iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Ethanol Eats Too Much Corn, Say Livestock Farmers

MICHAEL J. CRUMB   11/23/11 11:37 AM ET  AP

DES MOINES, Iowa — Livestock farmers are demanding a change in the nation's ethanol policy, claiming current rules could lead to spikes in meat prices and even shortages at supermarkets if corn growers have a bad year.

The amount of corn consumed by the ethanol industry combined with continued demand from overseas has cattle and hog farmers worried that if corn production drops due to drought or another natural disaster, the cost of feed could skyrocket, leaving them little choice but to reduce the size of their herds. A smaller supply could, in turn, mean higher meat prices and less selection at the grocery store.

The ethanol industry argues such scenarios are unlikely, but farmers have the backing of food manufacturers, who also fear that a federal mandate to increase production of ethanol will protect that industry from any kind of rationing amid a corn shortage.

The subject of debate is the Renewable Fuel Standard, a 2005 law requiring the nation to produce 7.5 billion gallons of renewable fuel by 2012. The standard was changed in 2007 to gradually increase the requirement to 36 billion gallons by 2022.

While a $5 billion-a-year federal ethanol subsidy is scheduled to expire this year, the production requirement will remain, unless it's changed by Congress.

That has other corn consumers worried that if production falls and rationing is needed, ethanol companies will be exempt. The U.S. Department of Agriculture recently reduced its estimate of this year's corn crop because of flooding in the Midwest and drought in the southern plains, and corn reserves are expected to fall to a 20-day supply next year. A 30-day supply is considered healthy.

At the same time, the price of corn for livestock feed has risen from an average of just over $3 a bushel in 2006-07 to an average of more than $6 this year.

"If we get a short crop, the ethanol industry does not participate in rationing and the brunt will fall on livestock and poultry," said Steve Meyer, president of Paragon Economics, a livestock and grain marketing and economic advisory company in Adel, Iowa.

A bill introduced last month by Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., would partially waive the ethanol goals when corn inventories are low.

The Grocery Manufacturers Association, which represents more than 300 food and beverage makers, also has endorsed the bill.

"We're behind livestock producers on this issue," said Geoff Moody, the association's director of energy and environmental policy. "We believe if there is a need to ration that ethanol will eat first because of the mandate."

About 5.9 billion bushels of corn were used for animal feed last year; 2.4 billion were exported; and about 4.9 billion were used for ethanol, up from about 630 million bushels in 2000, according to the National Corn Growers Association. About 1 billion bushels were eaten by humans in products such as cereal, sweeteners, and beverages.

U.S. corn farmers have steadily increased production over the years thanks to hybrid seeds and improved techniques, but Meyer said a 20 percent decline in the harvest would be enough to force corn rationing and lead to feed shortages. That would leave livestock farmers with little choice, he said.

"We can't shut down feeding," Meyer said. "The only way to do that is to kill the animals."

Even if there's no rationing, ethanol manufacturers generally have been better able to cope with high corn prices than livestock farmers because their business has bigger profit margins, said Darrel Good, an agricultural economist at the University of Illinois.

Randy Spronk, who raises corn and hogs in Edgerton, Minn., said farmers don't want to attack the ethanol industry but they want a plan in place if the corn supply should drop significantly.

"We really don't want to attack ethanol but wise people make plans," he said.

Matt Hartwig, chief of staff for the Renewable Fuels Association, called the effort to rewrite the fuel standard law "little more than a Trojan horse effort" to weaken or even eliminate it. He said the farmers' complaints were overblown and most livestock producers and meatpacking companies were making good profits.

Also, the ethanol industry now produces about 1 billion gallons of ethanol more than is required and if corn supplies fall short, it could cut back, he said.

The Environmental Protection Agency, which administers the fuel standard, said in a statement that states can already ask for a waiver "under certain circumstances, including inadequate domestic supply or harm to the economy or environment of a state."

Texas Gov. Rick Perry did this in 2008, claiming rising corn prices were hurting ranchers in his state. The EPA said it denied the request because the quota for renewable fuel wasn't causing severe economic harm to the state.

Meyer said many farmers are skeptical about a process that leaves such decisions to the EPA administrator, who "many in agriculture believe won't consider the best interest of livestock."

