iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Wisconsin Voter ID Law Ensnares Teacher In Rural Part Of State


First Posted: 12/12/2011 5:16 pm Updated: 12/13/2011 7:26 am

WASHINGTON -- Rita Platt is a teacher in Wisconsin who moved to the small town of Osceola last year. She has gone through FBI background checks in the four states where she has been certified to teach, has her Social Security card, held a Wisconsin driver's license from 1984-1998 and currently has a driver's license from Iowa.

Despite all this, she is currently ineligible to vote in the 2012 elections in Wisconsin.

Platt is one of the growing number of people ensnared by the state's new voter ID law, which requires residents to show valid photo ID when they go to the polls to vote. While Platt is sure she'll be able to get her new license in time for the next elections, she's frustrated that in the end, she will be forced to pay more than $100, endure bureaucratic headaches and take time off from work in order to be able to carry out one of her constitutional rights.

Osceola is a small town in northwestern Wisconsin with a population of under 3,000 people. The two closest Department of Motor Vehicle (DMV) offices are in the towns of Amery and New Richmond, which are approximately 30 minutes away, and rarely open. The Amery DMV is open from 8:45 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on only the first Tuesday of every month. The New Richmond DMV is open during the same hours on the second Tuesday of every month.

The closest DMV open full-time during business hours is the one in Hudson, a city about an hour south of Osceola. Platt and her boyfriend, who also needed to get a new license, went there on their day off from work, only to find out that the DMV's computer system was down that day.

"So we drove an hour there. No matter what documentation we had had, we couldn't have gotten our driver's licenses, which is a huge problem, because that's what -- $15 in gas both ways? We're upper-middle class, so we're doing fine. We're both teachers ... But for some folks, that's an impossibility. So you have to have a car, you have to have enough gas to drive an hour there," she told The Huffington Post, outlining some of the difficulties involved in getting ID in order to vote.

Moreover, neither Platt nor her boyfriend, John Wolfe, had a certified birth certificate or a current passport, one of which is required to obtain a new license.

"My passport is long-expired," said Platt. "I have two small children. It costs money to re-up your passport, and I'm not going to be traveling anywhere until my kids are older ... And I've moved every two years my whole adult life. I'm 42. I have no idea where my certified birth certificate is. I'm not sure I ever even had one, since I've never needed one before."

"It's not that I can't get my voter ID. I will get mine," added Platt, who said she is very active politically and has never missed an election. "It's just that there's a huge poll tax that's going to be upwards of $100 by the time I'm done."

Platt has joined a lawsuit challenging the voter ID law, known as Act 23. It is the second lawsuit challenging the law, and the Milwaukee branch of the NAACP is the lead plaintiff.

Milwaukee attorney Richard Saks, who is representing the plaintiffs, said while Platt's case shows the burden of the law, there may be thousands of other people in the state who will be unable to vote because they don't plan weeks and weeks in advance to vote.

"We know about people like Rita because they're the most motivated people," he said. "They're the ones who have already made the effort to register to vote for the election. There are scores of people like Rita who may not do anything about this until just a week before the election, by which time, it'll probably be too late to vote. They may hear about Rita's situation, or they may read about the requirements under the law, and they may decide it's too burdensome, takes too much time and is too expensive, and they might not even bother to get an ID."

Kristina Boardman, director of the Bureau of Field Services for the Wisconsin Department of Transportation's DMV, told The Huffington Post she has spoken with Platt and she was able to look her up on the system. Since Platt had a Wisconsin driver's license in the past, she will be able to renew without showing proof of legal presence, although she will still have to make the extra trip to the DMV in order to get a new license.

"Generally, there is some confusion, and we're trying to make sure that well in advance of when this is required for the first election in February, people understand what they need to get a product," Boardman said about the voter ID law.

Beginning the week of Jan. 23, every county in the state will have at least 20 hours of DMV service. The DMV in Amery, near Platt's house, will be open two days a week for 10 hours each day.

Recently, the Wisconsin Rapids Tribune reported on an 84-year-old Wisconsin woman who has voted in every election since 1948, but may not be able to do so in 2012. Ruthelle Frank never received an official birth certificate, and in order to get one, she'll have to pay $20. However, as the paper noted, "The attending physician at Frank's birth misspelled her maiden name, which was Wedepohl. To get a birth certificate that has correct information, she will have to petition a court to amend the document -- a weeks-long process that could cost $200 or more."

