iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Paul Schurick: Robert Ehrlich Aide Guilty Of Conspiring To Suppress Black Voter Turnout

Robert Ehrlich Maryland Paul Schurick Black Voter

SARAH BRUMFIELD   12/ 6/11 06:31 PM ET   AP

BALTIMORE — A political aide to former Maryland Gov. Robert Ehrlich was convicted Tuesday of conspiring to use Election Day robocalls in what prosecutors cast as an effort to suppress black voter turnout during the 2010 gubernatorial election.

Paul Schurick was found guilty of all four counts he faced, including conspiracy to influence or attempt to influence a voter's decision whether to go to the polls through the use of fraud and conspiracy to publish campaign material without an authority line. A stoic Schurick comforted his wife in the courtroom after the Baltimore jury's verdict was read, but declined to comment.

His attorney, A. Dwight Pettit, said they will appeal.

Political experts say the case could have an impact on future campaigns, discouraging attempts to keep voters from casting ballots.

Prosecutors argued the calls that went out on the evening of Election Day to about 110,000 voters in Baltimore and Prince George's County – two jurisdictions with high percentages of black voters – were an effort by the Republican campaign to reduce the number of black Democrats voting in heavily Democratic Maryland.

"Hello. I'm calling to let everybody know that Governor O'Malley and President Obama have been successful," the call said. "Our goals have been met. The polls were correct, and we took it back. We're OK. Relax. Everything's fine. The only thing left is to watch it on TV tonight. Congratulations, and thank you."

Schurick testified that he rejected campaign consultant Julius Henson's black voter suppression strategy dubbed "The Schurick Doctrine" but later approved the robocall script. He called it a counterintuitive attempt to mobilize crossover Democrats and said he didn't know the authority line, which would have noted that the message came from Ehrlich's campaign, would be left off. Henson, whose trial on similar charges is set to begin in February, has said he did not believe the calls were illegal and that they weren't meant to suppress the vote.

O'Malley handily won last year's rematch against the Republican Ehrlich, whom he had unseated in 2006. Ehrlich issued a statement in response to the verdict supporting his friend: "While I vehemently disagree with the decision from a Baltimore City Jury, I do respect our legal system."

These kinds of activities aren't new, but have become more problematic recently, said State Prosecutor Emmet C. Davitt. He said he hopes the verdict will send a message that it is more than just "dirty tricks" and the law will be enforced.

"The First Amendment does not protect fraudulent speech," he said. "We think clearly that this was the case here. It was fraudulent. It wasn't just political speech."

The call was fraudulent because the language seemed to come from the point of view of Ehrlich's opponent and lacked an authority line, he said. He didn't believe Schurick's reverse psychology explanation, he said.

"I think it was ridiculous," he said. "I just don't buy it and evidently the jury didn't buy it as well."

Pettit, the defense attorney, said, "We don't think the jury understood the issues of law in terms of the First Amendment and constitutional issues. If you allow the state to create arbitrary and capricious laws in terms of vagueness and in terms of what fraud is and allow that kind of prosecution to control free political speech, then you throw a dagger in the heart of our political system."

Pettit noted that this is the first time someone has been charged under the statute that was revised in 2006 and said his client's appeal could have an impact beyond this case.

"This has repercussions in terms of state elections, national elections across the board," he said. "This is a very, very significant constitutional legal issue that has not been decided by the high courts of this nation."

University of Baltimore associate professor and voting rights expert Gilda Daniels hopes that the verdict does have an impact, showing people that this kind of behavior is wrong.

"Political speech is the highest level of speech, but when you use speech to harm, that's when you walk outside the protections of the constitution," she said.

The message was clearly a misrepresentation intended to hold down turnout and ideally the verdict will discourage such behavior, said Donald Norris, director of the Maryland Institute for Policy Analysis and Research at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County.

"This was free speech in the same sense that lying is free speech and lying is not permitted," he said. "What they were perpetrating was a fraud."

