iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

California Budget Cuts Slam Higher Education, Almost Spare K-12

Jerry Brown Budget Cuts

  Kathryn Baron and John Fensterwald First Posted: 12/14/11 01:22 PM ET Updated: 12/14/11 01:46 PM ET

This story comes to us courtesy of Silicon Valley Education Foundation's Thoughts On Public Education blog, TopEd.org.

Midyear budget cuts hit California like a tornado on Tuesday, leaving public schools with less damage than anticipated while bearing down on state colleges and universities with full force. Gov. Jerry Brown announced that although state revenues rose, it wasn't enough to stave off the so-called "trigger cuts" built into this year's budget.

With revenues more than $2.2 billion below projections, Brown said the state has to cut another $1 billion in spending. Of that, about $328 million will come from K-12 education, which is significantly less than the $1.4 billion worst-case scenario.

There was no such reprieve for higher education; the University of California, California State University, and the state's community college system will each lose an additional $100 million in the new year.

I want to invoke a Latin phrase here," said Brown at a press conference in the Capitol. "Nemo dat [quod] non habet; it means no man gives what he does not have. The state cannot give what it does not have."

Several times during his comments, the governor acknowledged that he's sensitive to the hardships the reductions will cause, but said the state has to live within its means or it will end up like Greece, Italy, and Spain, countries that overspent to excess and are now unable to climb out of the holes they dug.

HIGHER ED, HIGHER FEES

His argument didn't sway critics, especially at the three college and university systems, which have already lost billions of dollars in state funding in recent years.

"The governor is the Grinch that stole Christmas," said Foothill-De Anza Community College District Chancellor Linda Thor, only half jokingly. Although she knew the cuts were a strong probability, Thor said it still means another $2.8 million from her district ($3.3 million if you count the lack of cost-of-living increases), and that's on top of $24.6 million in cuts over the last three years.

For the rest of the academic year Foothill-De Anza will dig into a rainy day fund established during better times, but that's running low after several years of stormy economic weather.

What's more, starting this summer student fees will jump from $36 a credit to $46. That's far below the rest of the nation, but it's still nearly $1400 a year for a full-time student, and community colleges have a high percentage of low-income students.

De Anza College awarded financial aid to more students in the current fall quarter than it did to all students in the entire 2010-11 academic year.

California State University students will also be paying more. Last month the Board of Trustees approved a 10 percent fee hike that will kick in next fall. CSU has already raised fees by 29 percent over the past year and a half.

"It is disheartening to say the least when your budget is cut by an initial $650 million, but to face an additional $100 million reduction midyear makes things extremely challenging," said CSU Chancellor Charles Reed in a statement on the university's website.

CUTS PUT BRAKES ON SCHOOL BUSES

Funding cuts for K-12 schools under Proposition 98 are a bit fuzzier. The governor and legislative leaders had predicted that revenues would rise $4 billion over the May revise amount. If revenues were down by the full $4 billion, public schools would have been cut $1.4 billion, or about 3 percent. Since revenues weren't that low, schools will see a midyear total cut of $328 million, or about 0.7 percent. That's an average of $55 per student.

But that's not exactly how the governor presented it. Brown broke the reductions into two parts: First, a $79.6 million reduction in the basic school funding, called revenue limit funding. That's the equivalent of about a half-day of school cut, instead of a potential elimination of a whole week.

The second cut is more substantial; a $248 million reduction in home-to-school transportation, in other words, school buses. Taken together, they amount to an average of $55 per student.

However, because school transportation funding primarily affects rural and low-income urban districts ­– and uses an outdated, quirky formula ­– the impact will vary widely among districts, from less than $7 per student in the 19,000-student Antioch Unified, to a whopping $638 per student in the 744-student Southern Humboldt Joint Unified.

Los Angeles Unified, the state's largest district, which will be absorbing the biggest transportation hit of $38.6 million – $59 per student – announced that it plans to file suit today to halt the cut. The district contends that the cuts would violate a 30-year-old court mandate resulting from a desegregation lawsuit that set up magnet schools and a school choice program; 35,000 students in the district now take buses. At the same time, the alternative – cutting additional services to the classroom ­– would violate the state's constitutional duty to provide equal educational opportunities.

"LAUSD cannot withstand further budget cuts without adversely impacting the educational benefits offered to its students," Superintendent John Deasy said in a statement. "We stand with our students to say enough is enough."

Transportation funding has huge disparities, because it's based on a decades-old allocation formula that punishes districts that have grown rapidly. California is last in the nation in terms of the proportion of students bused to school: 14 percent, according to Stephen Rhoads, a lobbyist with Strategic Education Services in Sacramento who has focused on the transportation issue.

