More

Human Rights Watch Slams Obama Administration For Ignoring Abuses In Uzbekistan [UPDATED]

Uzbekistan Human Rights Clinton

First Posted: 12/12/11 07:15 PM ET Updated: 12/13/11 02:41 PM ET

The Obama administration has allowed gross violations of human rights in Uzbekistan to go unchecked in order to avoid losing a crucial supply route for Afghanistan, Human Rights Watch alleges in a Tuesday report.

"The West's increasingly soft approach on rights in Uzbekistan became even more pronounced in 2011 when it contrasted starkly with the stance of the Obama administration and EU officials during the Arab Spring," HRW said in its new report, entitled "No One Left to Witness."

Steve Swerdlow, a researcher with Human Rights Watch covering Uzbekistan, said his organization was kicked out of Uzbekistan late last year, the first time in the organization's three decades that an entire field office was expelled from a country. The move drew minimal reproach from the administration, he added.

"There was a very soft statement from the State Department a few months later 'expressing concern,' but no condemnation of the move," he said. Swerdlow himself was expelled from the country on Christmas eve of last year.

Instead, Swerdlow said, the administration has focused its energy on winning over Uzbek president Islam Karimov's cooperation with the crucial Northern Distribution Network (NDN), a supply line for NATO troops in Afghanistan that runs through Uzbekistan.

The northern supply line has become increasingly vital after Pakistan cut off American movements from the south late last month, when an errant NATO airstrike killed two dozen Pakistani soldiers.

The link between apparent American self-censorship on human rights and Uzbekistan's cooperation with the NDN has been documented for some time.

Classified cables released by Wikileaks last year described how, after Secretary of State Hillary Clinton named an Uzbek human rights activist as one of her "Women of Courage" in 2009, Karimov became enraged and threatened "in icy tones" to withdraw support for the NDN.

In September, at the urging of the White House, the Senate Appropriations Committee quietly passed a measure that, if approved by Congress, would allow the Obama administration to bypass the seven-year-old sanctions on foreign funding to Uzbekistan, something that had become a personal mission of Karimov for months.

"The Obama administration is in frequent consultation with colleagues on Capitol Hill on this issue," said State Department spokesperson Emily Horne. "We are all seeking peace and stability in Afghanistan and the region and are working to support our troops on the ground."

According to Jeff Goldstein, a Eurasia expert at the Open Society Foundations, the drawdown of American efforts to pressure Uzbek leaders on human rights was evident in Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's recent visits to the nation.

When Clinton traveled to Tashkent in 2010, she held a meeting with several human rights activists, and the American embassy proudly posted a photograph from the meeting on its website.

At the more recent visit in October, Clinton met with an even smaller group, and no public notice of the event was made online.

Several prominent human rights activists told the news outlet EurasiaNet that they were either not invited to participate in the meeting or -- in at least one case -- were prepped for a meeting by a State Department official and then excluded.

"There is really a disinclination to do anything that might cause Karimov to play around with the NDN," Goldstein said.

At the end of the latest visit, a senior State Department official briefing reporters said that Clinton had raised human rights with Karimov, but that on the whole, the administration was inclined to believe Karimov's own claims on the matter.

"He's said several times that he's committed to this," the official said, adding that Karimov had made a speech the previous November in which he discussed reforms.

"The ironic thing is that just a month after that speech, I was booted out of the country," Swerdlow said. "There's actually no evidence of any improvement or any desire to reform [from Karimov]. It's hogwash to think he's trying to change anything."

The Human Rights Watch report documents numerous violations of basic human rights in Uzbekistan, including arbitrary and indefinite detention, rampant suppression of free speech, and evidence of brutal torture of dissidents.

The State Department's own human rights reports on Uzbekistan are relentless, with the most recent one describing the country as an "authoritarian state," and offering an extensive litany of abuses.