More than 10 percent of U.S. citizens lack government-issued ID needed to vote in some states. Constituencies that traditionally vote Democratic are hit the hardest, with 18 percent of young voters and 25 percent of African-Americans without such documentation. Advocates of voter ID laws argue the measures are necessary to prevent voter fraud, even though the Department of Justice has found no credible evidence to suggest there is widespread cause for concern. Civil rights groups argue that these laws amount to a "poll tax" that prevents voters from going to the polls.

The GOP-controlled legislature pushed through Wisconsin's voter ID law before the summer's recall elections, in an attempt to get the highly controversial measure approved while they still had a solid majority in the state Senate. Gov. Scott Walker (R) signed the bill into law in May.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,104
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (41 total)
  1 of 2  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
realpolitic 08:55 PM on 12/12/2011
Republicans are the party that does not want people to vote. They want to suppress the black vote, the young vote, the senior vote, and the Hispanic vote enough so that only those supporting tax cuts for the wealthy, the Republicans, show up. It will not work. There are very, very few cases of voter fraid across the country. It is almost unheard of, yet Republican governors across the land has implemented  Read More...
04:18 PM on 12/14/2011
If I read the statute correctly, Ms Platt was legally required to get her Wisconsin License within 60 days of establishing residence in the State.
Isnt this a moot point?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bkump
compassion is the toughest thing of all
05:43 AM on 12/15/2011
It is not. I work with the homeless persons who often carry no ID and cannot afford to aquire one. Now, some people will dehumanize them, believing they are less than American or whatever, but the fact is there is no way for them to obtain one. They cannot get to an office or pay for one. Homeless persons deserve the right to vote.

Additionally, your simplistic view fails to understand that not everyone can afford to obtain ID.
11:24 AM on 12/15/2011
Perhaps you could take a quick break from your holier-than-thou lecture delivery to recognize the fact that I was addressing the very specific example in the article above?

Anyone with an ounce of brains recognizes that there are other cases out there with different degrees of merit, but that does change the fact that this woman is not homeless or destitute and that she was already legally required to comply with this directive by changing her license to reflect her new state of residence. The fact is she has been illegally using her out of state license for some time.

As for the indigent/homeless, I fully support offering whatever assistance is required to help them to obtain their no-cost state ID.
06:29 PM on 12/17/2011
IDs are free in wisconsin if needed for voting, so much for your simplistic view on anyones ability to afford one.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
dadw5boys
Disabled Vietnam Vet
12:44 PM on 12/16/2011
I own property in 4 states and I use the houses in those states at different time for varying amounts of time. I have clothes and a bed in each house and all the utilities are on even if I am not there. So which one should I be FORCED to use as an address ?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
rysagr
whip me beat me just don't bore me to death
08:01 PM on 12/21/2011
if you are a dem all 4
02:41 PM on 12/22/2011
How about the one where you vote?
07:14 PM on 12/13/2011
Typical strategy for a motivated minority, make sure that the vote is not put to the people and then pretend that if you had let them vote that they would, of course, voted for the very agenda that makes sure their interests are over looked, that their most dear issues are neglected, and that the very basis of democracy is sold to the few people who have the money to support the elected officials with what are called campaign funds but are truthfully better known, even to the Robert's court, as BRIBES.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
renatastar
04:42 PM on 12/13/2011
ID voter laws instituted poll taxes wherever they are enacted. They are unconstitutional and I don't understand why they re not being challenged.
luvdatbobcat
4 more years of no jobs, no change, and no hope.
05:51 PM on 12/13/2011
In 2005, Indiana passed a voter ID law. This law was challenged all the way to the USSC. I haven't read any of the lower court rulings, but I do know that it was upheld by the Indiana Supreme Court, the 7th District Court of Appeals, and the USSC (a 6-3 decision). Those courts found that it was NOT a poll tax, and allowed that law to be used since 2008.

The Wisconsin law is a mirror of the Indiana. Since the court has said the Indiana law was not a poll tax, I would think the same applies to the Wisconsin law.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ramirez
Taxpayer-American
03:37 PM on 12/13/2011
Ms. Platt has additional reasons to get a Wisconsin driver's license. Like many states, Wisconsin law requires new residents to get a Wisconsin DL within 60 days of moving to the state and according to the article she has been in WA since last year.

If she is pulled over she will likely be cited for driving on her Iowa license.

