More

Newt Gingrich Unveils Alternative To Social Security In New Hampshire

Gingrich Pitches Growth And Opportunity In Nh

PHILIP ELLIOTT   11/21/11 09:40 PM ET  AP

MANCHESTER, N.H. — Republican presidential contender Newt Gingrich on Monday proposed allowing younger workers still decades away from retirement to bypass Social Security and instead choose private investment accounts that would be subject to stock market gyrations.

The former House speaker, who has risen in the polls, would allow younger workers to take their share of the payroll tax that funds Social Security and put it in a private account.

Employers would still pay their share of the tax, which would be used to pay benefits for current retirees. But it would create a funding shortfall that Gingrich brushed off.

"That gap is more than covered by the savings" that would come from giving states control of 185 social welfare programs, Gingrich told reporters after a speech that laid out broad concepts but lacked key details.

Gingrich's plan would cover the near-term deficits by giving to states responsibility for such programs as AmeriCorps volunteers, Section 8 public housing and Pell Grants for college students. He said states were better suited to administer those programs.

Gingrich said his retirement proposal, an idea floated by Republicans before him, would empower voters.

"Wouldn't you rather control your account?" Gingrich asked an audience of students at St. Anselm College.

His advisers couldn't say how much the plan would cost, when it would begin or who would be eligible. They did say, however, that current retirees would continue to receive benefits at promised levels.

Peter Ferrara, Gingrich's senior economic policy adviser, said federal spending as a whole would be reduced by half within the next three decades.

"It's a lot of reduction," he said.

At a business leaders' breakfast earlier in the day in Nashua, Gingrich predicted that the program "would save literally trillions over the next generation."

Under the plan, workers would be able to do one of two things: continue sending their share of Social Security taxes to the popular, safety-net program or give it to private firms that would compete for those dollars – as much as $20,000 a year, Gingrich estimated.

"No one is ever forced into the (private account) system," he said after the speech.

Markets would determine how much money workers who chose private accounts would get each month. Gingrich guaranteed a minimum income in case Wall Street collapses like it did in 2008.

As Gingrich spoke Monday, stocks plunged several hundred points by midday as a special congressional panel in Washington appeared ready to declare failure in its attempt to agree on how to trim federal spending by $1.2 trillion over a decade.

Under Gingrich's plan, the federal government would regulate the private accounts run by private firms to ensure the portfolios were diversified enough to prevent one company or sector from taking down the entire system.

Government approved firms then would compete for consumers, who could move their money among accounts based on fund performance.

Organized labor and advocacy groups such as AARP would be allowed to collaborate with the investment firms to tailor plans to reflect the promises they make in pension plans.

Gingrich's plan also would treat the private retirement accounts as other investments, which could be passed on as part of an estate.

President George W. Bush offered some similar proposals for Social Security after he was re-elected in 2004, but faced stiff resistance from Democrats and some within his own party about any proposed changes to the popular program.

Workers pay a 6.2 percent Social Security tax on the first $106,800 in wages, which is matched by employers. This year, the tax rate for workers was reduced temporarily to 4.2 percent. The tax cut is set to expire at the end of the year, though President Barack Obama wants to expand it and extend it for another year. Congress is expected to approve.


Background on Newt Gingrich:
Nearing The End?
1  of  26
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
Speaking the day before the Delaware primary, Gingrich hinted he was considering ending his presidential run:

"I think we need to take a deep look at what we are doing," Gingrich said in an interview with NBC News during a campaign stop in Delaware. "We will be in North Carolina tomorrow night and we will look and see what the results are."

According to NBC, the former House speaker said he would need to "reassess" based on the results of Tuesday's primary in Delaware, a state where Gingrich has spent a great deal of time campaigning in recent weeks. Gingrich indicated that the state's 17 delegates were crucial to his viability as a candidate.
FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
MANCHESTER, N.H. — Republican presidential contender Newt Gingrich on Monday proposed allowing younger workers still decades away from retirement to bypass Social Security and instead choose pri...
MANCHESTER, N.H. — Republican presidential contender Newt Gingrich on Monday proposed allowing younger workers still decades away from retirement to bypass Social Security and instead choose pri...
Filed by Jade Walker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6,685
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (227 total)
oneleg
Armed progressive and ready for a revolution
09:31 PM on 01/06/2012
Hey lets all work for free(minimum wage) Oh wait we are already Thanks GOP gut oll people. Not the 1% or corporations they are not people. Even as they claim they are
oneleg
Armed progressive and ready for a revolution
09:06 PM on 01/06/2012
Keep in mind Wall Street is fixed to favor insider trading and the 1% everybody else can burn in ell but leave your hard earned pennies with them first before you go.
oneleg
Armed progressive and ready for a revolution
08:48 PM on 01/06/2012
I was in several mutual funds for over 20 years before I got fed up with little to no growth on any of them( before the crash) I sold off everything and paid off my house started saving what my house payment use to be and also what I invested every month and had enough $$ in the bank after the crash to buy 7 other investment properties and now make about 20% annually. If I had stayed in the market I would be living under a bridge so you better know what and who your voting on and for next election or you will be up chits creek. GOP get old people
oneleg
Armed progressive and ready for a revolution
08:04 PM on 01/06/2012
Newtie can't drop out of the race so he proposes the craziest ideas to make himself un electable so he can continue with his book and video sales pitch described as a run for POTUS. Newtie your a crook and you should be in prison
03:10 PM on 12/06/2011
Giving the programs to the states is a bad idea even if the states were not too broke to take over 185 programs from the federal government.

