More

National Texting While Driving Ban: U.S. Urges No Cell Phones, No Texting While Driving

Textingwhiledrivingban

JOAN LOWY   12/13/11 09:33 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — Texting, emailing or chatting on a cellphone while driving is simply too dangerous to be allowed, federal safety investigators declared Tuesday, urging all states to impose total bans except for emergencies.

Inspired by recent deadly crashes – including one in which a teenager sent or received 11 text messages in 11 minutes before an accident – the recommendation would apply even to hands-free devices, a much stricter rule than any current state law.

The unanimous recommendation by the five-member National Transportation Safety Board would make an exception for devices deemed to aid driver safety such as GPS navigation systems.

A group representing state highway safety offices called the recommendation "a game-changer."

"States aren't ready to support a total ban yet, but this may start the discussion," Jonathan Adkins, a spokesman for the Governors Highway Safety Association, said.

NTSB chairman Deborah Hersman acknowledged the recommendation would be unpopular with many people and that complying would involve changing what has become ingrained behavior for many Americans.

While the NTSB doesn't have the power to impose restrictions, its recommendations carry significant weight with federal regulators and congressional and state lawmakers. Another recommendation issued Tuesday urges states to aggressively enforce current bans on text messaging and the use of cellphones and other portable electronic devices while driving.

"We're not here to win a popularity contest," she said. "No email, no text, no update, no call is worth a human life."

Currently, 35 states and the District of Columbia ban texting while driving, while nine states and D.C. bar hand-held cellphone use. Thirty states ban all cellphone use for beginning drivers. But enforcement is generally not a high priority, and no states ban the use of hands-free devices for all drivers.

A total cellphone ban would be the hardest to accept for many people.

Leila Noelliste, 26, a Chicago blogger and business owner, said being able to talk on the cellphone "when I'm running around town" is important to self-employed people like herself.

"I don't think they should ban cellphones because I don't think you're really distracted when you're talking, it's when you're texting," she said. When you're driving and talking, "your eyes are still on the road."

The immediate impetus for the recommendation of state bans was a deadly highway pileup near Gray Summit, Mo., last year in which a 19-year-old pickup driver sent and received 11 texts in 11 minutes just before the accident.

NTSB investigators said they are seeing increasing texting, cellphone calls and other distracting behavior by drivers in accidents involving all kinds of transportation. It has become routine to immediately request the preservation of cellphone and texting records when an investigation is begun.

In the past few years the board has investigated a train collision in which the engineer was texting that killed 25 people in Chatsworth, Calif.; a fatal accident on the Delaware River near Philadelphia in which a tugboat pilot was talking on his cellphone and using a laptop computer, and a Northwest Airlines flight that sped more than 100 miles past its destination because both pilots were working on their laptops.

Last year, a driver was dialing his cellphone when his truck crossed a highway median near Munfordville, Ky., and collided with a 15-passenger van. Eleven people were killed.

The board said the initial collision in the Missouri accident was caused by the inattention of the pickup driver who was texting a friend about events of the previous night. The pickup, traveling at 55 mph, hit the back of a tractor truck that had slowed for highway construction. The pickup was rear-ended by a school bus that overrode the smaller vehicle. A second school bus rammed into the back of the first bus.

The pickup driver and a 15-year-old student on one of the buses were killed. Thirty-eight other people were injured. About 50 students, mostly members of a high school band from St. James, Mo., were on the buses heading to the Six Flags St. Louis amusement park.

Missouri had a law banning drivers under 21 years old from texting while driving at the time of the crash, but wasn't aggressively enforcing the ban, board member Robert Sumwalt said.

"Without the enforcement, the laws don't mean a whole lot," he said.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reported earlier this year that pilot projects in Syracuse, N.Y., and Hartford, Conn., produced significant reductions in distracted driving by combining stepped-up ticketing with high-profile public education campaigns.

Before and after each enforcement wave, NHTSA researchers observed cellphone use by drivers and conducted surveys at drivers' license offices in the two cities. They found that in Syracuse, hand-held cellphone use and texting declined by a third. In Hartford, there was a 57 percent drop in hand-held phone use, and texting behind the wheel dropped by nearly three-quarters.

However, that was with blanket enforcement by police.

The board's decision to include hands-free cellphone use in its recommendation is likely to prove especially controversial. No states currently ban hand-free use although many studies show that it is often as unsafe as hand-held phone use because drivers' minds are on their conversations rather than what's happening on the road.

Hersman pointed to an Alexandria, Va., accident the board investigated in which a bus driver talking on a hands-free phone ran into a bridge despite his being familiar with the route and the presence of warning signs that the arch was too low for his bus to clear. The roof of the bus was sheared off.

The board has previously recommended bans on texting and cellphone use by commercial truck and bus drivers and beginning drivers, but it had stopped short of calling for a ban on the use of the devices by adults behind the wheel of passenger cars.

