iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

School Lunches: How The Food Industry Controls Student Meals

School Lunch

First Posted: 12/05/11 02:01 PM ET Updated: 12/05/11 02:20 PM ET

In a biting piece in The New York Times Sunday, investigative reporter Lucy Komisar offers an in-depth look at how the food industry -- and its complex web of internal alliances -- is taking over school meals. And not in a good way.

Komisar notes that the U.S. Department of Agriculture spends about $1 billion annually to send fresh products to schools across the country as part of the $13.3 billion National School Lunch Program. But increasingly, schools are paying high prices for third-party food processors to turn those products into fried and fat-laden items.

Deals between management companies, food processors and food manufacturers complicate the system and exchange more money within the system as schools foot the bill, Komisar finds. The report also details accounting tricks and contractual incentives that make the business all the more lucrative -- click through to The New York Times to read the full report and more about motivating factors for both the companies and the schools.

About 21 million students across the country receive free or reduced-price lunches, and at a time when children receive between 19 and 50 percent of their daily caloric intake at schools, more than a third of American children are considered overweight or obese.

The New York Times report also reveals the trials that face figures like First Lady Michelle Obama and chef and media personality Jamie Oliver, who actively work to fight childhood obesity by promoting healthy school lunches and nutritional education. Those efforts are further thwarted by lenient regulations, as Congress supported the final version of a spending bill Nov. 17 that would allow tomato paste on pizzas to continue to be counted as a vegetable and blocks efforts to limit the use of potatoes in school cafeterias.

On Jimmy Kimmel Live last month, Oliver declared that "the food companies of America own you," adding that "These moron frozen food companies -- pizza industry, french-fry industry -- have basically bought, bribed, bullied Congress, who have completely let everyone down, into basically making it okay to feed [students] french fries every day."

The Nov. 17 move by Congress was seen as a victory for those food manufacturers. American Frozen Food Institute spokesperson Corey Henry told Reuters that the overturned standards would have forced food producers to "change their products in a way that would make them unpalatable to students."

Still, some schools -- like several in California -- have taken the matter into their own hands, and have found ways to profit from those efforts. Umpteen school districts have taken part in a decade-long initiative, supported by a philanthropic organization, that provides schools with equipments and chefs who teach cafeteria workers to cook from scratch and produce fresh meals.

A report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention last month revealed that more than a third of high school students were eating vegetables less than once a day -- "considerably below" recommended levels of intake for a healthy lifestyle that supports weight management and could reduce risks for chronic diseases and some cancers.

Watch Oliver on Jimmy Kimmel Live:


FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

In a biting piece in The New York Times Sunday, investigative reporter Lucy Komisar offers an in-depth look at how the food industry -- and its complex web of internal alliances -- is taking over scho...
In a biting piece in The New York Times Sunday, investigative reporter Lucy Komisar offers an in-depth look at how the food industry -- and its complex web of internal alliances -- is taking over scho...
Filed by Emmeline Zhao  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 156
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
Oginikwe
I think therefore I'm dangerous
11:14 PM on 12/07/2011
After reading these articles, I no longer allow my son to eat lunches at school:

Snokist Growers, School Lunch Supplier, Investigated By FDA For Repackaging Moldy Applesauce: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/07/snokist-growers-school-lu_n_1080340.html?view=print&comm_ref=false

BPI’s ammoniated beef for use in school lunches: http://www.ucsusa.org/scientific_integrity/abuses_of_science/food-safety-outbreaks/food-safety-outbreak-ground-trimmings.html?print=t

And Cargill:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/04/health/04meat.html?_r=1&pagewanted=print

USDA Inspector General: meat supply routinely tainted with harmful residue:
http://www.grist.org/article/2010-04-15-usda-inspector-meat-supply-routinely-tainted-with-harmful-residu/PALL/print

Lessons on the food system from the ammonia-hamburger fiasco | Grist 1/5/2010
http://www.grist.org/article/2010-01-05-cheap-food-ammonia-burgers

Better to buy local
http://www.ecoliteracy.org/essays/food-security-it-takes-community
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:52 AM on 12/07/2011
Did I just read the word "umpteen"?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zephyra
03:06 PM on 12/06/2011
This is not a new trend, but the louder James gets, the more pressure he generates. The fake food companies continue to stuff the maximum number of additives along with subsidized calories into each item. We're being led toward extinction by our stomachs, my friends. Yum, yum.
foresure
Brash and Harsh
01:48 PM on 12/06/2011
Something Positive:

There is a really important and innovative idea on the "EdNews Colorado" blog site.

