iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Rupert Murdoch Lobbies Congress To Restrict Internet

First Posted: 12/07/2011 7:26 pm Updated: 12/08/2011 7:32 am

WASHINGTON -- News Corp. honcho Rupert Murdoch threw his weight behind Congress' attempt to restrict the Internet, personally lobbying leaders on Capitol Hill Wednesday for two measures that purport to combat piracy.

Murdoch's media empire is among some 350 large corporations that have come out in favor of the Stop Online Piracy Act in the House, as well as the Protect IP Act in the Senate.

Both measures would require Internet operators to police activity online, and would mandate Internet giants like Google and AOL (the parent company of The Huffington Post and an opponent of the bills) and credit card companies to take down sites that have content deemed to be in violation of copyright rules.

The battle has pitted huge content generators like Disney and the motion picture industry against their online competitors, with each side reportedly spending some $90 million on lobbying efforts.

Supporters say the measures will help curb theft and preserve the integrity of the Internet. Opponents charge that the measures amount to censorship that will stifle innovation and impose higher costs on consumers.

News Corp. owns 20th Century Fox films and many television franchises such as "The Simpsons." The firm has long lobbied on the issue, donating to members on both sides of the aisle.

The personal intervention of Murdoch shows how high the stakes are. Sources confirmed to HuffPost that the media magnate was pushing for the two bills, and that he met with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).

Murdoch's presence comes as high-profile opponents, such as Google's Eric Schmidt, have been ramping up their public efforts to kill the bills.

Additional reporting by Zach Carter

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,919
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (103 total)
  1 of 2  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
dizmo4 03:56 AM on 12/08/2011
If SOPA passes, then large media companies will have carte blanche to censor any and all forms of content.    

Sites like youtube would become enormous liabilities for Google, meaning extremely restrictive policies over what can be uploaded.

Message boards could become targets too.   Who knows whether someone will post some comment with a link to copyrighted content.   Best  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Siebenstein
> there is no endless growth
05:44 AM on 04/22/2012
Hey Zucky, I will take my Facebook site down the second this bill passes, okay?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Siebenstein
> there is no endless growth
05:42 AM on 04/22/2012
LET THE SYSTEM IMPLODE !!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Siebenstein
> there is no endless growth
05:40 AM on 04/22/2012
Obama, we are watching this attack on our freedom !

Of course Murdoch, the pig (sorry pigs) will be able to shove millions up those sleezy a55holes. However, we have to make sure he does not succeed.

OCCUPY FOX NOISE !!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Iva 123
09:08 AM on 12/19/2011
This Act, just like Patriot Act, is just a pretense to accomplish something else by government or people in power. I hope that people will see this and vote No on this.
Its real intend is not piracy, it is censorship of information.
I think England has already this because when my friend tried to open the link regarding the lawsuit filed by Dragon Family it came back as "private property".
Do we want this?
We have the right to public information.
Check these two links and you will know what is going on. Why some people don't want us to know.

http://divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/995-lawsuit-end-tyranny

http://divinecosmos.com/media/Keenan_complaint_11-23-2011_SDNY.pdf
03:55 AM on 12/18/2011
Why doesn't Murdoch influence the appropriate Congressman the way he would in Britain: hack their cell phones and blackmail them /
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Owlwriter16
Check out www.Twitter.com/Owlwriter16
12:36 AM on 12/15/2011
Why doesn't the US Congress investigate hacking activities at News Corp operations on this side of the Pond while Rupert's in DC pushing for Internet restrictions? He's donated so much money to so many politicians on both sides of the aisle such hearings are going to be a long time coming.

Even President Obama has remained quiet on the matter. How much did his first campaign get directly or indirectly? This has got to be one of the biggest scandals ever kept under wraps for so long. We can only presume the practices that made his media empire so successful in the UK and Australia were also employed in the US. Elementary, my dear Watson!

Has any major media noted how fast Rupert has been selling off assets both personal and corporate? As mentioned else where the Grimm Reaper may very well beat justice to the courthouse.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:12 AM on 12/14/2011
Evil. Evil. Evil. Protect the money above all else.
06:58 PM on 12/13/2011
The other day someone somehow convinced me Rupert Murdoch wasn't the epitome of evil. Thank you HuffPo for bringing me to my senses again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lorili Lee
02:53 PM on 12/12/2011
This is just part of the attempt to neuter the internet and turn it into another TV-like wasteland with endless propaganda and advertisements. The tyrants realize that the internet is the most powerful weapon the people have against them and will do all they can to destroy it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Kato
11:19 PM on 12/11/2011
this is just to cover up that hacking scandlle he dealing with if not then ask yourself why is he doing this piracy will and always be there ya they shut down lime wire but guess what there was another site that was created hours after they killed that one police the internet????ok i dont think i want some one looking at everything im saying or doing what next online games will be next police that
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
honky1234
Sweep the leg? But I'll be disqualified!
10:17 PM on 12/11/2011
Sadly, regulation and censorship are going to happen, sooner or later. I'm surprised its taken this long. The media companies have deep pockets and they will buy the legislation.

Capitalism 101
06:16 PM on 12/13/2011
That's not capitalism - it's corporatism. It would be nice to have capitalism. The big flaw is not enough accountability to the people in our Constitution. Watch for Dave Champion's release of Constitution of the United States 2 that will REALLY put the power in the hands of we the people. And with no baked-in racism/sexism this time. Bye-bye cronyism and corporate tyrants. The big question will be how to get it implemented.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
maureen ettinger
an existentialist
08:35 PM on 12/11/2011
It is safe to rule that whatever Rupert Murdoch wants go in the opposite direction.
08:30 PM on 12/11/2011
This is hysterical coming from Murdoch of all people. The bastion of good taste and fair journalism.
07:37 PM on 12/11/2011
Anybody else reminded of Mr. Burns when they see Rupert? Was Matt Groening biting the hand?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gordon Hilgers
Poet and writer
06:54 PM on 12/11/2011
Did Rupert also manage to squirt-out to Congress that his mother doesn't know he's a homosexual yet?