In his press conference, Brown characterized the transportation cut as flexible, giving districts the ability to backfill bus service by making cuts in other areas. But it's not as easy as that. Rob Ball, associate superintendent of Twin Rivers Unified in Sacramento County, said that the district already reduced bus routes as much as it could, with some students now walking three miles to a bus stop. Buses also transport high school students through rough neighborhoods in North Sacramento to Grant High; eliminate transportation, and fewer students would show up to school, reducing the state's tuition reimbursements. This year, said Ball, the district will take the $1 million transportation cut out of its reserves.

Rhoads said that heavily affected districts will lobby legislators to combine the transportation and revenue limit cuts, so that the pain is spread evenly among districts. The Education Coalition, representing the PTA and teachers, administrators, and school boards associations, expressed sympathy. The transportation cut will devastate transportation services and hit poor and neediest students the hardest, it said in a statement. "It will also put at risk the safety and lives of students who will be forced to walk on unsafe roads and through dangerous conditions."

Kathryn Baron is a co-writer of TOPed.org, a blog on California education policy. John Fensterwald is the editor and co-writer of TOPed.org. Follow him on Twitter (@jfenster). Read more of their work and more at www.toped.org.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

This story comes to us courtesy of Silicon Valley Education Foundation's Thoughts On Public Education blog, TopEd.org. Midyear budget cuts hit California like a tornado on Tuesday, leaving public s...
This story comes to us courtesy of Silicon Valley Education Foundation's Thoughts On Public Education blog, TopEd.org. Midyear budget cuts hit California like a tornado on Tuesday, leaving public s...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 56
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
03:43 PM on 12/15/2011
California can free up $2 Billion fast.

If you take the shine off an apple and find that it is 75% rotten due to worm infestation, what do you do? You toss the whole thing and don't think twice. A permanent re-direct of all First 5 funds would immediately free up $2 billion.

I am no extremist, but we should stop using public funds for First 5 when we need those very funds for California's students, disabled and its poorest children.

And - we will finally know where the funds went - and it won't be for Jelly Belly Factory tours, belly dancing classes, and weekend retreats at expensive hotels (Oh yes they did!) - and now - LA First 5 cannot document where they spent $200 MILLION.

See, the problem with First 5 is that the Commissioners guard and EAT from the hen house. First 5 allows the Commissioners to give most of the money to themselves (77% of Riverside funds in a recent year went to Commissioners). For ALL other agencies in California, it is ILLEGAL for board members to self-deal funds and for good reason.

It's time to kick First 5 to the curb.

For more info, see my Facebook Notes under Ruben Stutter: 25+ articles, 12+ resignations and at least two grand juries can't be wrong. http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=188253321258716
11:53 AM on 12/15/2011
Awww come on everybody. Give us Californian's a break.

After all, we have millions of illegal aliens we need to educate and feed and subsidize.

So how about all the other 49 states raise your taxes, send it on to O'Dhumbo. He'll strip off his '30% vig' and then he'll send us a check for a few billion to cover our shortfall.

After all, it's only a few more billion in taxes. You don't mind...do you????

You know we'd ask those hollywood millionaires and billionaires to pitch in but they are much to busy making movies overseas where it is cheaper and they don't have to deal with unions.

So please, call your Senator and tell him to raise your taxes to help California today!
photo
lostnacfgop
Tiny Ripples of Hope from a Blue State's Red spot
09:32 AM on 12/15/2011
Who let the trolls out this morning?
07:36 AM on 12/15/2011
This is the first thing Brown has said that makes sense. "The state cannot give what it does not have." Start living within your means. Frankly, I think he should have cut K-12 funding as well. Education money is being wasted just as much as any other spending. Time to force schools to make do. And no, I do not care to pay more into a bloated government (Federal OR State) to continue wasting taxpayer money.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ariel Bonzai
Naked is the best disguise.
06:30 AM on 12/15/2011
Oh my. That's rich. Lausd siting discrimination laws that it has been violating for decades. Maybe you should get your driver to take you through the hood sometime Mr. Deasy. Go to Locke HS or Freemont. Maybe Washington Prep. Then check Santa Monica, San Marno Eagle Rock. Alhambra. Right. We are pretty much segregated,. And the contrasts are pretty blinding too . Broad ES is crumbling and in West LA kindergartens get state of the art accommodations.
More money is the last thing LAUSD needs, hats what attracted all these problems to begin with. Fewer officials, less administration, a ban on consultants and philanthropists , oversight, accountantabilty, transparency... Oh yeah and some deference to experts, your greatest resource, is in order. A little respect for teachers and their students.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
01:31 AM on 12/15/2011
Money can be saved by drastically reforming higher education. There are three duplicate systems of general education that is supported by the state government. There is no need for both UC schools, CSU schools, and community colleges to all offer English 101. The community colleges should be exclusively general education. The CSU school should be exclusively bachelor degrees in arts/humanities/some sciences. And the UC system should be advanced degrees in sciences/medicine/technology.
07:37 AM on 12/15/2011
Hey, somebody here is THINKING. Good job.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
notmytime
well adjusted to craziness
01:09 AM on 12/15/2011
A large contributing factor is the Prop 13 tax, eliminating the increase in taxes due to market value and maintaining the same level of taxes that occurred at time of property purchase. This has created a huge loss of tax income for the state over the years.