Good, the University of Illinois farm economist, said meat supplies could tighten if competing demands force corn prices higher. He said it boils down to a simple choice: "We're going to have to reduce our rate of increase in corn consumption or we're going to have to produce more corn."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

DES MOINES, Iowa — Livestock farmers are demanding a change in the nation's ethanol policy, claiming current rules could lead to spikes in meat prices and even shortages at supermarkets if corn ...
DES MOINES, Iowa — Livestock farmers are demanding a change in the nation's ethanol policy, claiming current rules could lead to spikes in meat prices and even shortages at supermarkets if corn ...
Filed by James Gerken  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 113
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GEEWIZ
09:22 AM on 12/09/2011
Cheap American corn has driven tens of thousands of poor Mexican corn farmers off their land, contributing to the illegal problem here. In fact a recent report in a leading Farm oriented magazine said that the collapse in the Hay supply has driven beef farmers to rely more on grains. Then the high prices of gasoline and diesel have driven up grain prices.
One solution is to eat vegetarian--healthier and frees up more food to feed our hungry billions with more babies arriving every minute in Africa and India.
09:16 PM on 11/26/2011
Well, how about this perspective, we should let ethanol win and tell livestock producers to stop feeding grain to their cattle.

Seriously. Nature may not have intended for corn to be used as fuel, but if it was intended for cattle, then they wouldn't get acidosis from eating it, now would they?

Ideally speaking we wouldn't grow corn for ethanol either, we would grow it for appropriate consumption by humans and animals, but hey, they decided to step in it, so why not?
07:38 PM on 11/26/2011
Ethanol production produces distillers grains for cattle feed.

It is one of the by products and is produced in large volumes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aligatorhardt
Cut on the bias
07:16 PM on 11/26/2011
Reduce the amount of red meat eaten and feel better.  Economic experts claim that speculation in farm commodities is causing price inflation. Even during periods of lower ethanol production, food prices have not been affected significantly. There is major advertising campaigns from oil company interests seeking to create bad press on ethanol, but this is more of a slander technique than a need response.
At Gas Prices Oversight Hearing, House Republicans Push Big Oil Agenda

Ethanol Prices Have Dropped, Will Grocery Manufacturers Follow? | Growth Energy

Biofuels | Hawaii Renewable Energy Alliance
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aleks Hunter
Dear God, please save us from Your followers.
04:19 PM on 11/26/2011
WE do need alternatives, and biofuels have a place, but corn is really wasteful. No I am not an oil company hack I honestly believe that fossil fuels should be globally taxed at 100% at the point of combustion. Solar cells are ,much more efficient. the wind is as well. Geothermal power is virtually untapped, and always there. We haven't touched the Tides. The energy in Canada's Bay of Fundy tidal changes is far more than Canada's hydroelectric capacity. We use fission in the form of pressurized water reactors that are accidents waiting to happen over pebble bed reactors which are much simpler and safer. The ITER project is almost never mentioned in mass media.

Burning a gallon of oil to grow and process corn to produce a gallon of ethanol which has a lower BTU content than the oil, is effectively wasting the food growing capacity of the farmland and artificially raising the price of corn worldwide. All while people are starving. Its what happens when capitalism takes a left turn. Those subsidies are nothing but socialism, the bad kind at that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aligatorhardt
Cut on the bias
07:20 PM on 11/26/2011
Subsidies to oil, coal, and nuclear are more counterproductive. The corn supplies can be regulated if a crisis occurs. If other factors became a problem, supplies can be redirected according to priorities.  Other sources of biomass for ethanol are also used, and some are pricing better than corn ethanol. Our farmers could use the business that ethanol provides.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aleks Hunter
Dear God, please save us from Your followers.
10:07 AM on 11/27/2011
All of the subsidies are counterproductive. We subsidize industrial farmers to burn fossil fuels from subsidized energy companies to grow corn which has been genetically modified by subsidized companies that will be diverted from the food supply as literally hundreds of millions of people starve.
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
07:26 PM on 11/26/2011
try actual giving us actual data for a change rather than just spewingg politics from a soapbox:

http://www­1.eere.ene­rgy.gov/bi­omass/etha­nol_myths_­facts.html

For 1 btu energy output by gasoline it takes 1.23 btu of fossil fuel energy input.
For 1 btu energy output by ethanol it takes 0.74 btu of fossil fuel energy input

This is straight from scientists at DOE.

