iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Occupy Wall Street And Homelessness: Millions Spent To Evict Camps, While Cutting Shelter Funds

Occupy Atlanta

First Posted: 11/27/11 08:58 AM ET Updated: 11/27/11 09:17 PM ET

As cities around the country have swept Occupy Wall Street camps from their plazas and parks in recent weeks, a number of mayors and city officials have argued that by providing shelter to the homeless, the camps are endangering the public and even the homeless themselves.

Yet in many of those cities, services for the homeless are severely underfunded. The cities have spent millions of dollars to police and evict the protesters, but they've been shutting down shelters and enacting laws to prohibit homeless from sleeping overnight in public.

In Oakland, Atlanta, Denver and Portland, Ore., there are at least two homeless people for every open bed in the shelter system, according to the most recent data from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. In Salt Lake City, Utah, and Chapel Hill, N.C. -- two other cities that have evicted protesters from their encampments -- things are better but far from ideal. In Chapel Hill, according to the HUD study, there are 121 beds for 135 homeless people, and in Salt Lake City, 1,627 for 1,968.

Heather Maria Johnson, a civil rights attorney at the National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty, said most cities in the U.S. lack adequate affordable housing, emergency or transitional housing, or other social services for people who are either homeless or are in danger of losing their homes. "This was true before the current economic crisis and remains true today, particularly in areas that have cut social services due to budget concerns," Johnson said.

According to HUD, job losses and foreclosures helped push more than 170,000 families into homeless shelters in 2009, up nearly 30 percent from 2007. Of course, those are some of the same problems that have inspired people to protest.

ATLANTA

After Atlanta's Mayor Kasim Reed forcibly evacuated Occupy Atlanta from a public park, protesters moved into a homeless shelter. As it turned out, the shelter had been tied up in court battles with the city for a few years, and the city had planned to close it. The shelter was scheduled to be shut down a few days after the protesters moved in, but that date has since been postponed indefinitely and protesters have taken up the shelter's cause.

Local stakeholders -- including city officials, the local business development group Central Atlanta Progress, Emory University and other business interests -- have been trying to boot the Task Force homeless shelter from its home as it sits on a valuable piece of real estate.

The fight between the shelter and its opponents goes back at least to 2008. In a recent court case, the task force that runs the shelter contended that Emory University had been trying to rid their area of the shelter for years. Emails released in court show that officials from Emory approached major private donors to the task force to make their case against the shelter, and that they talked with investors about foreclosing on it. And in recent weeks, the shelter has fought the city to prevent local authorities from turning off their water.

Some point out that the media has been paying more attention to the shelter's troubles since the protesters' arrival. Earlier this month, the county told a local TV station that tuberculosis had broken out at the shelter. Protesters told HuffPost that they thought these claims were bogus.

One protester, Tim Franzen, said he'd been living in the shelter for weeks and had yet to see signs of anyone getting sick. He described the claim as an attempt to smear the Occupation and the shelter.

So did Shab Bashiri, another protester. "The city wants to shut it down with absolutely no alternative," she said. According to Bashiri, the protesters had not only been "occupying" the shelter but had also been sleeping outdoors in areas where homeless people stay.

The shelter is the largest in the southeast, housing more than 1,000 people on some nights. "The city doesn't have the infrastructure to deal with 1,000 people," Franzen said. "So where would they go? We don't know."

Atlanta has been flagged as one of the worst cities nationally in which to be homeless and has the widest income gap between rich and poor.

Many protesters argue that the city should fund the shelter with the money they've spent on dealing with the protest. The mayor's office reports they spent nearly $500,000 in just two weeks dealing with Occupy Atlanta, most of it on overtime pay for police. Maurice Lattimore, who helps run the shelter, said $500,000 could fund the shelter easily for two years. He noted that the city hasn't put any money into the shelter's coffers since the court battle began three years ago.

The Atlanta mayor's office did not respond to a request for comment.

