iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Barney Frank: Elizabeth Warren Is 'The Ultimate Outsider' (VIDEO)

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

First Posted: 12/05/11 10:54 AM ET Updated: 12/05/11 10:56 AM ET

Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) appeared on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" on Monday and spoke about Massachusetts Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren, praising her as both politically adept and easy to get along with.

"Until a few months ago I was the person most disappointed in America that the president did not appoint her to be head of the consumer bureau," he said. "I was right behind you," replied host Mika Brzezinski. "But we're both behind Scott Brown, he's now the most disappointed person," he quipped.

Frank went on to cite a recent UMass poll as evidence that Warren's electoral chances were strong. The poll showed Warren four points ahead of Brown, just within the poll's margin of error.

"Elizabeth is the ultimate outsider, but she's the outsider who has been very effective inside," Frank said. "I worked very much with her. I'll look back on my career, and working with her to create the independent consumer bureau was a highlight for me. And she showed a shrewdness, she was sort of a pragmatic ideologue and that's the best combination."

"She's very likable," Frank continued.

Frank, who recently announced that he would not run for reelection in 2012, went on to say that Warren's charm was something that neither he nor GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney shared.

Warren said in a recent New York Times profile that she was motivated to enter politics when Frank called her to help write the financial regulation bill. "That was the first time that I understood -- and real well -- what it means to be in the room," she said.

Frank said last June that some of the opposition to Warren's nomination was because she is a woman. "Some people almost unconsciously think that for a woman to be in an important position regarding the titans of the financial industry is not appropriate," he claimed.

More on the political history of Elizabeth Warren below:
Loading Slideshow...
  • Introduces Financial Product Safety Commission

    Elizabeth Warren <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/10/financial-product-safety_n_173691.html" target="_hplink">announced</a> a bill creating a Financial Product Safety Commission with House and Senate Democrats in March 2009. The body was designed to have oversight over mortgages and other financial instruments to protect consumers against predatory practices. She said if the agency had existed before the subprime collapse then "there would have been millions of families who got tangled in predatory mortgages who never would have gotten them." HuffPost's Ryan Grim <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/10/financial-product-safety_n_173691.html" target="_hplink">reported</a>: <blockquote>Without all these toxic assets on banks' balance sheets, the institutions wouldn't be on the brink of collapse and the recession would be more manageable. "Consumer financial products were the front end of the destabilization of the American economic system." Sen. Charles Schumer's cosponsorship of the bill is notable because of his proximity to Wall Street. The bill's merit, the New York Democrat said, is that it regulates the actual financial product rather than the company producing it.</blockquote>

  • Geithner Opposes Her Heading CFPB

    Tim Geithner expressed opposition to her nomination for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/15/tim-geithner-opposes-nomi_n_647691.html" target="_hplink">reported</a> HuffPost's Shahien Nasiripour. Geithner thought Warren's views on the big banks and Wall St. were too tough. Warren's oversight of the Treasury department as a watchdog for TARP apparently irked Geithner, agressively <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pz7ruJw6byQ" target="_hplink">questioning him</a> during Congressional hearings: <blockquote>While her grilling of Geithner in September, over what members of Congress have called the "backdoor bailout" of Wall Street through AIG, inspired the "squirm" video, just last month Warren pressed Geithner on the administration's lackluster foreclosure-prevention plan, Making Home Affordable. Criticizing him for Treasury's failure to keep families in their homes, she questioned Treasury's commitment to homeowners.</blockquote>

  • Ready For A Fight

    Elizabeth Warren <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/03/fight-for-the-cfpa-is-a-d_n_483707.html" target="_hplink">reiterated her desire</a> for a strong Consumer Financial Protection Agency to HuffPost's Shahien Nasiripour: <blockquote>"My first choice is a strong consumer agency," the Harvard Law professor and federal bailout watchdog said in an interview with the Huffington Post. "My second choice is no agency at all and plenty of blood and teeth left on the floor."</blockquote>

  • Named Interim Chief Of CFPB

    In September of 2010, HuffPost's Ryan Grim <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/13/elizabeth-warren-interim-cfpb-chief-consideration_n_715457.html" target="_hplink">reported</a> that Elizabeth Warren was being considered as a candidate for interim director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Days later the announcement was <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/15/white-house-taps-warren_n_715291.html" target="_hplink">official</a>. The move allowed Warren to set up the groundwork for the agency immediately without risking a GOP filibuster of her nomination, a response that seemed certain giving the <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2010/09/15/opposition_mounts_for_interim_appointment/" target="_hplink">public opposition expressed</a> by some Republican senators. When it came time to put forth an appointment for a longterm CFPB chief, Warren was overlooked, partially because she was seen as unfeasible, but also, HuffPost's Shahien Nasiripour <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/18/republican-opposition-to-elizabeth-warren_n_902165.html" target="_hplink">reported</a>, because she was a divisive figure within the Obama administration: <blockquote>Ultimately, Warren wanted the job, allies said. And near-united opposition from Senate Republicans -- 44 of them signed a letter saying they'd oppose any nominee -- should have made it easier for Obama to nominate her, since the Republicans publicly said they wouldn't support anyone for the role. Instead, the Republicans made it easy for the White House to deflect questions about the administration's lack of support for Warren. Asked how she squared the administration's public statements with its private ones, Warren declined. "I really have to say, I'm just not there. I'm not in the intricacies of the political part of this, and I can't comment," Warren said Monday. "The truth is I don't know anything about it."</blockquote>

