More

California Budget Cuts: Jerry Brown To Impose Another $1 Billion In Cuts

Jerry Brown Budget Cuts

JUDY LIN   12/13/11 07:44 PM ET   AP

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Gov. Jerry Brown on Tuesday ordered $1 billion in midyear cuts to California's budget that will result in pain for students who rely on school buses to get to class, mothers who depend on child care subsidies to keep working and support programs for the developmentally disabled.

Brown, a Democrat, said that the state's revenues will fall about $2.2 billion below the $88.4 billion he and state lawmakers had hoped for when they passed the budget last summer.

The announcement was not surprising and could have been worse. The state's legislative analyst had predicted revenues would fall $3.7 billion below forecast.

Still, the automatic midyear reductions sparked outcry from advocates and invited lawsuits from school districts.

The cuts include up to $100 million each to the University of California, California State University, developmental services and in-home support for seniors and the disabled. Community college fees would increase $10 per unit from $36 to $46, and reductions would be made for child care assistance, library grants and prisons, among other programs.

School advocates warned that an estimated 1 million students – many of them with special needs or from low-income and rural areas – will be affected by the loss of home-to-school transportation funding. In addition, school districts will lose another $79.6 million under the trigger cuts.

"The cut to transportation is absolutely devastating," said Steve Henderson, a lobbyist for the California School Employees Association, which represents school bus drivers among other school workers. "What that means is a lot of low income and rural kids will not have the ability to get to school."

Shortly after Brown announced the cuts, which start taking effect Jan. 1, Los Angeles Unified school board voted to sue the state over its $248 million cut to home-to-school transportation funding.

Superintendent John Deasy said at Tuesday's school board meeting the lawsuit will be filed Wednesday. He called the loss of busing funds "catastrophic" and warned it would leave 35,000 students all over the district and 13,000 special needs students without busing to school.

Advocates estimated that cuts to schools amounts to $55 per student in California and could result in additional layoffs.

Brown and Democrats in the Legislature had hoped for a $4 billion increase in tax revenue through the current fiscal year, which ends June 30. The budget they passed last summer without Republican support was based on a combination of spending cuts, fee hikes and overly optimistic revenue projections.

The governor said that following through on the cuts is a demonstration of California's fiscal discipline.

"This is not the way we'd like to run California. But we have to live within our means," he said in a news conference at the state Capitol.

The midyear reduction authorizes districts to cut the school year by up to seven days, but they likely won't have to cut more than half a day because the funding cuts weren't as severe as predicted, finance director Ana Matosantos said.

"He proved that there is an adult in the room when it comes to courage to pulling the trigger," said Kevin Gordon, president of School Innovations and Advocacy, a Sacramento education lobbying firm. "But he found a way to spare schools from the ultimate damage that may have occurred if all the cuts had been implemented."

Patty Siegel, executive director of the California Child Care Resource & Referral Network, said thousands of working parents will be hit by a new round of child care cuts to save the state $23 million. The state announced it would reduce 7,500 slots for child care assistance on top of 32,000 slots cut last summer.

"When you look at that against the 187,000 fully eligible children on the waiting list for child care, you have a perfect storm for unemployment, for return to welfare, and for a lack of opportunity for children to get the best start they need," Siegel said.

California currently faces a $3 billion shortfall and is expected to face a $10 billion deficit for 2012-13, resulting in a $13 billion gap over the next 18 months.

Earlier this year, GOP lawmakers opposed Brown's proposal to place a question on taxes before voters without reforms to the public pension system, regulations and a spending cap. Having failed to broker a compromise with Republicans, the governor said he felt it necessary to introduce his own tax initiative, which he hopes to bring before voters next November.

Brown warned of further cuts when he releases his proposed 2012-13 budget in January unless voters support higher taxes.

Brown said he wants to temporarily increase taxes on the rich, starting with individuals making more than $250,000, and raise the statewide sales tax by half a cent, to 7.75 percent. The proposal would raise about $7 billion a year for five years.

"Going forward, in another three weeks, we will have a number of more cuts, far more than $1 billion," Brown said. "And they'll be the same kind of state services, very important to help the poor, elderly, our university students."

He added, "We don't have the money so we've got to cut back."

Republicans accused the governor of using the mid-year cuts to his advantage as he pushes his tax proposal. They said they are willing to work with the governor on a budget that protects education.

"Republicans were ready to roll up our sleeves and hammer out a budget solution then, and we are still ready now," said Sen. Bob Huff, R-Diamond Bar, vice chair of the Senate budget committee.

