iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

The Strength Of Sacred Buildings At The Beginning Of The 21st Century (PHOTOS)

First Posted: 12/12/2011 7:34 am Updated: 12/13/2011 11:47 am

By Lukas Feireiss, co-editor of 'Closer to God: Religious Architecture and Sacred Spaces' (Gestalten).

Architecture addresses and expresses. It touches and repels. It narrates and remains silent. It encloses and excludes. It is definitely permissible to speak of a language of architecture. The horizon of architecture covers a wide span across the history of mankind, from the basic housing afforded by the mud hut to the complex systems of cathedrals and skyscrapers. It would be naïve to suggest that this is a metaphorical way of speaking that could be avoided or even replaced.

No doubt, the formal repertoire of even the simplest building has a functional value and semantic quality that goes over and beyond it. It is therefore of no surprise that -- in particular, with buildings of religious designation - connotation and context are read as intelligible, tangible symbols of the content they embody. Reaching far beyond functional considerations, architecture's usual criteria of purpose -- access, capacity, construction technique and financial viability -- are simply not enough. More than any other type of construction, religious buildings seem to be essentially about the ideas they contain, and the abstract principles they materialize throughout the interplay of form and content. But apart from these narrative spatial values that cannot be accessed at first glance, religious buildings as bearer of meaning also demand in their spatial and artistic coherence the provision of social space as well.

The book Closer to God now brings together a unique selection of international examples of contemporary religious architecture of all faiths and denominations. Churches, synagogues and mosques of all sizes are collected here alongside Buddhist temples, wayside chapels and meditative places for quiet contemplation. What these buildings share is an avant-garde and often explicitly expressive formal language that shows an exciting relationship between traditionalism and a pioneering, future-oriented outlook. This focus on examples of architecturally progressive sacred buildings means that faiths which still cling firmly to traditional building styles and ideas–such as Islam and Hinduism, for example–do not feature very prominently in this book. It is all the more striking then to see how strongly architecture features as a vehicle for conveying ideas in Christianity and Judaism. The wide variety of stylistic approaches from all over the world presented here is vivid proof of the fact that 21st century sacred architecture is not dominated by a particular style.

In however diffuse and varied a form, the numerous examples of recently-built sacred buildings featured in the book Closer to God vividly illustrate the co-existence of traditional concepts and patterns hand in glove with modern principles, and novel approaches freed from the shackles of historicism in buildings of faith today. Despite their different, respective context and approach, all of these buildings not only thrive for the extraordinary and experimental, but are in their extroverted architectural stance also characterized by a deliberate spatial introversion, a distinguished sense of conscious retreat from the everyday into an innermost sanctum. Thereby their concepts are particularly ample in metaphors, usually unfolding an abundance of historical and thematic relationships in the fundamental formulation and development of the building's shape and narrative surplus.

Maybe the strength of contemporary sacred buildings a decade into the 21st century lies in their ability to allow the cracks and ruptures, contrasts and contradictions between the past and present co-exist. Offering us a level and a depth of contemplation that we cannot live without, and that we need to experience religion, the sacred building is still the image, the manifestation of a higher level of order and meaning. The building as a whole, its material form and individual elements, are a starting point for a journey of reflection that tries to exceed the visible to probe its intelligible basis.


Also on HuffPost:

http://www.stylelist.com/2011/12/12/taylor-swift-style-photos_n_1141545.html
FOLLOW HUFFPOST RELIGION

Filed by Josh Fleet  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 103
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Melody3274
Trolololo
12:35 AM on 01/23/2012
STAVE CHURCHES! Building your church out of what you have, no real fancy decorum - amazing architecture.
photo
brooklyncitizen
Soror quaerens lucem
01:19 AM on 12/18/2011
Most of the posts decry the use of money to build these buildings. A reminder- God is us....that includes Architects. That creativity and genius and engineering on display in these buildings (well most of them ) is another a manifestation of God n us since all gifts (including good design)come from him. To say that we should spend the money on the homeless is ridiculous, one doesn't take from the other.Religion has been one of the best employer of creative artists and architects and sculptors and I applaud this.Good Architecture is a rare thing.
photo
brooklyncitizen
Soror quaerens lucem
11:48 PM on 12/17/2011
That Harajaku temple certain owes a lot to Alvar Aalto.
All pretty neat except for that meditation outhouse. that looks oppressive.
photo
elsquibbs
Socially liberal, fiscally prudent atheist.
12:12 PM on 12/16/2011
Nice architecture.
photo
simsum
have Trek will travel
07:36 PM on 12/14/2011
The Baha'i Houses of Worship around the world, and the famous Baha'i gardens in Haifa, are also very beautiful

