iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

U.N. Envoy: U.S. Isn't Protecting Occupy Protesters' Rights

Occupy Protest Rights

First Posted: 12/02/2011 1:04 pm Updated: 06/18/2012 5:08 pm

WASHINGTON -- The United Nations envoy for freedom of expression is drafting an official communication to the U.S. government demanding to know why federal officials are not protecting the rights of Occupy demonstrators whose protests are being disbanded -- sometimes violently -- by local authorities.

Frank La Rue, who serves as the U.N. "special rapporteur" for the protection of free expression, told HuffPost in an interview that the crackdowns against Occupy protesters appear to be violating their human and constitutional rights.

"I believe in city ordinances and I believe in maintaining urban order," he said Thursday. "But on the other hand I also believe that the state -- in this case the federal state -- has an obligation to protect and promote human rights."

"If I were going to pit a city ordinance against human rights, I would always take human rights," he continued.

La Rue, a longtime Guatemalan human rights activist who has held his U.N. post for three years, said it's clear to him that the protesters have a right to occupy public spaces "as long as that doesn't severely affect the rights of others."

In moments of crisis, governments often default to a forceful response instead of a dialogue, he said -- but that's a mistake.

"Citizens have the right to dissent with the authorities, and there's no need to use public force to silence that dissension," he said.

"One of the principles is proportionality," La Rue said. "The use of police force is legitimate to maintain public order -- but there has to be a danger of real harm, a clear and present danger. And second, there has to be a proportionality of the force employed to prevent a real danger."

And history suggests that harsh tactics against social movements don't work anyway, he said. In Occupy's case, he said, "disbanding them by force won't change that attitude of indignation."

Occupy encampments across the country have been forcibly removed by police in full riot gear, and some protesters have been badly injured as a result of aggressive police tactics.

New York police staged a night raid on the original Occupy Wall Street encampment in mid-November, evicting sleeping demonstrators and confiscating vast amounts of property.

The Oakland Police Department fired tear gas, smoke grenades and bean-bag rounds at demonstrators there in late October, seriously injuring one Iraq War veteran at the Occupy site.

Earlier this week, Philadelphia and Los Angeles police stormed the encampments in their cities in the middle of the night, evicting and arresting hundreds of protesters.

Protesters at University of California, Davis were pepper sprayed by a campus police officer in November while participating in a sit-in, and in September an officer in New York pepper sprayed protesters who were legally standing on the sidewalk.

"We're seeing widespread violations of fundamental First Amendment and Fourth Amendment rights," said Mara Verheyden-Hilliard, co-chair of a National Lawyers Guild committee, which has sent hundreds of volunteers to provide legal representation to Occupations across the nation.

"The demonstrations are treated as if they're presumptively criminal," she said. "Instead of looking at free speech activity as an honored and cherished right that should be supported and facilitated, the reaction of local authorities and police is very frequently to look at it as a crime scene."

What they should do, Verheyden-Hilliard said, is make it their mission to allow the activity to continue.

Using the same lens placed on the Occupy movement to look at, say, the protest in Egypt, Verheyden-Hilliard said, observers would have focused on such issues as "Did the people in Tahrir Square have a permit?"

La Rue said the protesters are raising and addressing a fundamental issue. "There is legitimate reason to be indignant and angry about a crisis that was originated by greed and the personal interests of certain sectors," he said. That's especially the case when the bankers "still earn very hefty salaries and common folks are losing their homes."

"In this case, the demonstrations are going to the center of the issue," he said. "These demonstrations are exactly challenging the basis of the debate."

Indeed, commentators such as Robert Scheer have argued that the Occupy movement's citizen action has a particular justification, based on the government's abject failure to hold banks accountable.

La Rue said he sees parallels between Occupy and the Arab Spring pro-democracy protests. In both cases, for instance, "you have high level of education for young people, but no opportunities."

La Rue said he is in the process of writing what he called "an official communication" to the U.S. government "to ask what exactly is the position of the federal government in regards to understanding the human rights and constitutional rights vis-a-vis the use of local police and local authorities to disband peaceful demonstrations."

Although the letter will not carry any legal authority, it reflects how the violent suppression of dissent threatens to damage the U.S.'s international reputation.

"I think it's a dangerous spot in the sense of a precedent," La Rue said, expressing concern that the United States risks losing its credibility as a model democracy, particularly if the excessive use of force against peaceful protests continues.

New York Civil Liberties Union Executive Director Donna Lieberman welcomed the international scrutiny.

"We live in a much smaller, connected world than we ever did before, and just as Americans watch what goes on in Tahrir Square and in Syria, the whole world is watching us, too -- and that's a good thing," Lieberman said.

"We're kind of confident that we're living in the greatest democracy in the world, but when the international human rights world criticizes an American police officer for pepper spraying students who are sitting down, it rightly give us pause."