___

Associated Press writer Christina Hoag contributed to this report from Los Angeles.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SAN FRANCISCO

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Gov. Jerry Brown on Tuesday ordered $1 billion in midyear cuts to California's budget that will result in pain for students who rely on school buses to get to class, mothers...
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Gov. Jerry Brown on Tuesday ordered $1 billion in midyear cuts to California's budget that will result in pain for students who rely on school buses to get to class, mothers...
Filed by Anna Almendrala  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 60
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:06 AM on 12/15/2011
As Michael Moore said:

>>>"Contrary to what those in power would like you to believe so that you'll give up your pension, cut your wages, and settle for the life your great-grandparents had, America is not broke. Not by a long shot. The country is awash in wealth and cash. It's just that it's not in your hands. It has been transferred, in the greatest heist in history, from the workers and consumers to the banks and the portfolios of the uber-rich. --- Today just 400 Americans have more wealth than half of all Americans combined. --- Let me say that again. 400 obscenely rich people, most of whom benefited in some way from the multi-trillion dollar taxpayer "bailout" of 2008, now have more loot, stock and property than the assets of 155 million Americans combined. If you can't bring yourself to call that a financial coup d'état, then you are simply not being honest about what you know in your heart to be true."
07:09 PM on 12/15/2011
If you look at how much those 400 Americans have contributed to society vs those 155 million Americans, it makes sense that the two groups would have equal amounts of money.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:40 PM on 12/15/2011
What do you imagine they have contributed to society? How in the world can you denigrate the lives of 155 million good Americans. If they do nothing else but raise 200 million good children, they have accomplished more good than those 400 could ever dream of. Of course, those millions of good Americans have done far, far more than that.

That is an amazing trashing of the worth of Americans.
09:11 PM on 12/14/2011
California, welcome to Laos! You just became a fourth world non-emerging economy..
10:32 AM on 12/14/2011
Wait a minute Jerry, Another senior moment? Didn't you recently sign ab 131 enabling illegal aliens financial aid paid for by taxpayers, yet now these same taxpayers are going to have education cuts for their LEGAL sons and daughters??? Jerry, its seems like those things you may have done in the 70's are having an effect on your judgement
08:38 PM on 12/14/2011
Moonbeam lives!!!
photo
RobietheCat
Altruism with someone else's money isn't
05:49 PM on 12/15/2011
If the students and their parents can't figure this out, Jerry the Weasel will continue to try to rip them off.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mudshark12
Now who are you jiving with that cosmik debris?
02:16 AM on 12/14/2011
If Governor Jerry Brown wants to acquire revenue to cover the State's budget shortfall all he has to do is legalize, and tax: Marijuana. BAM! overnight the money will start flowing in and soon California will have a surplus. AND it will cripple the Mexican drug cartels also.
MrStat1
I believe in the rule of law
01:02 PM on 12/14/2011
A dude, he CAN'T do it by himself. It would have to have a bill passed by the state legislature. They won't do it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mudshark12
Now who are you jiving with that cosmik debris?
11:18 PM on 12/14/2011
R you sure? We're hurting enough for them them
photo
RobietheCat
Altruism with someone else's money isn't
05:52 PM on 12/15/2011
Why isn't Gov Moonbeam standing up for California's right to legalize med MJ?

He's curiously missing in action on this one.

Is he getting funded by the illegals and the Cartels?

Under his watch as California Atty General, the Cartels became widespread in State and National parks in California, but he couldn't seem to locate them. Wonder why?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mudshark12
Now who are you jiving with that cosmik debris?
08:27 PM on 12/15/2011
Maybe payola under the table?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JScott
John Galt's last name is McGuffin-Smithee
01:58 AM on 12/14/2011
Why don't all the whiners on here always blame unions, illegals, liberals, high taxes and burdensom regulation please just MOVE TO TEXAS, tough people stay in Calif. because it's great but all the RWNM whiners PLEASE LEAVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MrStat1
I believe in the rule of law
01:02 PM on 12/14/2011
Many are, and taking lots of jobs with them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christopher Hull
Democratic Socialist
11:57 PM on 12/13/2011
This is of course the first shot to get people to vote out Prop 13. Which, had some nasty things in it, BUT it is not exactly why we are broke.
Most homes get sold to new occupiers and the property tax rate gets reset. No problem.
Business property and rental homes get bought and sold as businesses so the business being the "owner" doesn't have the value reset. This all goes to the "personhood" of corporations.
Prop 13 also gridlocked Sacramento and gave millions to business property owners.
I know of one company with a property portfolio worth about fifteen million dollars that pays taxes based on a value of less than a million. Because they have had the property for so long.
Anyway. The cuts are coming. Gov Brown nor the Dems nor the Reps will level in any way about how to even attempt to fix the CA economy so just enjoy/suffer through!
photo
mlaiuppa
Pres. Sarcasm Society. Like we need your approval.
11:31 PM on 12/13/2011
What? No quote from the Repub1%can't who claimed that this just proves that California doesn't need to raise taxes?