The First Amendment leaves it to the electoral process to police what are true political ideas or facts, but the government has an interest in making sure people aren't kept from voting through false statements, ACLU of Maryland staff attorney David Rocah said.

"That's why we supported and helped pass the legislation that made it a crime to engage in such conduct," he said. "And we think that the actions that the Ehrlich campaign took in 2010 clearly violated that statute."

Pettit suggested that the campaign's Republican political affiliation in a heavily Democratic state influenced the decision to pursue the prosecution.

"This was a political witch hunt from the beginning," he said.

But Davitt disagreed, noting that the case was opened by his predecessor, who was appointed by Ehrlich.

In addition to the conspiracy charges, Schurick was also convicted of influencing or attempting to influence a voter's decision on whether to go to the polls through the use of fraud and failing to provide an authority line on distributed campaign material. The authority line violations carry a maximum of a year in prison. The other charges carry up to five years in prison for each count.

Baltimore Circuit Judge Lawrence Fletcher-Hill dismissed an additional conspiracy count and one count of obstruction of justice for allegedly withholding documentation sought through a grand jury subpoena.

A presentencing investigation will be completed before a hearing scheduled for Feb. 16.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
BALTIMORE — A political aide to former Maryland Gov. Robert Ehrlich was convicted Tuesday of conspiring to use Election Day robocalls in what prosecutors cast as an effort to suppress black vote...
BALTIMORE — A political aide to former Maryland Gov. Robert Ehrlich was convicted Tuesday of conspiring to use Election Day robocalls in what prosecutors cast as an effort to suppress black vote...
Filed by Luke Johnson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,629
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (26 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
06:33 AM on 12/27/2011
So he's convicted , but the defense makes a statement afterwards claiming the jury supported them. Yeah, OK. CONs gotta do what a CONs gotta do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
06:08 AM on 12/27/2011
So justice was served, maybe, if there aren't more twist, turns and legal motions. But the conflict goes back to 2006, so it's not exactly swift justice.
Another example of CON deck-stacking: http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/votes/112/house/1/873
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mary Nissenson
10:50 PM on 12/07/2011
LISTEN UP. I've written about this endlessly on Huffpo and can't get anyone to perk up and pay notice. But I'm not giving up. Because, in the light of one of the most horrendous assaults on voting rights in this country (and the nauseatingly insulting way those robo calls underestimated the intelligence of black voters) I want to strike back at the Republicans with everything we've got. And we've got something that (while, perhaps minimal in other circumstances) is big -- very big -- in this context.

Republicans are "worried about the integrity of the voting process"?? Really? They believe it's worth suppressing some votes to "keep one fraudulent vote from being cast"? Really?

Then let's make sure that Mitt Romney is charged, tried and convicted for committing vote fraud last year in Mass. He did. And no one did anything. Romney, who's so cramped in his 5,000sf
mansion in LaJolla that he's more than tripling it, claims he was living in his son's unfinished basement, qualifying him to vote in Mass at the time. Right! Let me guess... he was sleeping between the water heater and the dryer?

I'm not sure any major presidential candidate in history has ever been proven to have committed vote fraud before. How ironic that Mr. Morality did it - while his party suppresses minority votes for the sake of the "purity of the voting process."

