iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Invoking 'Appeasement,' Republican Candidates Blast Obama At Jewish Forum

Chamberlain

First Posted: 12/07/2011 5:22 pm Updated: 12/08/2011 7:14 am

WASHINGTON -- Though Wednesday marked the 70th anniversary of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, speeches by a series of U.S. presidential candidates at the Republican Jewish Coalition rang strongly with rhetoric that applied more to the European theater in the years before the outbreak of World War II.

In speech after speech, five of the six invited GOP candidates invoked the specter of "appeasement," the pre-WWII policy that many historians say emboldened Adolf Hitler to conquer Europe and carry out a full-scale genocide of its Jewish population. U.S. President Barack Obama, the Republicans said, was making a comparable mistake by "appeasing" Iran, "appeasing" Islamist extremists, even "appeasing" other countries who want to take America's place in the world.

Former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum accused the Obama administration of the kind of "appeasement" of Iran that allowed Hitler to invade neighboring countries with impunity.

Michele Bachmann said, in reference to Iran President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, that "again a madman is speaking, and it seems the world is again not listening."

Mitt Romney said, "Internationally, President Obama has adopted an appeasement strategy. Appeasement betrays a lack of faith in America, in American strength and in America's future."

And Newt Gingrich, currently leading in the polls, used his time to rip into the Obama State Department, accusing it of "appeasement."

In such a setting, of course, there are few terms more loaded than "appeasement," the word used to describe British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain's policy of accepting German land-grabs in the late 1930s to avoid open war. When German troops reoccupied the Rhineland and annexed Austria, Europeans stood by. When Germany threatened to take over over Czechslovakia's Sudetenland, Chamberlain traveled to Munich to meet with "Herr Hitler."

The result, the notorious Munich agreement, was followed shortly after by Kristallnacht, the violent anti-Jewish pogroms that marked the beginning of the Holocaust.

Mindful of Chamberlain's famous words upon returning from Munich, none of the candidates promised "peace in our time." Instead, each called for a harder line against Iran and enemies of the United States or Israel. Only Jon Huntsman, the former ambassador to China who bypassed foreign policy to focus on restoring trust in government, didn't utter the 'A' word.

Romney, however, applied it widely. "This appeasement by this Administration has taken many forms," he said. "It includes offers to engage with the world's most despicable dictators. It consists of concessions to Russia to remove our missile defense sites from Poland and to exclude tactical nuclear weapons from the new, remarkably one-sided, New START treaty. President Obama even looks the other way as China employs unfair trade tactics that endanger our economy and kill jobs."

The conference was held a day after the president sought to heft the populist torch once carried by the Republican president Theodore Roosevelt. His would-be replacements forgot to mention one historical fact about the original "appeasers" in this country, though.

For even Gingrich, the former college history professor who managed to mention the presidential election of 1860, George Kennan's Long Telegram of 1946 and George Orwell's "1984," left out the inconvenient truth that in the years before Dec. 7, 1941, nearly all of the "appeasers" opposed to President Franklin D. Roosevelt's efforts to aid Europe were Republicans.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Though Wednesday marked the 70th anniversary of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, speeches by a series of U.S. presidential candidates at the Republican Jewish Coalition rang strongly...
WASHINGTON -- Though Wednesday marked the 70th anniversary of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, speeches by a series of U.S. presidential candidates at the Republican Jewish Coalition rang strongly...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 308
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seawolf56
Truth should never be censored
09:19 AM on 12/09/2011
As most of the candidates on the right continue to show blind support of Israel the margine of Americans that support Israel contiunues to slide rapidly. Meaning that Obamma or Ron Paul will have the chance to change things in America!
the poll since 2010 at about 43%, many more Americans chose to rate Israel negatively in 2011, marking an increase of 10% since 2010.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Vapula
Failure is not an option
02:43 AM on 12/09/2011
Sorry to disabuse you Republicans but there would not have been Hitler and WWII if it had not been for WWI. And contrary to popular belief WWI was not solely or even mainly Germany's fault. Buying into propaganda and extending hatred seems to be a Republican pastime. They may regret it come the elections because the game is up. The Republicans bailed out the rich at the expense of everyone else, they cynically tell people to get jobs when there are none, they refuse to extend the payroll tax cut which would help the middle class, while they campaign for tax cuts for the rich. And they support Israel and disregard the atrocities they commit everyday because they also sanction torture. The Republicans are so much like the Nazis everyone should be very worried and not supporting these mindless thugs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Watching rock grow
FE = Iron, and Female = Iron Male :)
12:12 AM on 12/09/2011
So, what did the audience think of all that appeasement?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stephen the Grate
There is grandeur in this view of life ...
12:01 AM on 12/09/2011
This is obviously coordinated rhetoric designed to invoke an emotional response from this audience. Can’t these disgraceful bigots come up with their own words when putting a speech together? They are running for President of the United States for gosh sakes!
photo
BannedInBoston
Everyone is entitled to my opinion.
08:31 PM on 12/08/2011
Don't think you can call somebody who's killed off most of the al Qaeda leadership an "appeaser"....
08:28 PM on 12/08/2011
There's a more recent and pertinent example of appeasement in the world that our lovely republicans should be reminded of. Much of the world appeased the United States in 2003, when it decided to invade an unrelated middle east country in the wake of 9/11. It was called the "Coalition of the Willing", yeah, willing to give us a pass on a morally bankrupt invasion of Iraq that killed tens of thousands of innocent men, women, and children, not to mention all the homelessness and other suffering. They can talk Hitler all day, they're the ones who so easily write off the lives of innocent people as collateral damage, kind of Hitleresque actually.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
lightningbolt
05:42 PM on 12/08/2011
As usual, the republicans are lying.  Obama is no appeaser.  His foreign policy has been very aggressive, but not in a bad way like Bush.  Obama managed to organize the killing of Bin Laden, the overthrow of Gaddafi and Mubarak, and inspire the Arab Spring, all without starting a single war.  Obama continues to maintain the pressure on Iran and Syria and is even moving more aircraft carriers to the region.  He is also cooperating with Australia to contain China in the pacific ocean.  Obama is eviscerating the republicans on foreign policy and they are just overreacting in order to draw attention away from the massive failure that has been republican foreign policy, especially under Bush.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:35 PM on 12/08/2011
we're all hamsters on neocon "financially engineered" and "financially innovated" wheels

