More

EPA Implicates Fracking In Wyoming Gas Field Groundwater Pollution Finding

MEAD GRUVER   12/ 8/11 10:01 PM ET   AP

CHEYENNE, Wyo. — The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced Thursday for the first time that fracking – a controversial method of improving the productivity of oil and gas wells – may be to blame for causing groundwater pollution.

The draft finding could have significant implications while states try to determine how to regulate the process. Environmentalists characterized the report as a significant development though it met immediate criticism from the oil and gas industry and a U.S. senator.

The practice is called hydraulic fracturing and involves pumping pressurized water, sand and chemicals underground to open fissures and improve the flow of oil or gas to the surface.

The EPA found that compounds likely associated with fracking chemicals had been detected in the groundwater beneath Pavillion, a small community in central Wyoming where residents say their well water reeks of chemicals. Health officials last year advised them not to drink their water after the EPA found low levels hydrocarbons in their wells.

The EPA announcement could add to the controversy over fracking, which has played a large role in opening up many gas reserves, including the Marcellus Shale in the eastern U.S. in recent years.

The industry has long contended that fracking is safe, but environmentalists and some residents who live near drilling sites say it has poisoned groundwater.

The EPA said its announcement is the first step in a process of opening up its findings for review by the public and other scientists.

"EPA's highest priority remains ensuring that Pavillion residents have access to safe drinking water," said Jim Martin, EPA regional administrator in Denver. "We look forward to having these findings in the draft report informed by a transparent and public review process."

The EPA also emphasized that the findings are specific to the Pavillion area. The agency said the fracking that occurred in Pavillion differed from fracking methods used elsewhere in regions with different geological characteristics.

The fracking occurred below the level of the drinking water aquifer and close to water wells, the EPA said. Elsewhere, drilling is more remote and fracking occurs much deeper than the level of groundwater that would normally be used.

Environmentalists welcomed the news of the EPA report, calling it an important turning point in the fracking debate.

"This is an important first indication there are potential problems with fracking that can impact domestic water wells. It's I think a clarion call to industry to make sure they take a great deal of care in their drilling practices," said Steve Jones with the Wyoming Outdoor Council.

Pavillion resident John Fenton, chairman of the group Pavillion Area Concerned Citizens, applauded the EPA for listening to the homeowners with contaminated water.

"Those of us who suffer the impacts from the unchecked development in our community are extremely happy the contamination source is being identified," Fenton said.

Calgary, Alberta-based Encana Corp. owns the Pavillion gas field. An announced $45 million sale to Midland, Texas-based Legacy Reserves LP fell through last month amid what Encana said were Legacy's concerns about the EPA investigation.

Encana spokesman Doug Hock said there was much to question about the draft study.

The compounds EPA said could be associated with fracking, he said, could have had other origins not related to gas development.

"Those could just have likely been brought about by contamination in their sampling process or construction of their well," Hock said.

The low levels of hydrocarbons found in local water wells likewise haven't been linked to gas development and substances such as methane itself are naturally occurring in the area.

"There are still a lot of questions that need to be answered. This is a probability and it is one we believe is incorrect," Hock said.

Sen. James Inhofe said the study was "not based on sound science but rather on political science."

"Its findings are premature, given that the Agency has not gone through the necessary peer-review process, and there are still serious outstanding questions regarding EPA's data and methodology," the Oklahoma Republican said in a statement.

Wyoming last year became one of the first states to require oil and gas companies to publicly disclose the chemicals used in fracking. Colorado regulators are considering doing the same.

The public and industry representatives packed an 11-hour hearing on the issue in Denver on Monday. They all generally supported the proposal but the sticking point is whether trade secrets would have to be disclosed and how quickly the information would have to be turned over.

And while the EPA emphasized the Wyoming findings were highly localized, the report is likely to reverberate.

The issue has been highly contentious in New York, where some upstate residents and politicians argue that the gas industry will bring desperately needed jobs while others demand a ban on fracking to protect water supplies. New York regulators haven't issued permits for gas drilling with high-volume hydraulic fracturing in the Marcellus Shale since they began an extensive environmental review in 2008.

