More

Occupy Oakland Ports: Longshoremen Sent Home Due To Protests (PHOTOS)

Occupy Oakland Ports

First Posted: 12/12/11 05:16 PM ET Updated: 12/12/11 05:16 PM ET

By TERRY COLLINS, Associated Press

OAKLAND, Calif. (AP) — Most longshoremen at the Port of Oakland were sent home Monday after Wall Street demonstrators blocked entrances as part of a coordinated West Coast port blockade effort.

Shipping companies agreed with workers' concerns that the protests were creating unsafe working conditions and released about 150 out of about 200 workers on the morning shift, said Craig Merrilees, spokesman for the International Longshore and Warehouse Union.

Workers in unaffected parts of the port remained on the job.

Several hundred people began picketing at the Port of Oakland before dawn and blocked at least two entrances. A long line of big rigs sat outside the gates, unable to drive into the port.

Police in riot gear monitored the scene as protesters marched in an oval and carried signs with messages such as "Labor and Occupy Unite," an invitation to the powerful dockworkers union join their push against corporate greed.

No major clashes with police or arrests were reported.

Longshoremen arriving for the morning shift at the two affected port terminals did not try to enter due to what union officials said were safety concerns. Some longshoremen said they weren't willing to cross the demonstrators' picket lines.

Protesters cheered and declared victory when they learned about the partial shutdown, then dispersed. Another march on the port is planned later in the day.

Port spokesman Isaac Kos-Read said the facility remains open.

"There's been disruptions throughout the morning shift. We've done our best to minimize those disruptions," Kos-Read said. "We've kept the port largely operational."

It's unclear whether the longshoremen will be paid for the missed work. Union officials say longshoremen were not paid after Occupy Oakland protesters blockaded the port Nov. 2.

DeAndre Whitten, 48, an Oakland longshoreman for 12 years, said it was his understanding he would be losing about $500 in pay for the day. But he said he supported the protest effort.

"I'm excited. It was way overdue. I hope they keep it up," Whitten said. "I have no problem with it. But my wife wasn't happy about it."

Leaders of the ILWU, which represents thousands of longshoremen, spoke out in recent weeks against the coordinated effort by Occupy protesters to blockade ports from Anchorage to San Diego.

In Southern California, as many as 400 demonstrators gathered in a park then marched in heavy rain to the Port of Long Beach.

Before most dispersed about 9 a.m., they targeted a dock facility leased by SSA Marine, a shipping company partially owned by giant investment firm Goldman Sachs.

Beating drums and waving flags, dozens of protesters, gathered outside a fenced area at the port, part of a sprawling complex that spans parts of Los Angeles and Long Beach.

Police repeatedly warned that they faced arrest if they crossed the fenced area. Officers later started pushing the protesters further back. They spilled into the street, blocking access to the pier and holding up truck traffic. At least one person was taken into custody.

Protesters mostly remained in a parking lot so there were no major disruptions to operations, port spokesman John Pope said.
In Ventura County, about 150 protesters picketed outside the entrance to the Port of Hueneme. No arrests were reported.

In Oakland, the protests halted truck traffic at least two gates. Truck drivers, union and port officials and Oakland politicians have said the protests will hurt the incomes of people who have little connection to Wall Street.

"This is joke. What are they protesting?" Christian Vega, 32, who sat in his truck carrying a load of recycled paper from Pittsburg said Monday morning. He said the delay was costing him $600.

"It only hurts me and the other drivers. We have jobs and families to support and feed. Most of them don't," Vega said.

Oakland Mayor Jean Quan also urged protesters to consider the impact on port workers.

"Thousands of people work at the Port of Oakland every day. Thousands more in agriculture and other industries also depend on the Port of Oakland for their daily wages," Quan said.

Oakland protester Alex Schmaus, 26, said he believed the attempted shutdown was for the greater good of workers.
"We're trying to make things better for them," Schmaus said.

In San Diego, a few dozen protesters converged on the port as part of the blockade effort. Police spokesman Gary Hassen says four people were arrested, most for failure to disperse or refusal to comply with police orders but one for an unspecified traffic violation. He says there's been no violence.