It is about Adams City high school providing free breakfast and lunch for all their students, no means tests, and earning money for school activities doing it.

Google: "Adams City High School free breakfast"

I originally found the site from a short mention on Huffington Post.

It really sounds like a good idea that could be adopted elsewhere.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
El Chingaso
Fighting for mental superiority...
07:45 AM on 12/08/2011
Ain't nothing "free" about it: taxpayers get hammered with the bills -- in some form or fashion -- to feed others' kids.
foresure
Brash and Harsh
05:23 PM on 12/08/2011
El Chigaso:

Absolutely right, it is so much more satisfactory to build more Juvenile Jails, and adult prisons. That way we can have the joy of watching their behavior on T.V.

We all, who "Want to Take the Country Back" can see all the good work that prisons are doing with "undesirable" elements.

If we don't take care of our children, we will make plenty of more jobs in the "security industry", and the "social welfare industry".

Never thought of it, hungry children and the real "job creators" of the future.

I am really sorry I suggested to you that you might want to read something that demonstrates how an efficient government program is run.

Best you leave it alone, leave it to others.

Building more prisons means more jobs.

Now if we can just bring the cost of the death penalty down to what it is in China, we would have plenty more money to build prisons..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
msd7733
12:15 PM on 12/06/2011
I remember the good old days when you packed your own lunch and hardly anyone was over weight.
People are too lazy to fix their own lunch anymore.
01:18 PM on 12/06/2011
No, parents aren't 'too lazy'. But now we have more and more families that have single parents and/or working parents. Not many people can afford to have one parent stay home and take care of the children in the same way they used to.

Parenting has changed, but it has changed in a direct reflection of how society has changed at well.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
broui
No d#%& cat. No d#%& cradle.
02:39 PM on 12/06/2011
Yes and no.

That does apply to some of my students.

But 75-85% of my students are on free and reduced lunch (and breakfast) meaning that their parents poverty is low enough that these kids require TWO meals a day from the school. For them it is not about "lazy".

AND, our kids are getting fat and behaving worse and getting poorer grades as a result of the swill we feed them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
msd7733
03:56 PM on 12/06/2011
You know there were poor familes when I went to school , some had large familes, but they always had bread and a few things for a bag lunch. I saw how some of the so called poor live here when I took around abgel tree gifts and many had nice cars, big tv sets, cell phones. One had paid to have her nails done and was afraid the gift box would break her new nails, When you see all the misuse of the welfare cards and what they are used for today, you have to wonder. The news covers all this. I think many of money for what they want today and know how to play the system to get others to foot the bill.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Karl Wilder
Chef Stirring The Pot Harlem
11:26 AM on 12/06/2011
It won't be a bomb that ends the world, it will be the typical American diet, thanks to Monsanto and others of their ilk. Every school should have a cooking crew and no food should be served that comes in bottles, boxes, cans or jars.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
broui
No d#%& cat. No d#%& cradle.
02:42 PM on 12/06/2011
Look into Sodexho. One of the largest, if not THE largest supplier of school lunch programs. Terrible stuff. Poor quality. My students deal with it daily.
04:30 PM on 12/06/2011
Sodexho carries high quality ingredients too. Its just the prices they offer are beyond what the school can afford. Shame on them for not making healthy and nutritious food available at reasonable prices for schools.
10:33 AM on 12/06/2011
How about having the Capitol Building cafeteria simply run the same items as Dunbar High School in DC... let them have an idea what trying to live off that diet actually means.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:12 AM on 12/06/2011
Here's a thought: how about packing a healthy lunch for one's child and sending it to school with him or her? I don't believe it's against the law yet, and it can be done inexpensively. Or is this too outrageous or impractical an idea in the 21st centruy?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:14 AM on 12/06/2011
I meant "century," of course.
09:50 AM on 12/06/2011
The problem is for the kids that eat free at school, they cannot afford to pack a lunch, its sad.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sunnybunny
05:11 PM on 12/06/2011
I beg to differ. I used to get free lunch for my kids and I always thought it was dumb that when i got food stamps I automatically got free lunch, but when I didn't get food stamps I had to fill out long intricate forms and sometimes got free and sometimes reduced. My thinking is that if I get food stamps, I have something to pack, whereas if I don't then I don't (because most money goes to bills) and that is when it should be free. That and having stay at home moms at the top of the list for head start never made sense to me.
08:29 AM on 12/06/2011
It ALWAYS comes down to making a buck... but the real problem with school lunches is the
parents' lack of responsibility in feeding their children healthy meals at home, before & after
school. We should, also, be teaching kids how grow & prepare nutritious food in the classroom.
10:56 AM on 12/06/2011
Healthy food costs a lot more than unhealthy food. You really don't get that?
Picture this: You're a parent working two minimum wage jobs to pay the bills. You have $2 to buy your kid dinner and half an hour before you have to leave for your waitressing shift.
Do you buy a head of lettuce, or do you go to McDonald's and buy a small burger and fries?
Not all poor parents feed their kids fast food, but a lot do because they don't have the time or money to do otherwise.
When I was a kid, we didn't eat much fast food, but there was a LOT of ramen, frozen pizza, and boxed macaroni and cheese, none of which is any more nutritionally sound.
If a kid is eligible for free school lunches, the odds are pretty good that they're not getting very nutritious, or very much, food at home. For the food at school to be a nutritional wasteland is especially unfortunate - the people who run the school cafeterias receive years of education and training in nutrition, which most parents, even more affluent ones, do not, and they can't argue that they don't have enough time to cook healthy meals. What's their excuse?
The summer school program for low-income students I volunteered at this summer was feeding the kids Hot Pockets for lunch about three days a week. Actual Hot Pockets (well, okay, probably off-brand "Hot Pockets"), still in the crisping sleeves. I mean, FFS.
04:51 PM on 12/06/2011
My daughter's first school lunch experience was similar to the "Hot Pockets." She was so excited to finally be getting hot lunch at school, and what she was served was: a Jose Ole frozen burrito, a scoop of peanut butter (I'm serious), some flimsy looking iceberg lettuce, and a package of canned peaches.