* * * * *

Dan Froomkin is senior Washington correspondent for The Huffington Post. You can send him an email, bookmark his page, subscribe to his RSS feed, follow him on Twitter, friend him on Facebook, and/or become a fan and get email alerts when he writes.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

WASHINGTON -- The United Nations envoy for freedom of expression is drafting an official communication to the U.S. government demanding to know why federal officials are not protecting the rights of O...
WASHINGTON -- The United Nations envoy for freedom of expression is drafting an official communication to the U.S. government demanding to know why federal officials are not protecting the rights of O...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9,444
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (114 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Catherine Fitzpatrick
05:55 PM on 07/15/2012
This is just the latest hustle in the never-ending battle between socialism and capitalism at the UN, and it's reprehensible.

Frank La Rue couldn't wait five minutes for savaging the US delegation at the UN Human Rights Council that helped him get his beloved Internet freedom resolution passed just recently.

He had to go out and savage the US because his fellow third-worlders from oppressive regimes were angry at him complaining about their lack of Internet freedom.

He did this in the reprehensible pirouetting that these rapporteurs so often do to keep their "geographical distribution" and with the tiresome Marxist rhetoric of "greedy capitalists" that should have died with the USSR, but didn't.

http://3dblogger.typepad.com/wired_state/2012/07/un-rapporteur-frank-la-rue-attacks-us-over-ows-in-latest-un-hustle.html
photo
ClassicalGas
Colorado Rocky Mountain Hi!
09:56 PM on 07/14/2012
Please read and share - pass it on.

http://www.alternet.org/rights/156170/glenn_greenwald:_how_america's_surveillance_state_breeds_conformity_and_fear/?page=entire
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Ruth1966
No PC, no apologies.
08:38 PM on 12/09/2011
OWS is finished. even the democrats see them as unwanted and unpopular; they are making plans
to stifle any camping at the Democratic convention in Charlotte next year.

http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2011/12/charlotte-prepping-for-ows-at-dnc.html
10:49 AM on 12/09/2011
And I thought this is America and not Egypt, Libya, Syria....
photo
irrenmann
won't read your angry replies :D
03:40 PM on 12/08/2011
"'There is legitimate reason to be indignant and angry about a crisis that was originated by greed and the personal interests of certain sectors,' he said. That's especially the case when the bankers 'still earn very hefty salaries and common folks are losing their homes.'"

Maybe the common folks shouldn't have been greedy and borrowed something they couldn't have paid back. Since when does the question of whether or not you have to pay back what you owe involve consideration of the lender's salary?

"'The demonstrations are treated as if they're presumptively criminal,' she said. 'Instead of looking at free speech activity as an honored and cherished right that should be supported and facilitated, the reaction of local authorities and police is very frequently to look at it as a crime scene.'"

Not preemptively criminal—demonstratively. Don't like it? Try sending U.N. peacekeepers into America to force your views on us. Just try it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Ruth1966
No PC, no apologies.
07:04 PM on 12/08/2011
"Maybe the common folks shouldn't have been greedy and borrowed something they couldn't have paid back. Since when does the question of whether or not you have to pay back what you owe involve considerat­ion of the lender's salary?"

==Fanned and faved==
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
middleCmusic
07:52 PM on 12/08/2011
In the lead-up to the crisis, many banks would aggressively lend money to people who they knew couldn't stay above water and then other banks would bet on the loans, making money off of people's failure. That's conmanship at its worst. But really, we have our leaders to blame. Both the Clinton and Bush administrations deregulated lending and and encouraged banks to lend to people who really shouldn't have been given loans. Search for predatory lending: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_the_late-2000s_financial_crisis#Predatory_lending
11:13 AM on 12/16/2011
@middleCmusic So what? It,s still the consumers responsibility to realize that they will not be able to pay back the loan. Quit blaming everyone else and take responsibility for your own faults. The government shouldn't regulated businesses. It should be the owner's right to run the business as they please.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Activist Annie
03:11 PM on 12/07/2011
"...Frank La Rue, who serves as the U.N. 'special rapporteur' for the protection of free expression, told HuffPost in an interview that the crackdowns against Occupy protesters appear to be violating their human and constitutional rights...."

Merci Beaucoup, Monsieur La Rue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles L King
Retiree
12:04 PM on 12/07/2011
A deliberate and considered act of provocation, in order to justify an intended crackdown. Thank God it failed. The demonstrators knew their history.
08:28 PM on 12/06/2011
Maybe the U.N. should send in a peace keeping force? We live in a fascist state and have since 9-11 and the sheep will continue to sleep-walk all the way to the slaughter house....
11:14 PM on 12/06/2011
Ha that is funny guess which country has lead in numbers for every UN peacekeeping role? Oh that's right US
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SnarkyC
Anarchist and all-around eccentric.
02:48 PM on 12/07/2011
Hail Eris!

So it's time for the favour to be returned, then. It's only fair.