American coup d'état in broad daylight

American unelected Super Congress

American Shadow Government

Unites States of israel

8/11/2011

"EIGHTY-ONE CONGRESSIONAL REPRESENTATIVES from all over the country, led by Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer and House Majority Leader

Eric Cantor, are traveling to Israel thismonth.

Most are freshmen congressmen, and the group includes HALF OF ALL THE FRESHMEN REPUBLICANS voted into office in 2010.

The weeklong trips are being paid for by the American Israel Education Foundation (AIEF), which was created in 1990 as a supporting organization of

AIPAC, America’s major pro-Israel lobbying organization, and theyarelocatedinthe same building.

AIEF, which is ONLY ONE OF NUMEROUS ORGANIZATIONS PUSHING PRO-israel POLICIES, has an annual budgetof

over $24 million, with an even larger endowment.

This is an extraordinary situation.

NO OTHER LOBBY ON BEHALF OF A FOREIGN COUNTRY COMES ANYWHERE NEAR CONTROLLING SUCH WEALTH OR TAKING SO MANY OF AMERICA'S ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES ON A PROPAGANDA TRIP to its favorite country.

Not all those going on these trips are enthusiastic. The wife of one congressman who made a similar trip some years ago said that she and her husband had never been exposed to such pressure in all their lives. She said that at one point on their trip, her husband — a normally extremely tough man — was curled up in a fetal position."

http://original.antiwar.com/alison-weir/2011/08/10/israel-lobby-dominates-congress/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seawolf56
Truth should never be censored
09:22 AM on 12/09/2011
Great article thanks for posting it!
01:26 PM on 12/08/2011
Classic conservative ability to completely ignore facts that are wholly inconvenient. Was Obama practising appeasement when he shot Bin Laden in the face? Was he sitting around a camp fire singing 'Kumbaya' when he had al-Awlaki blown up by a drone?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fred Ricardo
The white hat, Truth, Justices and theAmerican way
01:05 PM on 12/08/2011
'Appeasement,! Obama needs to bring the hammer down on the right-wing NECONS in Israel. We got rid of Cheney and our NEOCONS and the only way Israel can survive in this world is to get rid of their Netanyahu NEOCONS.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Vapula
Failure is not an option
02:49 AM on 12/09/2011
We still have the supporters of 'enhanced interrogation techniques' which only the mentally deficient don't see is torture.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:53 PM on 12/08/2011
we're all hamsters on neocon "financially engineered" and "financially innovated" wheels

why do we give israel billions every year for decades?

"To date, only the United States, Israel (against Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza) and Britain (in Afghanistan) are known to have used drones for strikes. But American defense analysts count more than 50 countries that have built or bought unmanned aerial vehicles, or U.A.V.’s, and the number is rising every month. Most are designed for surveillance, but as the United States has found, adding missiles or bombs is hardly a technical challenge."

"Israel and China are aggressively developing and marketing drones, and Russia, Iran, India, Pakistan and several other countries are not far behind. The Defense Security Service, which protects the Pentagon and its contractors from espionage, warned in a report last year that American drone technology had become a prime target for foreign spies."

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/09/sunday-review/coming-soon-the-drone-arms-race.html?_r=2&pagewanted=all

"Israel, the second-largest drone manufacturer after the United States, has flown armed models, but few details are available. India announced this year that it is developing ones that will fire missiles and fly at 30,000 feet. Russia has shown models of drones with weapons, but there is little evidence that they are operational.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/global-race-on-to-match-us-drone-capabilities/2011/06/30/gHQACWdmxH_print.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Vapula
Failure is not an option
02:50 AM on 12/09/2011
2% of the population but 98% of the power. Seems suspicious.
12:42 PM on 12/08/2011
Obama does not appease, he does however include. He may even replace some stars on the U. S. flag with crescents.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Doug Sandlin
We See The World Not As It Is But As We Are
11:00 PM on 01/04/2012
"Obama does not appease, he does however include."

