iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app

Health Care Reform Program Much Costlier Than Expected In California


First Posted: 11/29/11 04:04 PM ET Updated: 11/29/11 04:08 PM ET

A temporary program created by the 2010 health care reform law has provided health insurance to fewer people than expected. Yet at the same time, in one big state, the program has turned out to be much costlier than expected.

The Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan launched last year to cover people shunned by health insurers because of conditions like heart disease or diabetes. In the new law, Congress gave the Department of Health and Human Services $5 billion to disperse among the states. California got $761 million, and earlier this year the state figured it would have enough money to insure 23,000 people until 2014, when the program is being phased out in favor of health insurance exchanges.

But California's PCIP has turned out to cost three times as much per enrollee than previously estimated. The state's Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board, which administers the plan, initially figured it would have to pay $1,000 a month in claims per enrollee. New data show claims cost $3,100 per member each month, meaning that the government will have to cap California's enrollment at 6,800 unless more funds are made available. As of October, 5,290 people are signed up in the state.

But an HHS spokeswoman suggested in a statement that freeing up more cash for California won't be a problem.

"The Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan is making a difference in thousands of lives in California, ensuring that sick and uninsurable Californians get the health care that they need," the spokeswoman said. "Each State received an allotment from the fixed total funding prior to the start of the program. We are in the process of reviewing state projections for2012 and will adjust as needed."

There's probably enough money available. The Government Accountability Office reported earlier this year that as of April, just 2 percent of program funds had been used.

To be eligible for the PCIP, a person must have a pre-existing condition and must have been uninsured for at least six months. The latter requirement has been widely blamed for the initiative's low participation rate nationwide. Just 37,000 had signed up as of September, according to HHS. Officials had estimated that as many as 375,000 would sign up in 2010 alone.

California's Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board has estimated that with another $500 million, it could avoid capping enrollment and provide insurance to some 11,247 Californians through 2014. With an additional 500 million, California's allotment would be $1.25 billion -- a quarter of the total funds Congress appropriated for the program nationwide. The most recent state-by-state numbers released by HHS show California has just 10 percent of total enrollment.

Cliff Allenby, chair of the state board said the program's initial cost estimates were based on data from the state high-risk pool that predated the PCIP, according to California Health Line. Thirty-five states had high-risk pools before the PCIP launched last year; the state pools are costlier for consumers and may exclude coverage of certain conditions. Expanding those pools was the centerpiece of the Republican alternative to the health care reform signed into law by President Obama last year.

Allenby told California Health Line it would be up to HHS to allocate more funds for the California PCIP. "It's their program. It's their decision."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST

A temporary program created by the 2010 health care reform law has provided health insurance to fewer people than expected. Yet at the same time, in one big state, the program has turned out to be muc...
A temporary program created by the 2010 health care reform law has provided health insurance to fewer people than expected. Yet at the same time, in one big state, the program has turned out to be muc...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 332
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
10:58 PM on 11/29/2011
President Obama, Mr. Reid, Ms. Pelosi and their colleagues knew from the outset that the economics behind the PPACA were BS. It's the primary reason we had to wait to find out what was in it until it passed.

The CLASS entitlement - government supplied long term health care for seniors - was so underestimated that the office was closed before it ever enrolled one patient. But the office is still a line item in the budget, because Ms. Sebelius at HHS wants to claim that CLASS is going to save 78 billion dollars (a third of the Obamacare "savings").

3 years after it started, Medicare was already 10 times over its budget projections. There is not a single piece of health care legislation which has been written since which came in on or under budget - not one!

Budget overruns are the norm in the federal government (after all, it's not their money, it's yours), but the government's continual meddling in health care has been a disaster which far overshadows any other aspect of federal incompetence.

You can pay for your car, and you can pay for your house. If the government would get out of health care, you could pay for that, too. For the few for whom this is not true, there is, and should be, medicaid and SCHIP. But for the 80 or 90% of Americans not at the bottom of the economic ladder, government involvement in health care has only served to price it out
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
new beginning
Practice random acts of kindness-change the world
07:42 AM on 11/30/2011
Well said! Fan #3. Welcome to hp.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:18 AM on 12/01/2011
Wrong! You merely point out how much greater the need for universal single payer really is, but go on to say that the people should bear the costs of an unnecessary insurance middleman and profits. Greed is what needs to be removed from health care and that is exactly what the right is trying to preserve to avoid the precedent of lower cost and higher wages for government employees doing the same work.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Obama cares about all of U.S.
06:44 PM on 11/29/2011
Note to Tr011s,

Get somebody to read the article to you and explain it,

Then you won't look quite so foolish.
06:48 PM on 11/29/2011
Obama's a foo'

Nuff said.
06:42 PM on 11/29/2011
Is this really news to anyone? The program is playing out exactly as we should have expected.
photo
BeautifulOnDaOutside
I ♥ Huffington Post
06:40 PM on 11/29/2011
It's ridiculous to call this insurance. Insurance is a pool to spread risk. This is just the government paying for the health care of a select group.
photo
ssnt
670 Economists(6 w/ Nobel Prize) like Mitt's plan
06:38 PM on 11/29/2011
Shocker!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hank Chiappetta
06:37 PM on 11/29/2011
When the state of Washington pays over 200 for bee sting kit through medicaid to a company its not the people its the greed of the company's and they are blaming the people
06:56 PM on 11/29/2011
The fault lies clearly on the state. They paid the 200. Nobody forced them to.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
new beginning
Practice random acts of kindness-change the world
09:13 PM on 11/29/2011
How much does it cost to produce the bee sting kit?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
seatheworld1
your duty is to accept me/my duty to tolerate you
06:28 PM on 11/29/2011
Project On Government Oversight was then known, along with others, brought to light $7,600 coffee makers, $435 hammers, and $640 toilet seats billed by unscrupulous defense contractors.