Will someone -- please -- anyone out there speak up about this? It's hard to be the lone
10:46 AM on 12/08/2011
Hi Mary. I understand your anger regarding this issue. I have often felt that the apparent goals of the conservatives was to push our society back to the "good old days" when rights were extended primarily to white, male land owners. This latest push by the Repubs to make voting more difficult for those that are not "privileged" is the perfect example of this. And it is all done behind the guise of preventing "voter fraud". And their followers are actually falling for that spiel. Although I have always been registered to vote without any problems, this is the first time I have felt compelled to make sure every "i" is dotted and every "t" is crossed because I am actually concerned that, as a registered Democrat, somebody will find a "technicality" and deny me the right to vote. Like you, I am also very concerned about this mentality and where this is taking us as a country.
conversations17
an eye for an eye makes everyone blind
10:09 AM on 12/07/2011
They make you want to stand in line twice and make up for the folks they are tricking and keeping at home... I wouldn't because I know it is fraud, but it makes you want to...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JubalTHarshaw
Just Passing Through...
09:45 AM on 12/07/2011
Why is anyone surprised that a class of people who promise everything to everyone are found to be lying to someone about something? All politicians, regardless of party, lie to get elected. Both parties engage in whatever level of cheating they think they can get away with. Anyone trumpeting a loud, angry rant against one party while pretending that the other is honest must be an idiot or a fool.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Pasterczyk
Banned!
01:53 AM on 12/09/2011
No, not all politicians regardless of party. You are trying to create a false equivalency just because one side's position is so much less defensible than the others.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JubalTHarshaw
Just Passing Through...
09:38 AM on 12/07/2011
Can we expect him to receive the same "equal justice" that we saw administered in the New Black Panther voter suppression case? Mr. Holder is enough hot water without adding yet another boondoggle to his "distinguished" record...
fo3angels
Equality is only equality if it is for all
12:43 PM on 12/07/2011
Well, considering that what happened was not voter suppression but rather accurately voter intimidation by one person, considering that the previous DOJ did not prosecute but the current DID successfully prosecute the person, I certainly do intend to hold the current DOJ to the same high standard they set by prosecuting and getting a judgement rendered against the person who was being intimidating in that one voting precinct.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JubalTHarshaw
Just Passing Through...
01:00 PM on 12/07/2011
Clearly you did not pay attention to any of the Congressional testimony that followed that event. Mr. Holder is a proven racist. I look forward to the day that he is disbarred. Mr. Holder is a disgrace to his office, his nation and his profession.
09:50 PM on 12/07/2011
I argued this point earlier. Unfortunately, lefties tend to ignore facts.

