More

HuffPost Social Reading

Tunisia: A Test For What 'Moderate' Islam Looks Like

First Posted: 11/28/2011 9:25 pm Updated: 11/28/2011 9:25 pm

By Elizabeth Bryant
Religion News Service

TUNIS, Tunisia (RNS) Nearly a year after Tunisia set off the Arab Spring of popular revolt, the face of political Islam in this fledgling Muslim democracy is a 47-year-old mother of two who favors tailored suits and stiletto heels.

Souad Abderrahim's main political experience was as a student union leader more than two decades ago, but the political neophyte is now cheered at rallies and trailed by the media as a leader of Ennahda, the Islamist party that is now the main political force in this North African country.

Abderrahim holds a seat in the country's new Constituent Assembly, charged with creating a democratic political structure following the downfall of Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, who ruled Tunisia for nearly a quarter century.

The Ennahda party is a religious party, but Abderrahim said she felt compelled to emerge as a spokeswoman to cut down fears that Ennahda would seek to impose a hardline Islamic theocracy.

"When I saw the phobia on the streets about Ennahda as a hard, backwards party, I felt it was important to be with them and shed light on this false image," said Abderrahim, who owns a pharmaceutical company.

Just as the Tunisian uprising triggered the Arab Spring protests that upended politics from Libya to Yemen, Tunisia's subsequent steps toward democracy are being closely watched as a model for other countries.

"Tunisia today is the major test of the Arab Spring," says Mansouria Mokhefi, head of Middle East and North Africa programs at the French Institute of International Affairs. "The direction it goes depends on the success or failure of Tunisia."

That's why the spotlight is on Ennahda, which styles itself after Turkey's ruling center-right Justice and Development Party. Its inclusive message and corruption-free image have attracted a wide following across all levels of society.

Will it make good on its promises to uphold Tunisia's pro-Western, secular foundations and women's considerable rights? Or, as some critics maintain, is Ennahda hiding a more radical agenda? The answer, analysts say, may shape the future of political Islam that is gaining ground in countries like Egypt, Morocco and Libya.

"Whether it will be moderate Islam as appears the case in Tunisia and Turkey or another form is unclear," Mokhefi said. "But it's an inevitable, unstoppable march by Muslims, young and old, toward what they feel is a reappropriation of their identity."

Abderrahim is not a typical face of political Islam, or even Islam itself. She declines to wear a headscarf, and has emerged as a passionate and articulate defender of women's rights.

Driving in from her upscale villa in the Tunis suburb of Manouba, Abderrahim expertly juggles cell phones and the steering wheel in her commute to Ennahda's gleaming headquarters downtown. She keeps in touch with supporters through Facebook.

"Women can have every degree of liberty, while respecting our religion and traditions," she said. "Equality at work, equality in all the Tunisian projects."

That inclusive message is echoed by other Ennahda officials who have forged a governing coalition with two secular, leftist parties.

"We take inspiration from the ethical values of Islam which we believe are universal values -- freedom, dignity, equality," said Yousra Ghannouchi, the London-raised daughter of Ennahdha's founder Rachid Ghannouchi. "Religion is not something we believe the state will interfere in or impose. It's a matter of personal choice."

Others are not so sure. Women's rights activists demonstrated in front of the assembly building as the new government began work on Nov 22.

"The big question is are we going to deal with women's rights through positive laws and codes -- which Ennahda vows not to touch -- or are we going to return to the Shariah (Islamic law), even if it's a soft interpretation?" asks prominent rights campaigner Khadija Cherif.

Opposition parties in the new government sound similar warnings.

"There are lots of things in Ennahdha's program that represent a danger, notably the relationship between politics and religion," said Samir Tayeb of the small, staunchly secular Democratic Modernist Pole coalition.

Probed about her beliefs, Abderrahim appears to stray off Ennahdha's tolerant message. She disapproves of homosexuality, children born outside of wedlock, and marriages between Tunisian women and non-Muslim foreigners.

"Tunisia is a Muslim country and we have our own customs, traditions and Islamic requirements," she said. "So we can't have these kinds of freedoms that other parties want."

Western governments have signaled their readiness to work with Ennahda. But Tunisia observer Steven Ekovich at the American University of Paris is not surprised at the lingering wariness.