This article has been updated with a comment from the State Department and to clarify the status of the waiver passed by the Senate Appropriations Committee.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

The Obama administration has allowed gross violations of human rights in Uzbekistan to go unchecked in order to avoid losing a crucial supply route for Afghanistan, Human Rights Watch alleges in a Tue...
The Obama administration has allowed gross violations of human rights in Uzbekistan to go unchecked in order to avoid losing a crucial supply route for Afghanistan, Human Rights Watch alleges in a Tue...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 164
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
04:09 PM on 12/14/2011
Well.....those running Uzbekistan.....were installed by gw bush and company. Right now....the US needs that part of the world....for whatever reasons. But once finished with them....you can bet the real people of that country.....have something nice in store for those whom betrayed their country for gw bush. Same thing is going to happen in the US....greedy rightwingers are in store for a real surprise. lol
11:40 AM on 12/14/2011
Obama gets slammed for “allowing” this to happen but if he tried to do something about it everybody would scream that it’s none of our business. d@mned if you do, d@mned if you don’t.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lonewolfwisconsin
StandingOnYourGround-TreadingOnYourSnakeFlag
08:00 AM on 12/14/2011
Replace Uzbekistan with the Occupy Movement, and you've got the REAL story out there. Why haven't the OWS folks obtained a lawyer to protest the violation of their Civil Rights and the use of Chemical Weapons by oinks, which have been BANNED by the Geneva Convention.
07:28 AM on 12/14/2011
Did the US World Wide Police Department not stick their noses in some others country affairs in time? What is wrong with our Morality Police, must need more funding? Get out of other people business,NOW!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lonewolfwisconsin
StandingOnYourGround-TreadingOnYourSnakeFlag
08:01 AM on 12/14/2011
We have 160 military bases around the globe, clearly making us the Evil Empire to them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alexey Braguine
Author of Kingmaker, a novel
11:06 AM on 12/14/2011
Correction: Over 600 bases
layman
Live and Let Live !
04:53 AM on 12/14/2011
Rogue righteousness.
04:46 AM on 12/14/2011
Human Rights Watch lost a large chunk of its credibility with its complicit stand with NATO on its demolition of Libya--leading to several thousands on the "collateral damage" list. They are still very quiet on the ongoing abuses of the most egregious kind meted out innocents in Libya by the NATO mercenaries.

So to win back some credibility it has seized on to a case that has been well known for years. Karimov just loves to boil people who are irritants to his one-man rule.

HMR is just playing naive. It knows fully well that the West operates globally not on moral grounds but on the principle of real politik.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Sunwyn Ravenwood
Farewell my friends, time to go...
04:18 AM on 12/14/2011
Time for what Old Paul Harvey called "the rest of the story" folks. There is a huge pool of oil under the Caspian Sea. All the nations around it want to drill for oil and ship it via pipelines out to the sea to sell. Russia wants it to go through Russia, Iran thru Iran, and the US has been cozying up to the other states around it for the last 13-14 years. The US wanted to run a pipeline from Tajikstan thru Afghanistan and Pakistan to the Indian Ocean.

The US military was already working on plans to invade Afghanistan before Osama bin Laden gave them a perfect excuse. They delayed finding him until they'd given up on ever pacifying Afghanistan enough to make a pipeline possible, not to mention that Pakistan now hates our guts too. We are keeping up relations with Uzbekistan and its neighbors as a way of keeping a hand in the Caspian Sea region, on the grounds that even if we can't get control of Caspian Oil, we can try to keep Iran or Russia from profiting.

Yet another reason why we should pull all our forces out of central Asia as soon as possible.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lonewolfwisconsin
StandingOnYourGround-TreadingOnYourSnakeFlag
08:02 AM on 12/14/2011
But Cheney needs that oil to live.....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:28 AM on 12/14/2011
Finally somebody else gets it. I posted just about the same thing a few months ago and was ignored.