The charges brought against members of the New Black Panther Party were made by the Bush administration, but were dropped by the Obama Justice Department. In fact, the Obama administration initially pursued the case, and even won a default judgment in federal court in April 2009 when the Black Panther members didn't appear in court. But a month later, Eric Holder and the Justice Department suddenly moved to drop the charges. There was never a full explanation given to the public. But we do have this:
http://www.politico.com/blogs/joshgerstein/0311/Eric_Holder_Black_Panther_case_focus_demeans_my_people.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Pasterczyk
Banned!
01:55 AM on 12/09/2011
How did these two particular New Black Panthers engage in worse acts than the GOPer in the story here? Please explain that "fact".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
06:28 AM on 12/27/2011
Ah another conspiracy.
Where's your birth certificate? I haven't seen it. Your parentage has not been fully explained.
So sad. Just sayin'.
Any other distractions?
photo
fcmean
I built my business.
09:35 AM on 12/07/2011
but, of course, when eric holder's black panther thugs intimidated white voters, that was perfectly ok.
conversations17
an eye for an eye makes everyone blind
10:01 AM on 12/07/2011
... this was FRAUD!! How exactly did the panthers intimidate, did they block the entrances, what did they do exactly. please provide link, ot hearsay
photo
NVEd
I love mountains.
10:12 AM on 12/07/2011
The gop's view is they intimidated by standing around while black.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aurical
Trolls Should Make Like A Tree & Get Out Of Here!
06:00 PM on 12/07/2011
All they have are talking points, this is what they are told to say in response to this issue. Don't take the bait, every minute spent talking about Holder is one less talking about Ehrlich.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Judith Ford
10:03 AM on 12/07/2011
When?Liar.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gwens
Well done is better than well said."
09:32 AM on 12/07/2011
what won't the GOP do to win?? So sad
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JubalTHarshaw
Just Passing Through...
09:40 AM on 12/07/2011
While I condemn the lies I find it hard to justify this outcome when compared to armed thugs scaring off little old ladies in Philadelphia. If we are going to demand accountability it should be without reference to party or race.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
WhatWhat1
Don't believe everything you think.
01:07 AM on 12/09/2011
How this story turn into "armed thugs"? It gets better and better. Quick, whisper the latest version in my ear and I'll keep the chain going.
ONE GUY was prosecuted by AT Holder. One guy. ONE. Got it?
(That's singular, by the way. Use your numbers).
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mimssandi
09:15 AM on 12/07/2011
A self fulfilling statement - voter fraud is rampant in the US says the F news and the R spokesmen.
Unsaid is - and we will continue to think of new ways to do it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JubalTHarshaw
Just Passing Through...
09:41 AM on 12/07/2011
Surely you are implying that voter fraud is the sole province of one party. We need to carefully examine the party affiliations of the legions of dead voters in Chicago before jumping to conclusions...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aurical
Trolls Should Make Like A Tree & Get Out Of Here!
06:03 PM on 12/07/2011
Do you have any evidence of these "legions" that were not started by Joe Kennedy? Voter SUPPRESSION is the true voter fraud, the cases of the dead and Mickey Mouse voting are republican camp stories.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
WhatWhat1
Don't believe everything you think.
01:13 AM on 12/09/2011
Don't conflate election fraud and voter fraud. I believe the number of people convicted of voter fraud in the last 7-8 years is fewer than ten. That's nation wide, including all local, regional, state and federal elections.
Out of hundreds of millions of votes cast during that time, that's an infinitesimally small number. You are 50 - 100 times more likely to win the state lottery.
08:08 AM on 12/07/2011
Once again the GOP shows their ugly head. They have no idea what is the meaning of the term democracy. They have been crying about voter fraud, that doesn't exist, only as a means to suppress voter participation. They will do every dirty trick available to win an election. I hope he gets a serious sentence that will only be reduced if he starts identifying who else was involved in the crime.
09:00 AM on 12/07/2011
you're funny. Because we ALL know the Dems have never done anything shady when it comes to voter fraud. The Dallas Cowboys casting votes in Nevad and Arizona??? Black Panthers standing outside of polling halls????
Liberals getting upset because you have to show photo ID in order to vote??? I've had to show my DL every time I've ever voted for the last 30 years and yet for some reason you guys think that's wrong.
11:01 AM on 12/07/2011
Why is it every time a Republican is caught with his pants down (sometimes literally) the crime is justified with the comments about a Democrat did it 10 years ago? Why not deal with the issue at hand? Both Right and Left should raise hell about about the crime, not point a finger at the past. There are sleazy Democrats too. I was just as discussed with the former Democratic governor of Illinois as any else and said so. In your world I should justify the act by accusing previous Republicans governors of the same crime.

