iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Kelly Ayotte Challenges Obama On Detainee Policy

Kelly Ayotte Obama Detainee Policy

DONNA CASSATA   11/29/11 03:45 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — The face of Republican opposition to President Barack Obama's policy for handling suspected terrorists is a 43-year-old former prosecutor who has been in the Senate a mere 11 months.

New Hampshire Sen. Kelly Ayotte is at the forefront of the escalating fight over whether to treat captured suspects as prisoners of war or criminals. The administration says it is determined to build on its success in killing al-Qaida's Osama bin Laden and Anwar al-Awlaki and frustrated by lawmakers' meddling. Republicans counter that Congress is filling a void created by Obama's failure to establish a consistent system on how to treat suspects.

"The administration doesn't have a detainee policy," Ayotte said in an interview. "It's ad hoc. ... There's a lack of clarity in the administration's positions."

In a strong message to the Obama administration, the Senate on Tuesday overwhelmingly rejected an effort to strip provisions dealing with terror suspects from a massive defense bill. The White House has threatened to veto the bill over several provisions, including one requiring military custody of a suspect deemed to be a member of al-Qaida or its affiliates and involved in plotting or committing attacks on the United States.

The vote was 61-37 against an amendment by Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo., to delete the provisions and hold hearings with intelligence and military officials on the issue.

As the Senate pushes to complete a massive defense bill this week, the confrontation is testing the constitutional boundaries of executive and legislative authority as well as the mettle of a Democratic commander in chief in a politically charged environment.

Steadfast in defending the provisions are longtime members of the Senate Armed Services Committee and familiar players from past detainee debates – the panel's chairman, Carl Levin, D-Mich.; its top Republican, Arizona's John McCain and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.

Joining that cadre is Ayotte, who served as New Hampshire's attorney general for five years and is married to Lt. Col. Joe Daley, a reservist fighter pilot who flew combat missions in Iraq.

"We don't want to tell a terrorist you have the right to remain silent," Ayotte said Tuesday during Senate debate. "That's the issue here."

Legal affairs and the ongoing war on terror are major elements of Ayotte's life, and she requested a seat on the Armed Services panel when she arrived in Washington in January. At hearing after hearing, she pressed senior Pentagon officials about what the United States does with captured suspected terrorists and why some 27 percent of detainees transferred back to their home countries return to the battlefield.

"The answers I got from the military and the Defense Department was very unsatisfying," Ayotte said.

In the spring, she spent a day at the Navy prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, a facility she described as top rate with a state-of-the-art courtroom for military tribunals.

This fall, she has been outspoken in rejecting administration criticism of the detainee provisions, complaints from the White House, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and FBI Director Robert Mueller that the legislation is congressional micromanaging and would thwart ongoing terrorism investigations.

"She has a good understanding of the difference between fighting a crime and a war. And she's been very helpful in constructing a legal system that recognizes the difference between fighting a crime and a war," Graham said.

Ayotte has pushed even harder than some of her colleagues, offering an amendment to the defense bill to expand forms of interrogation of suspected terrorists detained by the United States.

Her measure would authorize new interrogation methods beyond those established in the Army Field Manual, which specifically prohibits torture and degrading treatment. Ayotte's proposal would allow for a classified section to the manual, which civil rights groups say could be used to sanction more aggressive techniques.

More than 30 civil rights groups say Ayotte's amendment to a defense bill would "dangerously roll back" restrictions on interrogation techniques that Congress overwhelmingly approved in 2005 by allowing interrogators to use new methods beyond those allowed in the Army Field Manual. They've warned it could reopen the door to methods they consider to be torture.

"Some of these amendments are solutions in search of problems, especially the amendment on interrogation," said Devon Chaffee, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union. "No one in the military is asking for this amendment. Even the military and intelligence services believe they have what they need."

Ayotte says the criticism is unfounded and dismisses the suggestion that it would allow cruel and inhumane treatment as false.

Privately, Republicans and Democrats describe the freshman senator as studious and hard-working. A fiscal and social conservative, Ayotte narrowly won the GOP Senate nomination last year – she got a boost when Sarah Palin called her "one tough Granite grizzly" – and rode the Republican wave to Capitol Hill. She is the mother of two young children, 7-year-old Katherine and 5-year-old Jacob.

