More

Facebook, FTC Reach Settlement Over Alleged Privacy Violations

Facebook Ftc Settlement

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 11/29/11 01:14 PM ET Updated: 11/29/11 02:53 PM ET

This post has been updated.

On Tuesday, Facebook reached a settlement agreement with the Federal Trade Commission regarding the social network's policy on changing privacy controls and informing users of those changes.

Under the terms of the settlement Facebook must obtain approval from users before making changes to the way their personal data is shared on the network. For the next 20 years, Facebook must also submit to scheduled checkups by "independent, third-party auditors" to ensure that the company's privacy policies and practices do not violate users' rights.

"Facebook is obligated to keep the promises about privacy that it makes to its hundreds of millions of users," said FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz, according to a release published by the agency. "Facebook's innovation does not have to come at the expense of consumer privacy. The FTC action will ensure it will not."

Facebook Co-founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg also published a lengthy post on the Facebook Blog regarding the social network's future privacy efforts and its settlement with the FTC.

"I'm the first to admit that we've made a bunch of mistakes," Zuckerberg wrote.

These announcements confirm rumors earlier this month that Facebook and the FTC were reaching an agreement over the site's controversial policies regarding the protection of users' data.

The FTC's release lists seven complaints against Facebook's allegedly deceptive privacy practices, specifically that it told users some of their personal information would be kept private, but that the site later allowed that information to become accessible.

The agency's complete list of allegations are as follows:

  • In December 2009, Facebook changed its website so certain information that users may have designated as private – such as their Friends List – was made public. They didn't warn users that this change was coming, or get their approval in advance.
  • Facebook represented that third-party apps that users' installed would have access only to user information that they needed to operate. In fact, the apps could access nearly all of users' personal data – data the apps didn't need.
  • Facebook told users they could restrict sharing of data to limited audiences – for example with "Friends Only." In fact, selecting "Friends Only" did not prevent their information from being shared with third-party applications their friends used.
  • Facebook had a "Verified Apps" program & claimed it certified the security of participating apps. It didn't.
  • Facebook promised users that it would not share their personal information with advertisers. It did.
  • Facebook claimed that when users deactivated or deleted their accounts, their photos and videos would be inaccessible. But Facebook allowed access to the content, even after users had deactivated or deleted their accounts.
  • Facebook claimed that it complied with the U.S.- EU Safe Harbor Framework that governs data transfer between the U.S. and the European Union. It didn't.

Under the proposed agreement, Facebook must adopt a policy of allowing users to opt-in whenever changes are made to the site's privacy policy and sharing options. If a user deletes his or her account, Facebook must block other users from accessing data from the deleted account after 30 days.

For the next 20 years, Facebook's privacy policy will be assessed every two years to ensure that the company has made its privacy policies clear to its users and that it hasn't violated the terms of its agreement with the FTC.

Mark Zuckerberg wrote in his blog post that Facebook had recently taken many steps recently to give users more control over what they share on the network. However, he admitted that the company could do more to guarantee data security to its users.

Zuckerberg also wrote that the company has added two new Chief Privacy Officer positions. Erin Egan will become Facebook's executive in charge of policy, and Michael Richter will oversee products.

According to AllThingsD, "Facebook’s punishment is in line with what its competitors Twitter and Google have already agreed to: Clearer privacy policies that are audited every two years for the next 20 years."

Take a look at a roundup of reactions to the announcement that Facebook would cooperate with the FTC regarding users' privacy.


FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

This post has been updated. On Tuesday, Facebook reached a settlement agreement with the Federal Trade Commission regarding the social network's policy on changing privacy controls and informing us...
This post has been updated. On Tuesday, Facebook reached a settlement agreement with the Federal Trade Commission regarding the social network's policy on changing privacy controls and informing us...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 469
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
02:13 PM on 12/08/2011
This is a small batlle won in the war of keeping our data secure online.
I would have preffered to see a steap fine applied to Facebook for all of thei lil' "mishaps" on privacy!
http://www.vectorash.ro/facebook-settles-with-ftc/
02:08 AM on 12/01/2011
Mark Zuckerberg's parents made the worst mistake.
07:54 PM on 11/30/2011
diasp.org
05:42 PM on 11/30/2011
That's not a punishment. That's Facebook agreeing to follow the law from now on after not only had they not been, but also were lying about it. 20 year agreement? Sorry there Zuckerberg but if Facebook is still around after 5 years I'll eat my shoes. As soon as the "next thing" comes along with the popularity of Twitter then Facebook will join Myspace in obscurity. As everyone found out in the 90's with the "tech bubble" so shall Facebook learn that companies who provide no services or products are subjects to the whims and fads of their audience.
Norm
Read think read analyze read comment
06:50 AM on 11/30/2011
So, what was the punishment? None, you say? Just a "settlement"? Seems the FTC is as impotent as the SEC. Zuckerman is undoubtedly laughing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:59 PM on 11/30/2011
Laughing all the way to the bank. Does anyone think the computer whizzes Zuckerberg hires to find ways around anything the FTC 'desires' - and proposes to look into every 2 years - will slow them down? What a joke.

