Why Aren't Small Businesses Getting Loans From Big Banks?

Rothmans

First Posted: 12/12/11 03:45 PM ET Updated: 12/16/11 01:06 AM ET

Politicians and banking executives are quick to hail small businesses as key to economic expansion and job creation. That message was front and center recently when New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg and American Express CEO Kenneth Chenault came to Rothman's, the Manhattan-based, family-owned men's clothier, and praised the store's success as a shining example of the power small businesses have to revitalize local neighborhoods.

There's just one problem: Rothman's can't get a bank loan. Much to his surprise, owner and president Kenneth Giddon was recently turned down when he sought financing for his small business.

Like Giddon, many small-business owners are exasperated by the disconnect between big banks' promises to lend to small businesses and their real-life experiences.

"I fully understand the frustration," says Nancy Bush, bank analyst and contributing editor to SNL Financial. "The rules changed -- the whole game has changed. And no one told small businesses about it."

Giddon, who has owned the landmark business his grandfather started in 1926 for 25 years and is a founding board member of the charity New York Cares, projects revenues of $7 million to $10 million at Rothman's in 2011. Yet his application for a $500,000 loan was rejected by three different large banks, two of which have long held Rothman accounts with over $500,000 in deposits.

He didn't think he'd have a problem. "Given all the rhetoric about banks [increasing] small-business lending, I thought it would completely be a layup," Giddon says. "I'm not a bash the banks kind of guy. I've not jumped on that bandwagon at all. But this has been a real eye-opener for me."

Giddon applied for the loan after negotiating a deal with his landlord for a raw industrial space a block north of his current location that would almost double his square footage. He saw it as the right time and right opportunity -- "we're going big," he says -- and went to the two banks he had existing relationships with and a third that was interested in his business. All three banks, which he declined to name, gave him the same response: Rothman's has made money every year since it opened in 1986, except in 2008 and 2009, and because of that dip, they were unable to lend him money. Giddon's response to the bankers: "Yes, we lost money in 2008 and 2009, but guess what? So did you. And I didn't get bailed out. I had to own up to it -- cut expenses, change my business, retool, be an entrepreneur and come back."

One banker questioned whether, upon getting the loan, Giddon would just turn around and cut a check to himself. "Then I wouldn't be funding my business," Giddon says. "I've told people I'm going to build this new store and make it work -- if it fails, that's a failure for me personally. And that's what's important to me: my reputation, my family's reputation. It's easy when you look at a balance sheet and say, well they lost money in 2008 and 2009, so we can't trust their cash flow to repay a loan, but I don't know what column says that this is the guy's lifeblood and this is the guy's heart and soul."

Two of the three banks did propose a solution. "They came back and said, 'I have really good news. We will lend you the money, but there's one catch: You'll have to leave it in a CD, and that's the security against the loan.' And the CD was going to earn about 1.5 percent, but I'd borrow it at probably 6 or 7 percent. I said, 'Listen, I'm not the smartest guy. I just sell pants for a living. But I don't know if that's a good deal.' It was actually humorous."

And though Giddon says these experiences won't derail the project, he's still confused about the rejection. "A guy who's been in business for 25 years, making a decision to upgrade his business, moving to a bigger and better space, and personally guaranteeing the loan?" he says. "I would think that's the kind of credit banks would want."

WHAT EXACTLY DO BIG BANKS WANT?

So what specifically are big banks looking for now, and what are some typical deal breakers? Representatives from the nation's four biggest banks shared their lending records and criteria for small businesses, which they generally define as businesses with revenues of $20 million or less:

WHY THE DISCONNECT?

If so many big businesses want to say yes, then why are so many small businesses hearing no?

"For political reasons, for marketing reasons, big banks clearly want to represent that they're very friendly to small business," says Ami Kassar, founder and CEO of Philadelphia-based MultiFunding, which helps small businesses find the best loans available to them. "But the data tells a different story."

Though large banks say they're increasing loans to small businesses, studies suggest there hasn't been much improvement in the small-business lending climate. According to an October Federal Reserve survey, 89.3 percent of loan officers at large banks said credit standards for approving applications of small firms (defined as those with annual sales of less than $50 million) remained basically unchanged over the past three months.

And only a quarter of all businesses said their borrowing needs were completely satisfied in the last three months, according to the latest quarterly economic trends report from the National Federation of Independent Business, down from 36 percent in the two years before the recession.

