iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Janet Napolitano, Homeland Security Director, Says Lone Wolf Threat Growing

Janet Napolitano Lone Wolf Attack

ANGELA CHARLTON   12/ 2/11 05:28 PM ET   AP

PARIS — U.S. Homeland Security Director Janet Napolitano said Friday that the risk of "lone wolf" attackers, with no ties to known extremist networks or grand conspiracies, is on the rise as the global terrorist threat has shifted.

Such risks, Napolitano said in an interview in Paris, heighten the need to keep dangerous travelers from reaching the United States, and she urged European partners to finalize a deal on sharing passenger data that has met resistance over privacy concerns.

Napolitano acknowledged shifts in the terror threat this year, but said the changes had little to do with the uprisings that have overturned the old order in countries around the Arab world and opened up new opportunities for extremist groups.

Asked about the greatest current threats to the United States, she said one from al-Qaida has morphed. "From a U.S. perspective, over the last several years we have had more attacks emanating from AQAP (al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula) than from core al-Qaida," she told The Associated Press.

"There's been a lot of evolution over the past three years," she said. "The thing that's most noticeable to me is the growth of the lone wolf," the single attacker who lives in the United States or elsewhere who is not part of a larger global conspiracy or network, she said.

She named no examples, but it's a phenomenon that is increasingly the focus of international anti-terror operations.

A former U.S. Army psychiatrist is the sole suspect in deadly shootings at Fort Hood, Texas, in 2009. In March, a Kosovo Albanian acting alone fatally shot two American airmen in Frankfurt, Germany. In April, a remote-control bomb exploded in a Marrakech cafe popular with tourists, killing 17 people, mostly foreigners – an attack devised by a Moroccan who was inspired by al-Qaida and tried unsuccessfully for years to join the international terror network before returning to Morocco to devise an attack of his own.

One threat that has remained constant, Napolitano stressed, is that of terrorists reaching U.S. territory. She said the agreement with the EU on sharing data on air passengers for flights from Europe to America is needed to "make sure these global networks and global systems that we all rely on remain safe."

She stressed that such data aided high-profile U.S. terrorist investigations in recent years, including that into Najibullah Zazi, who admitted plotting to bomb New York subways, and David Headley, who was involved in the 2008 Mumbai, India, terrorist attack.

The United States and European Union initialed a new agreement on Nov. 17 after a previous accord from 2007 had to be renegotiated because of changes in EU legislation, and amid criticism that it allowed U.S. authorities too much insight into the private data of EU citizens.

The new deal sets clear limits to what data can be used by U.S. authorities and for how long, and allows passengers to obtain access to their records to correct and delete them.

The accord must still be endorsed by the EU Council – the heads of state, expected to sign off easily later this month – and the European Parliament, where a small group of legislators remains opposed.

The U.S. effort won support Friday from France's interior minister, who acknowledged that Europe gets spillover benefits from the tough U.S. line on terrorism. Claude Gueant said the U.S. made concessions to European concerns about privacy and agreed to share some data with Europe.

"I think this is accord is really a win-win," he told reporters after meeting with Napolitano and U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder.

Napolitano and Holder were in Paris for a meeting with counterparts from the so-called G-6 countries: Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Poland and Spain.

___

Associated Press writer Jamey Keaten contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

PARIS — U.S. Homeland Security Director Janet Napolitano said Friday that the risk of "lone wolf" attackers, with no ties to known extremist networks or grand conspiracies, is on the rise as the...
PARIS — U.S. Homeland Security Director Janet Napolitano said Friday that the risk of "lone wolf" attackers, with no ties to known extremist networks or grand conspiracies, is on the rise as the...
Filed by Eline Gordts  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,546
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (46 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joe Goforth
contempt for the status quo
10:53 PM on 12/29/2011
Janet will soon propose to monitor all citizens for the lone wolf potential.

http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/suspicious-activity-reports-from-u-s-malls-being-processed-by-police-state-fusion-centers_12292011

Also new viper action by Homeland security;

http://www.truthistreason.net/massive-expansion-of-tsa-checkpoints-and-viper-teams