On the flip side, who wants to increase the taxes at the same rate as market value and have grandma foreclosed upon as she is on a fixed income. Can you imagine what the tax increases would have been on grandma during the bubble? Half of CA's seniors would have been out on the streets.

Herein lies the conundrum for our state (and the country): How do we meet the social needs of our populace (education, healthcare, infrastructure) without an increase of revenue. I have heard insults and blame lobbed from either side of the aisle. I truly would like to know if there are any constructive ideas that could get this state (nation) out of the crapper that we currently reside in.
01:24 AM on 12/15/2011
We should modify prop 13. Every family should keep it for one house only. Commercial and rental properties and vacation home owners should pay tax according to current market value.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:30 AM on 12/15/2011
Right on Eva!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
notmytime
well adjusted to craziness
01:33 AM on 12/15/2011
AHA!!! See, I knew common sense existed somewhere!

I think that is a great idea. I knew about the commercial property loophole, but I did not realize the second/rental home as well. It does make complete sense to have these properties taxes adjusted to market levels.

One of my solutions is to decriminalize drug abuse and require treatment facilities instead of mandatory incarceration. Annually, CA spends $52K on inmates and $7440 on K-12 public education students. And imagine, one generation of an educated populace and the incarceration levels continue to decline.

BTW... I had to revise my annual #'s, I thought it was only $40K for inmates... our values are so backwards http://www.news10.net/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=80703
07:40 AM on 12/15/2011
Too bad. Prop 13 is one of the best things ever created. Why? It prevents wholesale wasteful and abusive spending by government. It forces them to work on the same level the individual has to work on. Prop 13 caps increases. That works because most worker pay is capped as well. Why should I, having paid off my mortgage, have to take on a tax bill that was as big as my mortgage simply because other people want to waste my money? No. Should never happen. I used to live in NJ. Go ask them how it feels to be paying three times or more as much in taxes as I do for the same size house (with the same or smaller size property). Uncapped property taxes is a license to steal for the government.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Larry Andre
A system of morality which is based on relative em
10:20 PM on 12/14/2011
Every major school district, every major city and every major county and the State of CA is run by Democrats, and everyone is bankrupt. Maybe it is the people running them and their political agenda
07:41 AM on 12/15/2011
Thank you !!! It's a difficult road (getting Dems out of office), but one we had better start working on.
photo
lostnacfgop
Tiny Ripples of Hope from a Blue State's Red spot
09:32 AM on 12/15/2011
Really? San Diego, Orange, Riverside, and Contra Costa Counties are all "run by Democrats?"
Or does "Every Major" to you mean Los Angeles only?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:55 PM on 12/14/2011
This is no biggie, just tack it onto the student loan. Dont have to repay them anyway.
09:06 PM on 12/14/2011
Comon Jerry its the kids. WHere is The telethon?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:33 AM on 12/15/2011
ROTFLMAO
06:19 AM on 12/15/2011
HI there. What does ROTFLAMO MEAN?
08:22 PM on 12/14/2011
LOL! What a horrible title, since when is $329 million in cuts "almost sparing" K-12?
01:30 AM on 12/15/2011
It is $59 per student considering it is "almost spared"
06:56 PM on 12/14/2011
This was predictable. Californians crowed about the Jerry Brown balanced budget, in which he did do some serious cutting, but he achieved his goal of balancing the budget by forecasting a 14% increase in revenues for the coming fiscal year. No way were they going to meet that, so you have the mid year cuts. Again I laud Jerry Brown for his quick and decisive action, but six months from now he will proably again face revenue shortfalls of the forecasts he made last year.
08:22 PM on 12/14/2011
Thank the continual Republican filibuster to any tax revenue and letting the 1% sales tax expire.
08:28 PM on 12/14/2011
Who says the Republicans are wrong? Maybe the Republicans are right and the Democrats are the stumbling block. It depends on your perspective. Remember, Clinton and Reagan worked sixteeen years as Presidents with only two of those years in control of the House. They had leadership and political skills, neither of which our preeent President has.
08:32 PM on 12/14/2011
Sorry, misread your post, this is on California. Excuse me. The point of my post was that Jerry Brown used pie in the sky revenues to balance the budget. He did a fine job and I was surprised. But still he used a large projection in revenues to cloak a balanced budget. California cannot continue to spend like they have in the past. Tough times are here and they do not look like they are going to get better anytime soon. We shall see what the next six months bring for California. Thank you for your rpely.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Big Game Hunter
Facts are Republican Kryptonite
06:41 PM on 12/14/2011
How many gophers would we have to exterminate in the legislature to fix this mess?
photo
Acemkr6
Trying to keep the left honest!
06:34 PM on 12/14/2011
Liberalism has finally killed a state, the 7th largest economy in the world! On one hand they cut the schools and then the next news story on our local station is how the city housing authority went unchecked and spent lavishly on their workers at parties and outings! liberals doing it to liberlas! Fun to watch!!
08:25 PM on 12/14/2011
You have no clue, the Republicans filibuster any new revenues. In California you need a 2/3 majority to raise taxes, Democrats are 2 seats shy of that number.
photo
Elk Hunter 1
Organic=Profit
11:52 PM on 12/14/2011
So if taxes are too low in CA why are so many business's leaving?

