iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Newt Gingrich Suggests Drug Testing For 'Any Kind Of Federal Aid'


First Posted: 11/28/11 01:16 PM ET Updated: 11/28/11 01:54 PM ET

Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich thinks the federal government should make it more expensive to be a drug user.

"It could be through testing before you get any kind of federal aid," Gingrich told Yahoo's Chris Moody in an interview on Saturday. "Unemployment compensation, food stamps, you name it."

Newt's suggestion is a popular one lately. Republicans in several states this year proposed drug testing the poor and jobless as a way for the government to save money on programs like welfare and unemployment insurance. Only Florida actually followed through and enacted a new requirement, which has been blocked by a federal court.

Gingrich suggested denying benefits to drug users would be a better way to prosecute the drug war than just locking people up. He also disavowed an earlier proposal to legalize pot for medical purposes.

"It has always struck me that if you're serious about trying to stop drug use, then you need to find a way to have a fairly easy approach to it and you need to find a way to be pretty aggressive about insisting -- I don't think actually locking up users is a very good thing," he said. "I think finding ways to sanction them and to give them medical help and to get them to detox is a more logical long-term policy."

From July to October, Florida required welfare applicants to submit to urine testing to prove they were not using drugs. The policy lasted only four months because a federal judge stopped it with an injunction, finding the 35-year-old single father who claimed the test violated his constitutional rights would be substantially likely to win his case. Courts found the same policy unconstitutional when Michigan tried it in 1999.

The judge also blasted the state's fiscal rationale for the policy, saying the government "has not demonstrated any financial benefit or net savings will accrue as a result" of the law. Just 2.5 percent of applicants have tested positive for drugs -- a lower rate of usage than in the general population. Since the state requires applicants to pay for their own tests but reimburses people who pass, the scheme could be a money-loser.

Even so, Gov. Rick Scott (R) has appealed the judge's ruling in what the local ACLU calls "a legal crusade defending a campaign pledge to create an unconstitutional, big-government program that is itself a waste of money."

According to worker advocacy group the National Employment Law Project, lawmakers in a dozen states proposed drug testing the jobless this year. None of those proposals has become law, though Indiana and Wisconsin now deny jobless benefits to anyone who flunks a potential employer's drug test.

South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley (R) said this year she wanted to drug test the jobless because she'd heard hundreds of job applicants failed a local employer's test. When the claim proved utterly false, Haley did not withdraw her support for the policy.

Arthur Delaney is the author of "A People's History of the Great Recession," HuffPost's first e-book.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich thinks the federal government should make it more expensive to be a drug user. "It could be through testing before you get any kind of federal aid,"...
Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich thinks the federal government should make it more expensive to be a drug user. "It could be through testing before you get any kind of federal aid,"...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,253
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (72 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
DrObvious 02:44 PM on 11/28/2011
Once again Republicans want to strip away freedoms from Americans that are constitutionally based. The government may not search your person or property for illegal activity or possessions without probable cause based on a reasonable suspicion. Warrants are required so that a judge may make an independent determination if reasonable suspicion rises to the probable cause standard required to protect our  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MalcolmKyle
07:12 AM on 02/03/2012
The Singapore CNB (Central Narcotic Bureau) announced in September 2011 that the the 5% drop per year, which they often proudly proclaimed as proof of the effectiveness of their tough drug stance, was totally inaccurate. Arrests it seems have actually increased since 2008 contradicting Singapore’s assertion that being tough on drugs (even with mandatory death sentences) has ever been effective.
 
From January to June 2011 there was a 20% increase in arrests compared to the previous year. This not only indicates that drugs are entering Singapore but also that the amount of people in Singapore using drugs is steadily and surely increasing.
 
This isn’t just a problem Singapore can claim is due to chronic drug users, as a large percentage of those being arrested are first time users -- 41% in 2008, 45% in 2009 and 46% in 2010. This clearly shows that threats of caning, harsh prison sentences and even death does nothing to deter either 'chronic users' or 'first time users'.
 
The government has promised to "look at the problem afresh and comprehensively", but they've also pledged to maintain Singapore’s 'zero-tolerance policy'. So no change there then.