PORTLAND

In Portland, Ore., Mayor Sam Adams said despite his support for the Occupy movement's principles, the Portland camp was getting dangerous. After the eviction, the mayor pointed to the presence of homeless people and people with mental illnesses. Nearby businesses had been pressuring him with claims that homeless residents were scaring away customers.

Judas James, a member of Occupy Portland who is himself homeless, said the protesters have tried to help homeless people who sought shelter with them by providing food, medical attention, tents and blankets.

"If there was money there for them, these people could be taken care of," James said. "It's hard because we want everyone to be safe, and we just don't have the resources to help them with it."

If the city were to take care of them using the money they've spent to pull down tents and clean up the park, it would amount to nearly $850,000, according to data from Mayor Adams' office.

Adams has acknowledged that the Occupy Portland movement has highlighted the city's homelessness problem, and said he supports a lot of the protesters' positions.

The city has invested $13 million towards relieving homelessness in the past five years and has devised a long-term plan to combat the problem. Yet, in an attempt to climb out of a budget hole of over $3 billion, Oregon has slashed its funding for social services by more than $73 million.

Amy Ruiz, a spokesperson for the mayor, wrote in an email that "providing social services and maintaining peace are not mutually exclusive. The City must, and does, do both." Ruiz pointed out that several nonprofit organizations, which receive money from state and local governments, had moved several dozen homeless people out of the Occupy camps into shelters, motels and other "lower-impact, and safer, camps."

Ruiz said more than 20 outreach workers representing at least seven organizations reached out to the homeless at the encampments before shutting them down.

Dennis Lundberg, an outreach worker, told Adams that the camp was doing more harm than good to Portland's street youth, who preferred the camp to the shelter system because they could reap the benefits of free meals without submitting to the sorts of rules imposed by the shelters.

DENVER

In October, Denver Mayor Michael Hancock came out in support of new legislation that would ban homeless people from sleeping in public places overnight.

"We only have one downtown," Hancock said at the time. "We cannot afford to lose our city core. If people don't feel safe going downtown, that is a threat to the very vitality of our downtown and our city."

A couple weeks later, Hancock said he didn't want to allow protesters to set the precedent for sleeping in tents in the public parks. This was a prelude to Denver sending in riot police to evict the protesters.

Johnson, the civil rights attorney with the NLCHP, said the organization has noticed a nationwide increase in laws that criminalize homelessness, including laws that prohibit sleeping, sitting or storing belongings in public spaces, even when there is insufficient shelter space.

She argued these criminalization measures cost far more to municipalities than providing adequate shelter to people. Citing studies conducted in 13 cities and states, she said that it costs on average $87 per day to jail someone, compared to $28 per day to house them in a shelter. "With state and local budgets stretched to their limit, it's profoundly irrational to waste taxpayer money on these expensive criminalization policies," she said.

According to Revekka Balancier, the communications director of the homeless outreach program Denver Road Home, the city's homeless shelters are at capacity every night, and many have long waiting lists. And she noted that the city's homeless population is growing. A report from 2009 found that 10,604 people were living on the streets and in area shelters on the night the survey was conducted. By 2011, that number had increased by 6.5 percent, to 11,377.

