iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Syracuse Child Abuse Cases Spur Calls To Reform New York Statutes Of Limitations


First Posted: 12/13/11 02:40 PM ET Updated: 12/13/11 04:32 PM ET

NEW YORK -- On Dec. 7, William Fitzpatrick, district attorney for Onondaga County in upstate New York, said he found credible the allegations of two former Syracuse University basketball team ball boys that Bernie Fine, the team's long-standing assistant coach, molested them in the 1980s.

"These two victims are believable," Fitzpatrick said at a press conference.

But state prosecutors won't be bringing any criminal charges against Fine for the alleged abuse, which the coach adamantly denies. The statute of limitations in both cases expired nearly two decades ago -- just two years after his accusers, now in their late 30s, passed their 18th birthdays.

Fine can't be sued either: under state law, the two men needed to file a civil suit against him before they turned 23.

"There is no remedy," said Jeff Dion, director of the National Crime Victim Bar Association. "Because of New York law, a child molester is going to get off scot-free."

Fine would not have fared nearly as well elsewhere in the country. In a growing number of states, legal reforms now allow victims of childhood sexual abuse to seek civil damages and criminal charges against their alleged abusers many years after reaching adulthood. The reforms are an acknowledgement of substantial research demonstrating that abuse victims often require an extensive period of time before they are ready to confront their abusers.

"People are so messed up that they don't get the courage and the gumption to do anything until they're in their 40s -- if then," said Thomas Neuberger, a Delaware attorney who has represented hundreds of victims of childhood abuse. "It takes a person decades before they get the courage to speak out."

The allegations against Fine, arriving on the heels of the Jerry Sandusky scandal at Penn State, have triggered a new push by victims' rights advocates and legislators to reform New York's statute of limitations for child sex abuse, which are some of the most restrictive in the country.

In the last week, two lawmakers announced plans to introduce legislation extending the time period when victims of childhood abuse can seek criminal charges and civil restitution against their abusers. A previous bill to reform New York's child abuse laws passed the Assembly three times, but was repeatedly stymied in the state Senate after heavy lobbying by Catholic bishops, who vigorously opposed a key provision to temporarily lift the civil statute of limitations for decades-old abuse.

Yet the intense publicity now surrounding the Syracuse and Penn State scandals may finally push the vote for a reform bill over the top in New York, according to Marci Hamilton, a law professor at Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law in New York and a long-time advocate for child sexual abuse victims.

"I do think in the next year or two or three, it's going to be impossible for legislators to maintain statutes of limitations that favor predators," Hamilton said. "The public outrage is building."

The proposed reforms would bring New York closer in line with many other states, which afford child abuse victims special rights not given to other crime victims or civil plaintiffs.

Delaware has no criminal statute of limitations at all for any sex crime against a child. In Pennsylvania, victims have until their 50th birthday to seek criminal prosecution against an abuser. Six other states, including Connecticut, Louisiana and Missouri, allow criminal prosecutions of child sex abuse for at least 20 years after victims turn 18.

On the civil side, a majority of states now allow victims of child sex abuse to file claims against their abusers well into adulthood. Some states, like Delaware and Florida, have even eliminated the civil statute of limitations for child sexual abuse. Over two dozen other states have special laws that begin the civil statute of limitations only when a victim links an injury or condition to their abuse as a child, even if the recognition of the connection occurs decades later.

Several states have also passed special legislation temporarily lifting civil statutes of limitations for victims of decades-old abuse. In California, a 2003 law creating a two-year window for such claims resulted in hundreds of lawsuits against priests, teachers and other alleged abusers dating back to the 1950s and '60s.

New York has no statute of limitations for the most heinous sexual crimes against children, such as rape or aggravated sexual assault. For other forms of felony sexual abuse, victims have no more than five years after their 18th birthday to seek criminal charges. For misdemeanor abuse, the criminal statute of limitations is just two years after victim turns 18. For civil claims, child victims have just five years from the time they reach their 18th birthday to file a suit against an abuser.

Such laws are among the most restrictive in the country.

The bill proposed by New York State Assemblywoman Margaret Markey (D), which previously passed the Assembly three times only to be rejected by the Senate, provides child victims an additional five years to file civil claims.

Attorneys who represent child abuse victims said such a change still did not go nearly far enough. But they do applaud a provision in the bill to temporarily lift the civil statute of limitations for victims to file claims for abuse that happened decades ago.

A bill with a similar provision for past abuse has also been rejected several times in Pennsylvania, where victims lose their ability to file civil claims against abusers at age 30.

Such a window would allow victims of priests, teachers, coaches and other authority figures to pursue claims against not just their abusers, but the institutions that may have helped cover up the abuse or did nothing to stop it.

