More

Newt Gingrich's Rise Puzzles Longtime Republican Critics

Newt Gingrich Surge Campaign 2012

CHARLES BABINGTON   12/ 9/11 10:51 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — Newt Gingrich's rapid rise in presidential polls has left veteran Republicans scratching their heads, and not just because he vaulted from far back to lead Mitt Romney in several key states.

They're trying to figure out why the former House speaker is supported by GOP voters who think he's not particularly honest and doesn't share their values. They're puzzled that Iowa evangelical Christians are flocking to a man who was unfaithful to two wives, paid $300,000 in House ethics fines and converted to Roman Catholicism.

They're surprised that Republican voters say they value Gingrich's experience far more than that of his rivals. Gingrich's record of earning millions of dollars in the government influence business, after 20 years in Congress, seems to upend the notion that this election cycle is driven by tea partyers' hostility to Washington insiders.

"I can't decipher what's going on," said Rep. Allen West, R-Fla., one the tea party's best-known first-term lawmakers.

"I've had a little trouble figuring it out, too," said Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, one of Congress' most conservative members.

Fueling the perplexity are three independent polls of Iowa Republicans, who will hold their caucus Jan. 3. They show Gingrich leading, with Romney and Rep. Ron Paul of Texas battling for second, and four others trailing.

Republican elected officials and strategists offer an array of theories, with varying degrees of confidence.

One school holds that Gingrich articulates conservative positions so forcefully that he attracts hard-right voters willing to overlook his record of inconsistencies and foibles. While many people see Gingrich as a consummate Washington insider -- making $1.6 million advising Freddie Mac, for instance -- his sharply anti-Washington rhetoric and unorthodox views convince others that he's willing to buck the system and make needed changes.

Another theory, however, suggests that many Republicans simply don't know much about Gingrich, 68, whose greatest political triumph was 17 years ago when he rose to become House speaker. Voters may be unaware of his repeated clashes with fellow Republicans, or his 1995 complaint about being seated in the back of Air Force One. Gingrich said the "snub" contributed to that year's budget impasse with President Bill Clinton and the unpopular government shutdown that followed.

With Gingrich, "the message resonates more than the record," said Mark Meckler, a co-founder of Tea Party Patriots. Gingrich is skilled at synthesizing and expressing conservatives' goals and anger, Meckler said. But he also has "a long history that's hard to explain away."

If that's true, it's possible the attacks being launched against Gingrich, mainly by Paul and groups backing Romney, will take a big toll before the Iowa caucus and the Jan. 10 New Hampshire primary.

It's also possible, some GOP analysts say, that the attacks will endear Gingrich to conservatives more than ever. Romney has struggled for months to rise above 30 percent in Republican horserace polls.

The obvious hunger for a non-Romney candidate could anoint Gingrich if he's the last rival standing after others have fallen.

Issues and questions raised by the three polls of Iowa Republicans include:

EXPERIENCE.

Separate surveys for The Des Moines Register and New York Times-CBS News showed Gingrich with an overwhelming lead on the question of which Republican has the best experience to be president and handle world crises.

That raises serious doubts about Romney's strategy. The former one-term Massachusetts governor says his decades as a businessman are preferable to the background of someone who "has spent the last 40 years in Washington."

Romney's campaign this week brought out former congressional colleagues of Gingrich who said he was divisive and erratic in his four years as House speaker.

Even his toughest critics generally praise Gingrich for leading the 1994 GOP takeover of the House. But they note that his tempestuous time as party leader led to a failed Republican coup attempt in 1997, and then his departure from office after the disappointing 1998 elections.

Other Gingrich critics are trying to remind voters that he has favored bank bailouts, an individual mandate to buy health insurance and a bipartisan push to combat climate change. They highlight the millions of dollars he made in the Washington influence world, including his contract with Freddie Mac, a mortgage backer he publicly criticized.

Two decades in Congress, followed by big paychecks from special interest groups, would hardly seem the type of resume embraced by tea party activists. But King, the Iowa conservative, said staunch conservatives know that some level of government experience is needed to change federal policies.

"The anti-Washington part of the tea party seems to have diminished a little bit," King said. "They've become more sophisticated. They have a better understanding of how Washington works."

VALUES vs IDEAS.

The Times-CBS poll asked Iowa Republicans to name the candidate that best represents "the values you try to live by." Rep. Michele Bachmann, Paul and Romney were bunched near the top, although no one was chosen by more than 19 percent of the respondents. Gingrich finished fourth, at 11 percent.

A Washington Post-ABC News poll found that only 13 percent of likely Iowa caucusgoers see Gingrich as the most honest and trustworthy in the field, also a fourth-place showing. Yet Gingrich easily leads on the "who would you vote for" question.

