More

GM Will Buy Back Chevrolet Volts From Owners Afraid Car Will Catch Fire

TOM KRISHER   12/ 1/11 07:15 PM ET   AP

General Motors

NEW YORK — General Motors will buy Chevrolet Volts back from any owner who is afraid the electric cars will catch fire, the company's CEO said Thursday.

In an exclusive interview with The Associated Press, CEO Dan Akerson insisted that the cars are safe, but said the company will purchase the Volts because it wants to keep customers happy. Three fires have broken out in Volts after side-impact crash tests done by the federal government.

Akerson said that if necessary, GM will recall the more than 6,000 Volts now on the road in the U.S. and repair them once the company and federal safety regulators figure out what caused the fires.

"If we find that is the solution, we will retrofit every one of them," Akerson said. "We'll make it right."

The fires happened seven days to three weeks after tests performed by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. And GM has said there's no threat of fires immediately after crashes. GM also has said that no Volts involved in real-world crashes have caught fire.

Still, NHTSA has opened an investigation into the fires and has asked other companies that make electric cars for battery testing data. NHTSA said the safety testing hasn't raised concerns about electric vehicles other than the Volt.

"The fire broke out seven days later. Not seven minutes. Not seven seconds," Akerson said, adding that the company wants to fix the problem so people continue to have faith in Volts and other advanced technology cars. The company is notified of any Volt crash through its OnStar safety system and dispatches a team with 48 hours to drain the battery, preventing fires, he said.

"I think in the interest of General Motors, the industry, the electrification of the car, it's best to get it right now than when you have – instead of 6,000 – 60,000 or 600,000 cars on the road," he said.

The NHTSA testing, Akerson said, intruded into the Volt's battery pack by four to five inches, beyond the normal testing standard of about two inches. Then the cars were rotated 360 degrees to simulate a rollover crash. He said anytime there's a new technology introduced like the Volt, problems will arise. GM is dedicated to fixing them.

He conceded that the fires may cause some potential buyers to shy away from the Volt. But he added that GM is trying to get the message out that they happened only after extreme tests. Akerson also stressed that standard gas engine cars also have problems with fires after crashes.

The Volt can go about 35 miles on battery power before a small gasoline generator kicks in to keep the car running. The car can be recharged with a standard home electrical outlet.

The Nissan Leaf, a fully electric car and the Volt's main competitor, has not had any similar fires after crash tests or real-world crashes, Nissan said.

The Leaf battery is cooled by air rather than a liquid used to cool the Volt battery.

Akerson said investigators are looking at spilled coolant as one possible cause of the fires, although he said the coolant itself did not catch fire. Investigators are looking at everything from circuit boards to the way the battery cells are packaged into the Volt's larger T-shaped battery pack, he said.

Investigators have some promising leads but no conclusions yet, Akerson said.

GM doesn't expect many Volt owners to return their cars, given feedback from customers thus far, said spokesman Rob Peterson.

Earlier this week GM offered loaner cars to all Volt owners until the cause of the fires is found and fixed. So far, Akerson said 16 Volt owners have inquired and only two have taken the loaners.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Filed by Maxwell Strachan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 228
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
07:29 PM on 12/04/2011
The Volt will follow the same path as the EV-1 their first electric vehicle. After poor sales and performance they were bought back and crushed. The car never made sense, a Volt costs $25000 more than the comparable Cruz. And the max savings on gas is only $1 a day. (the cost of charging the vehicle overnite($2.58) versus 1 gal of gas at $3.59/gal). Do the math that means it would take 25,000 days to break even or approximately 68 YEARS--and that doesn't even include changing the batteries every 10 years at a cost of 8-10,000
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JannielB
A lot of people were born on Bastille Day
01:47 PM on 12/02/2011
I would be glad to buy a used Volt.