She needs to stop whining and start complying with the law.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Talossa
Liberal. Pro-Israel. Recovering atheist.
04:48 PM on 12/13/2011
Any idea what a poll tax is, and why they're unconstitutional?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ramirez
Taxpayer-American
05:46 PM on 12/13/2011
Yes.
luvdatbobcat
4 more years of no jobs, no change, and no hope.
05:53 PM on 12/13/2011
You do know that this same law has been upheld? You do know that the court said this was not a poll tax?
10:51 PM on 12/13/2011
I am not now, nor have I ever "whined". Whether or not I drive is none of your business. Not everyone drives. The law does NOT require new residents to get a WI DL. It requires drivers to do so. In any event, even if I were to be "cited for driving on [an] Iowa license. What in the world does that have to do with my right to vote? You are not thinking this through.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ramirez
Taxpayer-American
01:50 AM on 12/14/2011
Stop being a victim. Comply with the law. You think you're the only one in the country who had to go to a DMV?

You are living in a new state. Get your new license and then drive, vote, and do all the things that residents do.
luvdatbobcat
4 more years of no jobs, no change, and no hope.
08:26 AM on 12/14/2011
Whether you want to drive or not is very important in this case. If you want to drive, then your point is moot because you have to have to get a WI DL. Then my next question would be, if you want to drive, do you or anyone in your same situation, have standing to even challenge this law? I my bet is that you would not.

Further, if you take a look at Crawford v. Marion County Election Board, you will see that the USSC has found (6-3 decision) that this is not a poll tax. The Wisconsin law is a mirror to the Indiana law, thus I would argue that this is already "settled law" and you would have no case.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
neolow
Radicalized Dem
03:03 PM on 12/13/2011
Correction
neolow
Planned DMV Closures Frustrate Local Leaders
---------------------------------------------------------------
DMV: No center will be shut down, four new to open (http://www.defendwisconsin.org/2011/08/04/dmv-no-center-will-be-shut-down-four-new-to-open/) "DMV Operations Manager Patrick Fernan said pressure from the Legislature and citizens to keep the DMV accessible led to the decision not to close any branches. “It became clear that there was a strong desire to maintain service in all current locations,” Fernan said." This was Aug 4, 2011. I hope this is the most up-to-date information.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
neolow
Radicalized Dem
02:58 PM on 12/13/2011
Planned DMV Closures Frustrate Local Leaders (http://www.channel3000.com/news/28663005/detail.html) Walker had this planned from the very beginning. Voter suppression. Make state documentation central to voting then cut down on the means of getting that documentation.
luvdatbobcat
4 more years of no jobs, no change, and no hope.
03:09 PM on 12/13/2011
There are no closures.

"Department of Transportation Secretary Mark Gottlieb said the expansion leaves all current offices open, increases the total number of offices across the state from 88 to 92 and drastically expands the hours of operation for some 40 counties."

http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/local/govt-and-politics/article_d56f24d2-bee1-11e0-b4a8-001cc4c03286.html
photo
dollbaby
Spice...."The Toughest Fighter."
02:51 PM on 12/13/2011
The nearesst CMV is open twice a month, (both a half hour away). And how long do we think the computers will be now? probably until the week before election day. I will make you a bet that the bureau of vital statisitc is just as far away and uses the same malfunctioning computer system. You can get a birth certificate on line for a fee but that would involve having a computer and in some cases a drivers license.
Clevelandinwi
Progressive is good; regressive, not so much.
02:47 PM on 12/13/2011
It should be called the 'stop voters' law. It's a typical Regressive law.
03:36 PM on 12/22/2011
It's regressive because it ensures only those that are allowed to to vote, get to vote? Sounds Progressive to me. In the true sense of the word, not the deluted liberal sense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgilley
Question Authority!
02:36 PM on 12/13/2011
Voter supression is the Republican plan to win in 2012. That is why they are so arrogantly attacking working middle class people and protecting the 1% of corporate elites who own and manage them.