I'm lucky. Way back when I went to a state university, I only had to pay $10.00 a unit. If I were going to school now, I wouldn't have a college education because neither I nor my parents could afford it.
photo
RobietheCat
Altruism with someone else's money isn't
05:58 PM on 12/15/2011
But Brown has the money to give to illegal aliens for college.

Nice.
photo
Amznlif
Bark less, wag more
09:55 PM on 12/13/2011
What about the pensions, Jerry?
photo
mlaiuppa
Pres. Sarcasm Society. Like we need your approval.
11:33 PM on 12/13/2011
What about them?

Jerry doesn't have the authority to take pensions away from state employees any more than Obama can take away Social Security. They're the same thing, only one is state and one is Federal. State employees pay into their pensions same as everyone else pays into Social Security.
photo
RobietheCat
Altruism with someone else's money isn't
05:59 PM on 12/15/2011
Jerry is responsible for this debacle. He proposed and signed the bills authorizing public employee unions.

The only way out maybe bankruptcy for CA.

Thanks, Jerry. You're an idiot.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bldr1bob
09:14 PM on 12/13/2011
Mr. Brown is doing the best possible can with the cards dealt to him. He did the same in Oakland. It's time the people of CA realize the years of "everythng's free" are over. There just aren't the dollars there to keep up with the status Quo.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JScott
John Galt's last name is McGuffin-Smithee
01:55 AM on 12/14/2011
Yup government services are people intensive, you have to pay people to do them and apparently people want them but are loathe to pay for them----lower taxes at all costs leads to service cuts----------cause and effect IT'S NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
photo
RobietheCat
Altruism with someone else's money isn't
06:00 PM on 12/15/2011
Then start cutting govt. State is still growing and adding employees.

Do you keep charging your credit card when you're broke?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael D Ballantine
Former Presidential Candidate - Amer Elect 2012
08:54 PM on 12/13/2011
The solution to Gov Brown's problems is in the hands of President Obama. If America had Medicare for All paid for with a National Sales Tax as I propose, the state of California would not need to contribute to Medicaid saving the state 10s of billions of dollars eliminating the deficit they face and creating a surplus. Extending Medicare for All would eliminate the payments to state employee health plans saving the tax payers 10s of billions. Instead of proposing a tax increase, tax payers would get a tax decrease, schools could be fully funded, and people could get back to work. Paying health care through employment makes no sense when only 65% of the adult population is employed. The solution to California's problems are in Washington, when will Washington acknowledge its responsibility?
07:47 PM on 12/13/2011
Wow..never in a million years would I have thought that Arnold was better than Jerry.

This man is taking this out on the poor people in this state. His cuts to Medi-Cal were horrible and it hasn't even taken effect and already we are seeing the fall out. Doc who take medi-Cal are paid the LOWEST in all 50 states BEFORE the cuts. I couldn't get an internist to see a patient the other day. I had to involve the Medical Staff person and it was next to impossible. Patients are going to die lots of them. The doctors kind enough to take the patients are going to be more at risk for liabilty because if they take the patient and something happens and they need another specialist they may not be able to find one to consult on the patient.


