iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Seattle Schools May Ease Junk Food Ban Amid Profit Loss

First Posted: 12/14/2011 11:51 am Updated: 12/14/2011 11:53 am

The Seattle School District is considering rewriting a policy enacted in 2004 that removed junk food from public schools, citing the ban's huge cut to revenues used to fund school programs.

When the Seattle School Board first implemented the policy seven years ago, the district was placed on the cutting edge of the battle against childhood obesity. Fatty snacks like candy bars and fried chips were stripped from vending machines and replaced with orange juice, water and granola bars.

But the change has reduced vending machine profits across the district to $17,000 this year, from $214,000 before the ban was adopted, The Seattle Times reports. The money went toward funding student clubs, publications, athletic uniforms and social events -- some of which had to be canceled or cost students more out of pocket to hold or keep.

The ban also hasn't kept some students from eating unhealthily, as some students simply go off campus to find their treats.

"If we can go five minutes and get candy and stuff, it's not like they're preventing us from having it, they're just making it slightly harder to obtain," student Alex Franke told NBC's TODAY.

This student behavior supports existing research on junk food in schools. Research published in November revealed that just banning soda from schools doesn't actually curb student consumption of sugary drinks. Across all states, whether they have no policy, ban sodas or ban all sugary drinks, students' out-of-school access and purchasing behavior of those beverages was unchanged.

"Our study adds to a growing body of literature that suggests that to be effective, school-based policy interventions need to be comprehensive," the study's authors write in their report.

Parents are divided on the issue in Seattle, as some argue the need for students to have every opportunity to access healthy food, others would rather their child eat a candy bar than nothing.

"The question is did we go too far?" Michael DeBell, Seattle School Board president, told MSNBC. "If the students aren’t finding the offerings to their liking, then we're not really meeting that goal of having them choose healthier foods."

But that also doesn't mean Seattle schools will be reintroducing Snickers bars and cans of Coke to the machines. Schools across the country are by 2013 required to comply with the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act, which will mandate federal nutrition standards for healthy foods in schools.

"I think there's a middle ground," DeBell told The Seattle Times. "I'd much rather see students buy reasonably healthy products in vending machines than junk food off campus."

That middle ground may mean introducing items like Vitamin Water, hummus and granola bars with a little bit of chocolate, George Lewis reports on TODAY. A proposal could be presented by the spring and take effect as early as next fall.

In a biting piece in The New York Times last week, investigative reporter Lucy Komisar offered an in-depth look at how the food industry -- and its complex web of internal alliances -- is taking over school meals.

The New York Times report also reveals the trials faced by figures like First Lady Michelle Obama and chef and media personality Jamie Oliver, who actively work to fight childhood obesity by promoting healthy school lunches and nutritional education. Those efforts are further thwarted by lenient regulations, as Congress supported the final version of a spending bill Nov. 17 that would allow tomato paste on pizzas to continue to be counted as a vegetable and blocks efforts to limit the use of potatoes in school cafeterias.

On Jimmy Kimmel Live last month, Oliver declared that "the food companies of America own you," adding that "These moron frozen food companies -- pizza industry, french-fry industry -- have basically bought, bribed, bullied Congress, who have completely let everyone down, into basically making it okay to feed [students] french fries every day."

The Nov. 17 move by Congress was seen as a victory for those food manufacturers. American Frozen Food Institute spokesperson Corey Henry told Reuters that the overturned standards would have forced food producers to "change their products in a way that would make them unpalatable to students."

Still, some schools -- like several in California -- have taken the matter into their own hands, and have found ways to profit from those efforts. Umpteen school districts have taken part in a decade-long initiative, supported by a philanthropic organization, that provides schools with equipments and chefs who teach cafeteria workers to cook from scratch and produce fresh meals.

A report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention last month revealed that more than a third of high school students were eating vegetables less than once a day -- "considerably below" recommended levels of intake for a healthy lifestyle that supports weight management and could reduce risks for chronic diseases and some cancers.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

The Seattle School District is considering rewriting a policy enacted in 2004 that removed junk food from public schools, citing the ban's huge cut to revenues used to fund school programs. When th...
The Seattle School District is considering rewriting a policy enacted in 2004 that removed junk food from public schools, citing the ban's huge cut to revenues used to fund school programs. When th...
Filed by Emmeline Zhao  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 70
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
06:41 PM on 12/23/2011
Can you say, "Conflict of interest?" Let's make money by making the students more unhealthy. And maybe they'll also do poorer in school.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ghostberry
All empty souls tend toward extreme opinions.
05:17 PM on 12/17/2011
Honestly Why are nutrition, credit and finance, and parenting not required classes in school? Can we at least give kids the tools they need to make informed decisions?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:21 PM on 12/16/2011
It's sickening that this school is so worried about profit that they're willing to sacrifice the health of the students. Is that really the only way to fund student programs? Can't anyone in the school system write an effective grant proposal?