The problem of texting while driving is getting worse despite a rush by states to ban the practice, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said last week. In November, Pennsylvania became the 35th state to forbid texting while driving.

About two out of 10 American drivers overall – and half of drivers between 21 and 24 – say they've thumbed messages or emailed from the driver's seat, according to a survey of more than 6,000 drivers by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

However, the survey found that many drivers don't think it's dangerous when they do it – only when others do.

At any given moment last year on America's streets and highways, nearly one in every 100 car drivers was texting, emailing, surfing the Web or otherwise using a hand-held electronic device, the safety administration said. Those activities were up 50 percent over the previous year.

Driver distraction wasn't the only significant safety problem uncovered by NTSB's investigation of the Missouri accident. Investigators said they believe the pickup driver was suffering from fatigue that may have eroded his judgment. He had an average of about five-and-a-half hours of sleep a night in the days leading up to the accident and had had fewer than five hours of sleep the night before the accident, they said.

The pickup driver had no history of accidents or traffic violations, investigators said.

Investigators also found significant problems with the brakes of both school buses involved in the accident. A third school bus sent to a hospital after the accident to pick up students crashed in the hospital parking lot when that bus' brakes failed.

However, the brake problems didn't cause or contribute to the severity of the accident, investigators said.

Another issue involved the difficulty passengers had getting out of the first school bus after the accident. Its doors were unusable and passengers had to exit through an emergency window. The raised latch on the window kept catching on clothing as students tried to escape, investigators said. Escape was further slowed because the window design required one person to hold the window up in order for a second person to crawl through, they said.

It was critical for passengers to leave as quickly as possible because a large amount of fuel underneath the bus was a serious fire hazard, investigators said.

"It could have been a much worse situation if there was a fire," Donald Karol, the NTSB's highway safety director, said.

___

Associated Press writer Karen Hawkins in Chicago contributed to this report.

___

Follow Joan Lowy at http://www.twitter.com/AP_Joan_Lowy

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Texting, emailing or chatting on a cellphone while driving is simply too dangerous to be allowed, federal safety investigators declared Tuesday, urging all states to impose total ba...
WASHINGTON — Texting, emailing or chatting on a cellphone while driving is simply too dangerous to be allowed, federal safety investigators declared Tuesday, urging all states to impose total ba...
Filed by Jillian Berman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 28
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Reyn Mansson
simply not content with the way the world is going
10:56 AM on 12/21/2011
In 1996 there were 6.5 million auto accidents in USA and the population was 265 Million, there were about 50 million cell phones in use.

In 2009 there were 5.5million accidents in a population of 307 million and about 300 MILLION cell phones.

More people, more phones but fewer accidents. Actually since the surge in popularity of the cell phone the number of accidents has FALLEN!!

How can cell phones increase, population increases, yet number of accidents go down? Is cell phone use really such a threat? 600% increase in cell phones and fewer accidents in a larger population­? If cell phones were such a threat why didn't accident number multiply 6 fold?

Conclusion­: These are accidents that would have happened anyway, we have just found a new scapegoat.

There are less than 1000 real deaths a year caused exclusively by cell phone usage. Is that small a number really worth all the limitations so many of you wish to impose on personal freedom, on commerce and on choice of lifestyle? I really don't think so. The freedom to choose to be in a car is dangerous, it means you have entered a kind of Russian Roulette that kills 30,000 every year, or choosing to ride a motorcycle that increases your chance of death by 15 or 20 times over a car and takes 4000 a year?

I stand more for freedom of choice, civil liberties than I do for public safety.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
PRONESE
Somewhat Opinionated Curmudgeon
05:37 AM on 12/19/2011
We're the Government, we're here to help!
Link: http://www.gocomics.com/henrypayne/2011/12/17
More Coffee...
R/ PRONESE
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
barb gantt
walk in sacred grace
12:45 PM on 12/15/2011
PULL OVER DRAMA QUEENS!...DWT; DWC;

When I am approachin­g a metro.
I turn everything off including music.
The only strategy that has kept me alive and safe.
This way I will be super alert.
This way I catch out of the corner of my eye...
the peripheral movements
of the car next to me
veering right into me at 75 mph
while they talk on their cell.

80-85% of the reasonable drivers have to pay
for the 15-20%
that are self absorbed in their "dramas".
Everytime I have an encounter
with a totally dysfunctional driver.
They are gesturing wildly;
waving their arms;
looking back yelling at their kids;
and ALWAYS talking on their cells;
while their kids hang out the windows.

Public Safety doesn't apply to them
because their 'personal dramas'
are more important than Public Safety.
I say.
If you have a flat you have to pull over.
Likewise, if you have to talk...pull over.
PULL OVER DRAMA QUEENS!
Pareto's Principle. 80-20.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_principle

DWT; DWC
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:24 PM on 12/14/2011
Absolutely--Ban them!