Fundamental Injustice: Voter Suppression Threatens Democracy
http://www.aclu.org/blog/voting-rights/fundamental-injustice-voter-suppression-threatens-democracy

Are the Koch brothers denying your vote?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dwOTm3ShQh0&feature=relmfu

The GOP War on VotingIn a campaign supported by the Koch brothers, Republicans are working to prevent millions of Democrats from voting next year
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-gop-war-on-voting-20110830

The GOP's 2012 Campaign Plan: Disqualify Eligible Voters
A tide of new stricter state voter ID laws proposed by Republicans targets presumed Democratic voters.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x599769

" In 1980 Ronald Reagan told biographer Laurence Barrett that the 1965 Voting Rights Act was "humiliating to the South." The carefully handpicked, emotionally charged words from then GOP Republican presidential candidate aimed to tap into the fury of white Southerners over civil rights, and, of course, garner their votes. Two years later, then Assistant Attorney General John Roberts (now Supreme Court justice) sent a tidal wave of memos imploring President Reagan to reject a 25-year extension of the act. A hesitant Reagan approved the extension anyway."
http://www.alternet.org/story/38202/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
getsit
good morning, I'm here
02:28 PM on 12/13/2011
If the Republicans want a law so badly you know it's wrong for the country. It isn't really voter fraud they're worried about, it's CITIZENS VOTING Democrat that they are worried about.

This is why federal law should set the rules for voting for all the states. Ideally, the amendment to the constitutions regarding voting should be amended so that states can't take away their citizens right to vote, or to redistrict to favor a certain party.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Miller Time
02:50 PM on 12/13/2011
You are obviously admitting that those who commit voter fraud are Democrats.
mothergrace
If they knock you down, bite 'em on the ankle.
02:54 PM on 12/13/2011
No. But Republicans know that there are segments of Democrats who can be targeted with these unfair laws that require money and resources they are less likely to have, especially now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
getsit
good morning, I'm here
04:11 PM on 12/13/2011
I can't see where I said this. Republicans are the voter fraud elite squad.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Miller Time
09:04 AM on 12/14/2011
On the one hand, we have the Democrats who claim, without a shred of evidence, that they (the Democrats) are more educated, smarter, brighter, book loving, etc., etc.

On the other hand they also claim that the Tea Partiers and their ilk, are ignorant, uneducated, gun-toting, bible-carrrying rubes who can't even read a book.

And yet, the Dems are now claiming they are being discriminated against by those rich Republicans and that the poor Democrats haven't the wherewithal to get themselves a photo ID.

So which is it you Progressives?

And if you don't believe this, just read some of the posts on this subject!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
dadw5boys
Disabled Vietnam Vet
07:00 PM on 12/22/2011
Blame that on College Student who do those studies they are the one who post the education level of the voters it is not the Dems fault that most Republicans choose to live in trailors, stay drunk on welfare and fall for the primise that Republicans would not take their guns.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
trussia1
kids out of the pool, it's the adult swim
02:02 PM on 12/13/2011
Hey, check this one out Walker ! When it comes to the "fear of voter fraud"nonsense, we in Indiana have a real dussy. Our Secretary of State, Charlie White, was indicated by the grand jury for 7 counts of voter fraud and perjury based on some lies he told the election board before running for office.Now the Secretary of State in Indiana oversees elections. That's right Walker, the top guy in the election monitoring is himself wrapped up in voter fraud.His case is still working it's way thru the courts, but one thing's for sure, Walker's new plan on voting fraud prevention would have been useless in preventing this one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ramirez
Taxpayer-American
03:40 PM on 12/13/2011
Not all voter fraud can be prevented by photo ID's, but a large segment of it can be.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
trussia1
kids out of the pool, it's the adult swim
04:45 PM on 12/13/2011
Well, Ramirez, I've been voting since 1972 without a photo id with zero problems, It appears to me that this " voter fraud" business cropped up at a time when the GOP got worried that they might lose an election and that makes me smell a rat, a GOP rat to be precise. I live in Indiana where until this year no photo id was needed. Here in this state a voter must sign in before voting and that signature is compared to the voter registration card you filed so it's hard for me to understand why that system no longer works unless the real goal is voter suppression.
10:53 PM on 12/13/2011
No. It can't. It can't because the kind of voter fraud that you're talking about is miniscule. Read more. Think more. THEN post.
Norm
Read think read analyze read comment
02:02 PM on 12/13/2011
How are people being employed now without birth certificates? Ms. Platt doesn't have one, but I have had to produce one for every job I have applied for the past twenty-five years or so. I remember having to get the first one; it was not easy.
austintacious
When you look in the mirror, you will only see a r
02:06 PM on 12/13/2011
I have never had to produce a birth certificate for a job. ADL and SS card, yes, but not a BC.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgilley
Question Authority!
02:39 PM on 12/13/2011
That is the Republican strategy. require a govt id then make sure the targeted people eg democrats don't have the "right" govt id. It's a severe attack on our most cherrished right the right to vote!