The Singapore government, and those who blindly support them, now have no proof whatsoever that their laws are curtailing drug smuggling or drug usage rates.

http://www.todayonline.com/Singapore/EDC110923-0000304/Actually,-drug-arrests-were-on-the-rise

Due to the embarrassment this has caused to the Singapore authorities, the original article from the above link has recently been removed.
03:05 PM on 12/28/2011
I had to find this story because I heard about it and I doubted it, thinking it was too ridiculous to be true! Well I was wrong!
03:26 PM on 12/22/2011
Should recipients of farm subsidies, the mortgage interest deduction, federally-subsidized loans... bank bailouts... be drug-tested? These are also forms of government aid? Can Gingrich and Perry describe what forms of federal aid they'd like to target? If they can't do so without classism, they should drop the idea or have it apply to every government program.
12:33 PM on 12/08/2011
Here we have another republican wanting to waste our money. But I am sure that there is some drug testing company willing to contribute to Newt's campaign for this to happen.
12:28 PM on 12/08/2011
Let"s let Newt pay for all this drug testing out of his pocket. This sounds like another cost from the budget, like we need that.
12:23 PM on 12/08/2011
We need drug test for every elected official across the board, because these people can and do affect the lives of many people. Also some of these politician must be on drugs or need mental help just listen to some of the ideas they come up with.
03:26 AM on 12/05/2011
Hell we should just drug test everybody.and I mean alcohol and unprescibed pills to.its funny how we will drug test a high school football player,but not politicians and they make the biggest decisions in our life.I love to check nuks urine and see what he has going on in his life.oh I'am sorry that drug is legal and it is the worst one out thier.
02:04 AM on 12/04/2011
Newt authored US bill HR4170 to provide mandatory life sentence without parole or, in multiple convictions and certain circumstances, the death penalty for transporting 100 doses of a controlled substance. Today he says death penalty makes sense for cartel kingpins but when he wrote the bill (1996) he was thinking that anyone carrying a half carton of smokes would be sufficient for capital punishment.
Does this sound a bit hysterical to anyone?
07:57 PM on 12/02/2011
Sounds like a good plan to me. Workplaces can drug test randomly and that's not considered any kind of violation. But I also want to see drug testing for congressman that receive taxpayer money for life and any businesses that get bailouts from the taxpayers
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MalcolmKyle
07:14 AM on 02/03/2012
And for Alcohol or tobacco?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fred Bronson
America Unite, Export and Deport
09:34 AM on 12/02/2011
I agree any one how collects any state and/or federal aid, no madder what Medicaid, food stamps or full welfare needs to be drug tested and E- VERIFYED . If you work for the private sector you are subject to test and I do not want my tax dollars going to buy drugs or support illegals.......
Frederick Bronson Durham, NC
04:51 PM on 11/30/2011
they should of gave Bush a drug test when he bankrupt the country
photo
K August
Research Alec Exposed
01:53 PM on 11/30/2011
AP did a months long study of what's in our water .....cities that filter out solid waste and dump treated water back into waterways to be used again have had as many as 80 different drugs show up in tap water. How is anyone going to come up clean in cities that recycle waste water when everyone is being drugged without their knowledge?
photo
ihatepeople0 1
at caput asini ex tuo
01:52 PM on 11/30/2011
N00t.....If he wants drug testing for any recipients of Federal Aid...THEY SHOULD START WITH CONGRESSMEN FIRST, THEN THE "FEDERAL AID" WELFARE QUEENS...
How typical that N00ts' idea is MORE SUPRESSION of the 99%
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Activist Annie
08:45 AM on 11/30/2011
Let's begin by testing members of Congress. They receive federal aid don't they?

Drugs are but a visible manifestation of deeper problems below the surface. Our society is sick and needs a lot of fixing.
02:41 AM on 11/30/2011
Newt's NutZ.
photo
Spadreisle
My Prez gots game! Now bring it!
01:49 PM on 11/30/2011
I would give anything for Newt to be the nominee.
Can you imagine the ad President Obama could run, just from clips from these kinds of speeches?
And the debate? We could buy futures on popcorn!
11:54 PM on 11/30/2011
Yes
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LilacGypsy
Its time the right gets a grip on Reality...
09:40 PM on 12/01/2011
Honestly The Prez would have a field day on any of them, individually, or , all of them as a collective unit!!!