And this is in what is considered an affluent school district in an affluent suburb. Granted, the program has changed slightly (they now have a centralized kitchen for the district that cook several meals from scratch per week, although there are still frozen items on offer, and pizza once a week) from when it was strictly heat and eat.
09:51 PM on 12/14/2011
"Do you buy a head of lettuce, or do you go to McDonald's and buy a small burger and fries?" Neither. You do like my granny did, you get a can of mixed veggies for 48 cents, a bag of pasta or egg noodle for a 75cents -$1 and a can of chicken broth. Throw all of it in a pan with some seasoning(salt/pepper), and get dressed for the other job while it's cooking, and if you add enough water you will have 4-6 servings of cheap veggie soup with noodles.

I grew up a free lunch child. But unlike most children who ate a lot of processed food, I was lucky to have adults around me who could cook. Or who could atleast fake cooking. The biggest issue facing our children today in terms of their diet is that the adults around them lack the knowledge of how to cook a meal. A meal that can reworked over and over again to make mutiple meals on a small budget. Too much of a dependence on microwave/convienence foods, if you ask me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cadawa
03:44 AM on 12/06/2011
The person leading the charge against this sort of abuse of our youngsters is Brit super chef, Jamie Oliver. Check out his web site, sign the global petition and get on his mailing list. http://www.jamieoliver.com/us/foundation/jamies-food-revolution/sign-petition
So many health problems are food related. School lunches are setting kids on the wrong path.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
El Chingaso
Fighting for mental superiority...
03:31 AM on 12/06/2011
This article just reinforces the fact that...public schools -- by & large -- are very dangerous and extremely unhealthy environs for America's children...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
YupIndeed
We are all made of star stuff.
03:38 PM on 12/06/2011
Seriously??!! There are abusive parents in high-income households who send their children to private schools that are far more dangerous!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
El Chingaso
Fighting for mental superiority...
09:04 PM on 12/15/2011
Liar.
01:00 AM on 12/06/2011
Remember "bag lunch"? In many cases, a polite name for left-overs. In other cases PB&J.

I send them in with a bottle of tea (they bring the bottle back for reuse), leftovers from dinner (if not that homemade jam, PB & J, or sandwiches from left-over meat from dinner that we froze for storage). Today it was left-over home-made soup with diced dried bread. And we bake our own bread and toss it in the freezer to keep it from going bad.

They love chilli - 1 lb ground meat, 1 lb onions, 2 lb dried beans, 2 quart cans of tomatoes, + water and spices. Goes a long way. Cheap too. Particularly if you buy in bulk. They like it for lunch too.
09:11 AM on 12/06/2011
I read an article that some schools were banning bagged lunches unless your child had an allergy. Insane right?!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Yam716
For Natural Hair CurlTalk, Visit: lillian-mae
12:57 PM on 12/06/2011
How were they able to warm up the chilli?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
YupIndeed
We are all made of star stuff.
03:41 PM on 12/06/2011
Maybe it tastes good cold...or they are allowed to ask the lunch ladies to nuke it for them.
12:32 PM on 12/07/2011
Some school do have microwaves in the cafeteria, but not all. And I know plenty of people who actually do like cold chili.
foresure
Brash and Harsh
11:28 PM on 12/05/2011
For an excellent solution to the problem of school cafeterial problems:

Google: "Adams City High School Colorado free breakfast"

It is an article about how that school has found some very creative, and inexpensive ways to make sure their students have good, free meals, at low costs.

