iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

New Payroll Tax Cut Proposed By Obama, Democrats, With A Broadside For The GOP (UPDATE)

President Obama

First Posted: 12/05/11 04:22 PM ET Updated: 12/05/11 04:38 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- Senate Democrats offered their second plan to extend the payroll tax cut Monday, this time proposing a smaller tax on the wealthy to pay for the middle-class cut. Highlighting the political nature of the effort as well as the economic importance, Senate leaders released the bare bones of the plan in a coordinated push with President Barack Obama.

A plan last week to boost the payroll tax cut from 2 percent now to 3.1 percent next year failed, with just one Republican senator signing on and Democrats losing three from their own caucus. The cut would have been paid for by levying a 3.25 percent surtax on income above $1 million -- a proposal toxic to the GOP, but designed to cast Republicans as friends of the rich.

The payroll tax cut has saved the average household about $1,000 in 2011. It primarily helps the middle class because it targets the 6.2 percent payroll tax, which funds Social Security and applies only to the first $106,000 in income.

Among the Democrats who opposed last week's plan, Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia opposed the cut because he fears it will undermine Social Security.

The new proposal would slap a smaller surtax on those top earners -- just under 2 percent -- and would not be permanent. It would cost less -- $185 billion instead of more than $260 billion -- because it would not extend the 3.1 percent cut to employers as well as employees, as the earlier plan did.

Democrats also said they would include some revenue-raisers supported by the recently failed super committee, but did not specify what those were.

They were very clear about the political argument against the GOP's opposition to the payroll tax cut.

"Last week, virtually every Senate Republican voted against that tax cut," President Obama said, speaking at the White House nearly concurrently with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's comments on the Senate floor. Sen. Susan Collins of Maine was the only Republican to vote for it.

"Now, I know many Republicans have sworn an oath never to raise taxes as long as they live. How can it be that the only time there's a catch is when it comes to raising taxes on middle-class families?" Obama wondered. "How can you fight tooth and nail to protect high-end tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans and yet barely lift a finger to prevent taxes going up for 160 million Americans who really need the help? It doesn't make sense."

Republicans had not yet been provided with the details of the Democratic plan, so they could comment only generally, noting that three Democrats opposed the last version -- not just the GOP.

"The only thing bipartisan about a tax hike is the opposition," said a spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), referring to the tax on the wealthy.

McConnell has said that the payroll tax cut should be extended, but Reid noted in his floor speech that only 20 Republicans voted for the version of the extension that McConnell offered last week, which would have been paid for by reducing the federal workforce.

"Whatever my friend Senator McConnell may say, it is obvious Republicans just aren't interested in preventing a $1,000 tax increase on nearly every family in this nation from taking effect on Jan. 1," Reid said, maintaining the partisan tone.

Obama made one other point to cast the GOP as friends of the rich and no one else, noting that Republicans rewrote House rules this year to require new spending to be paid for, but not new tax cuts.

"They explicitly changed the rules to say that tax cuts don't have to be paid for," Obama said. "So forgive me a little bit of confusion when I hear folks insisting on tax cuts being paid for."

UPDATE: 4:38 p.m. -- Democrats say the best way to fund the payroll tax cut -- besides hitting up the rich -- is to add a fee that lenders would pay to mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which should raise $38.1 billion. The Democratic plan also adopts a proposal from Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) to bar millionaires from collecting food stamps or unemployment insurance, which Sen. McConnell signed on to last week.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Senate Democrats offered their second plan to extend the payroll tax cut Monday, this time proposing a smaller tax on the wealthy to pay for the middle-class cut. Highlighting the politi...
WASHINGTON -- Senate Democrats offered their second plan to extend the payroll tax cut Monday, this time proposing a smaller tax on the wealthy to pay for the middle-class cut. Highlighting the politi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 802
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ryan Kenneth Leddy
Facts have a liberal bias.
03:12 AM on 12/06/2011
It just amazes me how the GOP base, which consists of middle-class white families which would benefit most from an extension of the payroll tax are not pressuring their party to agree to these cuts. Time and time again, the GOP tries to hold the middle-class hostage. Whether it was only agreeing to an extension of unemployment benefits for the extension of the Bush Tax Cuts or now when they propose to pay for the payroll tax cut but laying off Government Workers.