Zipping by those gas stations would be so very satisfying.
07:31 PM on 12/04/2011
you may not get the chance--their first electric vehicle the EV-1 had to be bought back and crushed by the company---the same will probably happen here.
wbearl
Retired Manager Mechanical Operations
09:07 AM on 12/02/2011
Everyone is acting like an electric car is a novel new item. Back in the 70's a Senior Manager at my company, with an electrical engineering degree, designed and build electric cars as a hobby. He drove them daily to work. One of his biggest problems was one I have not heard anyone talk about, the batteries. They were unbelievably expensive to replace and unbelievably expensive to get rid of. He also joked that if he ever got in an accident they would have to call a Haz Mat Team to deal with any spilled battery acid from cracked or broken batteries.
05:15 AM on 12/03/2011
Big deal...Henry Ford's wife drove an electric vehicle.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
08:57 AM on 12/02/2011
Electric cars are going to be the 'norm' in 20 years. I just wonder what they are going to do with all the spent batterys.
photo
intolleft
ObamaCare...getting you shovel ready
07:35 AM on 12/02/2011
The Pinto 2.0
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
08:58 AM on 12/02/2011
What was it with the Pinto anyway? A few of my friends had them and they ran pretty good. Butt ugly but fairly decent transportation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jbrantow
11:19 AM on 12/02/2011
Controversy followed the Pinto after 1977 allegations that the Pinto's structural design allowed its fuel tank filler neck to break off[8] and the fuel tank, in all too common occasions, to be punctured in a rear-end collision,[8] resulting in deadly fires from spilled fuel

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Pinto#Fuel_tank_controversy
photo
Morgantheaxe
Right is wrong, and left is correct!
01:12 AM on 12/02/2011
Do the math folks. 40 miles a day without using a drop of fuel. That's 280 miles a week. That's 14,500 miles a year without buying a drop of gasoline. How many miles a year do you drive? The average American drives far less than 14,500 miles a year but if you do the volt gets about 40 mpg highway in hybrid mode. Oh and the cost of charging the volt is a minimal increase in your electric bill. Oh did I mention the tax credits? Oh did I mention ev/hybrid or not the volt looks damn good?

You starting to get the picture why the oil industry wants to kill this car?
12:22 PM on 12/02/2011
Sounds great - only how many people can afford one? What about the environmental problems of used batteries? It still takes products like coal to generate electricity used to make / charge those batteries. And you make it sound as if the oil industry is the giant electricity-stomper. The electrical / power companies make a pretty penny themselves, and could have a big say in this.
photo
Morgantheaxe
Right is wrong, and left is correct!
07:38 PM on 12/02/2011
Quite a few people can afford them and they are getting cheaper every year because of the streamlining of manufacture and advancement of technology. Nobody ever suggested the Chevy Volt was the cure for all carbon output but it sure cheaper to run and burns less of that carbon fuel you are referring to. Your comment on the oil industry in no way disputes that they want to kill this car before more like it get momentum. Its a great car. Oh and recycled batteries are the norm in the automotive industry. If you don't like the car hey welcome to America its a mildly free country. The car is a GREAT car. its a GREAT looking car. Its GREAT we are seeing a succesful viable vehicle moving to get us on track to reduce the gasoline we use. There are a LOT of reasons that is a very good thing.
09:14 PM on 12/02/2011
Yep. I've heard OPEC has established a super secret band of ex special forces agents to do just that. They are hiding out in Chicago in a near north cell with the acronym 'da volt zap it 'ya
12:46 AM on 12/02/2011
GM will not be buying back these cars. This posting is incorrect in that respect.
photo
cmr11
how do you want it
02:01 PM on 12/02/2011
out of all volts sold 2 people asked gm to buy there car back. the car has a higher quality rating than porsche and owners are very happy with them.
05:51 PM on 12/02/2011
I'm happy with mine.
09:14 PM on 12/02/2011
They don't want them either.
photo
cmr11
how do you want it
10:06 PM on 12/02/2011
explain exactly who it is that don't want them...... the owners are very happy. if you don't want one don't buy one...... pretty simple really...
03:48 PM on 12/03/2011
Very funny. NOT!