http://info.bahai.org/article-1-6-7-1.html
http://www.ganbahai.org.il/en/
08:06 PM on 12/13/2011
God has an edifice complex.
07:33 AM on 02/07/2012
Good one! Thanks for the laff....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
idontcare761
It seems I might care afterall..
02:43 PM on 12/13/2011
My favorite was the last one , the small blue one in the forest. The rest were , in my opinion , ostentatious. I've never thought that the bigger the better was fit for a church. The money spent building those churches could go a long way in helping the flock of any of those churches. Build a modest worship hall , a small house for the minister , pastor , priest (whatever name you use) , and that's it. Hold worship outside when its weather appropriate , inside when it's not.
photo
brooklyncitizen
Soror quaerens lucem
11:48 PM on 12/17/2011
you are not a fan of architecture huh?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
idontcare761
It seems I might care afterall..
08:43 AM on 12/18/2011
Absolutely not when it's a church costing millions of dollars , and its congregation is living paycheck to paycheck or going hungry. Modest doesn't have to imply ugly.
07:38 AM on 02/07/2012
I agree completely! I've often had the same thought when looking at some of the outrageously elaborate "houses of worship", not only how much misery was left unattended while the churches threw away huge amounts of money on their buildings, but how many lives were probably lost in their construction.
02:42 PM on 12/13/2011
Thank you for sharing these, they took my breath away.
01:49 PM on 12/13/2011
You dont need a special building or chapel to worship your Deity. Religious leaders want you to think you must go to a church, put money in the offering plate and listen to the minister/preist/rabbi/ etc give HIS/HER interpretation of what the Deity said. Sorry...that is BS. For those of you who follow the Christian faith...Did Jesus have a church? NO Only the big money grubbing religious groups had big churchs back then. And that money you give.....ever see a minister/priest/rabbi/etc in an old suit or shabby clothes? No? Bet that person up their on the pulpit has a nice home to live in too and gets paid too.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thom Nickels
01:48 PM on 12/13/2011
The Catholic churches displayed here are pretty awful looking. They
don't even look Catholic. Actually, this article is behind the current
architectural trend. The current trend is towards the traditional
or recapturing traditional elements. The spartan designs common
here offer nothing except a peek into the blank cold "soul" of
modernism.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
want2say
03:00 PM on 12/13/2011
I think they are all awful and disrespectful of Holy and Wonderful God.
photo
brooklyncitizen
Soror quaerens lucem
11:51 PM on 12/17/2011
You must prefer places that are aspatial.
Many of these create wonderfully contemplative spaces; nothing cold about them.
In any case Architecture has to be experienced directly in order for it to be understood and appreciated.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ljoyhunter
01:24 PM on 12/13/2011
Thank the Lord that we have the freedom to openly build churches of all types and styles that attract all different types of personalities and tastes to, ultimately, get the precious children together to pray and worship together, to help each other and to reach out to their communities with concrete help with food and other basic needs. These things are going on in many churches of all shapes, colors, sizes, locations and it is the heart of the Lord that loves each person that is appearing there in those buildings when the people are truly sincere and receptive. Praise God for every true House of God where the people are sincere, and the poor and sick are ministered to, where prayer is going on for our country leaders and for the victims of wars everywhere, for the sick we know and don't know, for the broken hearted we know and don't know. There are many churches operating on these premises whether their exterior is what we call fancy or not. For the ones who are just putting on airs, oh well, God will judge in the end. Please don't throw out the baby with the bathwater.

Rev. Laura
01:13 PM on 12/13/2011
Hum. They all look like props for a syfy movie.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
want2say
03:01 PM on 12/13/2011
yep, definately reminded me of planet of the apes.
photo
shlack123
Independent; Moderate; Atheist; Texan.
12:59 PM on 12/13/2011
I personally don't care what the chruches look like - just tax 'em!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kritikos
Intelligence is not a science
02:17 PM on 12/13/2011
...especially the mega's.
photo
shlack123
Independent; Moderate; Atheist; Texan.
12:58 PM on 12/13/2011
"Churches of the Furture" is an oxymoron - according to the people who attend said chruches, our world is due to end any day now.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anitaj
02:03 PM on 12/13/2011
Again?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
syntax facit saltum
We do not live in a 2 story universe
05:23 PM on 12/17/2011
You don't feel ashamed to spread a bigoted lie?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
heikhali
12:57 PM on 12/13/2011
I am perplexed by the beauty of these buildings and the paucity of worshipers.
photo
brooklyncitizen
Soror quaerens lucem
11:52 PM on 12/17/2011
what makes you think there are few worshipers?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
heikhali
12:09 AM on 12/18/2011
There is not a soul in any of the photos, and in many photos the subject building has no seats, or in the case of the out door chapel, it is not extended, but folded up (eg., "closed").

I am in a different part of the world, so if you know more, I am interested in your enlighten- ment (Please!).