iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Nativity Scene Comes To Life Before The Supreme Court


First Posted: 11/30/11 06:44 PM ET Updated: 11/30/11 06:52 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- Christmas came early to the Supreme Court Wednesday when roughly 20 members of the Nativity Project, a nationwide campaign to "celebrate religious freedom," displayed a live version of the Nativity just steps in front of the courthouse. There was Mary, Joseph, baby Jesus, the Three Kings, a camel and a donkey (the latter two being the real thing).

The group began by marching around the Supreme Court building to the front, where they sang classic Christmas carols such as "Silent Night" and "Joy to the World." Leading the march was Rev. Rob Schenck, president of Faith and Action in the Nation's Capital, and Rev. Patrick Mahoney, director of the Christian Defense Coalition. Their two groups co-sponsor the Nativity Project.

"We need to remind even our elected and appointed officials that work here on Capitol Hill that the true meaning of Christmas is the giving of the Savior, Christ the Lord," Schenck told The Huffington Post. "We exercise our First Amendment rights to express our religious beliefs, and we do that because if you don't exercise your rights, you lose your rights."

Mahoney told HuffPost that the Nativity Project has found "creative ways" to work around a Supreme Court ruling that held spending public money on Nativity scenes violates the First Amendment's establishment clause.

"Individual citizens can go apply for permits," he said, pulling out the one that the Christian Defense Coalition obtained from the U.S. Capitol Police Board. He said it allows his group to "circumvent what we believe are these unjust decisions by state, local and federal courts."

"How can any local court say it's not constitutional," Mahoney continued, "when we have a permit to do it in front of the highest court in the land?"

In fact, Mahoney's permit, which he said was not difficult to obtain, allowed a group of up to 60 individuals to participate in a three-hour march, along with live animals. Mahoney said supporters in other cities are applying for permits to set up their own live Nativity scenes.

The whole demonstration lasted roughly 30 minutes, catching the eye of many passing spectators with some opting to join the procession.

"We're telegraphing a message to the country: If we can do this in front of the United States Supreme Court, you can certainly do it in front of your county court, your city hall and your public square," Schenck said. "We want people across the country to be encouraged by this and realize they too can express their First Amendment constitutionally protected privileges."

The allocation of public money is not the only factor courts use to determine whether a religious display on public property is constitutional. Courts also ask whether reasonable observers of the display would see the display and think government was endorsing a particular religion. Just last month, the justices let stand a lower court's decision that used this rationale to deem unconstitutional a series of crosses placed along public highways in Utah by a privately organized police association.

Just in case any reasonable observer would think the government was endorsing today's performance, one restless camel made sure to leave a puddle of urine right in front of the Supreme Court.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Christmas came early to the Supreme Court Wednesday when roughly 20 members of the Nativity Project, a nationwide campaign to "celebrate religious freedom," displayed a live version of t...
WASHINGTON -- Christmas came early to the Supreme Court Wednesday when roughly 20 members of the Nativity Project, a nationwide campaign to "celebrate religious freedom," displayed a live version of t...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 69
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allen Bouchard
I worship His Divine Shadow.
11:13 AM on 12/01/2011
You're not circumventing anything, you superstitious idiot. You've done it the right way. You only think that you're circumventing something because you're so use to getting preferential treatment that you don't recognize the level playing field that you find yourself on for what it is.
schrodster
veni vidi I'm outta here
08:29 AM on 12/01/2011
Where's Santa????????
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nemo Oudeheis
Whoever is not busy being born is busy dying.
08:22 AM on 12/01/2011
Smallpox has been eliminated. Now we can turn our attention to that other invisible pestilence.
08:08 AM on 12/01/2011
Let em have at it...no different than gays getting a permit to march or rollerskate naked through our cities once a year to assert their rights...no different than the Polaski Day or Saint Patrick's Day parades or any other parade that celebrates a heritage. As long as they get a permit, abide by it, and limit their display to the permitted time frame, let 'em have at it. The marches and parades go on without my consent, interference, or frankly, attention of any kind. No different! Just don't force that BS on me through this country's legislative process and laws. That is where I draw the line.
07:50 AM on 12/01/2011
Oh, yeah, christians, the war guys. Follow us or we'll nuke you. The damage wrought by such people is immeasurable.
03:38 AM on 12/01/2011
Christian-Jews, if they weren't so dangerous, they'd be downright hilarious!!
03:06 AM on 12/01/2011
"We exercise our First Amendment rights to express our religious beliefs, and we do that because if you don't exercise your rights, you lose your rights."

