More

Egypt Elections: Second Round Of Parliamentary Vote

MAGGIE MICHAEL and AYA BATRAWY   12/14/11 12:06 PM ET   AP

CAIRO — Egyptians turned out in large numbers Wednesday for a second round of parliamentary elections, with Islamists looking to boost their already overwhelming lead and liberal voters concerned the outcome will push the country in a more religious direction.

Two Islamist blocs won close to 70 percent of seats in the first round on Nov. 28-29, according to an AP tally compiled from official results. The secular and liberal forces that largely drove Egypt's uprising were trounced, failing to turn their achievement into a victory at the polls.

The final two rounds of voting are not expected to dramatically alter the result and could strengthen the Islamists' hand.

"We have to try Islamic rule to be able to decide if it's good for us," said 60-year-old voter Hussein Khattab, an accountant, waiting to vote at a polling station near the famous pyramids in Giza province on the western outskirts of Cairo. "If not, we can go back to Tahrir," he said, referring to the Cairo square that was the focus of the uprising in January and February that ousted longtime President Hosni Mubarak.

He said he planned to vote for the Muslim Brotherhood, the country's most organized and well-known party. Its Freedom and Justice party took 47 percent of contested seats, while the even more conservative Al-Nour bloc won 21 percent.

The election is the first since Mubarak's Feb. 11 ouster and is the freest in Egypt's modern history. The parliament will be tasked, in theory, with forming a 100-member assembly to draft a new constitution.

But its actual role remains unclear. The military council that has ruled since Mubarak's fall says the parliament will not be representative of all of Egypt, and should not have sole power over the drafting of the constitution. Last week, the military appointed a 30-member council to oversee the process.

Nearly 19 million of Egypt's 50 million eligible voters can participate in the second round, which ends Thursday. It will decide 180 seats in the 498-seat People's Assembly, the parliament's lower house.

So far, many voters say they are just happy to participate in a real election after decades of fraud and vote-rigging by Mubarak's party. Lines were so long at some polling stations that vendors set up shop to sell tea and snacks to voters during their wait.

The Islamists' strong showing has raised questions about the future of a country that has faced deteriorating security and economic free fall since the uprising.

The Brotherhood faces its stiffest competition from Al-Nour, the party of Salafi Muslims whose ultraconservative interpretation of Islam is similar to that practiced in Saudi Arabia.

The Brotherhood is sending mixed messages about how much it will push to limit personal freedoms such as women's dress. Some have tried to assure the public they do not intend to strictly impose Islamic law, or Shariah. But other Brotherhood leaders have indicated a more hard-line direction, for example by suggesting tourists don't need to drink alcohol while they are in Egypt.

The Salafis say openly they will push for strict enforcement of Islamic law, and some have railed against tourists who wear bikinis at beach resorts popular with foreigners. At a recent campaign rally in the coastal city of Alexandria, Salafis covered mermaid statues with cloth.

Some voters worried about the growing clout of Islamists turned out to support the liberal and secular parties that performed poorly in the first round. The liberal Egyptian Bloc came in a distant third with just nine percent.

"I was worried about all their statements about sex segregation, tourism and beaches," said Giza voter Omniya Fikry.

Islamist parties appealed to voters who believe they'll run a clean government. Public anger over rampant corruption under Mubarak was a major impetus behind the uprising. The Islamist groups are also known to many for providing social services, especially to the poor.

In the city of Suez on the southern end of the Suez Canal, voters waiting in lines on garbage-strewn, unpaved streets complained of neglect by the Mubarak regime and hoped the new leadership would fix the economy.

Suez was one of the first cities to join the anti-Mubarak uprising and saw some of the most violent clashes between security forces and protesters.

Reflecting the trend throughout Egypt, however, most Suez voters supported Islamists, saying they expected them to avoid corruption and make life better for the poor.

Other residents bemoaned the liberal parties' weak organization.

"I would have wished that the liberal parties had united so we could vote for them, but they are all over the place thinking of their own good," said Ali el-Genadi, whose 24-year-old son Islam was shot dead by security forces during the uprising.

He also criticized Islamist parties for not supporting the uprising from the start and chose to vote for no one.

Scattered reports emerged during the day of problems at voting sites, most involving clashes between supporters of different parties. Five people were injured in a gunfight in the central province of Sohag, and police chased off a group of women elsewhere in the same province after voters complained they were trying to buy votes. But mostly, voting appeared smooth.

Throughout the country, activists for all main parties violated the ban on campaigning on election day, distributing fliers outside of polling stations.

Many voters said they had little knowledge about the parties or candidates – even the ones they voted for, prompting many to worry that last minute campaigning could easily affect confused citizens, especially in a country where almost one-third of the population can't read.

Outside a polling station in Giza, a bearded man grabbed an elderly man on his way to vote and told him "Al-Nour party, OK?"

In another polling station, a reporter from The Associated Press saw a judge overseeing the vote fill out a ballot for an old man. When the judge noticed the reporter, he shouted, "Why are you here, old man, if you don't know who to vote for?"

At a news conference Wednesday afternoon, election commission head Abdel-Moez Ibrahim called activists campaigning on election day "lawbreakers" and asked the public to report them so they could be punished. So far, no parties have been penalized for violations during the first round, when such practices were also common.

___

Batrawy contributed from Suez, Egypt.