  • Chats With HuffPost About Bureau

    In October 2010, shortly after being tasked with building the groundwork for the CFPB, Warren stopped by HuffPost to chat with Ryan Grim and Shahien Nasiripour "This is the first real agency we've built in the 21st century -- well, there's Homeland Security, but one for the people. And it means we ought to think differently," said Warren. "The government can talk to people and people can talk to the government differently than when the Consumer Product Safety Commission was built, or when the FDA was built. And if we do this right, that should change the whole dynamic of who this agency really is." HuffPost's Ryan Grim <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/07/elizabeth-warren-consumer_1_n_754026.html" target="_hplink">reported</a>: <blockquote>By gathering information, contracts and documents from homeowners and consumers, and allowing watchdog groups and individual concerned citizens access to those documents, the agency can exponentially expand the manpower it has to review the operations of banks and lenders. The goal would be to become aware of a particularly fraudulent practice before it is rampant and insulates itself in the financial services industry.</blockquote> For full video of the interview, click <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/07/elizabeth-warren-consumer_1_n_754026.html" target="_hplink">here</a>.

  • GOP Calls Her A Liar

    In May, Warren was called to testify before a House subcommittee and defend the merits of the CFPB. Some of the questions submitted by Republican representatives appeared confused and at times aggressive, leaving Warren to correct them on some basic facts about the actual purpose of the bureau. HuffPost's Mike McCauliff <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/24/elizabeth-warren-liar-gop-facts-cfpb_n_866505.html" target="_hplink">relays</a> one particularly contentious moment: <blockquote>The subcommittee chairman, Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.), began the proceedings by suggesting Warren had lied to the committee in a previous hearing that had questioned the CFPB's role in offering advice to state attorneys general negotiating a settlement with abusive mortgage servicers. At the time, Warren said she was proud her agency had been able to help, at the request of the treasury secretary. But McHenry brought up the memo again, suggesting it showed that she hid a larger role in the negotiations from Congress. "This is our job, and we're trying to do our job, to be helpful to other agencies, and to help those agencies to hold those who break the law accountable," Warren said, repeating that she was proud of the work.</blockquote>

  • Announces Senate Run

    Elizabeth Warren <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/13/elizabeth-warren-senate-massachusetts_n_960510.html" target="_hplink">announced</a> on September 14, 2011 that she was running for the United States Senate seat currently held by Scott Brown (R-Mass.) "After listening to people all across our state who know that we can do better, folks who are frustrated like I am that Washington just doesn't get it, I'm running for the Senate so I can fight every day for Massachusetts families," Warren <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/elizabeth-warren/senate-announcement_b_961624.html" target="_hplink">wrote on The Huffington Post</a>.

  • Fundraising

    One month into her campaign to secure the U.S. Senate seat currently held by Scott Brown in Massachusetts, Elizabeth Warren raised $3.15 million, largely <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/10/elizabeth-warren-raises-3_n_1003836.html" target="_hplink">from small donations</a>. According to a campaign email, 96 percent of donations were under $100. "These are pretty amazing numbers for our first official finance report, raised in a very short period of time," she said in an email to supporters. Warren's campaign has also attracted <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/18/elizabeth-warren-builds-s_n_1018334.html" target="_hplink">large liberal donors</a>, including colleagues from Harvard and well-known liberal donors like George Soros, Barbra Streisand, and DreamWorks CEO Jeffrey Katzenberg. Warren <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/11/elizabeth-warren-scott-brown-fundraising_n_1199680.html " target="_hplink">raised</a> an impressive $5.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2011. In early January, the candidate's <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/16/elizabeth-warren-money-bomb-fundraising_n_1208511.html?ref=mostpopular" target="_hplink">money bomb</a> pulled in more than $100,000 in just one weekend.