What's your problem with the Volt??? I drive one and it's a great car.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:28 AM on 12/02/2011
Thank you, Government Motors.
10:09 PM on 12/01/2011
This Just In: Chevy Dealers throughout the country are telling GM they fear their Dealerships might burn down...mysteriously, of course...unless the Company agrees to buy back all of the Volt cars that haven't yet sold, because the ones they have sold...appear to be spontaneously combusting upon leaving the lot.
11:48 PM on 12/01/2011
no such thing as an unsold Volt - there's a waiting list. Some purchasers are even watching the production schedule to see when theirs comes off the assembly line.
09:16 PM on 12/02/2011
They just want to make sure it wasent made on a Monday or a Friday.
photo
cmr11
how do you want it
02:02 PM on 12/02/2011
are you high?
06:17 PM on 12/01/2011
Buying back the Volt's sound like a repeat of the EV-1. Gas cars can blow up if you puncture the gas tank or spill gas while filling up. There are risks with any machine. Come on Shell Oil, you can do better that that. Stop influencing the auto makers. What are you going to do when you run out of oil in 10-15 years?
photo
intolleft
ObamaCare...getting you shovel ready
07:37 AM on 12/02/2011
I thought we wheres supposed to run out of oil 20 years ago.
06:56 PM on 12/03/2011
shell oil is not going to run out of oil in 10-15 years. for somebody that tries to sound like they understand the inner workings of oil companies I would figure you would say BP, just cuz thats what greenpeace would say, and greenpeace are a bunch of genius' (couggh cough).
06:10 PM on 12/01/2011
Maybe another rumor spread by the oil industry. They have been trying to kill the electric car since the model "T" Ford. Yeah, look it up. Or just get a Nissan Leaf. Mine works great. No battery issues at all.
photo
bridge to somewhere
That's impossible, even for a computer!
06:40 PM on 12/01/2011
Until it runs out on the freeway...then you've got issues.

Great car, don't get me wrong, but until the range issues are compensated for with better battery technology and/or on-the-fly induction charging, I'll probably remain in my hybrid.
photo
Morgantheaxe
Right is wrong, and left is correct!
07:07 PM on 12/01/2011
What range issues? It will go just as far on a tank of gas as any sedan out there....of course the volts "tank" being much much smaller. It is a hybrid u know. Oh and a 40 mile electric only range is more than most peoples everyday trips. Did I mention it's also a GREAT looking car? Go see one in person they are very impressive.
photo
gomezrules
Why Don't We Do It In The Road?
05:59 PM on 12/01/2011
So how much will THIS cost us taxpayers?
photo
Peter Combs
Amused by the illogical..no, NOT a Republican
06:06 PM on 12/01/2011
you've already lost Billion by taking GM Stock at the IPO price....
photo
LeFlaneur
does nuance.
09:10 PM on 12/01/2011
a lot less than an F-35
01:06 AM on 12/02/2011
Defense is the ONE area the Fed is supposed to be involved... not auto sales...
09:19 PM on 12/02/2011
well not as lethal as an F-35 but a fully charged one is like an IED
05:47 PM on 12/01/2011
Government Motors should be so proud
photo
April1261
Onward and upward
05:42 PM on 12/01/2011
Why do Club Car Golf Carts preform better than Chevy Volts? They are privately owned.............
12:50 AM on 12/02/2011
If you'd owned one, driven one or even ridden in one you wouldn't say that.
05:37 PM on 12/01/2011
Another great lib program: We (those of us 53% who actually pay federal income tax) paid to make the cars, and now we'll have to pay to buy them back.
photo
cmr11
how do you want it
02:06 PM on 12/02/2011
2 people have asked their cars be bought back..... get over it. the car is great and has a higher quality rating than porsche. the people that own them love it........ just go back to redstate.com and complain......