1  of  11
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
An Egyptian man shows his ink-stained finger after he voted at a polling station in Giza, southwest of Cairo, on December 14, 2011, during the second stage of Egypt's parliamentary elections. Some 18.8 million Egyptians are eligible to cast their ballots in this round of the first legislative polls since a popular uprising ended Hosni Mubarak's 30-year-rule in February. (MOHAMMED ABED/AFP/Getty Images)
FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

CAIRO — Egyptians turned out in large numbers Wednesday for a second round of parliamentary elections, with Islamists looking to boost their already overwhelming lead and liberal voters concerne...
CAIRO — Egyptians turned out in large numbers Wednesday for a second round of parliamentary elections, with Islamists looking to boost their already overwhelming lead and liberal voters concerne...
Filed by Eline Gordts  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 59
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nkurland
I'm going to leave this planet alive
10:58 AM on 12/15/2011
Its true that the liberal and secular parties represent the independent labor unions that helped to pave the way for Mubarak's overthrow. However, they've been attempting to limit the powers of future democratically elected presidents and parliaments ever since.

Under pressure from these parties, the ruling Supreme Council of the Armed Forces, or SCAF released a draft document of the new constitution. According to Esam al-Amin:

"The draft included: no parliamentary oversight of the military’s defense budget; a provision that would require parliament to obtain the military’s approval prior to issuing any laws affecting its budget or functions; authority for the military to refer the new constitution to the Supreme Constitutional Court if it is thought to violate any of the constitutional declarations issued by the military, in essence casting a veto over the new constitution before the people even cast a single vote; a provision that would allow the military to appoint 80 of the 100 members of the constitution-writing assembly, thus deeming the whole elections process a farce; and claiming authority to appoint a new constitution-writing assembly if the first one does not agree on a constitution within six months"

The results of the elections go far beyond whether or not Islamic parties will form a new coalition. Its not only ignorant, but profoundly hypocritical to ignore, as many posters here are doing, attempts by SCAF, supported by liberal and secular parties, to give themselves authority coming at the expense of parliament and the president.
09:09 AM on 12/15/2011
Caveman law. If you can't have a dictator, then caveman law is the next best thing.
07:59 AM on 12/15/2011
Its not about who wins, its all about having the right to speak out and vote ! whoever wins will try his best to avoid being thrown away again.

btw, im on my way to vote.
10:31 PM on 12/14/2011
Time to overthrow the US miIitary dictatorsh­­­­­­­­­­­­i­p of Egypt once and for alI. Sadat betrayed the Egyptian peopIe big time. Time to reverse Sadat's treaty with the entity. lt is well past time to overthrow the US supported military dictatorsh­­­­­­­­­­­­­­i­p of Egypt by the new democratic­­­­­­­­­­­­­­a­I­I­y eIected ParIiament of Egypt. So caIIed "isreaI is stoIen PaIestine. JerusaIem beIongs to the PaIestinia­­­­­­­­­­­­n­s­. The Egyptian treaty with the entity should be canceled, and close the Suez canal to the entity.
08:17 PM on 12/14/2011
Well, it's refreshing to see that America is not the only country with citizens who vote against their own interests.
photo
tallen
panem et circenses
08:13 PM on 12/14/2011
So did Al Qaeda win?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rybalaw
05:32 PM on 12/14/2011
There will be a liberal/Brotherhood coalition Govt. The Brotherhood will be conservative like the Islamic party presently governing Turkey. They will not take their orders from the house of Saud.
03:23 PM on 12/14/2011
What will the US Gov't do when Democracy in Egypt doesn't elect who they want elected?
02:49 PM on 12/14/2011
If egypst military does not crack down on these islamic monsters, I'm sure we will see Egypt try something really, really stupid...like attacking Israel. I guess it won't be that bad, since Israel probably needs a little more land to expand on those "settlements".
02:32 PM on 12/14/2011
Interesting they voting heavily for conservatives.
01:59 PM on 12/14/2011
Good for the brotherhood! They worked hard for it, endured years of persecution, detention, and torture. I do not want to live by their rules by any chance...but it is our role to provide a balanced alternative to them. As other countries enforce their laws and they are respected, they won the majority and have the right to enforce their laws...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CesarMilan
Buy ammo...the new gold
12:30 PM on 12/14/2011
Obama should resign and run for president of Egypt....he would be raising the IQ of both nations
02:16 PM on 12/14/2011
Just the reverse. The Muslim Brotherhood should run in 2012 to rule America. If they're as benign and peaceloving and moderate as liberals say they are, it would be better for the US than any of the other options.
photo
Vlady
Better Late
02:18 PM on 12/14/2011
Right: as you suggested IQ will rise in one nation upon his arrival and in the other upon his absence.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
omobob
left coast, usa
12:01 PM on 12/14/2011
Rumors of a conservative Islamic Government are premature as Egyptians are still voting. When they are done the new Parliament will draft a new constitution. Until then the fear mongers and naysayers will just have to guess and speculate their prophecies of doom on the FoxNews.
11:40 AM on 12/14/2011
Why is it a problem to require citizens to have an ID to vote? The fact is that requiring voters to provide photo identification is standard practice in much of the democratic world–even, and especially, in poor countries with a history of struggle against racism and colonialism. In South Africa, for example, where black people were denied the vote until 1994, the new democratic government requires every registered voter–black or white, rich or poor–to bring official photo ID to the polls. India’s election commission issues a special photo identification card to voters when they register, which they must present at the polls. In Europe, the official EU Handbook for voter operations acknowledges that voters are required to show identification in many countries, and suggests that observers verify that all voters are subject to the same ID check (166). Even the Carter Center for Human Rights, which monitors democratic elections all over the world, identifies “a requirement for identification” as a “reasonable limitation” on universal suffrage. That’s not to say international practice should govern American practice at the federal, state, or local level, but it certainly undermines the notion that photo identification is somehow motivated by a desire to keep people from exercising their rights. The opposite is true: voter ID laws are intended to protect voters’ rights against fraud and manipulation by those who would subvert their will.)
11:12 AM on 12/14/2011
In the Arab world they have a saying "One Man, One Vote, One Time".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:17 AM on 12/14/2011
'Nuff said. That just about covers the "Arab Spring".