock reaction like tears when lovers are reunited or laughter when yet another stand-up comic says the word f--k.

Both Finney and Ward were honored alongside Thanhha Lai, a Vietnamese woman who won in the young adult category for "Inside Out & Back Again," and Stephen Greenblatt, who won the nonfiction award for "The Swerve."

Watch Nikky Finney's moving speech below:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BLACK VOICES

Filed by Danielle Cadet  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:55 AM on 11/23/2011
Stephen Greenblatt, who won the nonfiction award for "The Swerve" was also a minority in this group.
01:33 PM on 11/21/2011
Here is the comment left on DG's article just so that you know the audience for Commentary Magazine:

Thomas McGonigle Ā· 2 days ago
Of course the best commentary on literary prizes was in the film The Swimming Pool... "literary prizes are like hemerroids eventually every a(hole) gets one...and sometimes as in the National Book awards this year... can we say it was proven in spades
01:22 PM on 11/21/2011
COMMENTARY is America’s premier monthly magazine of opinion and a pivotal voice in American intellectual life. Since its inception in 1945, and increasingly after it emerged as the flagship of neoconservatism in the 1970s, the magazine has been consistently engaged with several large, interrelated questions: the fate of democracy and of democratic ideas in a world threatened by totalitarian ideologies; the state of American and Western security; the future of the Jews, Judaism, and Jewish culture in Israel, the United States, and around the world; and the preservation of high culture in an age of political correctness and the collapse of critical standards.


Probably upset because it wasn't an all-Jewishsweep, no?
01:19 PM on 11/21/2011
Of DG Myers probably wethimself over "The Help".

Typical.
11:27 AM on 11/21/2011
That was beautiful!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Steve Leveen
CEO & Co-Founder of Levenger
06:26 AM on 11/20/2011
The National Book Awards are about the quality of the literature. I suggest people read the books and then make their judgments.

I'm a member of the board, which, by the way, has nothing to do with picking finalists or winners. As circumstance would have it, I had the honor of placing the medals over the heads of each of the finalists the evening before at the medal ceremony. What struck me was how very human and different and beautiful each of them was and how there is no telling by looking at someone what talents they have inside. I'm happy to live in a world that tries to identify art and reward it, no matter how hard that is to do, no matter how unjust for all the talented people who are not recognized, because at least some are, and all of us readers can benefit.
05:21 AM on 11/20/2011
D.G. Myers's comment about the African American female recipients is disgusting. It's disgusting because all though their race may have played a part in their consideration, his article just highlights a bitterness towards minorities.
Let's be real. Why one book wins over another is never so black and white. D.G. Myers insinuates that with white writers their ability is the sole consideration. There are many factors at play with literary honors. There is a question of who's in fashion, what writing style is in vogue, who has payed their dues, who is in disgrace, etc... I've stopped reading books based on their awards because I often find myself thinking "This book won an award? Why?"
The true literary award is time. If these candidates are not up to snuff then time will prove their incompetence (maybe). I don't want to get into the literary cliques whose soul creation is to uplift crap for all eternity (if you are a fan of Fountainhead you can see where I'm going here).
After having "the classics" shoved down my throat all through school that are exclusively from a white perspective there is more than enough great American literature (why do we read so much British literature?) representing people from ALL walks of life. So I guess the point I'm trying to make is that literary awards don't mean squat.
01:39 AM on 11/20/2011
"The National Book Awards 2011 winners exhibited diversity in the literary world. Of the four honorees, two were African American women who spoke about the importance of literature that represents the black perspective."

Why would you begin the article by commenting on the NBA's diversity of winners, yet not mention the fact that a Vietnamese-American also won, until the end of the article? Is "diversity" only defined by the inclusion of African-Americans? Writers like you perpetuate the belief that race and diversity are simply a black and white issue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lifeskills
May you be wise and alert in all your responsibili
04:56 PM on 11/19/2011
Diversity:
A context which is not characteristically monolithic. A group of white males would typically not be considered diverse. But if the group of males included Jews, Muslims, Hindus, and various denominations of Christians, then one could consider them religiously diverse.
Whereas pluralism often connotes an ideology (or intentional valuing) of difference, "diversity" is typically a neutrally descriptive term. Few would deny that diversity exists in contemporary U.S. society, but there is much debate about how this should be viewed. (See cultural relativism, multiculturalism, pluralism.) From: 'Multicultural Terms In Use' 135 terms. an Amazon ebook.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bessielil
trying to organize hummingbirds
12:32 PM on 11/19/2011
I read the post in Commentary, and that writer seems to have a bug in his ear about all the nominees, regardless of ethnicity. i.e. Despite Ron Charles’s oily toadyish compliments to the ā€œspectacularly powerful African American womenā€... he also insulted the allegedly token win, from his POV, by Greenblatt for Swerve. Cranky rascal.
photo
tonidnewman
Writer, Author, and Law School Student
11:54 AM on 11/19/2011
Ms. Ward's book Salvage for the Bones was a very good read. I wrote my memoir this year and I am aware of the dedication and thought that goes into writing a book. Great job Ms. Ward.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ezra Black
Long Live New Orleans
11:03 AM on 11/19/2011
Congratulations and I am inspired