Gingrich may have struck a nerve with voters by saying the 2012 election against President Barack Obama will be a campaign of ideas. Curt Levey, who heads the conservative Committee for Justice, said Gingrich recently told a private gathering of activists in Washington, "Don't support me, support my ideas."

In the Des Moines Register poll, Gingrich finished sixth on the question of which candidate is "most likeable." But he was the overwhelming choice as "best debater." He has challenged Obama to seven three-hour debates in the Lincoln-Douglas mold.

Veteran politicians sometimes roll their eyes when Gingrich unspools yet another round of ideas, which have included "a massive new program to build a permanent lunar colony to exploit the Moon's resources."

Iowa Republicans, at least for now, seem drawn to his intellect and ideas.

RELIGIOUS CONSERVATIVES.

In the Times-CBS poll in Iowa, Gingrich held a 2-to-1 lead over his nearest rival, Paul, among white evangelicals. He held a 3-to-1 lead over Romney, a Mormon.

Gingrich's acknowledged infidelities and two divorces are well documented. He was having an affair with a House staffer, now his wife, when he pushed for Clinton's impeachment over the Monica Lewinsky scandal.

Romney's latest TV ad notes that he has been married to the same woman for 42 years. Republican strategists are divided on the likely impact of such messages. Some think religious conservatives will turn against Gingrich when they learn more details of his past. Others think these voters might embrace Gingrich's story of contrition and hoped-for redemption.

ELECTABILITY.

In the Times-CBS poll, nearly half of Iowa Republicans said it's more important to pick a nominee who can beat Obama than to have one who agrees with them on the issues. Gingrich has a 23-point lead among these voters: 43 percent to Romney's 20 percent.

Yet most polls show Obama faring better against Gingrich than against Romney in hypothetical match-ups in key states. The findings puzzle some GOP insiders.

Voters sometimes express conflicting views, they note. And voters might believe Gingrich is stronger, or will become stronger, than the polls suggest.

Meckler, the tea party activist, thinks close and literal readings of the Iowa poll results can give a misleading picture of the contest. He also noted that Rudy Giuliani led the GOP field at this point four years ago, only to collapse.

He thinks many Republicans are embracing Gingrich's robust attacks on institutions they dislike, such as the news media and congressional wheeling and dealing.

"The way he pushes back against the press is very appealing to a lot of people," Meckler said. "People feel like he speaks for them."

When Gingrich used "stupid" to describe the bipartisan "supercommittee," which failed to break the political logjam on deficit spending, he expressed "our feelings exactly," Meckler said. "We knew it would fail. It was fake."

Meckler said such bombastic, anti-establishment language helps Gingrich obscure his history of cutting deals and pushing agendas as a lawmaker and well-paid consultant. "There is a disconnect between that and his long-term record," Meckler said.

Romney's goal in the next few weeks, either directly or through third parties, is to make that connection for voters in Iowa, New Hampshire and beyond.

Gingrich "is not a reliable or trustworthy leader," Jim Talent, a Republican who served with Gingrich in the House, said in a Romney-sponsored conference call Thursday.

The campaign will test whether conservative voters will overlook such barbs and embrace Gingrich's ideas and in-your-face rhetoric.

___

AP Deputy Polling Director Jennifer Agiesta contributed to this report.

Earlier on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Newt Gingrich's rapid rise in presidential polls has left veteran Republicans scratching their heads, and not just because he vaulted from far back to lead Mitt Romney in several ke...
WASHINGTON — Newt Gingrich's rapid rise in presidential polls has left veteran Republicans scratching their heads, and not just because he vaulted from far back to lead Mitt Romney in several ke...
Filed by Luke Johnson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 245
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
08:54 AM on 12/14/2011
He's not rising so much as everyone else is sinking around him, giving the perception that he is rising. Newt Gingrich is the status quo. A vote for him is a vote for every failed policy of this country for the past few decades.

A good quote from Ron Paul:

