More

Post Office Gun Ban Lawsuit Moves Forward For Mountain States Legal Foundation

Usps

First Posted: 11/28/11 04:01 PM ET Updated: 11/28/11 04:29 PM ET

Insofar as the U.S. Bill of Rights goes, the Second Amendment seems most likely to start a fight. Sure the First will talk smack and the Seventh thinks the people have its back, but battles over the right to carry a gun seem the fiercest fought. This is certainly the case for an Avon couple who, 7News reports, feel the U.S. Postal Service firearm ban unjustly keeps them from picking up their mail.

Debbie and Tab Bonidy of Avon, Colorado, filed suit on October 4, 2010 after traveling from their rural home to pick up mail in the city. While both are licensed with concealed-carry permits for their handguns, they are prohibited from carrying a firearm (or parking their vehicle with a firearm in it), on Postal Service property.

A federal judge in Denver recently allowed the lawsuit to move forward. The case, brought by the Mountain States Legal Foundation, argues the U.S. Postal Service's banning of firearms on its property violates citizen's rights to "keep and bear arms," reports USA Today

The Postal Service initially sought to dismiss the case, noting the Bonidys could easily leave their guns in their parked car on the street. Postal Service representatives also pointed out the U.S. Supreme Court affirms a right to carry firearms, but that prohibitions on firearms in "sensitive places" are legal, writes the Denver Post.

A Mountain States Legal Foundation press release argues,

The Postal Service’s total ban on firearms possession impairs the right to keep and bear arms as protected by the Second Amendment even when individuals are traveling to, from, or through Postal property because the Postal Service does not allow people to store a firearm safely in their vehicles. Anyone with a hunting rifle or shotgun in his car, or a handgun in his glove compartment for self-defense, violates the Postal Service ban by driving onto Postal Service property. Thus, the ban also denies the right to keep and bear arms everywhere a law-abiding gun owner travels before and after visiting Postal Service property.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST DENVER

Insofar as the U.S. Bill of Rights goes, the Second Amendment seems most likely to start a fight. Sure the First will talk smack and the Seventh thinks the people have its back, but battles over the ...
Insofar as the U.S. Bill of Rights goes, the Second Amendment seems most likely to start a fight. Sure the First will talk smack and the Seventh thinks the people have its back, but battles over the ...
Filed by Ryan Grenoble  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 20
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BHirsh
02:26 AM on 11/30/2011
The Post Office's regulation banning carry violates USC Title 18 § 930. Possession of firearms and dangerous weapons in Federal facilities - (a) Except as provided in subsection (d), whoever knowingly possesses or causes to be present a firearm or other dangerous weapon in a Federal facility (other than a Federal court facility), or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both. - (d) Subsection (a) shall not apply to— (3) the lawful carrying of firearms or other dangerous weapons in a Federal facility incident to hunting or other lawful purposes.

This law is pretty clear. But as usual, the federal government chooses which laws it wishes to obey. After all, who's gonna stop them?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
11:10 PM on 12/05/2011
A man with a gun took three people hostage at a post office a few years ago. Hostage: Post office gunman was angry at government. http://www.statesman.com/news/nation/hostage-post-office-gunman-was-angry-at-government-146816.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Conlaw Bloganon
Ron Paul 2012!
09:50 PM on 11/29/2011
See, that's the tricky thing about post offices and schools. In the whole rest of the world, I'm a law-abiding citizen, and a force to be reckoned with if a criminal attacks me. But as soon as I cross that threshold, according to the Brady Campaign, I'm a danger to society and must be disarmed. Because everyone knows that, even if I were a criminal intent on violence, a petty law about where I could carry my gun would stop me. /sarcasm
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Bourbon
03:56 PM on 11/29/2011
The most dangerous place in America is a "gun free zone".
02:06 PM on 11/29/2011
Here in Northern VA - every 7th adult is an attorney. If anything were to go wrong suring my trip to get staqmps they would stop all action until a committee rulede on a course of action. Every 20th adult person is carrying a gun anyway - by permit or off duty. Over 20 police departments in DC plus alll the armed FEDS, off duty cops etc. Yhe Post Office ban is consistant with their policy not to employ or continue to employ persons whom are in treatment for depression or panic attacks - as they consider them dangerous. USPS is messed up because their management is messed up. USPS is a stressful jateful place to work and destined to fail.
12:09 PM on 11/29/2011
Wow, I'm impressed with first 5 comments. Here we are on the Huffington Post & seems like most of us support gun rights - even if to different degrees. I'm a gun-toting liberal & am pleased & surprised by the comments.
photo
From my cold dead hands
pro-gun/anti-criminal
12:58 PM on 12/04/2011
Lots of liberals support the Second Amendment.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lensman3
11:02 AM on 11/29/2011
Can't carry firearms on the Denver Fed. Center either. I heard that when out of state hunters stop at the Fed center to get topo maps, they have to have someone stay outside the gates with the firearms while the group gets their maps.....
D-Driller
my micro-bio is empty
12:27 AM on 11/29/2011
Man, this is a frivolous lawsuit. I carry a gun, just not in certain federal places, or into bars. You're at the post office a total of maybe 24 hours in your entire lifetime - who cares?
photo
Grumpy Man
Disappointed idealist
08:51 AM on 11/29/2011
It's about principal, not specific risk. Rights should only be infringed when solid evidence indicates a greater good is served by that infringement. In the case of permitted concealed carriers stopping to pick up their mail I think one would have a very hard time arguing that a greater good is served by having them disarm.
08:23 PM on 12/03/2011
Please explain why a post office should be "gun free" (knowing that the sign will do nothing to stop those with criminal intent).
D-Driller
my micro-bio is empty
10:06 PM on 12/03/2011
But who cares? Is this worth a million or more in taxpayer funds to try the case? Postal workers shoot enough people, we don't need to give them the weapons...
11:11 PM on 11/28/2011
The lobby/customer service area of a Post Office is not a "sensitive place". It is a public area of a public institution.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Robert Weller
Retired AP Foreign Correspondent
05:01 PM on 11/28/2011
Wow. That is really scary. Driving in the Vail/Avon area. Sure wouldn't want to be there without my Glock. Might be hit by a flying snowboarder.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ElmCreekSmith
If the truth hurts, it should.
01:41 PM on 12/04/2011
In a post office, Bob?

ECS
photo
From my cold dead hands
pro-gun/anti-criminal
09:12 AM on 12/05/2011
Couldn't happen. Snowboards are banned in post offices.......