I think this was an appropriate time to send a message. Maybe a $1 billion fine for Zuckerberg and a $5 billion fine for Facebook. It might have stung a little, but it would be a start.
photo
The Dude67
This is not Nam; this is bowling, there are rules.
06:49 AM on 11/30/2011
Or you could just use unthink.com
06:40 AM on 11/30/2011
What if you could ask your iPhone to start your car? Developer Brandon Fiquett has gotten his phone to do just that - hacking Siri on the iPhone 4S....Read more »http://new3tech.blogspot.com/2011/11/siri-hack-lets-your-iphone-control-your.html
02:53 AM on 11/30/2011
So that means that FB is of the hook for all that it has done (and the money its made out from it) and now they are following particular rules. Until next time I guess, when the users will complain about something that is not covered by this deal, and then it will take another couple of years to deal with it.
I don't have anything about social media, especially since I am in advertising, but this selling of online data is really bad for all of us
photo
Lao2stroker
I love the smell of 2stroke smoke in the morning..
02:29 AM on 11/30/2011
I hope it goes away but prolly won't. Oh well, I can always be a dinosaur that says he never had it.
02:23 AM on 11/30/2011
I can't go hating on the Zuckerberg. He just doesn't look like an evil billionaire. Now Murdoch, there's your evil 1% look.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Adrienne Williams
Scifi Geek, Enneagram Life, Bi Social Network
02:10 AM on 11/30/2011
Geek Question: Are folks going over to Google+ now? As an IT person (once upon a time) that understand developers in some way, I don't think it's that black and white.... but I"m torn on this one. Any data you give to a computer is in some way going to be used by someone. The only way that you are off the grid is if you never get a credit card, you never open an account you never sign up for anything and you hide your cash under your mattress. Now let me link this to facebook. wink.
01:42 AM on 11/30/2011
Information through our friend - "Nishioka":

The Commission vote to accept the consent agreement package containing the proposed consent order for public comment was 4-0.

The FTC will publish a description of the consent agreement package in the Federal Register shortly.

The agreement will be subject to public comment for 30 days, beginning today and continuing through December 30, 2011 after which the Commission will decide whether to make the proposed consent order final.

Interested parties can submit comments online or in paper form by following the instructions in the "Invitation To Comment" part of the "Supplementary Information" section.

Comments in paper form should be mailed or delivered to: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, Room H-113 (Annex D), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20580.

The FTC is requesting that any comment filed in paper form near the end of the public comment period be sent by courier or overnight service, if possible, because U.S. postal mail in the Washington area and at the Commission is subject to delay due to heightened security precautions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hursh 4 ever
Smart Commenter - logical and wise
01:03 AM on 11/30/2011
I hid my friends list, cause I didn't want anyone to be able to see it... well when you add other people to your friends list, they have access to everyone of your friends... every name comes up as 'a person you might know' to them, and it clearly states that they are your friends.
01:02 AM on 11/30/2011
Considering how expensive lawyers cost I'm sure Mark Z. was fully aware of what they were doing and knew the risk. He just chose to take that chance because the payoff outweighed the penalty. Had the penalty been to end Facebook that "mistake" would've never happened in the first place.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Counter Sniper
Though I Wander I Am Not Lost...
12:59 AM on 11/30/2011
And this guy isn't in prison. Why the hell not. He made billions thru deceptive practices and outright fraud.
01:24 AM on 11/30/2011
he is obama's friend - and is needed for his re-election campaign.
01:49 AM on 11/30/2011
That was pretty low, even for a troll! GBA
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Adrienne Williams
Scifi Geek, Enneagram Life, Bi Social Network
02:04 AM on 11/30/2011
Wow, what a statement.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dave elliott
correcting the right's ignorance,fruitlessly
10:41 AM on 11/30/2011
same reason all the goper's, tpers, favorite criminals aren't in prison i guess, some people will make an us versus them case out of anything. the world works the way it works. even your favorite candidates. (yes all of them, dem or repub) play the same games. it is up to the people to set their rules and if we don't hold their feet to the fire, this is what we get. we have to tell them what we want them to do. as it is now, they tell us what they are going to do. and back to your post.......doubt it is outright fraud, but is on that fine line.