Unlike some in the GOP freshmen class, former House members Rob Portman, Roy Blunt and Pat Toomey, the Nashua-born Ayotte had no previous elective experience; attorney general is an appointed position.

"She was a real person before she was a U.S. senator," said Fergus Cullen, former chairman of the New Hampshire Republican Party. "Not a lot of them are."

Cullen said that as attorney general, Ayotte was "always measured, never bombastic."

She recently endorsed Mitt Romney for president, a critical move in the state that holds the first primary. Romney was pressed on possible vice presidential choices, said providing names would be presumptuous and then added: "There probably are 15 names of people, including Kelly Ayotte."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — The face of Republican opposition to President Barack Obama's policy for handling suspected terrorists is a 43-year-old former prosecutor who has been in the Senate a mere 11 months...
WASHINGTON — The face of Republican opposition to President Barack Obama's policy for handling suspected terrorists is a 43-year-old former prosecutor who has been in the Senate a mere 11 months...
Filed by Luke Johnson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 396
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
speedy evans
09:38 AM on 12/13/2011
kelly just got her job in the gop now you want to worry bout some terroist in lockup.she must be covering up for bush&chaney so we can't bring those 2 terroist to justice.. those 2 need to be detained on site if they leave the country
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sanarae Brachelle
08:50 AM on 12/05/2011
Okay Senators can we focus on whats a real problem, unemployment, housing and taxes just to name a few. Right now I could care less about these detainees, they at least have food on the table, housing to keep them warm, health care and many of our citizens don't have not one of these things. So since you came into office to change things Ms. Senator, stop trying to make it your job to get rid of the President and do what you were hired to do and PRIORITIZE!!! 1. UNEMPLOYMENT, 2. GAS PRICES 3. HOUSING, 4. HEALTHCARE !!!!!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sam Bark
It's a MAD world after all...
01:08 AM on 12/02/2011
Please Ms. Cassata what a trashy statement: "The face of Republican opposition to President Barack Obama's policy for handling suspected terrorists is a 43-year-old former prosecutor who has been in the Senate a mere 11 months". While this esteemed POTUS was a mere presence in Illinois assembly and the US Senate, since he is spending most of his time campaigning…... and it clearly shows in his job performance: The economy is down, the world is laughing at our weakness, and all he care about is calss warfare…. NOT LEADING OUR COUNTRY…..
photo
Gestas
Mountain Man
01:30 PM on 11/30/2011
Just another way for Republicans to talk, talk, talk...and never say anything.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CSKAP
Morlock or Eloi?
01:27 PM on 11/30/2011
“The administration doesn't have a detainee policy," Ayotte said in an interview. "It's ad hoc. ...”
Gosh, you mean that every single circumstance is not exactly the same?
Anytime you try for a cookie cutter response to complex questions you fail.
Every attempted terrorist attack is an act of war, there is nuance. If not, we should attack Texas for the Ft. Hood massacre. (humm…wait a sec, I might have something there)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sam Bark
It's a MAD world after all...
01:11 AM on 12/02/2011
CSKAP -- I guess you had the same kool-aid that the Attorney General Holder had..LMAO
12:59 PM on 11/30/2011
Let's forget about our debt and unemployment, but let's focus on detainee policy. Our government sure does have it's priorities straight don't they. Using Governor Christie's word's "what the hell are we paying you for".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lithium12
Fighting ignorance makes you an enemy of the right
12:34 PM on 11/30/2011
Her voice during dubya? not heard hmmm
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
caution08
let no-one change your beliefs!
12:24 PM on 11/30/2011
That old battlelax needs to go get her coloring book and crayons , and find a dark corner and crawl up in it .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gary St Lawrence
11th Commandment: Thou Shalt Not Get Away With It
12:19 PM on 11/30/2011
Pure Republican cafeteria patriotism: "I like that law. I don't like that law. This law should apply to some people, but not everyone. I'll have some of this amendment. That amendment doesn't apply to me. Here, you should have some of this amendment. I've already taken out the icky parts for you."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gary St Lawrence
11th Commandment: Thou Shalt Not Get Away With It
12:17 PM on 11/30/2011
Yeah? How about if Obama challenges Ayotte on her fraud and financial scandal?