A spokesperson for the mayor said that the city works with Denver Road Home and other organizations to "comprehensively address the needs of our homeless population."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
As cities around the country have swept Occupy Wall Street camps from their plazas and parks in recent weeks, a number of mayors and city officials have argued that by providing shelter to the homeles...
As cities around the country have swept Occupy Wall Street camps from their plazas and parks in recent weeks, a number of mayors and city officials have argued that by providing shelter to the homeles...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11,661
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (168 total)
12:19 AM on 12/07/2011
I know it may sound counter-intuitive but the business of poverty is extremely lucrative and I do not mean for the poor people I mean for the corporations "solving" the problem. In fact our state majority WHIP in CA Toni Atkins is married to a woman that was a previous investment banker for B of A, she has been a developer for years specializing in low income housing and homelessness. Recently she was paid $225 per hour to the tune of half a million dollars to count homeless people and come up w/ a solution. The housing commission is already paid to do this and an investment banker knows nothing about homelessness just how to turn a profit. She has been profiting from low income housing solutions for years. There is currently billions available each year to developers to build these "projects", Tonis wife lobbies on behalf of private developers to get them these lucrative contracts that pay 5-10 times the private market.
12:12 AM on 12/07/2011
HUD has been wrought with fraud and lack of oversight for decades. Reagan’s Department of Housing and Urban Development Secretary, his Secretary of the Interior, Assistant HUD Secretaries and other insiders were convicted on various charges stemming from unlawfully allocating HUD money to special interests. Catherine Austin Fitts, Former Assistant Secretary of Housing, Bush I, revealed that in researching large amounts of missing money at the Department of Housing and Urban Development she discovered the agency could not account for $17 billion dollars in FY 1998 and then $59 billion in FY 1999 and that they continued to refuse to publish audited financial statements from that point forward.

Thus, a call by OWS to continue funding HUD programs to build affordable housing looks like a big boost to the banks and special interests that OWS is trying to squash, particularly in light of the glut of housing sitting empty on the market. People need to understand how social programs are just covers for corporate giveaways. and how this is done...its done through something called a Delaware corporation. Here in CA almost all of our state housing projects for low income and homeless are organized as Delaware LLcs. These corporations are so secret the politicians can be investors in the projects they vote on. Thus homelessness is a homerun for a politician and his bank account. http://okhereisthesituation.com/2011/11/28/delaware-tiny-state-giant-situation-2/
12:04 AM on 12/07/2011
Occupy needs to be super careful about the "homeless" argument of the movement. HUD has been the biggest cesspool for fraud and abuse since the Reagan era. There are billions provided for low-income housing and homeless shelters every year, but there is no accountability for how this money is spent thus it ends up in offshore bank accounts. This argument is another power grab by the banks. there is nothing they want more than more money for defunct housing problems.
05:21 PM on 02/05/2012
I may be wrong, but I believe HUD controls section 8. When is the last time your state was accepting section 8 applications, and how long is the waiting list? Not accepting applications in Florida, waiting list,, at least 3 years.
08:44 AM on 12/03/2011
When Bush Sr was President, he evacuated all the parks of homeless people. Where they went I have no idea. He also closed all the mental institutions, orphanges, and closed alot of military instillations. You see the trend here, and we are still heading in that direction. The only problem with this is that we have twice as many homeless and no where for them to go. Secondly, our weather is getting much worse in most states. Children living in cars, parents with no where to take them. I believe, Bush Sr told Americans to take in the homeless, volunteer to help them. In other words this rich country is not in the business of taking care of its society, that wealth is for war only and directing our money to a poor nation to build them up. Its their own vision of the future, Survival of the Fitest.
medialv2
I love Capitalism!
11:19 PM on 12/02/2011
The rich who own the means of production (to sell to workers/consumers/debt slaves).
Can't stand the idea of socialism, because they can't wield all of the power under that system.

They constantly tell the workers, that "you don't want to pay for the lazy & idle!!!"
and the poor think "that's true !!!! I hardly have enough for myself !!!"

There are more than enough resources for workers if we globally cap birth rates.

The worlds workers could have food, roof and healthcare if we decide to do that.

You could have multiple months of vacation time to spend with loved ones, instead of chasing a never ending debt dream.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Hazegrae
My isms: optim, femin, athe, altru.
07:17 AM on 12/01/2011
Tired of hearing pundits proclaim that OWS has no message. So here's a slogan: "Don't let us eat cake; let us have our daily bread!"
photo
drbob601
Soylent Green is People
03:19 PM on 11/30/2011
To You

"Stranger, if you passing meet me and desire to speak to me, why
should you not speak to me?
And why should I not speak to you?"