It is something that seems could be copied in other high schools.

You can also get to that site by going to the Huff Post Search Box, with the same search. It will take you to a short summary, and a link to the longer article.

Full disclosure: I don't have any association with the school, or Colorado, or the food industry.

Read the article, and see if you don't think it is a really good idea!
09:17 AM on 12/06/2011
Unfortunately, most schools don't have enough in the budget to offer other FREE meals. Its sad, but, its the parents responsibilty to feed their children a healthy breakfast and dinner.
foresure
Brash and Harsh
11:26 AM on 12/06/2011
laurenproof12:

I very much appreciate your "educators" Can't Do Spirit. Especially since it is obvious tht you haven't Googled: "Adams City high school free breakfast".

They are actually making a profit (for their clubs) from the program.

I guess all those methods courses covered everything you will ever need to know.

If educating children is a priority, then every Teachers' Union in America would be demanding free breakfast and lunch for ALL its students.

Every teacher would be writing and lobbying every one of their state legislators

Your argument is perfect though.

Since children can't learn without being fed, and a high percentage of parents are FUBAR (Google the word), all teachers have a good excuse as to their failure.

Well not complete failure. According to a New York Times (nyt.com) editorial on 11/4/11 a full 25% of high school graduates can function at the 12th grade level.
11:21 PM on 12/05/2011
Whatever happened to "brown bagging" it? Parents boycott the school lunches and start sending the kids to school with a healthy lunch, then the industry doesn't make money and the kids eat better.
Stop acting like victims, and start taking charge.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bobbrowntown
12:50 AM on 12/06/2011
I live in a district with 100% free lunch for every child in school in a very high poverty district. The parents have no choice because they cannot afford to send their kids with a lunch. How are they supposed to take charge of their lunch? This is another way that food companies prey on the poor.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
El Chingaso
Fighting for mental superiority...
03:19 AM on 12/06/2011
Ain't nothing free in this world, baby, especially "lunch." Taxpayers are on the hook for others' kids. A lot of folks that are impoverished, too, smoke cigarettes and drink alcohol. Po' people could afford supporting their offspring -- if they adjusted their lifestyles.

Most people are "poor" because of their own decisions and lack of effort(s)...
foresure
Brash and Harsh
02:14 PM on 12/06/2011
bobbrowntown:

Let me add to your excellent post. Some kids are supposed to pay 40 cents for their lunch. Now I'll be a cost accountant would drop dead if s/he heard of such a thing.

Some school bother the parents for back payment.

Further, many children do not take a free breakfast because of the stigma associated with it. See: The South Park episode titled "Poor Student', or something like that.

For an excellent solution to the problem of school cafeterial problems:

Google: "Adams City High School Colorado free breakfast"

It is an article about how that school has found some very creative, and inexpensiv­e ways to make sure their students have good, free meals, at low costs.

It is something that seems could be copied in other high schools.
05:56 PM on 12/06/2011
PTA An angry mob of mothers is not a sight any board wants to see. Time to start prioritizing with our children first and demanding better for them from their lunches, to their education, and their daily care.
I think this is just another case of bullying, just by the food industry. Parents have to say "NO MORE!" It doesn't cot money to speak for what you believe. To do it as a group, creates a greater impact.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PatrickforO
America needs a Labor Party
11:02 PM on 12/05/2011
"An increasingly cozy alliance between companies that manufacture processed foods and companies that serve the meals is making students — a captive market — fat and sick while pulling in hundreds of millions of dollars in profits. At a time of fiscal austerity, these companies are seducing school administrators with promises to cut costs through privatization."

Did you notice the word 'privatize?' This is one of the three cornerstones of Milton Frieman's so-called 'free market' economy, and it doesn't work! Why, you ask?

Because the profit motive is amoral. Since the government is basically one of, by and for corporations, not us, it makes this 'privatization' possible. Companies come in and say, "Oh, we can do it better, faster, cheaper," and then once they come in begin maximizing profit at the expense of quality. Happens over and over and over. Argentina, Chile, Indonesia, Iraq, Afghanistan, and now our schools. The problem is our government is NOT doing its job, because the clowns we elect to represent our interests need to take care of things like this as opposed to legislating that pizza counts as a vegetable!