Kassar's own research tool, released last Friday, grades every FDIC-regulated bank in the nation based on their commitment to small-business lending, calculated by dividing their active loans to small businesses with balances of $1 million or less by their total domestic deposits. While the average bank in America uses 8 percent of its deposits to make small-business loans, Kassar found that of the nation's 10 biggest banks, four used less than 3 percent of their deposits to make small-business loan and four used between 3 and 6 percent of their deposits. Only two of the banks -- Branch Banking and Trust Company and U.S. Bank -- used between 6 and 10 percent of their deposits for small-business lending. (See the complete ratios and grades of the banks in the slideshow below.)

"Part of the disconnect small businesses are feeling is from the big banks' new stringent credit policy -- the difference between credit policies that existed prior to 2008 and 2009 and the policies now," says Bush, the bank analyst. "Big banks are proactively reaching out to a different credit profile than they were before, and it's absurd for them to deny that."

Bush says regulators "are fully acquiescent to banks not lending to small business. There's clearly an element of political pressure, regulatory pressure. I've heard from more than one bank that regulators will stand up and say they're pushing banks to lend, but they really don't want to see a bad loan hit the books. They don't want to go through a bad credit cycle again, and so there's a wink wink nudge nudge about urging banks [to lend to small businesses]."

Bernard Baumohl, chief global economist of The Economic Outlook Group, an economic forecasting firm in Princeton, N.J., agrees there's been a fundamental change in how big banks view risk. "There's a lot big banks can lose. It's a different climate for them."

That climate, according to Baumohl, includes the pressure to raise capital, repair their balance sheets and deal with the remnants of the financial crisis as they look toward a bleak 2012.

"What's going on in Europe is part of the equation that helps banks determine when to issue a loan, and there's a real concern that U.S. banks are going to take a hit," says Baumohl. "There could be spill-over into the U.S. banking system, and with that dark cloud hanging over the global and U.S. economy, it's understandable why small businesses are not the client of choice for big banks. They don't want to go with what they perceive is a risky customer."

According to the Fed's survey, every large bank listed "less favorable or more uncertain economic outlook" as a very or somewhat important possible reasons for tightening credit standards or loan terms. About 57 percent cited "reduced tolerance for risk" as somewhat important for tightening credit.

TOO BIG TO LEND?

If the conditions for small-business lending in 2012 are convoluted, the solution, according to these experts, is clear: Small businesses should go to small banks to get their lending needs met. For one thing, smaller, regional and community banks "aren't as exposed to the European debt crisis as the large banks are," Baumohl says.

"We could retool the bigger banks to deal with small business, or concede that large banks just don't do a good job with small business and automatically go to a smaller bank," Bush says. "There's a natural affinity between Main Street banks and Main Street businesses."

Small banks already play an outsized role in lending to small businesses: according to Kassar, small banks, defined as having $500 million or less in domestic deposits, account for 31.5 percent of all small-business loans, even though they account for only 11 percent of deposits.

And while some big banks claim that demand for small-business loans is sluggish, Umpqua Bank, a community bank serving Oregon, Washington, Northern California and Northern Nevada, has seen small-business loan applications double this year, and has increased its lending to small and medium-sized businesses by more than 50 percent, according to Umpqua spokeswoman Eve Callahan.

Callahan says some of their recent small-business customers "haven't had a close relationship with their previous banker, and their financial situation as a result was not clearly understood. We recognized a need in the marketplace to have a relationship -- a partnership -- with small businesses not based on a credit score but on a real understanding of their business and financials."

As Callahan describes it, small banks tend to see the potential, not just the risk, of small business. "We only thrive if the businesses in the community we serve thrive," she says. "The success of companies is as important to us as it is to them in a lot of ways, so we want to see them grow and innovate and create jobs. That's our role and relationship."

Erik Tonkin, of Sellwood Cycle Repair, a bicycle repair shop in Portland, Ore., says his business has an excellent, 15-year relationship with Bank of America, but when it came time to get a loan to buy a building, he consciously bypassed the big bank. "I have a personal relationship with the people at Bank of America and they work really hard for me," Tonkin says. "But they cannot make decisions and own those decisions. The power given to the individual officers to make decisions at the local Umpqua branch is important to me. Good customer service isn't just being friendly -- it's actually doing something for somebody. I don't like going to places like Walmart, where people can't help you with a problem, and they're essentially smiling and telling you no."