Snarky
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Ruth1966
No PC, no apologies.
08:41 PM on 12/09/2011
That's so funny; shows how out of touch this La rue person really is...

fanned and faved.

Even the democrats are taking steps to deal with ows-nobody likes them

http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2011/12/charlotte-prepping-for-ows-at-dnc.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beckjr2000
been there done that & tired of it
05:16 PM on 12/06/2011
"United Nations envoy for freedom of expression is drafting an official communication to the U.S. government demanding to know why federal officials are not protecting the rights of Occupy demonstrators whose protests are being disbanded -- sometimes violently -- by local authorities." Yep! That and a $5 dollar bill will get you a cup of coffee at Starbucks!
02:16 PM on 12/06/2011
The OWS people realized that it's a political system run by the rich and the Pentagon. That their protests have been so successfully routed is an indication of their powerlessness in the face of an indifferent political class, pursuing it's self interest: the interests of empire and financial feudalism.
Kommonman
Blame it on Dyslexic fingers..next question
02:04 PM on 12/06/2011
What does it say to the world when the principles our nation espouses to the world are rejected and denied to OWS protestors...When the guaruntee to the freedom of assembly and free speech are squashed in our own backyards...The world looks on and see's the hippocrysy why the protests are quashed and parts of the media demonize the protestors. Kinda sounds like Tunisia and Egypt in principle if not scale. I begin to suspect some of this squashing is in attempt to provoke a violent response from the protestors to further justify this basic denials of our constitution. Nowhere in the that document does it say that a munincipality has the right to preclude or deny our citizens the right to free assembly and protest that i know of. As a charter member UN the U.S. is fudnementally obligated to uphold the spirit of human rights...certainly abroad but even more fundamentally at home....Else all we as a nation claim to be is nothing but hogwash
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Activist Annie
03:07 PM on 12/07/2011
I bet the world sees that the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution are being treated as nothing than pieces of paper.
Kommonman
Blame it on Dyslexic fingers..next question
03:41 PM on 12/07/2011
They probably percieve our politicians as using those documents as nothing more than toilet paper
photo
hypnotoad72
Real democracy = living wages.
12:57 PM on 12/06/2011
Just wait until the UN comes to liberate *us*...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Ruth1966
No PC, no apologies.
07:32 PM on 12/08/2011
"Just wait until the UN comes to liberate *us*... "

==Hahahaha...don't hold your breath waiting...hahahaha
08:25 PM on 12/08/2011
Absolutely! If we do that,we will all be dead.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steelsil
Warren/Grayson 2016! Yes We Can!
12:19 PM on 12/06/2011
I recommend that OWS start running candidates to oppose the mayors of the cities which abuse them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
07:18 AM on 12/08/2011
thank you...now that is what call "takin it to em"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Activist Annie
03:52 PM on 12/12/2011
Response to: Steelsil


Yes, I totally agree with you. I've been thinking about the same thing for a while now but seem to hit a brick wall.

A group of us, both Dems and Repubs, have been studying and discussing "Faith and American Politics, Liberty and Justice for All, for the last six weeks. Helping congregations to talk about faith and politics without judgment." These sessions included viewing a DVD for 30-minute followed by discussion. The DVD is also included in each participant notebook.

Yesterday was our last meeting. At this meeting we discussed our support for OWS. Our minister wants to get the congregation engaged and ultimately to support OWS, not just our Social Justice team of the Deacons, of which I'm a member. However we need some concrete information to study and ultimately present it to the congregation.

I have been wondering for a while and now considering yesterday's discussion if there is a central contact about their agenda, etc. for folks to access?

Thanks.
09:25 AM on 02/06/2012
you're on the right track. There are loads of great news pieces, editorials and journalism about OWS to present to your congregation - I'd be more than happy to steer you in the direction. Overall, it's about self-empowerment and galvanizing those in your own community, which is just we started to do about a month and a half ago here in our own part of Queens NYC. For starters, I would check out the OWS websites:
http://occupywallst.org/attendees/
http://www.occupytogether.org/
http://interoccupy.org/

here's some great church-related action and a beautiful stirring speech by Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist Chris Hedges:

https://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/12/05-10
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6I3CtdyuzD8&feature=youtu.be
http://www.anglicancommunion.org/acns/digest/index.cfm/2011/12/6/TEC-Protestors-urge-Trinity-to-open-property-to-encampment
11:52 AM on 12/06/2011
Our freedoms and liberties continue to be trampled in the name of security.
photo
European1919
I am the PigmⒶn
08:45 AM on 12/06/2011
Just like Israel the USA believe themselves to be above the law. They have shown this time and again. So this UN move is nice, but it will sadly remain an empty token. American exceptionalism and arrogance will see to that.
photo
hypnotoad72
Real democracy = living wages.
12:57 PM on 12/06/2011
These days, I'm no longer sure what would be a surprise and what would not.