The new law would only allow alleged victims their day in court, advocates note. They will still need to prove their claims -- no easy task when the alleged abuse occurred decades ago.

The airing of allegations of long-ago abuse can even have a impact in the here-and-now, as many pedophiles continue to offend well into old age.

"It can help identify victims that are within the criminal statutes of limitations," said Dion, of the National Crime Victim Bar Association. "Pedophiles don't retire."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CRIME

NEW YORK -- On Dec. 7, William Fitzpatrick, district attorney for Onondaga County in upstate New York, said he found credible the allegations of two former Syracuse University basketball team ball boy...
NEW YORK -- On Dec. 7, William Fitzpatrick, district attorney for Onondaga County in upstate New York, said he found credible the allegations of two former Syracuse University basketball team ball boy...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 110
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Parade Keegan
I Can Hear You
11:17 AM on 12/14/2011
I don't agree with "statute of limitation" laws for any crime. If a criminal offense can be proven it shouldn't matter when it happened.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wendy Stewart
10:52 AM on 12/14/2011
How do they know a child molester got off scot free. Once again this guy is tried in the court of public opinion. Since the statute of limitations has passed this man needs to be left alone.
02:45 PM on 12/14/2011
I'm shocked you would think nonetheless suggest, "the statute of limitation­s has passed this man needs to be left alone". 3 victims have come forward and another may come forward and yet another is tormented about coming forward.

And you suggest we leave Fine "alone"???

Are you aware of the recidivism rate of pedophiles???
06:43 PM on 12/14/2011
ALLEGED victims.

Are you aware of the false conviction rates due to juror bias? I pray you are never called for jury duty.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:07 AM on 12/14/2011
statute of limitations exist for good reasons. there should be no exceptions for sex crimes. everyone is entitled to speedy access to justice. it is not as if the defendant stopped anyone from coming forward. we have become a vindictive nanny state. very pathetic.
photo
LivelyLexie
Don't panic.
08:03 AM on 12/14/2011
"It takes a person decades before they get the courage to speak out."
Absolutely true. There should be no statute of limitations on child abuse in any form.
07:56 AM on 12/14/2011
There shouldn't be a statute of limitations on sex crimes, regardless of the age of the victim and the penalty should be life without the possibility of probation or parole. The only exception I can think of would be for "Romeo and Juliet" type of cases where minors and the people they're sleeping with are within six years of age to each other and are having consensual sex. The laws are too lenient towards sex crimes in general, and if you're not a specific type of victim, i.e. a child, your suffering as a victim isn't taken as seriously and the criminal responsible gets a lighter sentence.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:08 AM on 12/14/2011
sex crimes should be taken seriously, but speedy justice is also a serious matter. there is no compelling reason to extend the statute of limitations.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
sillyfrog
Pastafarian and UU student
09:48 AM on 12/14/2011
I don't think there should be a time limit with children.
08:06 PM on 12/14/2011
A defendant has a right to a speedy trial once they're charged with a crime. But sexual predators should have no right to elude justice and live their lives without answering for their crimes when they have permanently ruined the lives of their victims. It should be a life for a life-if someone ruins another person's life forever with a violent and/or sexual crime, they should lose their liberty for the rest of theirs.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
plages
Take a plunge
12:58 AM on 12/14/2011
Its only a silly law, so, change it, and make it retroactive, and proactive to save children!
07:29 AM on 12/14/2011
Ex post facto laws ("retroactive") are expressly forbidden by the US Constitution.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:09 AM on 12/14/2011
the irrationality of your post is monumental.

what is "proactive" we encourage people to commit sex crimes? oy!
12:30 AM on 12/14/2011
Just to the right of the headline of this story, another headline, another storyt:

Man Wrongly Accused Of Rape: NYPD 'Destroyed My Life And They Didn't Even Say Sorry'

Learn it.
09:12 AM on 12/14/2011
Could you imagine if these charges were brought some 20 or 30 years after the fact and DNA evidence was possibly lost/had deteriorated/etc.?

He would be professing his innocence from prison.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SickOfGOPCrapola
Three R's: Recovering Reagan Republican
12:17 AM on 12/14/2011
To those on here who are blasting the alleged victims, unless you have survived such an ordeal yourself how dare you? The harm that these acts causes is very real and very long-lasting. The pain and anguish that a survivor goes through is at times unbearable. Please be kind in your posts as the survivors are blameless.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:12 AM on 12/14/2011
so if it was so traumatic do something about it. this is not about bashing anyone, it's about devising a system that respects everyone's rights, it is a balance. your statement that the harm is real and longlasting may be to some extent the result of a society which deems it so.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
duaneanthonywebb
12:16 AM on 12/14/2011
Removing limitations to file will only flood the courts and provide for any false accuser ample time to fabricate and rehearse lies for money. New Yorkers will have to bear the cost just like Californians do - and we all know where that states deficit is.
photo
bigdaveh
If facts have a liberal bias, I'll use facts
11:47 PM on 12/13/2011
How in the world is there a statute of limitations on any crime like this, especially a crime like this. It's not like the clock runs out for the victim.