Schools are also a recent battle ground concerning marketing junk food to kids. Check out all the proposed legislation that would allow school districts to sell advertising space on the side of school buses:

http://yaleruddcenter.org/legislation/search.aspx
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
02:56 PM on 12/16/2011
If the kids want to eat sugary snacks, then let them buy it off campus. It is silly for schools to allow the snacks to be purchased while society is paying for increased obesity in kids.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robidomoore
devils advocate
10:08 PM on 12/15/2011
and you thought smoking was dangerous... the food industry has you hooked on carbs and sugar and they know it. they have you so hooked to the point if you don't get your fix you have withdrawal symptoms. every doctor in the know will tell you so for some it can cause severe headaches and much more. and then they tell you it is fat free and what go you get as a replacement sugar. In europe and other cultures this is called the dumbing down of the taste buds. And the studies with artificial sweetners have proved this. and far as smoking sugar was a common additive. when one company said no fillers in our cigs anymore their brand took a hit. go figure.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:15 PM on 12/16/2011
The headaches are generally caffeine witdrawal from giving up caffienated sugary drinks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
El Chingaso
Fighting for mental superiority...
09:46 PM on 12/15/2011
How about firing most of the six-figure per year adminstrators that do nothing more than exchange e-mails all day...about stupid federal government ed policies? That'll free up some taxpayer revenue -- big time.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chipper1
07:28 PM on 12/15/2011
The headline tells it all - kids or profits? Profits every time!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sanity Inspector
He who laughs, lasts.
03:35 PM on 12/15/2011
Let those who cry "Nanny State" remember one thing, please: these are children we're talking about. Adults are supposed to make responsible decisions on behalf of children, since they are not mature enough to make them on their own. The sugar and fat in junk food are addictive, so naturally kids will gravitate towards it. I've got nothing but disgust for Statists who try to forbid parents from buying Happy Meals for their children, that's just proggs getting too big for their britches. But schools are different, or should be. Costs? Yes, schools cost money to run. But let's not make a Faustian bargain with deep pocket sugar daddies (pun intended), and sacrifice the children's future health as a result.
12:19 PM on 12/15/2011
many schools are trying to find the middle path, offer the healthy food and support the program by selling healthier snacks. Local control is still in effect as very few districts finanacially support the food service department. Lunch programs are federally funded and funded by cash purchases. If you run a business where 2/3 's of your income comes from cash sales to your customers, do you try to sell them items they will not buy? If you want change go to your local board of education meetings, work with them to find out how the program can be funded locally to support healthier fare.
photo
bmwracer
In the LEFT lane.
09:36 AM on 12/15/2011
Who cares about student health when there's money to be made?
photo
Charles-12881
If the doors of perception were cleansed
07:46 AM on 12/15/2011
U.S. House Says Pizza is a Vegetable and we need our children fit for war! USA USA
08:10 AM on 12/15/2011
excellent observation! What do expect from a congress that's been lobotomized?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:18 PM on 12/16/2011
No. They said tomato paste was counted as a serving of vegetable.
07:01 AM on 12/15/2011
its all about money
03:48 AM on 12/15/2011
Jamie Oliver's show was cancelled. He and the food nazis are seeking to impose their choices on everyone else. Yes, we should all be eating healthier but this is not the way to do it.
08:11 AM on 12/15/2011
Not much different from prohibition, is it?
03:53 PM on 12/15/2011
Right, instead we would rather have the food corporations impose their choices on us.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:22 PM on 12/16/2011
Never had a food company impose a purchase on me. If I don't like their product, I'll buy something else. Including vegeatable seeds.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roger Funk
12:30 AM on 12/15/2011
It would help them! Like the one child said I will go to the gas station and by them!
11:59 PM on 12/14/2011
Have they ever heard the phrase "you can lead a horse to water" well it applies here, you are not gonna force teens to eat what you want them to!