___
Associated Press writers Robert Jablon and Christina Hoag in Los Angeles and Marcus Wohlsen in San Francisco contributed to this story.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SAN FRANCISCO

By TERRY COLLINS, Associated Press OAKLAND, Calif. (AP) — Most longshoremen at the Port of Oakland were sent home Monday after Wall Street demonstrators blocked entrances as part of a coordinated...
By TERRY COLLINS, Associated Press OAKLAND, Calif. (AP) — Most longshoremen at the Port of Oakland were sent home Monday after Wall Street demonstrators blocked entrances as part of a coordinated...
Filed by Carly Schwartz  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 85
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
violetjones
I like cool things. Reward me.
07:38 PM on 12/17/2011
The dock workers get paid $500 and $600 a day?! That's insane. I don't feel bad for them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter007
10:24 AM on 12/16/2011
OWS participants are not really protesting anything. They are engaging in disruptive behavior and causing wide spread inconvenience and damage.
They are similar to vandals or graffiti artists.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
12:39 AM on 12/15/2011
What is wrong with these protesters? The only people they are affecting is the contract truck drivers and longshoremen who are missing work. I understand their message on unemployment, but adding to the unemployment number is probably not the best idea.
photo
WILLIEMOJORISIN
USN 1978-1984
04:44 PM on 12/15/2011
Exactly if the corporations lose money they will just raise thier prices,this is why OWS is losing many of us.
01:02 AM on 12/14/2011
You people need to get a clue here. The people sent home still get paid. Since brain cell one and two don't seem to bee working for most of you I will spoon feed you the correct argument.

Shutting down the ports can and will create supply chain issues in the long term for U.S retailers and manufactures. The net effect is lower economic output and lower productivity. Jamming up the supply chains of numerous companies is the real issue not the lost wages of longshoreman union members because that is simply not the case.
07:21 PM on 12/14/2011
It doesn't say anywhere that the people sent home were paid.
10:14 PM on 12/14/2011
Union Contract....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
12:42 AM on 12/15/2011
They didn't get paid. You have no idea how longshoremen work. If the port is closed and there are no ships to unload, they will not get paid. Also most truckers own the trucks, so if some hippies block the road, they will not get paid.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
10:18 PM on 12/13/2011
Stunts like this will turn public opinion away from the Occupy movement. It's supposed to promote working class people, not put them out of work.
12:53 AM on 12/14/2011
They are in a union.. They still get paid
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
01:51 AM on 12/14/2011
Aha, that someone will pay them for not being able to work makes it all right in your book?
01:15 PM on 12/13/2011
One of the most effective ways to lift people out of poverty is to provide them with a job. Moving low skill, low pay jobs to third world countries has a dramatic effect on their living standards. It is far more effective than foreign aid that often gets siphoned off by the governments. We certainly need better education here in the US to have better paying jobs, but keeping low paying jobs here isn't a solution to our issues. This seems ill thought out. Doesn't effect the 1% or even the 40%.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:12 PM on 12/13/2011
Why are we putting up with sedition?

I'm touched that there are specific workers who are grateful for the attention, but they could be just as grateful for attention drawn to their cause that didn't shut down their work and take away their livelihood.

There is zero reason that OWS protestors couldn't peacefully protest alongside the port without obstructing it. The banner says it all: Block their world, unleash our own. This is black-letter law, why aren't we enforcing it? They do not have the right to lead assaults on the existing authorities to supplant our government with the one they want. This is not protest when they shut down our ports and our streets.

Even if every worker in that port was for this, which I seriously doubt, the people who depend on these imports are not all 1%ers. The people who will be impacted by what OWS did today range far and wide, and it is so intolerably arrogant for OWS to call themselves the 99 percent and dismiss the people who feel the impact of their choices.

If they are the 99 percent they are directly responsible for the support structure of consumers and voters which drives every single one of the establishments they're protesting. If they are the 99 percent they hired and have the power to fire every Congressman they're angry at.

If they're not, they're saying anyone who is not them does not count as as much of a person as they are.
12:02 PM on 12/13/2011
An open letter from some of those workers:
http://cleanandsafeports.org/blog/2011/12/12/an-open-letter-from-america%E2%80%99s-port-truck-drivers-on-occupy-the-ports/
02:07 AM on 12/14/2011
hope you put this letter on face book ?
11:34 AM on 12/13/2011
I was there when a Union Stewart was talking to a lot of us during the protest.
He said this protest was LONG overdue, the people of this country need to be WOKEN up and they (unions) have been fighting this battle for 100 years. He was GLAD to see us (there we 15 other union workers behind him supporting his statments). Of course front line workers are going to feel the pain, but SOMETHING HAS to Change!! Children are starving in this country, people are dieing because they cannot afford healthcare (or the insurance company denies thier claim) We HAVE to chagne this country and it is our RIGHT to do so. the 1% has put good americans in the line of fire they we will not act, but we MUST act.