If you can't see those numbers straight, you need glasses.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aleks Hunter
Dear God, please save us from Your followers.
10:17 AM on 11/27/2011
My mistake I had been looking at what I have found, thanks to your rather rude, but factually correct pointing out that the energy balance of corn ethanol in the USA is indeed now positive at 1.23:1 Such was not the case a very few years ago.

That said, Brazil uses sugar cane for its ethanol production for motor fuels and their energy balance is now 8:1. Which is 650% higher. Much much better. Better yet is Switchgrass for cellulosic ethanol production which, depending on method of production can be 20:1

http://www.seco.cpa.state.tx.us/re_ethanol_cellulosic.htm

Straight from Texas energy authorities. They are not exactly an oil hostile bunch down there.
04:07 PM on 11/26/2011
Good God! When we don't have enough corn for silage for cattle, you know there's a problem. Feeding corn to cattle is a wasteful way to get calories, but now cows are competing with torilla eaters for the corn that isn't going to ethanol production. And in the name of sense, why are we the taxpayers subsidizing it?

Ethanol production from corn was always an iffy proposition. It takes nearly as much energy overall to produce the ethanol and you get in energy from the ethanol. Why do we have money for ethanol subsidies but not solar? Because big farming has a powerful lobby and liked the ethanol subsidies. Adds profit to their bottom line and they don't care that it makes no ecological sense. It's just another payout.
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
07:22 PM on 11/26/2011
Where is your math? Do you have numbers? links with real data?

obviously you didn't read my link.
http://www1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/ethanol_myths_facts.html

For 1 btu energy output by gasoline it takes 1.23 btu of fossil fuel energy input.
For 1 btu energy output by ethanol it takes 0.74 btu of fossil fuel energy input.

Those are black and white numbers. If you have a problem with those numbers, take it up with the scientists at the dept of energy.

The problem is that people like you (and your pals in Big Oil) just grandstand with no data. You assume since a lot of other people say something it must be true.

And as for subsidizing...good lordy...electric cars and solar are now subsidized to the hilt.

I get less than 10$ per acre for a crop subsidy....(again i have the math!). I can gross over 1200 $/acre with corn. Do you think I really lose sleep over subsidies being eliminated? 10$ vs 1200$? come on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aligatorhardt
Cut on the bias
07:23 PM on 11/26/2011
Most farm subsidies are swallowed up by multi-national corporations instead of the small business farmers the subsidies were supposed to be directed to.  The farm bill needs to be revised.
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
07:39 PM on 11/26/2011
Nope. Not right. 97% of farms are family owned operations. Not multi-national corporations.

Read this:
http://www.ers.usda.gov/news/AIB797_researchbrief.pdf
"Most farms in the U.S. are family farms (97 percent in 2001). Family farms are defined as farm operations organized as proprietorships, partnerships, or family corporations that are not run by hired managers. Even the largest farms tend to be family farms"

You are reading way too many of the farming myths coming from the lefties.

And i am not a republican. I am just a person keeping the discussions honest.
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
02:40 PM on 11/26/2011
I suggest the anti-ethanol folks who are now the new allies of the anti-ethanol pro-big oil types read actual data for once and not just stand on a soap box.

You greens are just being used by the big oil people and are too uninformed to even realize it. doh...

Here's a start:
http://www1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/ethanol_myths_facts.html
04:16 PM on 11/26/2011
I know for a fact that ethanol production from switchgrass is not ready for primetime. They are still hunting the right enzymes to make it profitable. Most of our ethanol comes from corn. It's using 25% or more of our corn crop and people have been switching from soybeans to corn because of the subsidies.

Corn as a cover crop results in more soil erosion and nutrient depletion than most other crops. No one does conservation tillage for vast acres of corn for ethanol production.