Admit it, voter ID is nothing but a scheme to limit voting of different segments of our society. Why is Wisconsin implementing expensive restricts to voting when there is no documented voter fraud? Dallas Cowboys voting in NV and AZ? When did this happen? Two black dudes raising hell outside a vote polling is not justification for national or statewide changes. So 86 violations out of how many millions of votes cast is justification to impose restrictions that will keep citizens from voting? It is good you have an ID, but unfortunately some don't. Is this justification to keep them from voting? Texas allows gun permits but not student ID's. Tell me there isn't a scheme behind this restriction.
fo3angels
Equality is only equality if it is for all
12:46 PM on 12/07/2011
Well, it is not like Ohio was won by manipulation of the returns by the company that made the systems once it showed that Sen. Kerry might actually win there, is it? Oh, wait, maybe I got that backward - maybe that is EXACTLY what happened in 2004!
08:08 AM on 12/07/2011
The GOP is like a sinking ship. This is example of their desperation to stay a float. They are a minority party and they think they need to cheat in order to win. Maybe if they dropped the baggers they not need to cheat. It is sad because the country needs a healthy GOP.
photo
gaydood
♥ Always Wins !!!
08:04 AM on 12/07/2011
see, vote outthe gopeeobaggers asap !
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lowrodiay65
08:01 AM on 12/07/2011
Republicans trying to surpress black vote, surprise, surprise, surpriseeee.
09:01 AM on 12/07/2011
that angle is so played out, really... it is. Until your mudslingin' president took him out, a black man lead in the GOP polls. Yeah, we really hate black people.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mimssandi
09:13 AM on 12/07/2011
Mudslinging President had nothing to do with taking out Cain. His broken zipper did it to himself. What planet do you get news from, not planet earth.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gwens
Well done is better than well said."
09:33 AM on 12/07/2011
how many black people are inthe republican party?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
SkyeinColorado
GOPers Have to Cheat to Win
07:57 AM on 12/07/2011
No doubt he learned this from the master: Richard Nixon aka Tricky Dick.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgilley
Question Authority!
07:52 AM on 12/07/2011
Voter suppression is an old and cherrished tactic of the GOP. and now it is their major plan to win in 2012.

"Republicans are exploring a new strategy - repealing the 1965 Voter Rights Act..."
http://www.thomhartmann.com/blog/2011/02/republicans-are-exploring-new-strategy-repealing-1965-voter-rights-act

Fundamental Injustice: Voter Suppression Threatens Democracy
http://www.aclu.org/blog/voting-rights/fundamental-injustice-voter-suppression-threatens-democracy

Americans for Prosperity, the conservative advocacy group backed by billionaires Charles and David Koch, has been accused of attempting to suppress Democratic voter turnout in the Wisconsin Senate recall elections.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/03/koch-brothers-americans-for-prosperity-wisconsin-recalls_n_913561.html

Are the Koch brothers denying your vote?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dwOTm3ShQh0&feature=relmfu

The GOP War on VotingIn a campaign supported by the Koch brothers, Republicans are working to prevent millions of Democrats from voting next year
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-gop-war-on-voting-20110830

Nothing is more un American than stealing the right of Americans to vote!
09:03 AM on 12/07/2011
or allowing people that aren't allowed to legally vote, cast a ballot. And there's a lot of that going on and guess who they vote for???
wolfsonnydiane
Good goverment lies in the middle
09:21 AM on 12/07/2011
Were is that happening give us some examples and number of people convicted of voting illegale bet you cant find 20 people in the whole usa thast voted illegaly and was convicted of doing so Flab voter fraud has never come close to influencing any election b ut voter suppresion certaimly has a much bettr ods of doing so now doesnt it please stop trying to dessemenate false infomation your being unpatriotc some might go so far as to say your acting like a terriost
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gwens
Well done is better than well said."
09:35 AM on 12/07/2011
i don’t believe there are a lot of them, the republicans try anything to stop people from voting if they had any proof that it happen they would be all over it. They check my ID when I go to vote and I have heard that is done in many other places.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JubalTHarshaw
Just Passing Through...
09:43 AM on 12/07/2011
And Democrats are pure as the driven snow. Grow up, politcial chicanery knows no party affiliation.
10:01 AM on 12/07/2011
Really? it seems only Repubs are found in voter suppression, please give me an example of Democrats trying to suppress the vote? I know dems supported get to vote programs, but Repubs try to stop them and make arcane rules for voting. While voter fraud is almost non-existent.

Now before the shrieking starts, I mean people who should not vote, are voting, or voting twice. Not college students paid by the name to enroll using Mickey mouse or the starting line-up for the Dallas cowboys. As that hurts the agency paying the students not the actual vote.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgilley
Question Authority!
01:15 PM on 12/07/2011
Is the Only justification for Republicans being so despicable that "they did it to" refering to democrats? Really?
And BTW NO Democrats are trying to supress the vote none zero!