It makes you wonder who would want to put something like this on the books.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:12 AM on 12/14/2011
it is called enabling someone to get a fair trial when memories and evidence is fresh. there are many cases of false accusations also.
photo
lcr999
scientist
11:27 PM on 12/13/2011
Failure (by the victims) to report in a timely manner is itself a "crime" in that it enables further abuse of others.
11:06 PM on 12/13/2011
Again, and in every story about his case, there are people here who are assuming guilt. That, is unAmerican:

"There is no remedy," said Jeff Dion, director of the National Crime Victim Bar Association. "Because of New York law, a child molester is going to get off scot-free."

Mr. Dion, of a Bar Association and presumably a lawyer, should be ashamed of himself. Mr. Fine has been convicted of nothing. There is substantial evidence that his third accuser, Tomaselli, is a liar. Tomaselli's father says he is a liar. Travel records are available to affirmatively prove that Tomaselli was not in Pittsburgh where he says the abuse occurred. Tomaselli, meanwhile, is suing. At the same time that he has admitted sexually abusing a minor himself.

The two other accusers are half-brothers, at least one of whom has had a sexual relationship with Mrs. Fine. Mrs. Fine's phone call proves nothing. Except she is angry, apparently, that her husband had a gay relationship with at least one of the accusers (who was 27 at the time). The half-brothers sue the University and Jim Boeheim. Bernie Fine has no money so he's not sued.

Other than the gory details, the public will never know anything about the truth of this case. The alleged events occurred over 30 years ago. There is no evidence other than an accusation. If a person can be convicted simply because of an accusation, we are back to the days of Salem Witch Trials.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Juanne Michaud
Proud Canadian, loony lefty
02:27 AM on 12/14/2011
The accused is innocent until proved guilty.

I guess the accuser is guilty until proved innocent.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:14 AM on 12/14/2011
loony indeed. there is no logic to your post. speedy justice is a good thing. justice delayed is not justice.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Daniel Miller
The change was because of you not for you.
11:05 PM on 12/13/2011
I have a hard time imagining how some kid has to live with being violated for their whole life but the violator has a statute of limitations. I'm just saying if you take away a kids innocence there should not be a statute of limitations.
photo
LuLou Murder
Don't blame God, it's not Her fault.
11:00 PM on 12/13/2011
Not surprisingly, every attempt to change this has been blocked by the Catholic Church.
01:14 AM on 12/14/2011
...and the Republican leadership. And in reply to another post, California has not gone bankrupt but the new law there has resulted in convictions in hundred of abuse cases whose perpetrators will no longer prey on victims. New York's statute of limitations is overly restrictive. The new proposal in New York also provides that an accuser must be deemed credible by a licensed mental health professional before filing charges. A lawyer who defended hundreds of priests accused of abuse in New York stated that fewer than 1% of accusations were false. Furthermore, the burden of proof is still with the accuser. Stale evidence, no proof. False accusation ? Sue for libel. Furthermore, reducing child abuse means fewer victims who will wind up with psychiatric problems, go unemployed or under employed. The net result: reduction in State spending and increase in State tax revenues. Sounds to me like a good deal for everybody except abusers and those who cover up their crimes.
01:40 AM on 12/16/2011
The Catholic church is a professional pedophile protection program, and they spent a ton of their parishioners money on lawyers and lobbyists.
10:58 PM on 12/13/2011
Victim's rights must be balanced with the rights of the accused...not trample all over them.

While the statute of limitiations could certainly allow for more time...increasing it to decades is presposterous.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Juanne Michaud
Proud Canadian, loony lefty
02:27 AM on 12/14/2011
Why?
08:17 AM on 12/14/2011
In reply to the first sentence. Because we all have rights...even the accused (as much as some would like to believe otherwise).

As to the second sentence...proving the abuse (as well as defending oneself against such charges) is difficult enough within the relevant time period the abuse allegedly occurred...it is virtually impossible decades later. Evidence doesn't get better with time.

In addition, while the law should not favor the accused...it should not favor the accuser either. What would ultimately happen is the accuser will be given the benefit of the doubt 10/20/30 yrs later because evidence has deteriorated and jurors will have a difficult time acquitting an accused sexual predator. Most cannot bring themselves to acquit a "possible" sexual predator...they have a tendency to air on the side of caution (not evidence) and convict because they "may" harm someone else.