In Pennsylvania, where thousands of gas wells have been drilled and fracked over the past three years, some residents say their water wells have been contaminated with methane and drilling fluids.

Kate Sinding, an attorney with the Natural Resources Defense Council in New York City, said in an email Thursday that the EPA in Wyoming is now recognizing what other experts and families in fracking communities have known for some time: "Fracking poses serious threats to safe drinking water."

David Neslin, director of the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, said the Wyoming case is being watched.

"Protection of drinking water in Colorado is of the highest importance to us and therefore we look forward to reviewing EPA's draft analysis, as well as feedback from other parties, including Wyoming, on this matter," he said.

___

Associated Press writers Colleen Slevin in Denver and Mary Esch in Albany, N.Y., contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

Filed by Joanna Zelman  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 340
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
09:22 AM on 02/05/2012
corporatism at work! say goodbye to democracy people...big business rules our politicians, or media and our minds! When water costs triple what gas costs....only then will people wake up on this issue! If you think fracking does not cause harm to our water supply, then maybe you should ask yourself WHY the gas companies don't want to provide details on the fracking chemicals used? If I lived in an area where fracking was nearby, I would seriously consider moving before my property was worth nothing!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rdavidw
04:29 PM on 12/11/2011
Those companies sure do advertise, I'd like to see them sign on to the Clean Water Act. Which they are free from.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean_Water_Act

There is a simple reason why they do not, THEY WOULD VIOLATE IT DAILY.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:20 PM on 12/11/2011
Implicate?

Fracking does contaminated water. Look no further than this investigative reporting.

An original investigative report by Earth Focus and UK's Ecologist Film Unit looks at the risks of natural gas development in the Marcellus Shale-USA. From toxic chemicals in drinking water to unregulated interstate dumping of potentially radioactive waste that experts fear can contaminate water supplies in major population centers including New York City, are the health consequences worth the economic gains?

Marcellus Shale contains enough natural gas to supply all US gas needs for 14 years. But as gas drilling takes place, using a process called hydraulic fracturing or "fracking," toxic chemicals and methane gas seep into drinking water. Now experts fear that unacceptable levels of radioactive Radium 226 in gas development waste.

Fracking chemicals are linked to bone, liver and breast cancers, gastrointestinal, circulatory, respiratory, developmental as well as brain and nervous system disorders. Such chemicals are present in frack waste and may find their way into drinking water and air.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEB_Wwe-uBM&feature=related
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:47 PM on 12/10/2011
This link has some real facts.

http://www­.vancouver­sun.com/bu­siness/Lam­phier+Frac­king+test+­results+li­kely+chang­e+energy+g­ame/583935­9/story.ht­ml

It's a vertical well, without casings, fracking in shallow ground.

The natural gas boom is based around horizontal wells in deep ground with solid casings.

Saying the Wyoming contanimat­ion indicts fracking is like seeing Evil Kenievels broken bones indicts motoryclin­g.

Sure, ban shallow fracking - seems fair. No fracking unless you're 3000 feet down or more.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TruelyFedUp
Ethics is nothing else than reverence for life.
10:41 AM on 12/10/2011
There Will Be Water - article

"T. Boone Pickens thinks water is the new oil—and he's betting $100 million that he's right. [ ] If water is the new oil, T. Boone Pickens is a modern-day John D. Rockefeller. Pickens owns more water than any other individual in the U.S. and is looking to control even more. He hopes to sell the water he already has, some 65 billion gallons a year, to Dallas, transporting it over 250 miles, 11 counties, and about 650 tracts of private property." http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_25/b4089040017753.htm
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TruelyFedUp
Ethics is nothing else than reverence for life.
10:40 AM on 12/10/2011
"Hello all, I have not said much here. Its All talk and no action. But I know a few things about fracking, and the how and why, of this affecting water supplies. I currently work as a welder for an oilfeild construction company, buidling for Chesapeake, Sand Ridge and many others here in nothern Oklahoma. There is alot of fracking here, and all the wells go through the Ogallala aquifer. As a welder I repair and rebuild oilfield equipment. Oxidation in the oilfeild is at a rate 100 times faster than normal exposure. It is only a matter of time before all our water in the US is completely contaminated, and water is $20 a gallon. ~J" On a thread from the web site Pickins Plan.