"There probably should be some worry about what Ennahda may try to do," he said. "But on the other hand, Tunisians are going to be very vigilant. They're not going to let Ennahda go too far in the direction of an Islamic fundamentalism that doesn't suit the Tunisian temperament -- or Tunisian history, for that matter."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST RELIGION

Filed by Jahnabi Barooah  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 184
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:19 AM on 12/07/2011
There is nothing like moderate Islam. Islamic principles are laid out clear. These are the same principles which were there at the time of Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) and the companions.

You want to shape Islamic principles as you want it. That is never going to happen. At the same time please keep in mind Islam is not about subjugating people. There might be some cultures where people in the name of Islam have imposed it on people wrongly.
11:55 PM on 12/08/2011
You'd better re-read 9:29 (just for starters). Clear indeed. And that's from Allah, my friend. Or Mohammed if you don't believe in Allah.
01:01 AM on 12/09/2011
Thank you for replying.
You have directly jumped to verse 29 of chapter 9. I would rather advise you begin from verse 1 and see the context in which this verse was revealed.
Just to tell you in brief there was a peace treaty between Muslims and pagans of Mecca at the time of prophet Mohammad, which was unilaterally broken by the pagans of Mecca.

Therefore, this verse once again refers to those pagans who would continue to fight after the period of peace. It clearly commands Muslims to protect those who seek peace and are non-combatants. It is a specific verse with a specific ruling and can in no way be applied to general situations. The command of the verse was only to be applied in the event of battle.

Even in the situation of battle Quran commands in same chapter ( Chapter 9 , verse 5) "And if anyone of the enemies seeketh thy protection (O Muhammad), then protect him so that he may hear the Word of Allah, and afterward convey him to his place of safety"

Lets apply this principle in today's world. Assume you have US and Iran and a peace treaty is set between two countries. Now if Iran breaks this treaty and unilaterally attacks US. In this situation of battle between two countries, Do you think US Army General would tell his soldiers to don't do anything.Its right to fight in self defense when it comes to saving your own life.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alkh3myst
Of course you can pay me in gum!
01:41 AM on 12/03/2011
I love the way this article's headline put's the word moderate in quotes. "Moderate" Islam. How's that for objective journalism? The article goes on to try and equate concern for women's rights with being "moderate". This isn't proof of how pro or anti-Western (the definition of "moderate" to non-Muslims) a Muslim country is. Women's rights are PART of Islam. The stuff happening in Afghanistan for example is frankly un-Islamic. Then, Elizabeth Bryant quotes some Arab Frenchman on what some litmus tests of "moderation" will be. To many Europeans, the only "moderate" Islam will be when Muslims are having bacon cheeseburgers with beer. Finally, the article calls Souad Abderrahim a "hardliner" because she is opposed to homosexuality and promiscuity. Really??? THIS IS WHAT ISLAM TEACHES. If to believe in what our religion teaches isn't "moderate", then yeah, none of us are moderate. This is an attitude of irrational prejudice.
11:44 AM on 12/03/2011
"Women's rights are PART of Islam."

Excuse me? Then please explain Quran 2:228, 53:27, 5:6 and 4:11. Don't you even know "your own religion?"

If you believe this misogynistic foulness, then, yes, you are a "hard-liner," and "extremist," and anti-woman.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
harmlesstree
"We are a warlike people" George Carlin
07:48 AM on 12/11/2011
But I am sure you would agree with the statement that women's rights are part of Christianity and Judaism, despite the fact that Bible is far more misogynistic, and brutal towards women, than the Koran!

http://www.atheistfoundation.org.au/articles/women-bible

Well this is because you are a bigot,and thus hold a double standard, while selectively looking at Islam!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tracy Kline
03:40 PM on 12/07/2011
We use moderate to refer to those who don't follow the more abhorrent and inhumane parts of their religion. Yes, if you follow your religion, even the horrible parts, then you aren't moderate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alkh3myst
Of course you can pay me in gum!
04:13 PM on 12/07/2011
If you think my religion has "horrible parts", then you don't know anything about it.
07:46 PM on 11/30/2011
Quick question...when did Tunisia become Arab?