Though Tonkin got a loan for the same amount Giddon is seeking, their experiences couldn't be more different. Umpqua didn't just approve Tonkin's $500,000 loan, his banker actually found it for him. "They asked for details of my situation and remembered those details, so when this special loan come along, they said, 'This could work for Erik,' and contacted me and told me about it," Tonkin says. "I felt like I'm getting the customer service there that I try hard to give here. It's sort of this mutual understanding I have with my customers and suppliers, of trying to help each other out, like we're in it together. They're running their branch the same way I run my own business."

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story indicated that Bank of America was hiring approximately 100,000 small-business bankers across the U.S. by mid-2012. It is hiring approximately 1,000 small-business bankers.

SEE How MultiFunding Grades The Nation's 10 Biggest Banks On Small-Business Lending:

No. 10 -- Bank Of New York Mellon
1  of  11
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
Total Deposits: $103,635,000,000

Total Small Business Loans: $24,000,000

Ratio of Active Loans to Small Business to Total Domestic Deposits: 0.02 Percent

Grade: F

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SMALL BUSINESS

Politicians and banking executives are quick to hail small businesses as key to economic expansion and job creation. That message was front and center recently when New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg an...
Politicians and banking executives are quick to hail small businesses as key to economic expansion and job creation. That message was front and center recently when New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg an...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 66
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brett Tonaille
Author and translator
01:51 PM on 01/29/2012
Two things drove me mad about the bail-outs (which I basically supported). One was that no limit was placed on paying bonuses (for the jaw-dropping reason that the banks supposedly might then refuse the loans...); the other was that no obligation was built into the bail-outs that those being bailed out help home-owners and small businesses.
So why don't they do it? Because they have other ways of making money and no one's making them do the right thing.
-me-
D to go forward, R to go backwards
08:19 PM on 01/05/2012
In case you missed it, the reason why banks don't care about "small business"
JACK M van Zandt Wrote...
why should banks lend at risk- large or small to any small business..­they can make just as much money or more at NO RISK by borrowing from the Fed a 0% interest and buying treasuries at a 2-3% interest spread and using these treasuries as collateral (less interest which is kept as profit) and borrowing more from the Fed at 0% interest etc..TALK ABOUT A PONZI SCHEME! BUT THAT IS WHAT IS KEEPING OUR GOVERNMENT PAYING IT'S BILLS WITH OUR HUGE DEFICIT! and that is what is enabling banks to pay off their TARP LOANS..sep­arate banks and investment houses
I have stated this a few times before too..
03:17 AM on 01/04/2012
I find the bigger problem in my construction business is not that we cannot get a loan but rather that the homeowners are unable to receive a loan. When the homeowner cannot get a loan this hurts my business. I did however work on a flood project this summer where all the business owner's and the property owners were struggling to avoid going out of business and the ones that needed the assistance were not qualifying for any type of small business loans. It was devastating to view the results of this flood. http://roofingburlingtonvermont.com
photo
Barbarian At The Gate
Fortune favors the bold.
05:31 PM on 12/27/2011
Some of those huge banks received big bailouts, while mainstreet received none. The plan was the Feds bailout the "too big to fail" banks and the banks would invigorate the mainstreet businesses by lending money.

The reason why the Fed Gov resorted to Quantitative Easing was because interest rates were at historic lows but no one was borrowing money or lending it. By using monetary policy to increase the supply of money the big banks would have an incentive to loan money out to mainstreet businesses. The fear of QE inflation would become a reality if the money supply is increased but no money is loaned out or borrowed.