  • Historic Agreement

    Elizabeth Warren and Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/23/elizabeth-warren-scott-brown-attack-ads_n_1223574.html" target="_hplink">signed a pledge</a> to curb third-party attack ads. If either campaign breaks the agreement, they would donate half the cost of the outside ad to a charity of their opponent's choice. "This may not work," <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/david-catanese/2012/01/warren-this-may-not-work-112119.html" target="_hplink">Warren said in an email to supporters</a>. "But there's enough at stake to make it worthwhile to try to take back this election."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) appeared on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" on Monday and spoke about Massachusetts Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren, praising her as both politically adept and easy to get along wi...
Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) appeared on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" on Monday and spoke about Massachusetts Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren, praising her as both politically adept and easy to get along wi...
Filed by Nick Wing  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 645
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
04:58 PM on 12/12/2011
She has a brain. Bachmann has no brain.
01:03 PM on 12/12/2011
Any time I see a good woman running for office my heart goes out to her. I so clearly recall the voice of Shirley Chisholm saying she'd run into more prejudice because she was a woman than because she was black can clearly be seen now more than ever.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stephen B Kidde
Human Rights Rule!
11:36 AM on 12/06/2011
Elizabeth Warren is the better candidate for Senator of Massachusetts.

It's a shame that Barney Frank is retiring. The country will be losing a great representative. He has been constant in his advocacy for equity in the economy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jeff15
11:09 AM on 12/12/2011
Yes, his equity almost caused the nation to crumble into a debt laden, mortgage crises of Freddie and fannie. Now he can go off and has his bath house parties with his trophy boys.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
raker
07:55 PM on 12/05/2011
Barney lost me at the stuff about Warren facing opposition because she's a woman. I don't believe it.
photo
matt spedale
Let's be like Europe, they are killing it...
05:09 PM on 12/05/2011
my dog is likable...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ElBruce
07:14 PM on 12/05/2011
Would you care to discuss her credentials and qualifications then? Because it sounds like you're insinuating that hers are lacking. So this is a discussion I'd love to have at this point.
photo
askandtell
Proud Minnesotan; Inspired by Paul Wellstone
05:02 PM on 12/05/2011
Professor Warren Debunks A Few Healthcare Myths

I don't care what side of the aisle people sit; Elizabeth is speaking to all in explaining our healthcare challenges.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=LeYCk5ooNvY#!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:54 PM on 12/05/2011
We need a majority of senators and reps just like her and Bernie Sanders (I'm sure there are a few others). This country would thrive again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shershomenow
Be part of the solution, not the problem.
04:22 PM on 12/05/2011
I remember listening to Prof. Warren lecture in 2008. She impressed me with the amount of research she had done, and even more so because her research was so unbiased. She did not go into the project to prove a theory but to find facts. I could not imagine why anyone would not give her the respect she deserves.

I find the post here by trolls that just call her disrespectful names without having any evidence at all against her. She is a honest, good hearted, hard working, intelligent, thoughtful person. I challenge anyone to post one proven, factual negative thing about Prof. Warren. She has done nothing but try to give consumers tools that can protect us all from another collapse like the one that we are in now.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
12Purple
my microbio isn't empty yet communicates nothing
04:41 PM on 12/05/2011
Sher - just use this as a strawman when reading comments here -

Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss
people.

And say thank you to Eleanor Roosevelt
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:03 PM on 12/05/2011
Warren has the competitive combination of character, intelligence and class. The GOPers and other haters are going to have a hard time taking her down. I just hope she has skin thick enough to blaze the grueling campaign trail.
12:43 PM on 12/12/2011
F&F

My favorite quote and one I've found to be an accurate barometer when trying to understand some people.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
OcotilloKid
Conservatives work..liberals are the entertainment
04:07 PM on 12/05/2011
As we speak, the last few tons of Batty Betty Warren's "intellectual foundation" is being hauled of to the local landfills where it belongs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ElBruce
07:16 PM on 12/05/2011
Which of her findings do you take issue with, and what in her research do you find lacking? Please be specific and demonstrate a grasp of the subject.

Is it your conclusion that the corporate elite should be allowed to commit fraud on consumers at will? If so, why do you believe that?
photo
gts31bumbee
a Warehouse of Information
12:07 PM on 12/06/2011
You know if you could find your way to the nuts and bolts of this thing you would be a far better spokesperson instead of a transparent over-educated jerk trying to dazzle folks with unearned demands-answers to your multitude of diversionary questions. And no, I do not have two or more degrees and seek-to overwhelm honest discourse. Remember BUSH had a MBA from Harvard and he managed to destroy our economy in 8 years ! Wake the hell up ! You want an autopsy on Warren's missives , go see an M.E.
05:01 PM on 12/12/2011
He must be a Bachmann nut.
dmgg711
dmgg711
01:09 AM on 12/13/2011
Guess I should raise my ante in helping her campaign funds. Although I can't vote for her I will contribute for her election as Senator Elisabeth Warren of Mass. to beat out the Republican Senator puppet Scott Brown.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James Tarr
03:38 PM on 12/05/2011
I want a President Warren, not a Senator Warren!
photo
TommyObama
Abuse of power comes as no surprise.
05:11 PM on 12/05/2011
Warren 2016! When she wins next year, get her on the Senate Armed Services committee. She makes the right wing palpably nervous, and they should be.
02:42 AM on 12/06/2011
You got that right! They are very nervous about her. I have a hunch she's destined to be much, much more than the junior Senator from Massachusetts. Can't wait for 2016!
photo
gts31bumbee
a Warehouse of Information
12:08 PM on 12/06/2011
She was born in Canada I am told ! Not eligible !
12:50 PM on 12/12/2011
"Born in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma"