Same goes for Health Care, Our Government needs to stay out of Health care, and 80% of things they managed to get their hands on.

Ron Paul looks better and better every day!
06:33 PM on 11/29/2011
Paul would be fine with me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Obama cares about all of U.S.
06:40 PM on 11/29/2011
Did you even take the time to read the article?

Of course you didn't.
06:57 PM on 11/29/2011
Did you? Do you think something costing more than three times what it was projected to cost is not a problem?
06:26 PM on 11/29/2011
Obama enjoys nothing more than wasting the taxpayers money.

If he's re-elected in 2012, America is d00med.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:26 PM on 11/29/2011
This is the tip of the iceberg. You'll get to witness other states coming forward with similiar issues pertaining to the cost. This will be overturned in June by the SC.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Obama cares about all of U.S.
06:41 PM on 11/29/2011
If you'd taken the time to read the article, you would realize that there are no long term problems.

And the SCOTUS will not overturn Healthcare Reform. Not a chance.

Despite what you hear on Fox, it enjoys broad bipartisan support.
06:55 PM on 11/29/2011
"bipartisan support"???

Now we KNOW you are dreaming.
06:55 PM on 11/29/2011
Every Republican in Congress voted against it along with 34 house Democrats. That's what you call broad bipartisan support? Even to this date, more than half of those polled support repealing the bill. That is what you call broad bipartisan support? Perhaps you should read the votes for a bill and check the polls on it before you claim others aren't reading things.

Just because we have money for it does not mean it costing way more than projected is not a problem. Even if I can afford to pay twice what I expected to pay for something doesn't mean I want to or that it isn't a problem.
06:22 PM on 11/29/2011
"Health Care Reform Program Much Costlier Than Expected In California"

People were also surprised that the sun rises in the East. Obamacare is roadkill but I understand the shock this headline brings to HuffPo readers. The next 12 months for the true believers is going to be difficult. A lot of 'shocks' are coming.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
new beginning
Practice random acts of kindness-change the world
09:19 PM on 11/29/2011
You are right about that. It was no accident that we wouldn't see the full force of this monstrosity until after the election.

Fanned.
06:20 PM on 11/29/2011
HCR will be meaningless unless and until there is meaningful tort reform.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:29 PM on 11/29/2011
No, that is code for relieving corporations of class actions suits in product liability cases. Tort reform as the right wants it forces everyone on their own, effectively eliminating any person without financial resources to hire their own representation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Obama cares about all of U.S.
06:42 PM on 11/29/2011
Bingo!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
new beginning
Practice random acts of kindness-change the world
09:20 PM on 11/29/2011
Um. No. Wrong you are. Again.
photo
rocketdog56
Don't want to be an American Idiot
06:33 PM on 11/29/2011
Lol.
06:16 PM on 11/29/2011
so you mean all those people who said they were cookin these numbers up out of their arse were right? the sun also rose today....
06:15 PM on 11/29/2011
this admin cant budget a 3 month car promotion let alone the entire health care industry
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
new beginning
Practice random acts of kindness-change the world
09:22 PM on 11/29/2011
fanned
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
greeneyes51654m
Retired, finally...
09:36 PM on 11/29/2011
Fanned.
06:14 PM on 11/29/2011
I eagerly await Obama's spin on this one.

Should be a classic!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:31 PM on 11/29/2011
You mean that the need for single-payer is even greater given such numbers?
07:02 PM on 11/29/2011
Are you willing to give up medical advancement? Are you willing to trade likely death when you get a disease like cancer for a chance at slightly better preventative care? Do you like medication? Do you know where almost all new medicines come from? That's right! They come from our profit-driven health care system.

I'd much rather live in a world where health care is profitable. In that world new drugs are created. In that world new treatments are developed. In a world of single-payer nationalized health care we would have little to no advancement.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
new beginning
Practice random acts of kindness-change the world
09:23 PM on 11/29/2011
only if you want to have rationed and poor quality care for all....
06:07 PM on 11/29/2011
Gosh, a government program that costs more than expected.
Who woulda thunk it?

Just wait until Obamascare kicks in.
You ain't seen nothin' yet!

President Putz has royally screwed us.
photo
PatLow
A karate man bruises on the inside
06:40 PM on 11/29/2011
Yet my wife works for a major insurance/pharma company and they are 100 percent behind this. They also would love it if you cons got your way and sent everyone back into the private insurance sector. I am sure "market forces" would work this all out right?
07:03 PM on 11/29/2011
Of course they are behind it. It has allowed them to jack up premiums even faster than before the health care law. Amazing, a liberal citing a corporation as support for his opinion!