"“If Americans are serious about changing the status quo in Washington, then they must take into account the record of someone who profited from the housing collapse with taxpayers’ money, advocated for Obamacare-style individual mandates, and who played the Washington game of getting rich due to influence as well as anyone.”"
02:44 PM on 12/14/2011
.
01:37 AM on 12/13/2011
The Republican field looks pretty bad, if Newt is the frontrunner. Religious extremists, serial cheaters, or outright crooks seem to be the choices available. Only Ron Paul comes across as an honest choice, and he's continually marginalized by the party. If Newt's the nominee, Obama's reelection is guaranteed.
03:41 AM on 12/11/2011
So you are upset about how this country is being run right now.........well just what until to get a load of this. On one hand you have a man who cheated on a wife or two......who made millions on the the back of a falling mortage company......and has change his religon to something other than Christian and he's your first choice vs a man who has been faithfully married......educated at one to the top if not top institution......a devoted Christian......and by the way has made a lot of difference in the lives of struggling families....MMMMMMMmmmmmm this is a tough one, lets ask little Jonnie(5years old) if he can pick the better man. WOW!! he got it right. The bio's on the candidates must be written in crayon.....and apparently some adults don't read in crayon......
ItsGettingWeird
(or is it just me?)
07:17 PM on 12/10/2011
Republicans want their politicians to pick fights. That's what they think this is all about.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stephen the Grate
There is grandeur in this view of life ...
02:07 PM on 12/10/2011
So West and King are confused. No surprise there. Gingrich’s rise can be explained by the "anyone but Mitt" phenomenon. The GOP has been working through the other possible candidates and all have been shown to be unable to perform. Now, they are at the bottom of the barrel, which is where they found Newt. They are running out of time and it looks like they may be stuck with the choice of either Mitt or Newt. Looks like Newt!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
flossophy
Liberalism is not liberal.
01:54 PM on 12/10/2011
I'm not sure why anyone should be puzzled with Newt's ascendancy. 

The American people have been watching countless debates and reading up on the candidates positions and ideas... and they're making their choice. 

This is called 'the democratic process'.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stephen the Grate
There is grandeur in this view of life ...
02:11 PM on 12/10/2011
Newt's ascendancy? More like their last choice after Bachmann, Trump, Perry, and Cain.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
flossophy
Liberalism is not liberal.
02:13 PM on 12/10/2011
They were opening acts to the headliner.
01:50 PM on 12/10/2011
Newt's idea of giving Amnesty to 20 million+ law breakers aka illegal foreign invaders amd possible terroristic threat aka illegal "aliens" is telling the country that he is really a DEMOCRAT in Republican clothing..
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
flossophy
Liberalism is not liberal.
01:55 PM on 12/10/2011
good luck trying to sell that.
ItsGettingWeird
(or is it just me?)
07:02 PM on 12/10/2011
Are you on crack?
12:33 PM on 12/10/2011
Newt understands the basic nature of human beings, just like Goebbels did. Hate sells. King and West are either pretending, or more likely jealous of a Master At Work and refuse to admit it.
01:54 PM on 12/10/2011
Goebbels... haha!

I was actually thinking along those lines as well – that somehow Newt's nastiness is exactly what appeals to these GTOP voters. Sick.
12:32 PM on 12/10/2011
West and King are confused: they simply can't figure that hate motivates the very base of their own support more than any other single issue. So clueless.
11:36 AM on 12/10/2011
When you adopt the notion of anybody but Obama - this is what you get. All these candidates have very serious flaws. As voters learn more about these candidates and see the flaws, see the goofs, see their baggage we get this circus of one act in, one act out. Newt's rise puzzles some longtime Repubs, not as many as you would think from reading this article. Longtime Repubs know Newt and the majority just do not like him. He is a phoney and flip-flopper just like Romney but much nastier.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The ORF in Largo
Louder than a fart a hurricane
11:23 AM on 12/10/2011
Allen West and Steve King are prime examples of what is wrong with the Republican Party but
more importantly the mentality of their electorate. They vote for people supposedly way more
intelligent than they are but continue to get way less than expected
wordsalad12
Control over Congress is essential, not just WH
11:22 AM on 12/10/2011
isn't that delightful - a party so in disarray and clueless, it does not understand why its own supporters vote or don't vote a certain way. Brilliant. Talk about wandering in the desert, where ideas and sanity goes to die. The GOP is right in the middle of that. And speaking of Newt, what happens to balloons when they fill up too much and too fast with hot air?......­....mmmmhhmmm, exactly.
photo
Gestas
Mountain Man
10:50 AM on 12/10/2011
I thought the TEA Party didn't like Washington Insiders....Newt has been right in the middle of Washington for most of his life....taking and making money any way that he can....But then I never have thought the TEA Party ever knew what they where all about.
Jordan53
When is Jesus coming for the right?
10:23 AM on 12/10/2011
One of the put downs the Teapublicans offer up about Obama is his proffessorial style and his being 'lecturer in chief'...so now they are upholding the Newt whose style at the podium is ten times that of 'lecturer' and is much more 'condescender'...they make little or no sense to me.
10:12 AM on 12/10/2011
Newt is another NAFTA voter to ascend to Speaker, Senate majority leader, and / or run for President. Others received appointments to cushy cabinet positions in Clinton's and Bush's admins. From Pelosi, Boehner, Hassert, Kerry, etc -- to now Gingrich (again) - when will America realize the elite crony-capitalists running the country have control? And, then actually do something about it?