This is why we need Ron Paul
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
08:33 PM on 12/08/2011
These comments reflect the incredibly short attention span of most Americans. They have forgotten 9/11 and most every other terror attack that has occurred worldwide.
04:30 PM on 12/05/2011
This is all a scheme for our increasingly socialist, tyrannical government to find more and more ways to cost American citizens their privacy in the same of "national security",and try to gain international cooperation for doing so. Small wonder that there's a greater concern over home-grown terrorists.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:10 PM on 12/05/2011
Janet Napolitano . . .
The sock puppet speaks.
photo
Peace Warrior
Disenchanted yet hopeful.
06:24 AM on 12/05/2011
Unconstitutional are the laws that allow such bravado.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
nofriendofrepublicans
Mother friendly.
04:16 PM on 12/04/2011
Are we afraid of our own shadows now?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joe Goforth
contempt for the status quo
01:40 PM on 12/04/2011
Another reason for the government to monitor it's citizens. Like Ron Paul say's we can put cameras and cops in every house but what about our civil liberties- is it worth it? I say no to the police state.
01:32 PM on 12/04/2011
To live in a crime/terror free world would require us to all bend over and allow cavity searches, even at the grocery store. It's sick.
photo
dkandycrown
semper fi
01:17 PM on 12/04/2011
Maybe this person should start asking Obama why are you worried about other countries when we have our own problems of homeland security.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
heikhali
12:52 PM on 12/04/2011
Janet Napolitano is a "lone wolf."
12:19 PM on 12/04/2011
Janet Napolitano: "The Girl Who Cried 'Lone Wolf!' "

Her days of scaring the people of the U.S. into sacrificing their lives and liberties due to some exaggerated "threat" are coming to an end. People are finally beginning to realize that this fear-mongering has just been an excuse to further a foreign policy of imperialism and a domestic policy of authoritarianism. Both of which have caused harm to the vast majority for the benefit of an elite few.

Janet Napolitano and her ilk are the real threat.
photo
editer
just a voice giggling in the wilderness
04:55 PM on 12/04/2011
Were you making this big a stink when the Bush administration crafted the Patriot Act? Or when we invaded Iraq on trumped up evidence?
09:18 PM on 12/04/2011
I don't think I have ever been more angry and frustrated with the federal government than I was when they passed the USA PATRIOT Act.

The Patriot Act, military commissions, warrantless surveillance, etc. are all abominations. Yes, I condemned Bush and the Republican party vociferously, but the Democrats voted right along with him on all of these abuses.
I was likewise against the illegal and un-Constitutional wars. I think Bush, Cheney and many senior members of his administration should be arrested and prosecuted for human rights abuses and violations of the FISA Act, among other things.

For me, it's Ron Paul or a 3rd party candidate The Republicans and Democrats BOTH support the erosion of our civil liberties and the Constitution.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
uneeda
Make Peace in Our Time
12:05 PM on 12/04/2011
this woman might not qualify for employment as a grocery store bagger
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eaglescly
06:30 AM on 12/05/2011
what you mean may not
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beachinstead
socialist libs other countries need you
12:04 PM on 12/04/2011
Obama nice choice for Homeland Security Director!!! LLOOOLL!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beachinstead
socialist libs other countries need you
11:50 AM on 12/04/2011
Janet hopefully you will lose your job in 2012! Your were really a bad choice anyway!! Be quiet!!!
photo
dkandycrown
semper fi
01:16 PM on 12/04/2011
I hope
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beachinstead
socialist libs other countries need you
01:51 PM on 12/04/2011
i misspelled you slipped up on putting the R in there!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:38 AM on 12/04/2011
Does anyone consider that the policies and actions of our government need to be changed to mitigate the animosity of those who seek to destroy us? While I don't believe we can make all of the people happy all of the time, certainly we can act in a manner that is less adversarial and to lessen the extent that we provoke those with extreme ideological positions.
12:29 PM on 12/04/2011
I not only consider it, I believe it completely. If there were foreign military bases on U.S. soil, foreign troops conducting bombing raids which killed American civilians, foreign intelligence agents undermining our government, etc. etc. Americans would definitely engage in a violent response.

We can't make everyone "happy" but if we simply engaged in a foreign policy where we treated other nations the way we would want to be treated if the roles were reversed, much of the motive for violent response would be eliminated.

The idea that people thousands of miles around the world would actively seek to destroy us for no reason other than the fact that we have a secular government and different religions is laughably absurd.