Read and become educated. http://hir.harvard.edu/agriculture/corn-ethanol-as-energy
12:54 PM on 11/26/2011
Photosynthesis is less than one percent efficient in converting sunlight on a field to plant material. Only a part of that goes into corn and ethanol. It then goes into cars that are only 15 percent efficient. Solar panels are 15 percent efficient, and go into electric cars or hybrids that are 80 percent efficient. The sunlight can even be obtained over non-farmable land, without effecting food production. Furthermore, as much CO2 is produced in fertilizer for corn and in its production of ethanol as is used by the gasoline that it replaces, so it is not a gain for the environment. We need to get rid of ethanol subsidies and requirements and return to food production.
10:03 AM on 11/26/2011
Do they use the whole corn plant to make ethanol? What happens to the part of the plant that is not grain? Could this be used as an energy source instead? From what I see below, the non-grain part of the plant might be fermentable. On the other hand, if cows should eat grass, what about corn stalks?
D-Driller
my micro-bio is empty
03:10 AM on 11/26/2011
Only Americans would use food as fuel when half the rest of the world is starving...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:49 AM on 11/26/2011
fossil fuel propaganda bs....if you are a dem you should know better....
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
09:54 AM on 11/26/2011
You'd think the Dems would have known better than to start repeating big oil's anti-ethanol lines. You'd think the Democrats would have known something was up when many Democrats started to defend Republican senator Coburn's anti-ethanol stance. One of my home state's very liberal senators supports ethanol: Al Franken.

You'd think the Left would start to pull out the data sheets and start analyzing this issue more knowing they now support a right winger like Coburn and not Al Franken.
It's a weird world sometimes.

In fact.... this is from Franken's website:

http://franken.senate.gov/?p=hot_topic&id=1586
"Fighting to Stop the Republican Bill to End Ethanol Support"
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
09:57 AM on 11/26/2011
But I think the Ethanol battle is lost. The Left is now mostly very anti-farmer and anti-modern agriculture.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ddeanfountain
I think micro-bios are overrated!
11:54 PM on 11/25/2011
It was my belief that it was first held that grain based ethanol projects would lessen the need for governmental farm subsidies. In fact it's done the exact opposite. Producer prices of corn actually dropped for many years before rising during this drought. There a numerous products that can be used to produce ethanol, however, the current producers seem focused on corn as their primary ingredient. Sugar cane, sugar beet, switch grass (commonly known as johnson grass in Texas that grows wild everywhere in the state), many other products and even a form of corn grown primarily in South America which producers fewer ears of corn but the huge stalks contain a very high sugar/starch content; none of these are being implemented for use in ethanol production. Demand for beef has skyrocketed over the last 2 decades and feed lot cattle fed almost entirely on a diet of corn has increased the demand. Either we find a way to lessen the demands on corn, the demands on beef or we can expect skyrocketing prices to continue. There are several viable alternatives to corn as the primary source of ethanol and it's time to rethink the idea.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
rocksage7
sustainability rocks
09:20 PM on 11/25/2011
it has made my chicken feed go way up in price......
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:43 PM on 11/25/2011
more fossil fuel propaganda.....mash left over from ethanol production can be fed right back to cows and it has a higher protein content than the original corn....
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
10:30 PM on 11/25/2011
I was about to say the same thing. Distillers grain from ethanol production has been used as feed for a long time. Rarely do the anti-ethanol folks ever admit that this feed goes straight back to the livestock.

That fact causes to much confusion in their black and white brain cells i guess.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:24 AM on 11/26/2011
bingo....also in their money brain cells from all the cash they get from their fossil fuel monopoly....ethanol for cars is the only thing so far that has been able to dent that moopoly so ethanol for cars is an idea that needs to be destroyed....and we produce enough ethanol to make 50% of our gas right now as this is before the 3-4 fold increase to be obtained with cellulosic ethanol...so because republicans and the fossil fuel fasc*ists are blocking ethanol we export most of ours...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Overtone
See bio on the Aesop Institute website
01:50 PM on 11/25/2011
Ethanol is in pilot plant production without corn or any agricultural feedstock.

See MOVING BEYOND OIL on the Aesop Institute website.

In mass production it may retail at 60c per gallon.
photo
1oldhippie
yes, WE can again!
09:07 AM on 11/25/2011
Hemp could replace corn and yield a 'higher' octane!