I thought the GOP was supposed to create jobs and cut spending and so far they have failed to do both. They refused Obama's $487 billion jobs bill which would have created over 1.5 million new jobs through fixing our infrastructure while also modernizing our schools and protecting the jobs of cops, firefighters, and teachers. Yet, not even a few weeks later they don't even blink when agreeing to pass an Iran sanctions bill which has a price tag of nearly $700 billion. Then, they refused Obama's debt ceiling proposal which offered $3 trillion in spending cuts for $1 trillion in new revenues and would have trimmed $4 trillion off of the debt and been enough to avoid a U.S. credit downgrade.
photo
imusintheevening
With,without,who'll deny it's whatthe fights about
05:11 AM on 12/06/2011
the republican party is imploding for the reasons you describe
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WhineandCheeseHead
11:55 PM on 12/05/2011
A continuation of taking from Social Security to fund the general operation of the government.

Why not make it a income cut for the middle class paid for with the income tax surcharge.

or

Why not make it a payroll tax surcharge on the wealthy to pay for the payroll tax decrease for everyone else?
photo
imusintheevening
With,without,who'll deny it's whatthe fights about
05:12 AM on 12/06/2011
the money is not coming from SS Trust
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WhineandCheeseHead
08:18 AM on 12/06/2011
Directly I guess you are correct. Indirectly you are not correct.

Social Security has typically been funded almost exclusively by the payroll tax. This is what they wish to continue to cut and expand. Typically it has been funded by a combination of the employee and employer each paying 6.2% of payroll into the fund. This is capped at $110,100 per employee for this year. The proposal is to lower this to 3.1% for the employee. It was already lowered to 4.2%.

So they are without a doubt reducing the funding for SS.

This is being "paid for" by adding an income tax surcharge on those making over $1 million per year. As I'm sure you are aware income taxes go to fund the federal government.

So, in effect what this does is reduces funding for SS and gives it to the federal government to spend as they see fit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SMBrown2
99% of democrats make the rest look bad.
10:30 PM on 12/05/2011
The one plus side to Obama's plan is that D's would lose one of their defenses of a soon-to-be-bankrupt entitlement. Now they couldn't say that we had to pay SS because people had been paying into it for so long. Nope, it's just another gift from the wealthy.

The whole problem with this country, which D's exploit, is that there is a huge section that thinks government is free. If it doesn't cost you anything to get more government goodies, why not take them?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shankapotomus
09:57 PM on 12/05/2011
I see that hope and change bull didn't work out to well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cccoyote
America couldn't be bought by corps.
09:29 PM on 12/05/2011
Tis the season for Kabuki - Hurry, we have to pass anything that sticks before the holiday break.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SlyKermit
'You can't go pleasing everyone, so screw it!'
09:28 PM on 12/05/2011
That's the thing about you folk on the Right - you folk never listened to the message of 2008 and have doubled down on every one of your horrible policies and backwards Economic Policies -- Watch as the Republicans get swept away in the Tidal Wave heading their direction...

The left didn't vote in 2010, that is why it happened - whole different ballgame with Obama on the ticket, especially if you look down ballot and see Boehner, Cantor, Santorum, Bachmann, McConnell, Graham, Cornyn and Hensarling
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SlyKermit
'You can't go pleasing everyone, so screw it!'
09:21 PM on 12/05/2011
"Now, I know many Republicans have sworn an oath never to raise taxes as long as they live. How can it be that the only time there's a catch is when it comes to raising taxes on middle-class families?" Obama wondered

Anybody of you Republican/Bagger got any answers?
09:23 PM on 12/05/2011
I'm part of the middle class and lean conservative on fiscal issues.