My friend and I were on the front lines of both shift shutdowns in Oakland on Monday and there were THOUSANDS there and the Arbitrator for the union ruled in our favor!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nkdgolf
Be the best that you can be!
04:23 PM on 12/13/2011
Thousands huh? AP (hardly a conservative mouthpiece) reported HUNDREDS of protestors. AP also reported "the union that represents longshoreman doesn't support the shutdown."

Further, Chriatian Vega, a trucker in Oakland said the shutdown cost him $600. He said: "This is a joke. It only hurts me and other drivers. We have jobs and families to support and feed. Most of these people don't," Vega said.

Doesn't sound like you and your friend really helped that part of the 99%.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nkdgolf
Be the best that you can be!
05:29 PM on 12/13/2011
Sorry, flat out not true. The Associated Press today reported the union leaders did not support the shutdown. There were some great comments from truckers but last time I quoted them the left wing moderators at HP censored my quotes that demonstrated that the truckers do not support the protest at ports.
05:58 PM on 12/13/2011
Your telling me that the conversation I PERSONALLY was involved in is not true?... wtf?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JPMac
10:57 AM on 12/13/2011
Are the union workers that aren't getting paid right now still supporters of OWS??!! Is OWS going to put food on their table, pay their bills with their huge stash..probably not!!
09:38 AM on 12/13/2011
It will be interesting when/if these a h o l e s decide to shut down the Port of NY or NJ. North Jersey and NY Longshoreman will open their eyes to the real world, then shut them just as quick, hopefully with baseball bats
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bldr1bob
09:32 AM on 12/13/2011
Oakland Mayor Jean Quan allowed this to happen. One word from her and the police would have ended it.
04:18 AM on 12/13/2011
So sending middle class workers home is good for them? I thought this movement was about fighting for the 99%? Seems only to be harming them.
08:34 AM on 12/13/2011
This is a small negative, in what could be great change. You must also remember the loss in profits the ports and their affiliates took on yesterday.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bldr1bob
09:29 AM on 12/13/2011
If it was your paycheck you'd be pis-sed.
10:25 AM on 12/13/2011
Liberal hippie scuuuum
11:18 PM on 12/12/2011
We are getting minimal coverage of the events around the country (and Canada, Japan, and elsewhere) today. Thanks, corporate media!

Of course, OWS has more comprehensive information here:
http://www.occupywallst.org/article/watch-live-west-coast-port-shutdown/

And the following are listed as "Participating Occupations":
805 Albuquerque Anchorage Astoria Austin Bellingham Berkeley Boulder Chicago Coos Bay Dallas Denver Eugene Eureka Fresno Greensboro Hilo Homer Honolulu Houston Humboldt Kona Long Beach Longmont Longview Los Angeles Marin Maui Merced Minneapolis Oakland Olympia Omaha Orange County Oxnard Phoenix Portland Sacramento Salt Lake City San Antonio San Diego San Francisco San Luis Obispo Santa Barbara Seattle Tacoma Thousand Oaks Vancouver, BC Waimea Wall Street

From what I could see, at least Oakland, Portland, Houston, and some other ports were fully or partially shut down for some period of time today.
04:54 AM on 12/13/2011
AWEsome I knew this would be less reported than Elections in Russia !!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nkdgolf
Be the best that you can be!
04:26 PM on 12/13/2011
You are getting a lot of coverage, just not the kind you want:
10:46 PM on 12/12/2011
"Oakland protester Alex Schmaus, 26, said he believed the attempted shutdown was for the greater good of workers.
'We're trying to make things better for them,' Schmaus said.

Translation: We know what's best for you. Even if you need to work/earn money, and our protests cut your pay, our protests are more important than what you want and need. When you see see your next paycheck is smaller, you'll feel better about it because "we're trying to make things better for you."

The protesters realize that all the port protests are accomplishing is getting 30 seconds of news coverage paid for by increased prices of goods, right? The amount of goods that will be imported and exported won't be affected in the least. Shippers will be caught up within hours by using overtime. Overtime costs will be passed on to consumers through higher prices.

Does any of them believe Goldman Sachs is going to make a penny less because of this? Seriously? How naive can you be?