The big banks are a complete disappointment. They lost money because of risky derivative trading and buying securitized mortgage backed securities filled with junk mortgages. Now they don't want to make money the traditional way which is loaning it out to entrepreneurs.
08:36 PM on 12/21/2011
My small business has had success getting the loans it needs. Tell me if I'm wrong, but isn't it the business credit score that that determines whether you get the loan, and determines the interest rate charged? My business is in the top tier for credit rating, and my loans have always been approved, and I get the best interest rate available.
11:33 AM on 12/18/2011
not lending small businesses money is the way the banks are slowing the economy and to hurt president Obama, so that they can get their GOP buddies back in and cut their regulations like when bush was in. the economy is bad because the 1%ers want it that way .how else could all these companies be holding billions of dollars in reserve, with many people laid off and be making profits. everybody i talk to are super busy and making money. a major software company increased the employee insurance premiums by 23% as a cost cutting measure saving the co. $36 million and then 6 months later posted a $ 4 billion profit ? that's it ! take from the middle class and give to the rich!
11:50 PM on 12/22/2011
I think you're giving them way too much credit Bull77...the major banks have proven over time that they simply aren't that smart. Holding back small business funding in order to derail the economy in order to make Obama look bad in an election year in order to get a de-regulator back in the executive branch who can subsequently over-ride a probable dem controlled senate after 2012 seems like a conspiracy theory. My theory: They are to still shaking from the events of OCT 2008 and won't start taking small business risks until they steady their collective nerves.
04:35 PM on 12/25/2011
kudo's
12:34 AM on 12/18/2011
why should banks lend at risk- large or small to any small business..they can make just as much money or more at NO RISK by borrowing from the Fed a 0% interest and buying treasuries at a 2-3% interest spread and using these treasuries as collateral (less interest which is kept as profit) and borrowing more from the Fed at 0% interest etc..TALK ABOUT A PONZI SCHEME! BUT THAT IS WHAT IS KEEPING OUR GOVERNMENT PAYING IT'S BILLS WITH OUR HUGE DEFICIT! and that is what is enabling banks to pay off their TARP LOANS..separate banks and investment houses.
photo
Artos
Down with Tyrants
11:15 AM on 12/16/2011
It might be a good idea to investigate the individuals at the top of these Banks to find out just who else they are connected to vis a vis business interests. Many of theses Banks are owned by or have people involved in their decisions making that have connections to Corporations. Lets just theorize for a moment that given the way the winds are blowing, Corporations have in mind selling their products via the internet and delivering them directly ala UPS or FEDEX. If this were so then they would no longer be dependent on moving their products via middlemen or Small Business. Most Small Businesses are intermediaries that merely market the products for Big Businesses, so lets say that Corporations now decide that they no longer need Small Business and so they, have influence over these banks and direct them to no longer make loans to Small Businesses. With the way so many of the same individuals are sitting on so many various boards in various Corporations and Financial Institutions, it would not surprise me at all to find that my theory holds water. I think that "The Great Minds" are already at work shaping our society for their benefit and that they intend for Small Businesses to disappear. The only reason they are giving any at all is because some are being prompted by the Government via the Small Business Administration and the Banks want to also keep up the illusion that they are doing the right thing.
08:38 AM on 12/16/2011
Wy loan to small businesses when they can more easily screw the taxpayers out of money?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
McKibbinUSA
I side with the supermajority...
12:47 PM on 12/15/2011
Let's face it, small business lending has always been a hassle for banks, just like mortgages -- for example, regional banks never made any money originating mortgages, but rather, they made money selling mortgages to the "too big to fail" banks -- the money is being made at the "too big to fail" level supported by the sales operations at regional banks -- the same kind of thing goes on with business lending -- regional banking is simply not interested in creating loans that cannot be resold immediately to the larger "too big to fail" banks -- without "too big to fail" banking, consumer and small business lending grinds to a halt...
11:52 PM on 12/22/2011
Ahhh.... a voice of reason. Refreshing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anabelle Lee
03:08 PM on 12/14/2011
Chinese small business start up that employ Chinese and sell to Chinese are all the banks are interested in.
09:46 PM on 12/13/2011
My bank (HSBC) is known for helping small businesses with loans. Different accounts at the bank will get you better interest rates.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Reikoku Jaken
My economic philosophy? Pragmatism
09:36 PM on 12/13/2011
My god, with the banks being as good as they are at colluding to navigate the U.S. economy through the FED one would figure that they would also understand that pumping money into small businesses is precisely the sort of force which generates returns for the banks themselves. Monetary economics IS NOT complicated people. You get paid far more than I do - you should be able to grasp this.
01:27 PM on 12/13/2011
There are companies receiving business loans every it is just that many of them don't know there are options for business financing available. If you go online you will find many lenders who are willing to give businesses a loan. Here is a list:

http://shieldfunding.com
http://unsecuredbusinessloansforwomen.com
http://merchantcashadvancecompanies.com
photo
des946
Consultant
11:58 AM on 12/13/2011
A BIG part of the "solution" is to break up the TOO BIG TO FAIL banks into smaller banking entities that would HAVE to make loans in order to survive financially. One of our biggest problems is that the banks no longer depend on bank loans for their profitability. "Necessity is the mother of invention and business practices."

The government is looking for some type of "smooth transition" to these problems and that simply does NOT exists. Unfortunately, we are not going to be able to effectively effect the necessary changes to restore the balance and stability of our economy without some major changes which will have some sparodic progressive problems. ""You can't make omlets without cracking some eggs" . . . and that is true for economic readjustments. Trying to maintain the status quo of the banks is simply not working; and will not work. No one has the political or economic courage to address these matters.