CA doesn't have a revenue problem. It has a spending problem.

CA spends more on education for illegal immigrants than many states pay in all of thier education.
07:59 AM on 12/15/2011
And therein lies the real problem. Democrats only have one arrow in their quiver. Raise taxes. You just admitted it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brokerallen
The Middle Class Needs To Take Back America
03:29 AM on 12/15/2011
Conservatives are most of the problem. Only a conservative would enjoy watching human suffering.
08:01 AM on 12/15/2011
I do not want to be paying your life decisions. You chose to have kids. Good for you. Then, you pay for them. It has nothing to do with human suffering. My wife and I are not working for everybody else. We are working for us. We're working to keep a roof over our heads, food in our stomachs and pay for medical care. Nobody else is going to worry about whether we have enough money to support ourselves. I wouldn't expect them to. It's OUR problem.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Moravecglobal
06:29 PM on 12/14/2011
Higher education in California can operate with lower funding by reducing the cost of delivering university education to middle class and all Californians. It’s Time UC Berkeley Chancellor Birgeneau Put Needs of Instate Students FIRST. Paying more is not a better university. Instate tuition consumes 14% of a Californian’s median family income.
I love University of California (UC) having been a student & lecturer. Like so many I am deeply disappointed by the pervasive failures of Birgeneau from holding the line on rising costs & tuition. On an all in cost, Birgeneau has molded Cal. into the most expensive public university. Faculty wages must reflect California's ability to pay, not what others are paid.
UC Berkeley Chancellor Birgeneau ($450,000 salary) dismissed many needed cost-cutting options. Birgeneau did not consider freezing vacant faculty positions, increasing class size, requiring faculty to teach more classes, doubling the time between sabbaticals, freezing pay & benefits, reforming pensions & health benefits.
Birgeneau said such faculty reforms would not be healthy for Cal. Exodus of faculty, administrators: who can afford them?
We agree it is far from the ideal situation. Birgeneau cannot expect to do business as usual: raising tuition; granting pay raises & huge bonuses during a weak economy that has sapped state revenues & individual income.
We must act. Chancellor Birgeneau’s campus police deployed violent baton jabs on students protesting increases in tuition. The sky above Cal. will not fall when Birgeneau ($450,000 salary) is ousted.

Email opinions to the UC Board of Regents
photo
lostnacfgop
Tiny Ripples of Hope from a Blue State's Red spot
09:25 AM on 12/15/2011
You are in the right church but the wrong pew. The UC Regents don't control the systemic revenues - revenue is dictated to them by Sacramento. UC is chasing non-resident students as a way to balance a budget handed to it - because out of staters pay more in tuition, and therefore raise more revenue, thereby subsidizing CA Residents. California is not alone in that regard, and many other states are doing the same thing with their state university systems. California is just lucky that it has two jewels in its public University system (UC Berkeley, UCLA) which attrach a lot of interest from non-Californians. Not making excuses for Birgenau, but his job as a UC Chancellor has evolved in the last 30 years to that of a fund-raiser first and foremost, and its all about the erosion of state support. A strong university system turning out a great product here locally is essential for the future of California. Too many people mired in the present with an attitude of "I got mine, you're on your own" view of the economy.