Once more we have allowed a wealthy individual to own what is a necessary source of life to us all - water. Until we change the laws so that the natural resources of our country are the commonwealth of all the people we will continue to be controlled and enslaved by the 1%. "This U.S. Forestry Service survival training guide [MS Word .doc file] suggests 3 days without water is a serious threat to survival." So if one man has the right to determine the water supply of the rest of us in just 3 days he can rule who is worthy of life and who is not. T. Boone Pickens is the man.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Terri Skau
the moon rises as the sun sets
02:23 PM on 12/09/2011
Gasland is a 2010 American documentary film written and directed by Josh Fox. The film focuses on communities in the United States impacted by natural gas drilling and, specifically, a stimulation method known as hydraulic fracturing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Terri Skau
the moon rises as the sun sets
02:13 PM on 12/09/2011
Why would any person trust the Oil and Gas industry? Have you all noticed that gas prices have come down since Thanksgiving...As soon as the Holiday season is over I'd bet my life that it shoots back up 30 Cents. And the Oil And Gas Industry will claim they didn't make a profit.

By the way we all need to Thank Dick Cheney for Fracking. He was the head of Energy and gave the ok on it...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Forester
Foresters do it in the woods.
12:20 PM on 12/09/2011
Once fracking has completely contaminated our ground water, the EPA will do a study to confirm that it happened and why, and then release a 12-volume report to be filed somewhere in a government warehouse.

Mission Accomplished.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
kareemachan
watashi ha tororu ga oroka da to omoi masu。
12:04 PM on 12/09/2011
Well, it's about effing time.
10:20 AM on 12/09/2011
I never really thought about it this way but contaminating ground water really isn't a bad thing in the eyes of the capitalists' doctrine. Contaminated well water actually serves the interests of privatizing the water supply. Capitalism depends on perpetual economic growth and the more people who have a water supply that is off the grid that means they are not contributing to the growth of that sector. This fracking process is a double edged sword that is creating the need for the growth of multiple industries. It will eventually create a huge new demand for privatizing water supplies.

Most of our social engineering and social policy decisions are designed to be subservient to the concept of perpetual economic growth. Cancer itself is a growing industry. In the eyes of capitalism they will engineer whatever means necessary to sustain perpetual growth. The military industrial complex has perpetually grown mainly because it is seen as fundamentally essential to the health of our economy. It has very little to do with their being an actual necessity for war based on real threats. The threats are generally manufactured to serve the need for perpetual growth of the industry. And so it goes. This is why capitalism is worse than cancer in so many ways.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TruelyFedUp
Ethics is nothing else than reverence for life.
10:43 AM on 12/10/2011
Great comment. F&F.

Truly
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
personal beliefs
Things never go according to plan, so plan accordi
10:15 AM on 12/09/2011
EPA released draft report of growing water contamination in Wyoming. Unique situation with gas reservoir just below fresh water aquifer. Detected contaminants in water wells below established standards but deeper monitor wells have concentrations above acceptable limits. Issue most likely stems from surface casing not set deep enough (completely through the aquifer) and the proximity of gas zones to the aquifer (not common in modern plays). Not a game changer for fracturing but does give EPA another arrow in their quiver in anti-frac debate.
10:07 AM on 12/09/2011
Once ground water is polluted then what do you do?

Proceed with caution .....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
personal beliefs
Things never go according to plan, so plan accordi
10:03 AM on 12/09/2011
EPA spokesman Richard Mylott confirmed that the agency's analysis does not "directly link" contaminants in domestic wells to fracking
photo
paxatman
Do no harm, Help others.
09:53 AM on 12/09/2011
Communication between the formation being Fracked and the groundwater source is usually caused by cement 'channeling' during the casing cement operations. A cement bond log or 'CBL' is used to determine if the cement job was successful. Any evident channeling is supposed to be fixed by perforating the casing where the cement is absent and fresh cement squeezed into the spaces between the formation and the casing. A very expensive and additional cost to a well.

If the oil companies say 'WTH its good enough', then contamination of the upper formations become possible during the extremely high pressure Fracking operations.