More

HuffPost Social Reading

Chicago Teachers Express Concern Over New Evaluation System

Chicagoteacherstrike

First Posted: 11/29/2011 10:37 am Updated: 11/29/2011 10:42 am

Chicago Public School teachers are unenthusiastic about proposed teacher performance metrics for the district, saying they give excessive weight to standardized testing, according to a new survey released by the school district.

Starting next year, some Chicago school teachers will be graded in part based on their students' performance, if the new evaluation proposal drafted by CPS and Illinois State Board of Education members passes the Illinois legislature as is. But many details of the plan still need to be hashed out, including which tests will factor into teachers' scores and what weight test results will carry.

The plan, which will pilot in at least 300 schools by next September, isn't receiving good marks from Chicago's teachers. According to a new study released by CPS on Monday, Chicago teachers object to being evaluated by testing alone, saying it wouldn't accurately reflect their performance.

But frustrations with the reform effort didn't mean teachers were happy with the status quo: Only 30 percent said the current evaluation helps improve their practice.

In the report, which gathered teachers' reactions to various methods of evaluating their performance, educators offered alternative means of reviewing their work, including assessments of student work portfolios and individually set goals. But the teachers acknowledged the alternative evaluations presented logistical problems.

Two of their primary concerns were how much weight should be given to student performance, and how performance should be measured. Sixty-four percent said student performance should count for less than one quarter of a teacher's overall rating, with the remainder coming from other rating methods, such as conferences and teacher observations.

These positions set teachers at odds with Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel, who unveiled a merit-pay model earlier this month to CPS principals and network school chiefs.

Discussions of the value of standardized testing are particularly tense in light of the most recent batch of Illinois state performance exams. Illinois students returned record-low scores this year, after new legislation closed loopholes that had previously prevented 8 percent of low-performing 11th graders from taking the test.

Monday's study, commissioned by CPS and The Chicago Public Education Fund, is part of an outreach initiative to involve teachers in the redesign their evaluation system -- an approach mandated by the state's effort to reform teacher and principal evaluation, which launched in early 2010.

"Having the voice of teachers in this process was extremely important, having their input on the front end of this process" said Marielle Sainvilus, a spokesperson for CPS. "We respect our teachers and wanted them to be our partners because they're on the front lines in educating our children; they know best what works in a classroom."

Approximately 2,300 teachers had attended meetings held at 200 schools -- which Sainvilus said could give the study credibility in the eyes of the Chicago Teachers Union. The Chicago district has around 21,000 teachers.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CHICAGO

 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Realist1965
11:03 PM on 11/29/2011
I have never seen more time spent on demonizing one aspect of a job's evaluation - basic metrics around did you do your job or not? While it's not the entire picture, it certainly is a relevant aspect, and yet these people try to tell us "we don't understand - standardized testing are not relevant". So, what, every teacher in America has a completely subjective evaluation? I understand very well as a parent of 4 children and we demand every bit as much our teachers in what might be considered an"affluent" school district as what should be considered in Chicago. If you follow the logic, those in Chicago have far less of an opportunity to steer around and away from bad teachers/schools and yet we pay a fortune for their misfortune! The good teachers will say "Bring it on!", and the rest of the 50% or so will hide behind their union leadership.
10:47 PM on 11/29/2011
What's to stop administrators from loading up the classes of teachers they don't like with disruptive and low-achieving students?
09:37 PM on 11/29/2011
‘Almost every job in existence requires the employee show they are capable of doing the job and it is not uncommon for the employee to have to meet certain standards in order to keep their job.

With “every job in existence†when a worker is assigned a task, say, build a wall. If the worker receives “inferior wood†they send the wood back and start the job when they have the “requisite wood†(materials) to complete the job that is expected.
Do teachers get to return students who arrive with “inferior behaviors†from “inferior parents?â€
No.
I hope Emanuel’s horse had a nice time also.
08:19 PM on 11/29/2011
Standardized test scores have almost no correlation to quality of teaching. They correlate very highly to parent income (which tends to correlate with education).

Why not save all the money the schools spend on the standardized tests (it's a bundle) and just rate all the teachers in affluent areas "very effective," while rating all the teachers in the poor schools "inadequate." Same results, at a lower cost to the taxpayer.
09:37 PM on 11/29/2011
D**n, that's spot on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
youvebeenflagged
03:10 PM on 11/29/2011
Leave it to Rham to double down on No Child Left Behind. I feel sorry for you, Chicago, but at least we got him out of DC
12:20 PM on 11/30/2011
Don't feel sorry for us. We like for our teachers to be accountable for their performance and the teachers should want to be accountable for their performance.
03:06 PM on 11/29/2011
Fine but lets also evaluate the administrative staff, ceos, bankers, politicans etc.
Wow, will that mean everyone will be out of a job?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
softvoice
keep your eye on the prize
02:27 PM on 11/29/2011
I love teachers and appreciate what they do for our society. They should have no problem with being graded on their job performance. Almost every job in existence, requires the employee show they are capable of doing the job and it is not uncommon for the employee to have to meet certain standards in order to keep their job. Teachers should be no different.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
youvebeenflagged
03:12 PM on 11/29/2011
Ridiculous assertion. Standardized tests are NOT a real reflection of student learning and therefore no reflection on a teachers ability to teach. An over-reliance on standardized testing has destroyed our public education system and created generations of children incapable of critical thinking.
10:22 AM on 12/01/2011
Again...
It is false to say that teachers don't want to be evaluated. This feeds into the myth that educators or unions having an issue with how ineffective annual standardized state tests are at "evaluating" teachers equates teachers not wanting any type of accountability.
Of course there needs to be teacher accountability and of course teachers want feedback and measures to use to gage student learning and to gage our own lessons' effectiveness.

Understand ing that NCLB is damaging to public education and having the knowledge that annual standardized state tests scores have more to do with the neighborhood students are from than they do with the job a teacher is doing IS NOT THE SAME THING as believing the tests shouldn't be given to students or believing evaluations shouldn't be given to teachers. Not even close.
12:43 PM on 11/29/2011
Putting the cart before the horse never works. Before testing and evaluating, reform the curriculum making it logical. It is a shame that our educators do not recognize that humans learn when they are told a logical, chronologically correct story. Bits and pieces thrown at us, even though supposedly organized into subjects and lesson plans, work only to confuse us. On the other hand, you can sift, sort and integrate knowledge and make learning easy and exciting. See: http://news.medill.northwestern.edu/chicago/news.aspx?id=149281.
Center for integrative learning
www.centerforintegrativelearning.org and the
International Foundation of Microbiology
www.ifoundmicrobiology.com