-Walt Whitman, "Leaves of Grass"

http://www.counterpunch.org/2011/11/30/the-untouchables-of-zuccotti-park/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beardown
07:32 AM on 11/30/2011
If OWS were paying for permits and for cleanup and not taking the places of the homeless maybe it wouldn't be as bad!!!
11:43 AM on 11/30/2011
Seriously?

Protest Permits are not going to fund homeless shelters.

Public parks and communal areas are not "the places of the homeless".

If local municipalities weren't spending like drunken sailors to control and manipulate citizens excercising their Constitutional rights to peaceably assemble and address their grievances "maybe it wouldn't be as bad".
photo
JimInHouston
Arma virumque cano...
04:44 PM on 11/30/2011
Long-term disruption of public spaces, interferences with peaceful commerce, the destruction of public property, and the assault of LEOS is not described correctly as "to peaceably assemble and address their grievances".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
talkstocoyotes
10:42 AM on 11/29/2011
That's our "Christian nation" for ya!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kenneth Stout
04:30 PM on 11/29/2011
Exactly, a Christian nation teaches to be thrifty and productive, a liberal, godless society tends to succumb to the indulgences of life: laziness, promiscuity, drugs, destructive behaviors, etc. Why do you think most of these occupiers are potheads and junkies, liberal arts majors, and bums?
09:40 PM on 11/29/2011
"A Christian nation teaches to be thrifty and productive­, a liberal, godless society tends to succumb to the indulgence­s of life: laziness, promiscuit­y, drugs, destructiv­e behaviors, etc. Why do you think most of these occupiers are potheads and junkies, liberal arts majors, and bums?"

Give me a reliable source for your ridiculous claim.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TruelyFedUp
Ethics is nothing else than reverence for life.
12:05 AM on 11/30/2011
Please see my reply below. It was intended for you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TruelyFedUp
Ethics is nothing else than reverence for life.
12:04 AM on 11/30/2011
I bet you can't live up to this one Mr. Holier than Thou

Said to by a quote by St. Basil of Caesarea "Who, then, is greedy? -- The one who does not remain content with self sufficienc­y. Who is the one who deprives others? The one who hoards what belongs to everyone. Are you not greedy? Are you not one who deprives others? You have received these things for stewardshi­p, and have turned them into your own property! Is not the one who tears off what another is wearing called a clothes-ro­bber? But the one who does not clothe the naked, when he was able to do so -- what other name does he deserve? The bread that you hold on to belongs to the hungry; the cloak you keep locked in your storeroom belongs to the naked; the shoe that is moldering in your possession belongs to the person with no shoes; the silver that you have buried belongs to the person in need. You do an injury to as many people as you might have helped with all these things!"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
talkstocoyotes
12:23 PM on 12/01/2011
And you had to go back more than a millenium to find that example. Not many Christians giving away their cloaks nowadays, and those who are get little to no respect from the "Christian nation" mob.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tootsie56
help fellow travelers along the way, it comes back
10:21 AM on 11/29/2011
Huffington Post: WHY IS THIS STORY NOT ON THE FRONT PAGE ABOVE THE FOLD???
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kenneth Stout
04:31 PM on 11/29/2011
Because movie stars deserve it better. There is your liberal society for you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LANETexasLonghorn
05:58 AM on 11/30/2011
ZERO friends,
hey Buttercup, don't you light up a room....when you LEAVE
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beardown
07:35 AM on 11/30/2011
You are right!
photo
AskandThink
OWS! Because WAR is HELL!
09:55 AM on 11/29/2011
Someone PLEASE tell me this is not truth….

“The worldwide indefinite detention without charge or trial provision is in S. 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act bill, which will be on the Senate floor on Monday….

The senators pushing the indefinite detention proposal have made their goals very clear that they want an okay for a worldwide military battlefield, that even extends to your hometown.