(poking fun at the name Arab Spring).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alkh3myst
Of course you can pay me in gum!
01:43 AM on 12/03/2011
Uh...about a millennium ago?
10:25 AM on 12/03/2011
Tunisia is not Arab. The majority Arab countries end in Egypt. Tunisa is Mahgreb I think. Or maybe Berber.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stacy Ann Tucker
Liberal with a capital "L"
05:22 PM on 11/30/2011
Ultimately, the people have to choose for themselves. The previous government was hostile to religious expression, so the Tunisians have gone towards what the government has been preventing. Totalitarian regimes in the Middle East suppressed Islamic groups as a threat to their power, so voters likewise think of Islam as an expression of power against tyranny. They need to see for themselves whether they want to trade the dictates of a tyrant for the dictates of their religion.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:57 PM on 11/29/2011
What does moderate Islam look like? Not that picture.
10:37 AM on 11/30/2011
Why?
04:27 PM on 11/30/2011
Probed about her beliefs, Abderrahim appears to stray off Ennahdha's tolerant message. She disapproves of homosexuality, children born outside of wedlock, and marriages between Tunisian women and non-Muslim foreigners.

"Tunisia is a Muslim country and we have our own customs, traditions and Islamic requirements," she said. "So we can't have these kinds of freedoms that other parties want."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stacy Ann Tucker
Liberal with a capital "L"
05:26 PM on 11/30/2011
We may have our differences, but I like that question. I don't think anyone can answer it, really. Moderate is in the eye of the beholder. Wearing hijab is moderate compared to wearing niqab (face-covering): it's all relative, isn't it?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dan Same
01:20 AM on 12/03/2011
No, I think it's about freedom of choice. When measuring whether something is moderate, the question should be whether the wearer chooses to wear/not wear it, not how much is revealed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tracy Kline
03:41 PM on 12/07/2011
Moderate is a relative term. There's no denying that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
raker
09:20 AM on 11/29/2011
One nice difference between religion and atheism is that atheism is not a spectrum of people peaceable to violent in the name of atheism, with a segment of "moderates" disinclined to murder others. Lack of belief provides no motive to murder. Score one for us dreaded secular humanists.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ysm218
read marx's "das kapital"
01:02 PM on 11/29/2011
Actually, considering Sam Harris, Dawkins, and Hitchens have cheerleaded our massacres of Muslims throughout the globe (iraq, afghanistan list could go on), I think it's safe to say that religious people aren't the only one's preaching violence to those who oppose their views. Considering far more Muslims have died at the hands of our bombs than the other way around, I think it's rather fair to say that the US government is guilty of more heinous acts of murder and terrorism than Muslims are. Yet, I don't believe the primary motivator of US policy is religious-I imagine it has to do with maintaining hegemony, which has very little to do with religious doctrine.

People don't dread secular humanists. People dread atheists who wander out of their labs and act as if their expertise on biology and neuroscience makes them qualified to speak on international law, geopolitical dynamics, and the impact of imperialism. If they actually respected the scientific method, and didn't blatantly reject all information that stands contrary to their preconceived notions, there wouldn't be a problem. I'd say a biologist is about at qualified to speak on international law and the political dynamics in the Muslim world as a creationist is to speak on the validity of evolution.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
raker
01:28 PM on 11/29/2011
Your summary of grievances might be an apt reply to somebody else's comment, but it has little to do with what I wrote.
11:03 PM on 11/29/2011
I guess all the great atheist movements will save us..........like Stalinism, Maoism, Pol Pot. Yikes they killed even more people than religion.
photo
Oblongato
My micro-bio defines me.
02:34 PM on 11/30/2011
God is purported to have wiped out the entire population of the planet with the exception of one man's family and 2 of each animal. (Yikes)
07:51 AM on 11/29/2011
@There are moderate Muslims but no moderate Islam.@ / Wafa Sultan
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Doug Sandlin
We see the world not as it is, but as we are.
10:03 PM on 11/29/2011
And Wafa Sultan has credibility with you .... why?

She makes her living denouncing Islam.

There are 1.6 Billion Muslims in the world ... and most of them don't seem to feel the need to do that.

If you see an anti-Catholic, do you see that as reflection on Catholicism? Or just that person's view? I see Wafa Sultan as I do "anti-anything" people of any stripe -- someone with an axe of their own to grind, who can't be counted on for credibility.

There are plenty of moderate articulations of Islam -- anyone can Google around for themselves and find them easily.
photo
Damn Damien
Naturally!
10:43 PM on 11/29/2011
"And Wafa Sultan has credibilit­y with you .... why?"
------
Because she has lived under the boot and you haven't.

