More

Camille Grammer: I Still Wear A Ring From Ex-Husband Kelsey Grammer


First Posted: 12/07/11 08:48 AM ET Updated: 12/07/11 12:13 PM ET

Her marriage may be over, but Camille Grammer isn't exactly ready to let go of her ex-husband Kelsey Grammer.

The "Real Housewives of Beverly Hills" star revealed to Life & Style Weekly that she still wears a 10-carat diamond ring given to her by Kelsey on their fifth anniversary.

"Would you buy a woman you didn't love this ring?" Camille tells Life & Style. "He loved me, no matter what he says!"

Camille said she wears the ring as a reminder of her 13-year marriage to the "Frasier" star and all of the happiness they once shared as a family, even though their divorce took a nasty turn.

Though Kelsey moved on quickly -- he married his fourth wife Kayte Walsh in February -- don't expect Camille to jump back into marriage right away.

"At some point, possibly yes," she recently told E! News about tying the knot again. "A year ago I would have said I definitely never, I will never enter into that kind of agreement. But now I've definitely changed my mind."

Perhaps her new beau Dimitri Charalambopoulos is the reason for her change of heart.

"I'm very happy," the reality star told Life & Style about her relationship with Charalambopoulos, but added they are moving slow. "I'm going to take it one day at a time."

Check out Camille's photo below and for more from Camille, pick up this week's issue of Life & Style Weekly, on newsstands now.


FOLLOW HUFFPOST CELEBRITY

Her marriage may be over, but Camille Grammer isn't exactly ready to let go of her ex-husband Kelsey Grammer. The "Real Housewives of Beverly Hills" star revealed to Life & Style Weekly that she st...
Her marriage may be over, but Camille Grammer isn't exactly ready to let go of her ex-husband Kelsey Grammer. The "Real Housewives of Beverly Hills" star revealed to Life & Style Weekly that she st...
Filed by Kelly Fisher  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 159
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
10:22 AM on 12/09/2011
It's her ring he gave it she excepted it. it's hers to wear
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gwens
Well done is better than well said."
05:51 AM on 12/08/2011
I think she is still wearing the ring to stick it to him some more. Going out and saying the stuff she is saying is only to make her look good and him look even worse than he already looks. To me she is very plastic both in looks and personality.
05:39 AM on 12/08/2011
I don't understand some people. I went through a very nasty divorce 26 years ago,it was nasty then and it is still nasty now. What gives ?
photo
Californiagrove
Former liberal who grew up!
03:28 AM on 12/08/2011
"Real Housewives of Beverly Hills" OR " How to look like a plastic surgery mess and psychotic advertisment al at the same time!
01:18 AM on 12/08/2011
GOLD-DIGGER..GET LOST!
01:02 AM on 12/08/2011
Couldn't wait to sit and comment on this story. Ummm, lets see, WHO GIVES A RATS ASS?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gwens
Well done is better than well said."
05:48 AM on 12/08/2011
yet here you are
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CeeCee
Salta prima di inacidire
12:58 AM on 12/08/2011
Four marriages? I'd say the problem lies with Grammer not Camille.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gwens
Well done is better than well said."
05:49 AM on 12/08/2011
have you seen her show. might want to re-think that
10:26 PM on 12/09/2011
No, it definitely lies with Kelsey Grammer.
11:22 PM on 12/07/2011
I watched her show once, only because I wanted to see what it was like...I didn't like it, so obviouly I didn't watch it a 2nd time. She was not very nice, but I didn't find any of those Housewives nice, real, down to earth, non-snooty. They all were backstabbers. Maybe she really did love Kelsey in her own way. Maybe not. Maybe she's wearing the ring to make people think she could actually care about someone besides herself. But, she got what, $30 million in her divorce settlement, so why would she need to return the ring? Why should she return it? It's possible she went through the marriage totally oblivious to Kelsey not loving her, not wanting to be with her. Stranger things have happened.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:21 PM on 12/07/2011
And keeps his name. I always wonder why. But then, look at the banner for THIS site.
12:05 AM on 12/08/2011
After 13 years, it's her name too. Don't they have children (child) also? She's entitled to the ring as it was a gift; she can wear it, sell it, give it away or throw it away. She's also entitled to HER name.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:31 AM on 12/08/2011
In Japan, the man sometimes takes HER name.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
catslegl
09:09 PM on 12/07/2011
The ring was a gift. She can keep it and wear it if she wishes.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FLmarebob
07:07 PM on 12/07/2011
I'd wear a 10 carat ring, too. It wasn't her wedding ring, it was an anniversary present
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jmbsjy
too old for tea parties
10:11 PM on 12/07/2011
I would sell it, but I guess she doesn't need the money. It sounds like she is trying to hold onto him, saying "this proves he loved me". It's really rather sad. She has always seemed like a sad person to me anyway.
07:01 PM on 12/07/2011
there is something very sleazy and repulsive about this woman.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mailman
09:59 PM on 12/07/2011
It's probably that dye job and those fake rock hard boobs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jmbsjy
too old for tea parties
10:09 PM on 12/07/2011
She seems very shallow and insecure. One of those carbon copy Hollywood women, more like a mannequin than a real person.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MyNinja
N.W.A. Ninjas With Aptitude
06:28 PM on 12/07/2011
Daimonds are a b!tches best friend.
ttruckr23
Empty?.... Not anymore.
06:17 PM on 12/07/2011
To ask the repetitive and inevitable question of: We should care because?