iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Child Labor On Farms Advocated By GOP Candidate

First Posted: 12/09/2011 2:46 pm Updated: 12/09/2011 4:20 pm

WASHINGTON -- Tom Cotton, a GOP candidate for Congress, says he would like to see more children working long hours out in America's agricultural fields. The Republican from Arkansas' fourth district apparently isn't a big fan of child-labor laws pertaining to farms.

"We need more young people who've worked all day in the fields, not less," the Army reservist and Harvard grad fumed in a recent post on his 2012 campaign website (his italics). "It's time to tell Washington to get off our land."

The swipe at Washington is apparently a reference to some pending federal regulations pertaining to minors working on farms. The Labor Department has proposed a rule that would bar children under age 16 from performing certain agricultural duties deemed dangerous, such as driving tractors, operating power equipment, or castrating bulls. Although farm-worker advocates say the rules are decades overdue, some farmers have argued that bureaucrats are meddling needlessly in their industry.

Cotton is running for the seat that will be left wide open when Democratic Rep. Mike Ross retires next year, and he seems intent on making the new rules a campaign issue. His blog post urges visitors to sign a petition denouncing the child-labor regulations, calling them "just another example of how Washington regulates our state’s farmers without understanding us or our way of life." (Again, his italics.)

But Cotton's post also appears to promote some misinformation about the rules, saying they would "forbid our children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews from working their family farms."

Children working on their parents' farms would be exempt from the rule and permitted to do any chore their parents see fit. As a Labor Department fact sheet on the rule explains, "A child of any age may perform any job, even hazardous work, at any age at any time on a farm owned by his or her parent." And nephews, nieces and grandchildren could still perform grown-up duties on relatives' farms, so long as they're not formal, paid employees, notes a Labor Department spokesperson.

Cotton's campaign did not respond to an email seeking comment on the child-labor rules.

Norma Flores Lopez, director of the Children in the Fields Campaign, which advocates for child migrant workers, says that some people in the agriculture industry have distorted what the new rules would do. She says the rule isn't targeted at family farms but at major agribusinesses that employ minors.

"The exemption protects people so they can pass along traditions," says Flores Lopez, who was a migrant farm worker herself as a child in Texas. "We're not touching that. They bring that up to detract from the real issue, the fact that kids are being put into real danger."

Public safety advocates have pointed out that stronger child-labor rules in agriculture and the grain industry could have helped prevent some recent tragedies involving minors, including an August incident in which two teenagers were critically injured after being pulled into a grain augur in Oklahoma. Weeks earlier, two 14-year-old girls were electrocuted and killed when they came into contact with an irrigator on an Illinois farm. The girls had been detasseling corn for bio-ag multinational Monsanto.

On his campaign site, Cotton says he was raised on a cattle farm, describing himself as "a tested leader with proven courage standing for free-market principles." He holds both a bachelor's and a law degree from Harvard, and he enlisted in the Army after 9/11 and served in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Cotton nabbed an early endorsement in October from influential conservative blog RedState, which described him as "bright, articulate, and passionate about America, and conservative values. He is a small-government, pro-life conservative."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 200
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
05:36 AM on 12/13/2011
Enough of the politicizing of this issue. As a democrat who lives in a rural community, was raised on a farm, and works with farmers, I can tell you that this issue is not politically driven. Similar to urban youth who are given progressively responsible chores, a farm kid may start out sweeping the shop when a first-grader - until they have proven their ability and judgement to operate equipment. In addition, they learn the nuance of ag production.

Yes, they may work for their parent on a family farm. However, most farmers I work with are multi-family or multi-generational operations that have been incorporated to insure the long-term viabiltiy of the operations. They are still family farms, but according to this proposed regulation, these incorporated operations would not be exempt from the rule.

Children working on the farm is not forced labor, it is a form of apprenticeship. The business plan does not depend on child labor as some have suggested. The apprenticeship does, however, have a direct impact on children assuming the mantle of ownership of our nations farms.

What we need is continued improvement in ag safety - not a further hindrance to the survival of our nation's farms and farm families.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lriSdismayed
08:43 AM on 12/12/2011
Ahhhh MONSANTO, there ya go GOP and Monsanto... you need not say anything more. Hope cotton loses and gets a job working the fields.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tinarm
call me a proud FemaNazi according to Rush.
10:49 AM on 04/27/2012
He isn't going to lose unfortunately, he is a big deal here. I can't stand him, but this is a part of Arkansas that still lives in the early 19th century.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
reasonshouldrule
10:48 PM on 12/11/2011
The push to do away with our child labor laws is, imo, a perfect example of the mindset of the conservatives. It's the mindset of the grasping and greedy men during the industrial revolution who exploited everyone, even children, to work in their factories without regard to safety and paying them all a pittance that wasn't enough to keep them out of terrible poverty.