Don't believe all you are told. You're seated at a computer, add credibility to your argument and use it.
05:02 PM on 12/12/2011
You probably believe she is a Muslim
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jsgaetano
Legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus
03:25 PM on 12/05/2011
Conservatives are once again on the wrong side of history. But as history has proven, being on the wrong side of history is always the conservative's role in history.
photo
matt spedale
Let's be like Europe, they are killing it...
05:10 PM on 12/05/2011
So freeing the slaves was the wrong side? I know what you say sounds good but it's total bull because it isn't accurate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hburns1351
I'm too old to be diplomatic
05:31 PM on 12/05/2011
Ah, you are confusing REPUBLICAN with CONSERVATIVE. Not the same thing at all. Except in the minds of Conservatives.
05:56 PM on 12/05/2011
Conservatives didn't free slaves. It was the other guys. Republicans weren't always baggers.
photo
gts31bumbee
a Warehouse of Information
12:11 PM on 12/06/2011
Absolutely true- the Repugnicants exist solely to keep the spirit of revisionism alive !
03:17 PM on 12/05/2011
Warren is intelligent, genuine, and an independent thinker. She's one of the few genuine people out there like Ron Paul. She's a perfect threat to the status quo. Let's watch as she's painted as a liberal leftist socialist, like the way the media would cut Ron Paul from their segments.

When will people get tired of being screwed by politicians who only care about ensuring their new positions at the corporations they pass bills for (revolving door). Warren is one of the few who wouldn't participate and would likely work on killing the revolving door.

Surely the tea party could agree on ending the revolving door since congressmen end up doing the the bidding for corporations rather than people. Right?...guys? If the tea party doesn't agree on ending it, then i want a pretty damn good logical reason why.
photo
gts31bumbee
a Warehouse of Information
12:20 PM on 12/06/2011
Make no mistake; I have no use for Paul or the other repugnicants. Until or unless you cheerleaders decide to completely present Warren, warts and all to the voters, you fail to sell her to us... Are you consciously delaying the background in order to shorten the period of exposure of some of these lesser qualities, (warts)? Even her TV commercial raises more questions than it answers. Very poor with unfulfilled expectations ! You need some professional help with the copy.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SirenForSanity
The trouble vine keeps growing.
02:59 PM on 12/05/2011
Troll festerometer is tilting. Great Job, Elizabeth!
photo
CivilDebate10
Low Info People = Statism's Best Friends
03:34 PM on 12/05/2011
Your posts go directly to a meter somewhere?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SirenForSanity
The trouble vine keeps growing.
03:39 PM on 12/05/2011
Deflection won't work. You know who you are.
photo
CivilDebate10
Low Info People = Statism's Best Friends
03:44 PM on 12/05/2011
Please identify those you think are "T...s". If you do not, you are not being civil.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SirenForSanity
The trouble vine keeps growing.
03:46 PM on 12/05/2011
What?? Making demands is hardly civil either. Especially when it is off-topic and irrelevant to this article.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
neolow
Radicalized Dem
02:45 PM on 12/05/2011
Dem ticket in 2016
Hillary POTUS
Warren Senate Majority Leader
Pelosi Speaker of the House
Be still, my beating heart.
02:53 PM on 12/05/2011
another planet....neolow..

live long and prosper..
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jsgaetano
Legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus
03:27 PM on 12/05/2011
Your post makes me think. I'd like to see Warren in the White House... but would it do America more long term good to have her in the WH for 8 years... or have her in the Senate for decades? I'm kind of leaning for the latter, especially if influencing public policy at a high level is more of her personal inclination.
photo
gts31bumbee
a Warehouse of Information
12:45 PM on 12/06/2011
If so warranted, the White House for 8 years. That is term limits ! The biggest problems we have today is; no term limits in the Congress. All we have is deadwood and parasites who are self consumed with amassing wealth and influence: acute greed I calls it ! And you support the idea of Warren in the Senate for decades? Doesn't say much to me about your overall judgement. Just my opinion.