"There are 1.6 Billion ... in the world ... and most of them don't seem to feel the need to do that. "
-----------------
How right. Most flat-earthers, and geo-centrists didn't feel the need to do anything. Others wanted to and faced the consequences.

"If you see an anti-Catho­lic, do you see that as reflection on Catholicis­m?"
---------------
You mean like those tied to stakes at the time, or in camps at one point of time, or those children?

You know about Google, use it!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:59 PM on 11/29/2011
Translation: Only Muslims who agree with me are moderate.
11:07 PM on 11/29/2011
Wafa Sultan and Ayan Hirsi Ali among others are professional Islam bashers, part of the Islamophobia industry spearheaded by the likes of Robert Spencer Pat Robertson.
08:33 AM on 12/01/2011
There should be a lot more Islam bashers. The world needs Islam bashers speaking the truth about Islam. When it comes from those born and raised in Islam, like Sultan and Ali, it's better.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dan Same
02:12 PM on 12/01/2011
So, so true. Ali (and to a lesser extent Sultan) is beloved of ignorant Islamophobes who use them as a pretext to attack Islam. It is absolutely disgusting. As for Spencer- one of the most vile Islamophobes out there-, and Pat Robertson- whom makes God ashamed to have him as a believer-, they are horrible beyond words.
04:07 AM on 11/29/2011
How charming... when it comes to her rights as woman, "Religion is not something we believe the state will interfere in or impose. It's a matter of personal choice;" but if we talk about LGBT people, unmarried couples and interracial marriages, "Tunisia is a Muslim country and we have our own customs, traditions and Islamic requirements."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alkh3myst
Of course you can pay me in gum!
01:51 AM on 12/03/2011
Yes, we do! You have a problem with that? Tough.
05:36 AM on 12/04/2011
Yes you do... what?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:36 AM on 11/29/2011
I am struck by the juxtaposition of two articles in Huffpo today.

This one, in which the Ennahda spokesperson says--with pride in her culture's standards:

"Probed about her beliefs, Abderrahim appears to stray off Ennahdha's tolerant message. She disapproves of homosexuality, children born outside of wedlock, and marriages between Tunisian women and non-Muslim foreigners.

"Tunisia is a Muslim country and we have our own customs, traditions and Islamic requirements," she said. "So we can't have these kinds of freedoms that other parties want."

Western governments have signaled their readiness to work with Ennahda."

And this article in which Norwegians flay themselves for not being multicultural enough:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/27/norway-apartheid-high-school_n_1115083.html

I believe this is an example of what Christopher Hitchens calls “one-way multiculturalismâ€.
photo
BurtonDesque
Fear a Blank Planet
02:18 AM on 11/29/2011
A picture of women wrapped up due to purdah is hardly encouraging if that's what now constitutes "moderate" Islam.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ysm218
read marx's "das kapital"
01:04 PM on 11/29/2011
A white man like you surely knows what's best for Muslim women in Tunisia.
photo
BurtonDesque
Fear a Blank Planet
02:52 PM on 11/29/2011
Congratulations! Playing the sexism and racism cards simultaneously!

I might not know what's best for them, but I do know that living in a nation guided by the Enlightenment values of democracy and equality would be better than what they had.

So far Tunisia has the former. Sadly, is seems to beheading towards less of the latter.

Purdah is patriarchal and sexist. It is, therefore, evil in all its forms.
photo
Oblongato
My micro-bio defines me.
03:21 PM on 11/30/2011
What is the main fallacy in your argument? Is it the ad hominem guilt by association fallacy? (As a white male, you belong to the oppressors.) Is it an argument from authority? (Only Muslim women are qualified to speak on the situation of Muslim women.) Is it an argument from motives? (You just want to criticize Islam, that's why you are pretending to be concerned about Muslim women.)

The only thing missing is anything resembling logic.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dan Same
01:18 PM on 11/29/2011
What if it's her choice? If she chose to do so, would you respect her decision or would you only do so if she made the choice that you approve of?
photo
BurtonDesque
Fear a Blank Planet
02:54 PM on 11/29/2011
A woman who chooses to follow purdah should be pitied. People who force women to live under purdah should be condemned.

These women are the former. They and the party they represent also seems to be headed towards the latter.