Seriously, people, do we really want to go back to that time? I think Americans are more humane than that, and frankly, I'm surprised politicians like this Cotton person are willing to be so blatant about their ugly views.
09:53 PM on 12/11/2011
Government, Get off our land!!! ( so we can exploit children and pay them next to nothing ). I think the reason that we created these laws in the first place should speak for itself.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:16 PM on 12/11/2011
After 2012, look for conservatives to cut public schools from K-12 to K-6, adequate for jobs at Wal-mart, McDonld's, etc.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gonzo333
03:28 PM on 12/11/2011
The Wreckpublican answer to the employment crisis. Brilliant!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cpbsmw
War is won by the other guy dying not you - Patton
02:47 PM on 12/11/2011
They are by nature shorter. Therefore it would be much easier for them to do the picking.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ColoradoCool
Proud Liberal, Graduate Degree, Mother, Grandmothe
11:48 PM on 12/11/2011
I REALLY hope that's sarcasm. You just can't tell for sure these days.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cpbsmw
War is won by the other guy dying not you - Patton
09:13 AM on 12/12/2011
Very much so. I was hoping someone would understand the sarcasm.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
vippy
Carpe Diem!
02:43 PM on 12/11/2011
We don't have jobs for adults.  Kids should be educated and learn a profession would be the right thing to do.  I can see it now, companies will hire children for $ 5.00 and without oversight this will be abused.  
And what about the elderly, ship them to Mars?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
reasonshouldrule
10:49 PM on 12/11/2011
No, the elderly are supposed to die as soon as they're no longer useful, and the lack of health care can assure that outcome.
01:36 PM on 12/11/2011
Let them cultivate an entire generation that resents the GOP. Go ahead, just let them.
rogergoldkin
If you think education is expensive, try ignorance
05:25 PM on 12/11/2011
True and well spoken! It's happening.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JoeTroll
Prove your own claims. I'm not your intern.
12:47 PM on 12/11/2011
He's from Harvard? Republicans tend to bring that up as something shamefully and irretrievably liberal when discussing you-know-who.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:00 PM on 12/11/2011
It shows us that competent specialization is not synonymous with achievement or developmental maturity.
photo
somewhatodd
micro-bio undetectable to the naked eye
10:49 AM on 12/11/2011
if the survival of your business depends on children doing dangerous work for you for free, then maybe you oughta take a second look at your business plan.

just maybe.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
reasonshouldrule
10:50 PM on 12/11/2011
Good point. These "business plans" are not very well-thought-out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
standup11
Some people just never learn.
10:45 AM on 12/11/2011
Of course Repubs would try to bring back child labor. Children are exempt from minimum wage laws. They could be paid practically nothing. Repub policies do not promote job growth but they want to throw millions more into the workforce. How utterly ridiculous.
marka
A Purple State Progressive
02:41 PM on 12/11/2011
Republicans would love to see all of America back at work. Of course, they don't want to pay them diddly to do that work. If they had their way we would retreat to fuedalism and serfdom.
10:31 AM on 12/11/2011
Doing whatever they can to depress wages. Encouraging illegal immigration has run its course so expanding the labor pool into childhood follows. I can't wait for the spin justifying this as allowing the young more liberty
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
reasonshouldrule
10:53 PM on 12/11/2011
Great point. You can be sure that it will come out something in the near future: "Let our children work in the fields! They will have their own money (if you can count what they'll pay them as real money), and they will learn about the FREEDOM of working long hours for little pay."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
trekie70
Lifelong bibliophile and political junkie
09:04 AM on 12/11/2011
This guy would have to be from AR-glad I don't live in that district, although Steve Womack isn't much better. I have nothing against helping kids develop a strong work ethic but there is plenty of time for that after they get a good education.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
goodmarina
Most People use Religion to justify their bias!
03:40 AM on 12/11/2011
I have a proposal for all Republican politicians who support this idea of deregulation or easing-up of child labor laws ...

Let's have a pilot program for 4 years.  Let us start by putting your children and grandchildren in these farms and other areas you think it is acceptable to put children to work under less stringent child labor laws and protections.

Go ahead ...  tell us.   You still advocate for these laws, don't you?
photo
dogofwar
Never confuse liquidity with solvency
12:03 AM on 12/12/2011
In addition, bring back the draft with NO DEFERMENTS.