Enough of this nonsense of driving and texting and talking on the phone. Years ago, before texting even started, there was a research study published in the New England Journal of Medicine showing that talking on the cell phone proved to be as complicit in causing auto wrecks as drunk driving. Then, the texting started, and it got even worse.

If people want to talk on the phone or text an email to friends, pull over to the side of the road and do it.

Last week, I was driving behind a woman in an SUV who had a cigarette in one hand and her cell phone in the other and with her remaining fingers had to make a hard left turn while she was also turning around and yelling at her kids on the back seat. I was looking at casualties just waiting to happen--her kids, herself, and any unlucky vehicle and passengers who happen to be in her way.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rockv12
08:22 PM on 12/14/2011
Again, an all-encompassing law for a few various situations. If you can't drive down the road and hold a cell phone to your ear on a remote country road, then you should not have gotten a license to operate a vehicle! It's NOT hard. And anybody that says it's dangerous is ridiculous. NOW put yourself in downtown, rush hour traffic, and YES, it is a distraction. Don't make it illegal to do something completely easy for a normal person....
photo
Mister Grumpy
An Angry American
04:19 PM on 12/14/2011
Guess those built in navigation displays are okay? Dumb.
03:44 PM on 12/14/2011
Are you suggesting that it's legal to text while driving? It's never been legal for the driver not to have control of the vehicle. Technically you're required to have 2 hands on the steering wheel at all times to be driving properly. A law to stop one from typing while driving? Enforce the dammed existing law! We're losing it folks. Enforcement of existing law please.
03:58 PM on 12/14/2011
which would mean that you could not adjust the air/heat in your vehicle, change the music or volume of said music, take a drink of water, eat a piece of fruit, roll down your window....i understand the texting part of the argument because you are most likely looking down with your eyes off the road but the idea that I can't drive with one hand and hold a cell phone in another is absurd....on the other hand, if police issued tickets to everyone who is not driving with both hands we might be able to balance all states' budgets as well as create numerous jobs in the public sector.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roman238
Telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
12:44 PM on 12/14/2011
We have lasted this long without phones in cars, or attached at the hip. People nowadays seem to be lost without them. I just don't get it.
11:40 AM on 12/14/2011
This should be done and soon - before the numbers of those killed equal those of drunk driving. Most people I see driving can't walk and chew gum - there is just too much traffic - too many things for a driver to be distracted. While watching a TV program on the Alaska Troopers one of the women troopers was constantly checking her computer while speeding along - they (police) shouldn't be exempt either....
11:33 AM on 12/14/2011
I think its a great idea.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:27 AM on 12/14/2011
This will lead to mandatory jamming devices in all new vehicles, or wires embedded in vehicle glass, to turn the vehicle into a rolling Faraday cage.
11:15 AM on 12/14/2011
Ban drive-through food too..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TruEngineHearing
Happiness needs new pursuers...
10:57 AM on 12/14/2011
NTSB chairman Deborah Hersman says that "No email, no text, no update, no call is worth a human life." Ok, then neither is owning a car worth a human life, nor is owning a gun worth accidental death, nor drinking and...

She's using a conversation-stopper, and it isn't very helpful. We need better facts, and one of the things that the public really needs to know is in what ways hands-free communication is any worse than conversation with a passenger.

Hersman says, "We're not here to win a popularity contest," when in fact human beings choose and accept danger and risk every day, and in myriad ways. We may want to work for solutions less drastic than total cessation. I hope she's trying to scare us and jump-start a conversation - if so; this is a good start.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul108
03:53 PM on 12/14/2011
she is trying to fool stupid people.
10:52 AM on 12/14/2011
Do it.
10:50 AM on 12/14/2011
Why We DON'T Need Texting While Driving Laws

Texting while driving is very difficult for law enforcement to prove. What if I say I was looking at my phones calendar. Sure the officer can check my phones texting app, but next week there will be an app to delete my text for the last hour when I think a cop is going to stop me.

So now what, how much law enforcement man power and time are we willing to put into this one traffic stop for texting. Should the officer spend hours off patrol writing reports, getting and serving a search warrant on the cell phone company to prove texting just prior to the stop?

Or should officers stop drivers for weaving, crossing the center line, or fog line, tail gating or improper lane travel, if the driver is texting, putting on makeup, or just a bad driver.

Every state has negligent driving, careless driving, or inattentive driving laws, enforce these, they are easier to prove. What about computers in cars, a while back I was behind a police vehicle in Bullhead City Arizona, the vehicle was all over his lane, at 25 MPH in a 45 MPH zone. When I went around, sure enough, the cop was driving while typing on his in-car computer.

What's next, emailing while driving, what about talking GPS units, some people talk back.....