The GOP's war on voting
The GOP's 2012 Campaign Plan: Disqualify Eligible Voters
A tide of new stricter state voter ID laws proposed by Republicans targets presumed Democratic voters.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x599769

The GOP War on VotingIn a campaign supported by the Koch brothers, Republicans are working to prevent millions of Democrats from voting next year
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-gop-war-on-voting-20110830

"Upon assuming state power, ... pursued an agenda not unlike Mussolini'­s. They crushed organized labor and eradicated all elections, opposition parties, and independen­t publicatio­ns. " (Paerrenti p347)

http://www­.thirdworl­dtraveler.­com/Fascis­m/Fascism_­MParenti_C­N.html

Our Democracy is as risk!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
renatastar
04:44 PM on 12/13/2011
Agree with you on that. Never, ever I had an employer asking for my BC. I wonder where Norm lives. I've lived in NY, CA, WA, PA, SC AND PA. Never. ever.
02:09 PM on 12/13/2011
She had an out of state ID, which was fine for the purpose of employment, since it proved it's her. The difficulty here has been getting a WI one given access to facilities.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
getsit
good morning, I'm here
02:34 PM on 12/13/2011
It's shocking to me that the DMVs are open so little. So much for "bloated" government. Sound like to me that they don't have ENOUGH government services that the taxpayers are paying for.

If she has a driver's license from another state, and a social security card, and can prove residency THAT'S ALL SHE SHOULD NEED PERIOD.
02:00 PM on 12/13/2011
"My passport is long-expired," said Platt. "I have two small children. It costs money to re-up your passport, and I'm not going to be traveling anywhere until my kids are older ... And I've moved every two years my whole adult life. I'm 42. I have no idea where my certified birth certificate is. I'm not sure I ever even had one, since I've never needed one before."…And, and, and the dog ate my homework.
Norm
Read think read analyze read comment
02:05 PM on 12/13/2011
I really don't get it. You can get a passport without a birth certificate?
photo
VA Jill
I'm not perfect and neither are you
02:23 PM on 12/13/2011
READ the article again! Her passport is "long-expired." She might have known where her birth cert was when she got the passport, but when you move every two years things get misplaced, especially when you don't need them.

And you've never answered the question, what job do you do where you have to produce your birth certificate? I have had many jobs and never once had to show mine, only Social Security card.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeremy Ailes
renaissance geek
02:25 PM on 12/13/2011
Correct, and it's only $120 to renew for 10 years! My wife and I just renewed ours and I've used mine for ID quite a few times when 2 forms is required.
10:57 PM on 12/13/2011
Not making excuses. Just sharing what is the truth of my life. I have ALREADY obtained a birth cert. You are completely missing the point.
: )
08:09 AM on 12/14/2011
“Not making excuses”…Please. You make it sound like getting an ID is akin to the D-day landings. You may have to drive a whole hour to get a driver’s license? The horror! Guess sometimes its hard being a grown up. Requiring a valid ID will help curtail fraudulent voting, you know this. But the truth is you don’t care because leftists always bank on the majority of fraudulent voters voting with them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sylvia wadlington
Kindle Writer
01:56 PM on 12/13/2011
This year when I vote it will be more important than ever before because I will be thinking of the thousands of my fellow Americans who will be unable to vote and I will vote against everyone and everything that has caused it.
Keep America free and remember you are now not just voting for yourself, but for thousands of people who are being their legal right to vote with you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sylvia wadlington
Kindle Writer
01:44 PM on 12/13/2011
Evil is like a slow tide. It is rearing its ugly head again and all those who believe that all Americans should be able to vote are the freedom warriors who are once again called to arms to destroy the monstrosity of Jim Crow voting laws. This is not the first battle and it won't be the last. Whenever our Freedom is threatened we must fight to keep it safe. Again and again we fight this battle and make laws that darkside politicians try again and again to get around. Maybe after the elections if democrats hold the house, the senate and the presidency we the people should pass a law that will be so restrictive against voter supression that we will be done with this battle once and for all.
Prioities for 2012:
Pass the President's Jobs Bill.
Pass the most restrictive bill possible against voter suppression.
Pass as many regulations as we can concieve against banking, wall street, big insurance, big pharma and big oil.
The people of America are going to have to tell the government what laws we need because they obviously can't figure it out on their own.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mary Kreutz
08:28 AM on 12/14/2011
They could if their ethics hadn't been bought by Wall Street.