iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Sen. Susan Collins: Tax The Rich To Fund Payroll Tax Cut For Workers

Susan Collins

Posted: 11/30/11 02:54 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- Moderate Republican Sen. Susan Collins broke party ranks Wednesday, supporting a tax hike on millionaires and billionaires in order to fund a tax break for working Americans.

The senator from Maine also skewered a key GOP talking point by differentiating the wealthy, described in nearly all Republican rhetoric as "job creators," from the people who actually create jobs -- otherwise known as employers.

Democrats have proposed cutting payroll taxes by 3.1 percent, which could put about $1,500 back in the pockets of the average household. Republicans are supportive of the tax cut, but adamantly oppose the Democratic plan to pay for it by levying a surtax on income above $1 million.

"We're not arguing against extending this payroll tax cut," Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said Wednesday on the Senate floor. "We just think we shouldn't be punishing job creators to pay for it."

"If, in fact, we can find common ground on these extensions, I think you can take to the bank the fact that they will be paid for," House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) said later.

But Collins, often a maverick in her party, made a telling departure from the prevailing orthodoxy, arguing that job creators and the rich are not one and the same, and that actual job creators are businesses, such as small corporations and partnerships, that hire people.

"What I've been looking at is can you carve out those businesses from the surtax, and you can," Collins told reporters just outside the Senate chamber, explaining that there's a difference between working enterprises and idle rich.

"There is already a body of well-developed law in the tax code having to do with active business participation versus passive business participation," she said.

"I think that's the answer to this dilemma. I do not want to impose additional taxes on the employers at a time when our economy is very fragile and we want to encourage them to hire," Collins said. "On the other hand, I do believe that multimillionaires and billionaires who are not running businesses could pay more of their income to help us deal with the deficit."

Congressional leaders' offices did not immediately react to Collins' solution, which she described as being in the "embryonic" stage.

But she said she has spoken with them and with some of her colleagues -- and they might be receptive.

"I believe some are intrigued by the idea," Collins said. "What we've been hearing over and over again is that the reason Republicans are opposed to the surtax is because of the concern of its impact on job creation. Well, if you carve out employers, you take away that argument."

Collins may be breaking ground on taxing the rich, but another New England Republican -- Sen. Scott Brown of Massachusetts -- had already broken ranks with his leaders Tuesday, saying the payroll tax cut should not be paid for, which avoids the issue of taxing millionaires entirely.

Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan.) also reportedly suggested he might support some sort of surtax.

Democrats saw such statements as signs that their message accusing Republicans of favoring the rich was working.

"Cracks are starting to emerge in the Republicans' wall of opposition to asking millionaires and billionaires to pay their fair share," said a spokesman for Senate Democrats in a statement. "The Republicans are sensing that the debate is slipping away from them on this issue."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Moderate Republican Sen. Susan Collins broke party ranks Wednesday, supporting a tax hike on millionaires and billionaires in order to fund a tax break for working Americans. The sena...
WASHINGTON -- Moderate Republican Sen. Susan Collins broke party ranks Wednesday, supporting a tax hike on millionaires and billionaires in order to fund a tax break for working Americans. The sena...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,117
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (65 total)
  1 of 3  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
Gaylord P Farqua 06:14 PM on 11/30/2011
For then years the so called "job creators" have enjoyed huge tax breaks but there are still no visible signs that this relief to the rich has created any real number of jobs. It has taken a great deal of courage for Senator Collins to break ranks with the disciples of Grover Norquist and it will be interesting to see how long it will take before she is punished for her position. The Senator's logic is well  Read More...
10:40 PM on 02/08/2012
My question is: Why do these discussions always focus on federal income tax rates and at best give lip service to the other taxes we pay?

Federal income taxes only amount to 30% of the taxes we pay. The other 70% includes social security taxes, property taxes, sales taxes, and gas taxes. They shift the tax burden onto the working poor and middle class. But almost no one takes a serious look at those numbers.

If you do the calculation with those other taxes, a single minimum wage earner can easily pay over 30% of her wages in taxes, even though she may next to nothing in federal income taxes. Here's a website that goes through the calculation of all the taxes we pay ... for the working-poor, the middle class, Warren Buffett, and Mitt Romney: http://fairsharetaxes.org It also has a great proposal for a really fair, really simple, economy saving tax system for the US.

Guess what?

Romney pays 14% of his investment gains and income, including corporate taxes
A minimum-wage worker pays 34% of her wages.

Romney pays taxes 2% of his net worth (accumulated wealth).
A minimum wage worker pays taxes often over 500% of her net worth.

Pete
fairsharetaxes.org
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Endogenous Light Nexus
There actually is light within you
11:45 PM on 12/01/2011
It's nice to see that there are a few sane Republicans after all.
02:04 PM on 12/01/2011
Here's a novel thought--tax the hell out of the rich, and give them huge tax breaks when they actually DO "create jobs."
RoofinReality
In the middle, trending fast away from the radical
03:52 PM on 12/01/2011
I like the idea.
In fact, I believe the following should be the case.
Take the tax cut for the top 2% of income earners (Nothing but MILLIONAIRES in this group) and put their tax breaks back to the Clinton era.
Once the unemployment rate is under 6% for 5 consecutive months, the tax cuts they previously enjoyed can be gradually restored over the next 3 fiscal years. Even if the unemployment rate goes up a little, even over 7%, they can still get some of the tax cuts restored.
But, once it gets to 8%, the tax cuts expire the next fiscal year.