Newt is filled with self importance. He doesn't have a clue.

They keep saying the young won't get as much, but this is a ploy to make them hate Social Security and Medicare. This is another created crisis. Social Security has taken in enough to take care of many many younger retirees than the boomers. Medicare could be fixed if they would allow bidding. Boomers are being overcharged by big pharma on drugs under patent.

I read earlier this year in the paper that hospitals are being charged so much for medicine that they won't buy or use it and people are dying. (Stay away from hospitals). A lot of people are not buying their medicine because the prescriptions the doctor has prescribed are too expensive. Even if they have the money they did not work all their llives to give everything to the Medical fiasco.

If they had cancelled Bushes no bid clause instead of trying to figure out how to get to the elderly we would all be better off.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cruiselover11d
06:31 PM on 12/03/2011
How about congress and those retired from congress pay for there own heaaalth insurance. How much money would be added to thee debt
05:27 PM on 11/29/2011
Marvelous! We know how trustworthy Wall Street is. Republicans can't wait to get their hands on social security monies and on money from workers channeled into trustworthy (?) banks. Social security has been robbed so many times it is laughable.
photo
OliverTwist
Contrarian advocate for truth and justice
03:51 PM on 11/29/2011
Another Republican plan to help their wealthy friends steal or otherwise profit from social security.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
George Global
Diogenes has left the building
03:46 PM on 11/29/2011
A short-sighted plan financed by unfunded mandates foisted on the states.
Yep, Newtie is in mid-season form.

Highfalutin' nonsense...his milieu...
12:28 AM on 11/27/2011
Bad Bad Bad idea
Social Security works
Repubs. want Wall Street to have everyone's money-
Put your 401K's in stocks or anywhere you want. Social Security is too important to the 99% and needs to remain intact.
06:39 PM on 11/26/2011
Private accounts fine,,, but where to invest,,and does anyone have to invest,,and if so,,where ?
what happens if people squander investments or investments going sour,, then those who choose private investment are supported again by those who paid in SS ?
Beside that in my personal opinion Mr gingrich is unelectable looking on his political carrier too much is open, suggest private accounts to catch the young voters vote,,that,s easy,,but outline it in detail,, if there are details behond getting elected
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
George Global
Diogenes has left the building
03:47 PM on 11/29/2011
Appealing to greed...Newtie's wheelhouse.
photo
OliverTwist
Contrarian advocate for truth and justice
03:56 PM on 11/29/2011
Social security was originated by Otto Von Bismark in Germany over a century ago. It is intended to be an entitlement program not a private retirement program.

Allowing people to opt out kills the whole program and makes the resources of those people accessible for private pilfering by investment managers and bankers.

Gingrich knows that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
election2012
An independent voice for the greater good.
05:21 PM on 11/26/2011
"Workers pay a 6.2 percent Social Security tax on the first $106,800 in wages, which is matched by employers. This year, the tax rate for workers was reduced temporarily to 4.2 percent. The tax cut is set to expire at the end of the year, though President Barack Obama wants to expand it and extend it for another year. Congress is expected to approve."

Yes, now increase the income cap to balance those $$ lost from social security.
photo
OliverTwist
Contrarian advocate for truth and justice
04:00 PM on 11/29/2011
Yes. The President needs to stop stealing his stimulus funding from the social security fund intended as a buffer for regular Americans which he simultaneously claims has a revenue shortfall.
01:11 AM on 11/26/2011
This privatization is a bad idea. The best way to kill it is to demand that if passed, all investing done by brokerages, brokers, discount brokers, etc. of this money in private accounts is completely free to the owners of the accounts. The brokers make no money, and there are absolutely no fees, not even for generating any government-required reporting. Once no-fee investintg is made a requirement of the plan it will die a quick death, since the whole idea of this is to money in the pockets of brokers and brokerages, since they would normally make money trading no matter whether the investments gain or lose value. Anything the Republicans propose is to profit business--take the profit out of it, and the idea will lose favor. This whole thing reminds me of the Ferengi of Star Trek, the race of aliens that only cared about making a profit at the expense of anyone or anything.
08:12 PM on 11/26/2011
I told my son whatever he did stick with social security. Don't trust anything to do with Wall Street. Congress and especially the republicans. They love nothing better then to steal young peoples money. Young people need to have their money taken out of their pay because they wouldn't save. I trust social security. We didn't lose our money. We lost some of our money we had in the stock market. We didn't have a lot but we sure couldn't afford to lose alot either. We lost over $2,000 in our 401k.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
George Global
Diogenes has left the building
03:48 PM on 11/29/2011
Proud to be fan #1 to someone who not only puts forth a good argument, but ties it to the Ferengi...fnf
10:32 PM on 11/25/2011
Did he say who's private account the money would be going to? What would happen to the money when the stock market crashes? Have you forgotten about AIG? Wall Street Panic? Would you be better off by investing your money in a slot machine?
photo
chendri887
Viva California chaparral!
06:12 PM on 11/25/2011
God, if you love us, why is the GOP still here?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
George Global
Diogenes has left the building
03:50 PM on 11/29/2011
...remember the serpent in the garden...He hasn't lost his sense of Humor...fnf
photo
chendri887
Viva California chaparral!
10:51 AM on 12/01/2011
Ah, yes, how could I forget about the adversary. I guess we are just being tested again. Oh, joy.