True.

"He may even replace some stars on the U. S. flag with crescents."

False.
12:36 PM on 12/08/2011
Obama an appeaser? Bush had backbone? Insane! BUSH LET OSAMA BIN LADEN GET AWAY WITH 9/11. He walked away free, unpunished and laughing at America for nearly a decade. How many of you allegedly "patriotic" conservatives objected to this ongoing, humiliating stain on our nation’s honor? Zero. Zip. Zilch. You all kept cheering Mr. “Mission Accomplished” while bin Laden masterminded more murderous attacks and inspired new generations of terrorists. Bush left Al Qaeda strongest it had ever been.

President Obama restored America's honor. Under his leadership. we and our allies have taken out not only bin Laden but hundreds of other major terrorists, including senior Al Qaeda leaders al-Rahman and al-Masri, the American traitor al-Awlaki, and top terrorist commanders in Pakistan, Iraq, Somalia and Indonesia (including the perpetrator of the Bali bombings). Gen. David Petraeus says Al Qaeda has been “decimated.”

Bin Laden knew it. The Navy SEALS found a message in his effects from al-Rahman, complaining that Al Qaeda operatives were being killed faster than they could be replaced. And bin Laden called for Obama's assassination -- unlike Bush, whom he taunted as his best recruiting tool and helped re-elect with a video in 2004.

And still America's cowardly conservatives not only refuse to applaud Obama for his tremendous success in taking the fight to the enemy... they continue to accuse him of being soft on terror (and secretly Muslim). As they were with Hitler, it's the conservatives who are the appeasers.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:24 PM on 12/08/2011
we're all hamsters on neocon "financially engineered" and "financially innovated" wheels

privatizing government including "privately" earning millions in interest off aggregated unemployment payments was conceived bythe founder ofthe neocon movement and adviser to saint ronnie reagan

"It was the birth of what is now known as "Starve the Beast" – a conscious strategy by conservatives to force cuts in federal spending by

BANKRUPTING THE COUNTRY.

As conceived by the rightwing intellectual

Irving Kristol

in1980, the plan called for Republicans

TO CREATE A "FISCAL PROBLEM" BY SLASHING TAXES

andthen foist the pain of reimposing fiscal discipline onto future Democratic administrations who, in Kristol's words, wouldbe forced to "tidy up afterward.""

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/how-the-gop-became-the-party-of-the-rich-20111109

at the same time he said:

"it is now an interest of the Jews tohave a large and powerful military establishment inthe United States... American Jews who care about the survival of the state of Israel have to say,

NO, WE DON'T WANT TO CUT THE MILITARY BUDGET, IT IS IMPORTANT TO KEEP THAT MILITARY BUDGET BIG, SO THAT WE CAN

DEFEND ISRAEL."

10/8/10

Neocons Talk Deficit but Won’t Budge on Defense Cuts

"China spends half the share of its GDP on defense as the U.S. — lessthan $100 billion last year... That’s less than 15%of what we spent."

http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Columns/2010/10/08/Neocons-Talk-Deficit-but-Wont-Budge-on-Defense-Cuts.aspx
Sthernbull
I am one of the 53% that pays taxes.
11:23 AM on 12/08/2011
Every Democrat Leader from Carter to Obama has been an appeaser. This is nothign knew to people paying attention to what is going on.
madisgp
All we-we'd up.
12:20 PM on 12/08/2011
Oh bull. How is shooting Bin Laden in the face appeasement?
Sthernbull
I am one of the 53% that pays taxes.
12:52 PM on 12/08/2011
OH that's your 1 yes OBL was shot by SEALS on Obama's watch, that is true however had Clinton been more aggeessive back in the 1990's we could have killed him THEN! Clinton had channces to get OBL he was even OFFERED to the US and Clinton truned the deal DOWN!
12:51 PM on 12/08/2011
How about Reagan, then? How was cutting and running out of Lebanon after 240 marines were murdered by muslim terrorists not appeasement?
How was selling weapons to the Ayatollah not appeasement? Was Reagan appeasing the Soviets when he met with Gorbachev? Was Nixon appeasing Maoists when he met with China?
Did Bush appease Gaddafi, a serial American killer, when he restored diplomatic relations with Libya?
Sthernbull
I am one of the 53% that pays taxes.
01:23 PM on 12/08/2011
Reagan did not want to pull out perhaspo you have forgotten TIP O'Neal DEMOCRAT cut funding to the operation! Reagan was Supporting the Christian forces in the nation until the DEMOCRAT House cut funding for that too. As for weapons to Iran, most of the "weapons" DID NOT WORK, we sold them 1970's surplus they quickly used to kill Iraqis. it was much better to keep those to killing each OTHER and not Americans.

REAGAN WALKED OUT ON GORBACHAV!
NIXON was playing CHINA against the USSR, my enemies enemy is my Friend.
Gaddafi, TURNED OVER ALL HIS WMD's TO THE UN/US WHEN BUSH ORDERED HIM TOO! GADDAFI WAS AFRAID OF BUSH.

PLEASE TRY TO LEARN SOME FACTS OK?