iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

2 NY Students Surrender In Exam Cheating Scandal

Cheating

FRANK ELTMAN   11/28/11 04:18 PM ET   AP

GARDEN CITY, N.Y. — The last of 20 students accused in a college entrance exam cheating ring in an affluent New York suburb surrendered to authorities on Monday.

Michael Pomerantz, 18, and an unidentified teenager turned themselves into Nassau County prosecutors before being taken to district court for arraignment. Pomerantz is one of five current or former students at Great Neck-area public and private high schools charged with accepting payments of between $500 and $3,600 to impersonate other students on SAT and ACT college entrance exams.

A longtime critic of the testing system notes that Nassau County is one of the few municipalities to file criminal charges in a school cheating scandal.

Pomerantz was facing felony charges including scheming to defraud, falsifying business records and criminal impersonation. He pleaded not guilty and was released without bail. His next court date was scheduled for Jan. 5. His attorney did not immediately respond to a call for comment.

Pomerantz and the other four face up to four years in prison if convicted.

Fifteen other students, including one who surrendered Monday, are facing undisclosed misdemeanor charges for having others stand in for them and take the college exams. Prosecutors say they are barred from identifying those 15 because they are being prosecuted as juveniles. Authorities say they can't even contact the students' colleges to inform them of the cheating allegations because of privacy laws.

Also Monday, a spokesman for District Attorney Kathleen Rice said that the case against Samuel Eshaghoff, 19, the first of the five students arrested as alleged impostors, was postponed Monday pending a possible grand jury investigation. The spokesman, John Byrne, would not elaborate.

Eshaghoff, a student at Emory University in Atlanta, has pleaded not guilty.

The scandal, which erupted in September, has prompted a review by a state Senate subcommittee on higher education. The panel held a hearing last month where it received assurances from The College Board and Educational Testing Service that a review of security procedures surrounding the tests was under way.

The ETS, which administers the SAT on behalf of the Princeton, N.J.-based College Board, said former FBI director Louis Freeh has been retained to offer recommendations on enhanced security. There was no indication on when recommendations would be made.

Bernard Kaplan, principal at Great Neck North High School is among those suggesting that digital photographs of each student be taken when they arrive to take the exams. Great Neck North is where the scandal first surfaced in the spring after faculty members looked into rumors that students had paid someone to take the SAT for them.

Authorities were particularly dubious after hearing that Eshaghoff allegedly stood in for a female student on one of the exams.

In testimony before the Senate subcommittee last month, Kaplan noted that all proctors require of a student arriving to take a test is a photo ID, "which any fifth grader with a computer can make." He also argues that the current system that allows students to take the SAT at a location other than their "home" school should be abolished.

He said the students implicated in the scandal all went to schools where they would not be recognized by faculty to take the exams. He said about 150 students who don't attend Great Neck North went to the school on a Saturday in the spring for an SAT exam.

"The others all had some sort of picture ID, but anyone of those could be completely made up or forged, and we would have no way of knowing and neither does ETS. The proctors take a look, it says Joe Schmoe from Hoover High School with his picture and that's that.

"It is ridiculously easy to take the test for someone else."

Defense attorneys for some of the students have questioned whether the courts are the proper venue for students suspected in the cheating scandal. FairTest, a group critical of standardized testing, "is aware of no other current case in which a district attorney is pursuing criminal charges," said spokesman Bob Schaeffer. He cited a 1992 case in Maryland, where a student was sentenced to six months for having a friend substitute for him on an SAT exam.

A spokesman for District Attorney Thomas Spota in neighboring Suffolk County, on Long Island, confirmed that the prosecutor sent a letter Monday to school administrators in that county seeking any information on suspected cheating, although there was no immediate information that students there had participated in any schemes.

Rice, the Nassau County prosecutor, argues that the students need to be dealt with in the criminal judicial system.

"Educating our children means more than teaching them facts and figures. It means teaching them honesty, integrity and a sense of fair play," she said last week. "The young men and women arrested today instead chose to scam the system and victimize their own friends and classmates, and for that they find themselves in handcuffs."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST COLLEGE

Filed by Rebecca Harrington  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:53 AM on 01/07/2012
It's not cheating. It's outsourcing. They just hired a subcontractor. This is actually old news. For rich kids, their parents often pay other people to literally do their kids' homework. It's all about making sure that a kid is accepted into a school that will ensure their future access to power. Money is the ultimate affirmative action.
01:23 PM on 01/06/2012
It seems extreme to seek criminal fraud charges for something so trivial.

When a person arrives at an SAT test site, he or she must show a photo ID to an SAT administrator to be allowed to take the test. The person must also provide a handwritten statement and a signature as a further assertion of their identity and their compliance with the rules of the SAT.

Showing a false ID, and providing a false signature, and performing other actions to misrepresent oneself as another person, can, in situations other than an administration of the SAT test, burden the impersonated person with undue credit card debts and bank loans, and might even falsely implicate the impersonated person in various crimes. So, impersonation *can* cause serious damages to individuals and society.

But, clearly, in this particular case, with one person paying another person to take the SAT in their place, the actual damages to individuals and society will be insignificant, especially when compared to the lifelong mark of a felony conviction and the effects of serving a prison term. I think it is horrible that a prosecutor thinks pursuing criminal charges in this particular case would teach an appropriate lesson and ultimately benefit society. Even widespread cheating on the SAT would not be disruptive to society, because SAT scores are only part of the college admission process, especially for the more discerning colleges.

Excessive legal penalties hurt society. Laws and prosecutors should optimize the outcome for everyone, including the accused.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EmCeePee
05:21 AM on 01/06/2012
1. Require students to take the test at their home high school.
2. Allow alternate-site testing only with photograph, thumb fingerprint, and signature.
3. Change cheater scores sent to universities to lowest score possible (e.g., 200?) or zero.
4. Prosecute stand-in test takers as adults; sentence to community service with fine (>=$500).
5. Prosecute and sentence repeat offenders as felons and require jail time with major fine (>$1000).
6. Enforce these procedures for both paper-pencil and computer-based versions of testing.
7. Apply to all SAT and ACT testing including Advanced Placement and subject area exams.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fredpa
I will try again tomorrow.
05:40 AM on 12/03/2011
I'm no lawyer, but I don't see how this rises to the level of felony. There might be a few cases you could stretch that far. Such as, using the high score to get a federal award or appointment. But even then, just withdraw the money or the award. The number of cases is so small it has no effect on the scores of the honest scores. I think we're seeing a massive company looking to pile on a group of little people who have embarrassed them. I think some perspective is needed here.
02:45 AM on 11/29/2011
Keyboard issues. Correction: So
02:44 AM on 11/29/2011
Do this is how they appear so smart.
05:47 PM on 11/28/2011
Fingerprinting is the only way to go...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
inmyhumbleopinion
Vote third party.
02:04 PM on 11/28/2011
Why is it the test takers are being charged with felonies, but the kids who paid them are only charged with misdemeanors? The felony wouldn't have been committed without the complicity of the kids who hired them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:52 PM on 11/28/2011
I don't even understand this. If someone is going to cheat through high school and college... why even go? Aren't they just going to cheat through life, as well?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vobox3343
Each day is a new day - make the most of it
02:46 PM on 11/28/2011
They're finding out that cheating is the way to go - look at what's happening in politics today - Winning is everything, doesn't matter how you get there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fredpa
I will try again tomorrow.
05:41 AM on 12/03/2011
Shhhhh. We don't want to talk about the role models these kids learned this from.
11:59 AM on 11/28/2011
Very brilliant post huffington post is really world's huge site also www.scandal4u.com