You're more likely to lose your rights because someone expressing their religious beliefs pressed lawmakers to take them away.
02:15 AM on 12/01/2011
"one restless camel made sure to leave a puddle of urine right in front of the Supreme Court."

The only truly appropriate statement made by the whole event.
01:49 AM on 12/01/2011
Religious freedom for whom???
Then they won't have a problem when we grab our drums and rattles and dance to the Mother in the same spot? Freedom for everyone-
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bushfailure
12:37 AM on 12/01/2011
Their message is of peace and love for all. Pepper spray them.
03:08 AM on 12/01/2011
I admit, I chuckled.
photo
Intolerantcentrist
No thanks…I brought my own air.
12:09 AM on 12/01/2011
This is what implementation of the Establishment Clause looked like in 1789: government supported churches could be found in at least six states; some state constitutions barred non-Christians or even non-Protestants from holding a government office (at least eleven of the thirteen states had religious qualifications for hold a government office); and in Rhode Island, Jews and Catholics were ostensibly disqualified from state citizenship.
03:08 AM on 12/01/2011
Texas still has a no-atheists policy in their State Constitution.
06:53 AM on 12/01/2011
Believing that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their Legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church and State - Thomas Jefferson
photo
Intolerantcentrist
No thanks…I brought my own air.
12:06 AM on 12/03/2011
Yet what most of us fail to realize is that the First Amendment is best viewed originally to protect States from the Federal government. Jefferson provides proof. Jefferson as President in 1802 refused to declare a day of religious Thanksgiving; yet he had done so as Governor of Virginia 20 years before. In a letter to Reverend Samuel Miller in 1808, Jefferson defended his actions by referring to the First and Tenth Amendments:

“I am aware that the practice of my [Presidents] predecessors may be quoted. But I have ever believed that the example of state executives led to the assumption of that authority by the general government, without due examination, which would have discovered that what might be a right in a state government, was a violation of that right when assumed by another.”
12:05 AM on 12/01/2011
Do these people even realize that the two nativity stories completely contradict one another?

The one in Matthew has Mary and Joseph fleeing with the baby Jesus to Egypt because of some cockamamie dream Joseph has about Herod wanting to kill the child.

In Luke's account, the couple simply goes to the temple to have the baby sanctified, then returns to Nazareth no worse for the wear.
03:23 AM on 12/01/2011
Do you mean to tell me that in Luke, they made Jesus a Jew?!!
06:46 AM on 12/01/2011
Because religious belief, or non-belief, is such an important part of every person's life, freedom of religion affects every individual. Religious institutions that use government power in support of themselves and force their views on persons of other faiths, or of no faith, undermine all our civil rights. - Thomas Jefferson
photo
Harvey32
Wheresoever you go, go with all your heart
11:42 PM on 11/30/2011
"Celebrate religious freedom?"

Then I trust that they'll be cool with me doing a couple of chicken sacrifices in the middle of their nativity scene....religious freedom and all.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:29 PM on 11/30/2011
So they can have a nativity scene in front of the court, but Cornel West gets arrested?
photo
PaganKMcK
Dems are from Earth; GOP are from Ferenginar
12:15 AM on 12/01/2011
That was my question.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tazirai
Society is not your friend.
11:16 PM on 11/30/2011
Church State Separate