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/5415976/former_new_hampshire_attorney_general.html

Gotta love these t3ab@gg3rs, their hypocrisy and holier-than-thou-ness is beyond measurement.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
gsmp
What the ????
01:08 PM on 11/30/2011
I checked the link and will be doing more research, Gary, but, apparently it didn't matter to the voters. Hey NH, what's up? This is a tper? This is the vision of our future? Words fail me!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sam Bark
It's a MAD world after all...
01:14 AM on 12/02/2011
gary S L -- and Obama's friends in Chicago are falling one by one trying to keep him from being dragged with them......
Rowwdy
Truth Will Set You Free
11:53 AM on 11/30/2011
*No sentence shall be passed and no penalty shall be executed on a person found guilty of an offence except pursuant to a conviction pronounced by a court offering the essential guarantees of independence and impartiality.
In particular:
(a) the procedure shall provide for an accused to be informed without delay of the particulars of the offence alleged against him and shall afford the accused before and during his trial all necessary rights and means of defense;
(b) no one shall be convicted of an offence except on the basis of individual penal responsibility;
(c) no one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence, under the law, at the time when it was committed; nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than that which was applicable at the time when the criminal offence was committed; if, after the commission of the offence, provision is made by law for the imposition of a lighter penalty, the offender shall benefit thereby;
(d) anyone charged with an offence is presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law;
(e) anyone charged with an offence shall have the right to be tried in his presence;
(f) no one shall be compelled to testify against himself or to confess guilt.
http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/FULL/475?OpenDocument
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sam Bark
It's a MAD world after all...
01:17 AM on 12/02/2011
rowwdy -- somehow you are confusing international B$ wannabe and progressives fanatasy with US law system.......
11:19 AM on 11/30/2011
I would rather have Obama's policy than Sen Ayotte's policy of the military being able to imprison American citizens for life without a trial. Hers is a serious gutting of Constitutional provisions against government overreach. Under the policy just passed by the Senate, Sen Ayotte and others would get rid of the necessity of warrants, habeas corpus, due process, and right to trial by peers. It would also void Posse Comitatus and the Insurrection Act.

Under this scenario, people who were on Richard Nixon's "enemies list" would still be in prison. Charged with no crime. Not given a trial. Does that sound like freedom that Ayotte and other TPers claim that they want? Does that sound like ending intrusive big government that they claim they're trying to do? No. It creates a state where anyone who disagrees with the government is considered a terrorist. If that's the case, we've lost the war on terrorism.

Even if a trial was granted, it wouldn't be in a civilian court. It would be in a military court. The rules of evidence are much different. Civilian courts have shown they can handle this and handle it well. I do not trust you, Senator Ayotte, nor the military to determine who is and who is not a "terrorist."

I challenge YOU, Sen Ayotte to explain why you hate the Constitution so much? Why you hate freedom?

You swore to uphold the Constitution, Sen Ayotte, not gut it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Epilef2000
Cafe Con Leche Party
11:12 AM on 11/30/2011
so Republican Senators are more concerned with having a consistent policy on how we treat terrorists--i guess they are scared they might be confused and pull out the Constitution on the military.

But Bush's nuclear policy, which supposedly sought to prevent a nuclear attack by Iraq's Hussein, but negotiated and allowed North Korea's Kim Jong Il ascertain and test nuclear weapons was a consistent policy.....

At, the McConnell was truthful in saying Republicans want Obama to be a one term President, regardless of the damage they inflict on the American populace
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JoanMeijer
Author of Relentless: The Search For Typhoid Mary
10:57 AM on 11/30/2011
When we start picking and choosing who the 4th Amendment applies to we'd better watch our own backs.
photo
WiltonDiary
JoeMcNamara
10:53 AM on 11/30/2011
Where are the jobs the Republicans promised if elected to take back the Congress in 2010?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GypsyRobin
Cast aspersions on Gohmert not his asparagus!
12:37 PM on 11/30/2011
Nope. No jobs. Just a heap of nothing.

Kinda like the "Nothing" that took over the world in "The Never-Ending Story"