And, if the unemployment goes over 9, their rates go up 5% more AND the next 15% of income earners also get an automatic trigger of 5% increases in their taxes as well.

Now, all those millionaires who create jobs have plenty of "skin in the game" to get the unemployment rate lowered and then to keep it lower.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alex Fidelibus
Give reason a chance.
02:00 PM on 12/01/2011
This just in: "Hell has apparently frozen over!"
RoofinReality
In the middle, trending fast away from the radical
03:55 PM on 12/01/2011
Not really, at least in terms of Ms. Collins. Every once in a Congress, she'll come up with something that's sensible.

Now, if you're speaking of a Repub making such a sensical comment, that'sa fair statement.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rinpochet
Do unto others ...
11:45 AM on 12/01/2011
Tax cuts for the middle class must be paid for. Tax cuts for the wealthy? Not so much.
photo
mmsuki
Fine; I evolved, you didn't.
11:39 AM on 12/01/2011
It's amazing how many republicans will go against a proposal that a vast majority of Americans favor.
Don't they know this?
02:01 PM on 12/01/2011
They will.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ann Delicath
Hoping to get smarter rather than just older
02:03 PM on 12/01/2011
Unfortunately, the color green has blinded them. They don't know that a lot of citizens are seeing red, the bright red of anger.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
souzanne
11:36 AM on 12/01/2011
Bravo! Ms Collins,welcome aboard,you have made the right decision to help your Country and all of us citizens including yourself.,
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
WillCooney
Democrat dagnabit! Now leave me alone!
12:03 PM on 12/01/2011
Now, let's hope our "Blue Dog" Democrats are as receptive!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alex Fidelibus
Give reason a chance.
01:59 PM on 12/01/2011
Yes! Lets!
11:35 AM on 12/01/2011
It's about time. The people are behind her. People of every political persuasion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
opinioned1
MADAM president 2016
11:25 AM on 12/01/2011
Amazing--A republican that actually has some common sense and is willing to stand up for the 99%.

Wish I lived in her district, I would vote for her in a heart beat.
Rowwdy
Truth Will Set You Free
10:50 AM on 12/01/2011
*It’s great to see a Republican finally putting our Country first, above party ideology; Mrs. Susan Collins didn’t sign the Taxpayer Protection Pledge but Mitch McConnell and John Boehner did, she was smart enough to see what that pledge could do to America.
http://s3.amazonaws.com/atrfiles/files/files/091411-federalpledgesigners(1).pdf
"If, in fact, we can find common ground on these extensions, I think you can take to the bank the fact that they will be paid for," House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) said later.
Where are you going to get the money Mr. Boehner? You can’t get it from Social Security because that’s where the proposed tax breaks will be coming from; the so called payroll tax cut of 3.1% is actually coming from the amount employees pay into the Social Security Trust Fund. Are you going to get it from Medicare? More than likely not, because I guarantee you if you try to cut Medicare there will be 53,000,000 senior citizens you will have to answer to. Are you going to get it from Medicaid? You more than likely will, because the Republican Party has proven that they really don’t care about the widowed, orphaned and aged. Suggestions; how about cutting congresses salary and benefits, or your compensation for mileage, or your Restaurant Fund, or your Health and Fitness Facility, or your Congress Hair Care Revolving Fund, is that asking too much???
http://www.fms.treas.gov/annualreport/index.html
10:49 AM on 12/01/2011
The best plan for the Congress is to do absolutely nothing until the Bush Tax Cuts expire at the end of 2012. The Clinton Tax Tables gave us a flourishing economy and an annual BUDGET SURPLUS. What's not to like?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
den1953
The National Inquire of Politics the GOP!
10:19 AM on 12/01/2011
Don't blame the middle class blame the upper wealthy for not creating jobs for the middle class with those tax cuts from GW Bush, if they would have used those tax cuts for what the GOP gave them for people in America would have jobs and not been lied to!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JerseyGirl4Obama
The truth only hurts when it should
10:18 AM on 12/01/2011
""What I've been looking at is can you carve out those businesses from the surtax, and you can," Collins told reporters just outside the Senate chamber, explaining that there's a difference between working enterprises and idle rich."

Great statement.....working enterprises and idle rich. Now who will we support!
10:15 AM on 12/01/2011
A voice of sanity coming from the Republican't party? I never thought that I would see the day. She realizes that not all uber-wealthy americans create jobs (most that do seem to create them overseas) and she believes that it is equitable to add a small tax to those earning over $1,000,000 to put more money in the hands of working class citizens who will spend it and help the economy. Good for her.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
go2goal
Business Consultant
09:26 AM on 12/01/2011
One thing we need to realize about Obama's own idea on payroll tax cuts......he is contributing to the weakening of social security with these cuts and that is exactly why Republicans (like Collins) are supporting this tax holiday.

Obama needs to stop relying on gimmicks to start repairing our economy and lack of jobs......and his payroll tax cut is a gimmick...plain and simple!

Yes....give the middle and lower class a tax cut....they will spend every penny of it just surviving in today's economy. But don't fund it by cutting contributions to social security....that would be playing right into the Republican's plan to take away social security. Instead, fund these tax cuts by repealing the so called Bush temporary tax cuts that were never paid for!
photo
mmsuki
Fine; I evolved, you didn't.
11:41 AM on 12/01/2011
I saw an interview with an economist who said any money cut from SS will be replaced through general funds.