WHAT THEY PROPOSE IS A POLICE STATE - YOU CAN BE "TAKEN" AND HAVE ZERO, NO, CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF PROTECTION.

Urge your senators to vote YES on the Udall amendment to the Defense Authorization bill which would remove the harmful provisions from the bill and in their place, mandate a process for Congress to use an orderly process to consider whether any detention legislation is needed.”

Welcome to the United POLICE States of America
http://suspiciouspackaging.blogspot.com/2011/11/welcome-to-united-police-states-of_27.html

ACLU

Nat’l Defense Authorization
https://secure.aclu.org/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=3865&s_subsrc=fixNDAA

omg
Are we too late?!!!

ows
I am the 99%
08:56 AM on 12/03/2011
Hasn't this law been in place since Bush jr?
TRRoughRider
Truth be Known
06:29 AM on 11/29/2011
For all those you think the Occupy movement is all about occupying city parks and protesting at the taxpayer expense I suggest you google OccupySEC and enlighten yourself.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HopeMom
my micro-bio is empty
12:49 AM on 11/29/2011
Since the news came out on Saturday that a record number of people went shopping on Black Friday, I have been wondering. Some things don't add up.

The news media told us that 152 million (out of a total population of 312 million) went shopping.

The corporatio­ns that sell the stuff we bought this weekend are sitting on record levels of cash.

Local, state and federal government coffers are deeply in debt. The federal government debt is 1.4 trillion. States like California and Texas have enormous budget deficits. All in all, "Some 42 states and the District of Columbia have closed or are working to close $103 billion in shortfalls for the coming fiscal year (FY2012)." http://www­.cbpp.org/­cms/?fa=vi­ew&id=711

Some politician­s say taxes cannot be raised to increase revenues to help pay for these deficits. We are told that the people and corporatio­ns at the top of the income strata are the "job creators" and taxing them would inhibit their job creation. We are also told that Americans are hurting in this economy and raising taxes would hurt them even more.

Yet, 152 million people had enough money to go shopping, which represents a 7% increase over Black Friday in 2010.

So, which is it? Are people broke and taxes cannot be raised? If so, why are a record number of people shopping this year? Or is the economy okay and taxes can be raised to help stabilize the greatest government on earth?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CarmanC
04:43 AM on 11/29/2011
We contend that for a nation to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle.

BTW

There is a difference between the greatest nation on earth and the greatest government on earth.
11:11 AM on 11/29/2011
Out of those 152 million people, how many just put themselves even deeper into crippling credit card debt because they do not actually understand a credit card is not money and that they eventually have to pay back that money or face interest.

Not everybody just I'm sure, but I'm willing to wager (as a pure speculative guess) at the very least 10%.

The opposition to higher taxes is not that we cant (or at least this is my opinion based on what I have heard and read) but that we need to get the budget back under control before we open up the faucet for more money.

Its like helping a recovering crack addict. You dont just give him money during his rehab. If you do you're not helping but enableing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drachold
12:09 AM on 11/29/2011
dang hippies will probably protest world war three
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beardown
07:36 AM on 11/30/2011
Hopefully their livers will be shot by then!!!
11:58 AM on 11/30/2011
Hoping for your political opposition's gruesome demise?

How completely un-American and un-christian of you. I guess when that's all you have to offer, that's what you bring to the table.

Here's hoping those you curse are more humane (&or sane) than you.
09:04 AM on 12/03/2011
drink your koolaid.
11:06 PM on 11/28/2011
I agree with some of the protesters concerns but why don't they occupy the FED and the congress where the real criminals are?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
stuart100s
I started with nothing, & still have most of it.
08:11 PM on 11/29/2011
Because they are not smart enough to follow the money.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Activist Annie
04:36 PM on 12/01/2011
I heard the Occupiers will be in Washington D.C. the second week in December.