It's not human rights we are fighting for over there, it's a stupid pipeline and oil.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alexey Braguine
Author of Kingmaker, a novel
12:16 PM on 12/14/2011
Yuppers!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nico Jordaan
Double Standards dont apply to me!
01:52 AM on 12/14/2011
This is Typical America though...No OIL NO HELP..Very simple system. why should they help a country thatr cannot offer them anything? Its what they have been doing for years why are people only now realizing this now? The rest of the world has been seeing this for the past 50 years you idiots!
11:55 PM on 12/13/2011
Obama, just another Bush!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
09:07 PM on 12/13/2011
You'd think the woman that respresents us to the world would try to look less dowdy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ghostberry
All empty souls tend toward extreme opinions.
12:07 AM on 12/14/2011
Because if its a woman it becomes a fashion contest instead of merit right?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
12:18 AM on 12/14/2011
I would say the same for a man who, while representing the US in an official capacity, looked unkept
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lonewolfwisconsin
StandingOnYourGround-TreadingOnYourSnakeFlag
08:03 AM on 12/14/2011
We really don't care about performance and results, we only care about how they look. (?)
What a ridiculous statement.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
10:18 PM on 12/14/2011
And you actually believe appearances do not matter? Maybe you should read a bit of history. Quite often notes of diplomatic meetings contain the appearance of the participants, and their look sometimes influenced how discussions progressed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:19 PM on 12/13/2011
What, Hillary is in Uzbekistan ? What is going on, is she new mother Theresa of US politics I can smell Nobel price........
06:26 PM on 12/13/2011
The people of Uzbekistan must suffer so that Afghan girls can go to school.

(Before Iraq war I was not this cynical).
05:36 PM on 12/13/2011
The US only cares about human rights when it's convenient.  Human rights are being violated by the police inside the US and the Federal government isn't doing anything to stop them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:32 PM on 12/13/2011
Once again a report that underscores the fact that our esteemed Scretary of State has a commitment to human rights lasts as long as the speech or the photo op. Her actons serve the profiteering defense contractors and oil interests who put the Clintons in power and made them mega millionaires.

President Obama, the costs of pacifying the Clintons is too great. In these extraordinary and challenging times, please say good bye to Hillary and give us a Secretary of State with the integrity and diplomatic skills to champion Peace, HUMAN RIGHTS, and economic justice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ghostberry
All empty souls tend toward extreme opinions.
12:09 AM on 12/14/2011
You do know that the secretary of state is an envoy of the executive branch, not an independent post, right?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:56 AM on 12/14/2011
I am not sure I understand your point. Let me expand on mine. Mrs. Clinton’s supporters frequently give her personal, unqualified credit for anything good that happens in U.S. international relations, simply by the fact she is Secretary of State. By that standard, its seems equally accurate to give her personal, unqualified credit for the downsides of U.S. foreign policy and international actions.

Any cabinet officer serves at the pleasure of the president, but also has delegated authority that gives them great latitude on some decisions and strategies for policy implementation. Mrs. Clinton’s appointment in my estimation was a major compromise of President Obama’s values, made primarily to pacify a bitter political opponent and a powerful former president who could have continued as political adversaries. Her appointment not only helped repair her image, but has curbed some of her spouse’s personally lucrative influence peddling abroad. Unfortunately, the Secretary of State has used whatever influence she has within the administration to promote military intervention and escalation and corporate profiteering. It will be her legacy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lonewolfwisconsin
StandingOnYourGround-TreadingOnYourSnakeFlag
08:05 AM on 12/14/2011
Yea... those damn Clintons Balanced our Budget and tried to reform health care in the 90's.
...and who in their RIGHT mind wants that????? certainly not TBaggers.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:48 AM on 12/14/2011
Hillary certainly did TRY and failed badly to reform health care in the 1990s due in large measure to an very arrogant, my way or no way approach that alienated many Democrats, and contributed to the loss of a Democratic majority in the HOUSE for the first time in 40 YEARS. Imagine if Hillary had done what Obama was wise enough to do, looks for stages of reform, and had a VERY LEAST ended the exploitative “prior conditions” limits on insurance coverage, saving many individuals and family finances from devastation.

Bill Clinton as president did conspire with Newt Gingrich as Speaker of the House and President to balance the budget briefly, largely on the backs of the poor and aided by an economic bubble. Clinton then conspired with the GOP and Phil Gramm to repeal many New Deal era economic protections that opened the door wide to the greedy banks and the Bush era abuses that collapsed the economy, while Bill, Hillary, Newt, Phil Gramm and Robert Rubin all became multi millionaires. If you admire the Clintons, do you also admire the GOP? I don’t.
03:20 PM on 12/13/2011
It is time to overthrow the US dictatorsh­ip of the Uzbekistan and let the people of the Uzbekistan have free democratic elections. Hillary Clinton should stop supporting torture and Human Rights violations in the US dictatorships around the world.
03:12 PM on 12/13/2011
Hey look, a government motors plant in Tashkent. Is that a volt? Talk about a human rights violation...