We shall see.
photo
BurtonDesque
Fear a Blank Planet
03:55 PM on 11/29/2011
"I'm personally opposed to parts of purhah"

Purdah is patriarchal and sexist in all its "parts", so that is what you 'partially' approve of. Pretty disgusting really.

All in all, you come across as just another clueless multiculturalist and relativist with no proper sense of Enlightenment values. Perhaps if, like me, you had once personally witnessed two girls being beaten for the 'offense' of showing a few stray hairs out from under their hijabs, you might see purdah in its true light.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:14 AM on 11/29/2011
“There never existed a person who could give unusual laws to his people without recourse to God, for otherwise such laws would not have been accepted.â€

–Machiavelli, The Discourses Chapter XI.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ysm218
read marx's "das kapital"
12:32 AM on 11/29/2011
Very true. America would not have been able to sell us on all our wars in the past twenty years, the cold war, and the funding of death squads throughout latin America without the justification of divine providence. If only religion would go away, we'd live in a magical utopia of peace, understanding, and reason!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:49 AM on 11/30/2011
If you're being sarcastic, you're not articulating your point terribly well. If you're being serious, you're going way over the top about a utopia of reason. The fact of the matter is, they sold us the Cold War by demonizing the "godless communists." And in the process, they funded the Taliban to the tune of about 3 billion dollars.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dan Same
08:19 AM on 11/29/2011
One doesn't need religion to justify terrible and pathetic laws. All one needs is an enemy, and then you use a term like war to describe it (the war against drugs/terrorism etc...), and you call those who criticize it appeasers or traitors, and it becomes quite easy to pass these laws. It's sort of like how the term Patriot was used to name the act that took so many civil liberties; if you oppose it, you're not a patriot.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:45 AM on 11/30/2011
Quite a good point, and quite well said. Should be a footnote to Nick's Discourses.
photo
Oblongato
My micro-bio defines me.
03:30 PM on 11/30/2011
"One doesn't need religion to justify terrible and pathetic laws."

But it helps.

Of course there are non-religious laws that are not good. However, it would be more interesting to hear what laws you can name that are based solely on religion (i.e. without a "coincidental" logical component - murder is forbidden by most religions, but there are clear logical reasons why it should be forbidden) that are not terrible and pathetic.
09:45 PM on 11/28/2011
Moderate Islam, now only as ridiculous as Christianity.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ysm218
read marx's "das kapital"
10:22 PM on 11/28/2011
So, you think Nasser's attempts at reforming Islam within Egypt were ridiculous? They seemed pretty justified within the Qu'ran to me, and there were many improvements under his leadership it's a shame the United States propped up reactionary Islamic regimes like Saudi Arabia instead.

Of course, the US's reason for opposing Nasser's Egypt and supporting reactionary regimes like Saudi Arabia were entirely secular-maintaining American hegemony.
10:32 PM on 11/28/2011
Actually, my comment was not nearly as topical as that. It was basically a cynical observation how, from the standpoint of an atheist, moderating Islam only brings it up to par with Christianity. It's still insane.

Baby steps, I guess.
10:52 AM on 11/30/2011
If you knew anything about Islam you would find that Islam, not so called moderate Islam, is far more advanced culturaly than Christianity. It is a religion that supports and accepts science, yes even evolution and the big bang, and human rights and women rights are fundemental aspects of the religion that over time may have been eroded due to cultural influences. Christianity had to abandon its faith in order to modernize, Islam simply needs to return to its core values and beliefs to modernize.
photo
Oblongato
My micro-bio defines me.
03:52 PM on 11/30/2011
You refer to science, cultural advancement, human rights and women's rights. More accurate would be the terms "science," "cultural advancement," "human rights" and "women's rights." You are defining all of your terms within the context of Islam.

I would argue that Islam:

- discounts science that contradicts Quran
- is moving in a direction that most living in a secular society would refer to as backwards
- discriminates against women, and
- violates the human rights of disbelievers and homosexuals.

If Islam is so wonderful, why has there not been a constant upwards trend in societies in which Islam is the primary ideological influence on people's lives? Why are other cultures not envious of life in Islamic countries?
08:50 AM on 12/01/2011
Not true at all. Look out into the world. Live inj an Islamic repulic. Live in an Islamic community in a western nation. Look at history. And read the Qur'an and Hadith.