Taxes need to go up if the folks in Congress decide they want to spend about $4 trillion annually IMO.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SlyKermit
'You can't go pleasing everyone, so screw it!'
09:30 PM on 12/05/2011
Do you must refuse to vote for anybody who pledges to NEVER raise taxes?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WhineandCheeseHead
09:17 PM on 12/05/2011
A payroll tax cut paid for by an income tax surcharge? Who wouldn't want that!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rssllgtrby
09:09 PM on 12/05/2011
The 2010 Election was a mesage to stop the spending, The big spending Democrats had a huge loss and they know why.The Senate Dems. Voted against the last spending bill untill they knew it would lose. They were afraid they could lose their seats if the spending did not stop. Obama seems to want to keep spending on anything that comes up. He wants to tax the rich more then any thing else he has done. He wants to get the Republicans to brake their promise to not raise taxes so he can use that against them in the election.
09:05 PM on 12/05/2011
So their plans includes revenue raisers but didn't disclose....come on! What a joke.
08:57 PM on 12/05/2011
"Republicans had not yet been provided with the details of the Democratic plan"

So tell me again how you expect this to pass?

At this point in time, putting something together behind closed doors without working together is a recipe for failure.

Then again, I'm guessing this is just to score political points rather than offering a serious plan.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GoodBoySunshine
If you cannot help, at least do no harm
08:46 PM on 12/05/2011
Masterfully done Sir.

You have painted Groverpublicans into their corner with no way out.
-- except defeat at the polls.
luvdatbobcat
4 more years of no jobs, no change, and no hope.
08:51 PM on 12/05/2011
Obama trying to raid Social Security is painting the "Groverpubl­icans into their corner with no way out"?? How so??

"Americans pay for one thing with our payroll tax. One. Social Security," Manchin said in a Friday conference call with reporters. "We should be talking about how we can come together to fix a fiscal nightmare that will threaten the very programs we care about like Social Security. Instead, we're talking about undermining the very foundations of our longest-standing retirement program."

Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SlyKermit
'You can't go pleasing everyone, so screw it!'
09:32 PM on 12/05/2011
SS gets funded regardless of where it comes from.....read up on the subject
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chancho24
Any emotion, if it is sincere, is involuntary.
09:35 PM on 12/05/2011
Manchin, a DINO...
photo
3RawBob
My Bible: the Jefferson Bible
08:32 PM on 12/05/2011
This is a great start for the working and lower middle class, since it tops out at $110K. A plan to help the middle class making from $110K to $250K would be very helpful, and would be very simple to implement. Simply cap the effective tax rate at 15% up to $250K for couples. Obama kept saying he won’t raise taxes on couples making under $250K, but the time has come to say he will reduce taxes. Then sit back and watch the votes roll in. The middle class is the swing vote and Obama should not lose it.
luvdatbobcat
4 more years of no jobs, no change, and no hope.
08:40 PM on 12/05/2011
People are really going to support transfer of funds from the Social Security Trust Fund to the General Fund?? That is going to make the votes roll in alright, but not for the Democrats.
09:09 PM on 12/05/2011
You need to go to Fox's blog you don't know what your talking about here. I'm sick of you BS
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chancho24
Any emotion, if it is sincere, is involuntary.
09:35 PM on 12/05/2011
Stop with the spin, son!
No one is buying it! ;-)
08:28 PM on 12/05/2011
This is the message that the Democrats need to repeat over and over again. The Republicans do not care about working class American citizens. The only jobs plan that the Republicans have put forward is to lay off more workers.
luvdatbobcat
4 more years of no jobs, no change, and no hope.
08:41 PM on 12/05/2011
Cutting the money going to Social Security is a winning issue for the Democrats? Really?
08:42 PM on 12/05/2011
Republicans want to eliminate Social Security.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tazirai
Society is not your friend.
08:55 PM on 12/05/2011
Republicans want to Privatize or get rid of it all together. So yes it is. This is a kick needed to their arses. The ONLY pledge they should honor is the pledge of office and allegiance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Veganie
Live food, live bodies
08:14 PM on 12/05/2011
President Obama does the right thing trying to compromise with the GOP because he is a good leader, and chooses to help the middle and lower class by increasing funds for college education and decreasing the payroll tax. Lets hope in 2012 voters will remember who stood up for them and the deals he was forced to make with the republicans.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:18 PM on 12/05/2011
robbing paul to pay peter

is not sound economic policy
luvdatbobcat
4 more years of no jobs, no change, and no hope.
08:30 PM on 12/05/2011
I am sure those on Social Security and those who are about to start collecting befits will not forget how Obama and the Democrats are trying to de-fund Social Security.
08:39 PM on 12/05/2011
Oh go get yourself educated I so sick of your people's sounding bites.