If this is Obamacare...we are doomed

And taxing the rich doesn't work because they will just relocate. CA Rich already pay some of the highest taxes in the country. I have had colleagues just up and move because of the hate enviorment here.
08:37 PM on 12/13/2011
The doctors kind enough to take the patients are going to be more at risk for liabilty because if they take the patient and something happens and they need another specialist they may not be able to find one to consult on the patient.
-------------------------------------------
That sounds terrible. Informative post.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Polar Shift
Stop the censorship!!
09:05 PM on 12/13/2011
Babymed, I haven't had that experience at ALL. I have a great clinic full of GPs, which are usually hard to find, a wonderful specialist who found a 'mass', and had a surgeon scheduled within two DAYS, ALL paid for by Medicare and Medical, and even the surgeon called me three weeks later to ask how I was doing. And I have a wonderful ortho doc, who MOVED HERE because he fell in love with the place, and brought a wife and tree kids with him, bought a home, and loves the schools, etc. Moved from the Bay Area, in fact, and where he still has an office he occupies two days a week, and has local surgery privileges. I even have a holistic doc! That takes my Medicare and Medical. And NONE of them seem concerned about liability. In fact, liability hasn't been much of an issue at ALL. First, specialists can AFFORD it, and most GPs have very little risk, since they seldom perform procedures that put them at risk. Funny, but I haven't noticed many of the 'big box' stores leaving, or the corporate chains of fast food, gas, etc. going anywhere...in fact, there have been quite a few apps. by hotel chains, fast food, and big retailers to our county board of supes, (along with a bunch of us who oppose these monstrosities in our communities)
09:26 PM on 12/13/2011
Looks like they are leaving medicare alone at the federal level. BUT if you take medicare for elderly and disabled Mark my words within a year you will be singing a different tune. They forced all the Medi-Cal (medicaid) into health plans and they in turn "dumped" them into IPA's breaking every rule and law. This has happened in the last three years in Medi-CAL not medicare. You guys are starting now with a projection of two year completion. You do know that NO ONE monitors the IPA ?

If you are rural than you are better off BUT not here...sorry

You sound like a patient and I hope that your retirement plan has a great sub program. I'm grateful my parents moved when they retired.

NO one wants to see these patients.
07:45 PM on 12/13/2011
I've been disappointed by the dwindling numbers here at HuffPo as relity rears its ugly head.Still, I would urge HP readers to hurl invective against "nut Meg", make fun of Sarah Palin's child with Tri somy 21,mention what a failure Carly Fiorina is , and say anything you can (bad0 about Republican presidential candidates.Now,"Why?", you may ask Is it going to make one more Liberal Arts major employable? Is it going to keep one more Women's Studies program open? Is it even going to keep tje Dodgers in LA ?
Nope. But ,it's all you guys have.
Corwin.Cruel. To be Kind. (But sometimes it's hard to tell them apart.)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shooter486
I am the 53%
07:39 PM on 12/13/2011
Brown gives state money away to unions, illegals, and the lame high speed rail program, then cuts public services and programs for the poor.

How did we get this guy back?
07:41 PM on 12/13/2011
Dear Shooter,

The government will always cut what you want to force you to raise taxes, they will never cut what you do not want.
07:47 PM on 12/13/2011
If they cut school administrators, pensions, public commissions (CARB especially), and benefits to the prison guard unions, everyone would applaud and the argument to rise taxes would be null and void. That is why Brown will always hang the Sword of Damocles over our head and threaten the destruction of the state unless tax raises are enacted.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeffrey Williams
Don't worry ! Nothing is going to be OK !!!
06:11 PM on 12/13/2011
Moonbeam ~ Get a clue we just recently got rid of the last temporary tax increase !

Most here in this state dont want more TAXES we would like to se some responcible spending and if that means cuts than do so please. What in the world are you thinking Jerry ?
MrStat1
I believe in the rule of law
07:53 PM on 12/13/2011
Sadly, the poll in today's Sac Bee says they do support the rise in taxes, by over 60%.
01:23 AM on 12/14/2011
Happily the poll in today's Sac Bee do support the rise in taxes by over 60%. People making over a quarter million dollars a year can afford it. Save your tears for those who can't.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zombywulf
Pirate Captain Church of Saint Jerry
06:00 PM on 12/13/2011
If cuts need to made to schools, cut the most useless programs, SPORTS. Educating all the students is more important than running farm teams for Professional sports teams.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shooter486
I am the 53%
07:37 PM on 12/13/2011
"If cuts need to made to schools, cut the most useless programs, SPORTS."

Yes, fat and smart kids are out future!.

Actually, most colleges make a profit on their sports programs.
photo
mlaiuppa
Pres. Sarcasm Society. Like we need your approval.
11:37 PM on 12/13/2011
Then the colleges should subsidize K-12 sports.
01:26 AM on 12/14/2011
Wish we could still have it both ways. I'll take the fat smart kid who may find a cure for cancer, or aids. You take the guy who can throw a ball and consume his weight in steroids.
MrStat1
I believe in the rule of law
07:54 PM on 12/13/2011
Some sports, like football, generate enough money to pay for themselves through ticket sales.